Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

CRIMINAL LIABILITY AND THE APPLICATION OF MENS REA IN THE CRIMINAL OFFENSE OF INTERCEPTION IN INDONESIA Prasetyo, Ekky Aji; Lasmadi, Sahuri; Erwin
Hukum Responsif Vol 15 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33603/responsif.v15i2.9467

Abstract

The aim of this thesis research is to find out and analyze the findings of criminal liability related to mens rea in the crime of interception, and to find out and analyze the formulation of future norms regarding the regulation of criminal liability related to mens rea in the crime of interception. The problem formulation is how is the regulation of criminal liability related to mens rea in the crime of interception? and what will be the formulation of future norms regarding the regulation of criminal liability relating to mens rea in the crime of interception? The research method used in this research is normative juridical which reveals that normative legal research or doctrinal legal research is research on law that is conceptualized and developed on the basis of the doctrine adhered to by the conceptualizer or its development. In this research, the approaches that will be used are the conceptual approach, the statutory approach, and the comparative approach. Analysis of legal materials is carried out after all legal materials have been collected and then analyzed in a normative juridical manner. The analysis is carried out by evaluating legal norms based on the constitution on developing problems as a process to find answers to the main problems. Analysis of legal materials is carried out using inventory techniques, systematization techniques and interpretation techniques. The results of this research are that it is necessary to differentiate the mens rea for perpetrator witnesses who carry out interception or wiretapping so that their actions cannot be categorized as criminal liability, and there is a need for special protection for people who carry out interception or wiretapping in the public interest for certain criminal acts, such as criminal acts. corruption crimes, human trafficking crimes, money laundering crimes, and other special crimes.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA DAN PENERAPAN MENS REA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA INTERSEPSI DI INDONESIA Prasetyo, Ekky Aji; Lasmadi, Sahuri; Erwin
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i1.1491

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian tesis ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisi penemuan pertanggungjawaban pidana berkaitan dengan mens rea dalam tindak pidana intersepsi, dan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisi formulasi norma kedepan tentang pengaturan pertanggungjawaban pidana berkaitan dengan mens rea dalam tindak pidana intersepsi. Adapun yang menjadi perumusan masalah ialah bagaimana pengaturan pertanggungjawaban pidana berkaitan dengan mens rea dalam tindak pidana intersepsi? dan bagaimana formulasi norma kedepan tentang pengaturan pertanggungjawaban pidana berkaitan dengan mens rea Dalam Tindak Pidana Intersepsi? Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif yang mengungkapkan bahwa penelitian hukum normatif atau penelitian hukum doktrinal adalah penelitian – penelitian atas hukum yang dikonsepsikan dan dikembangkan atas dasar doktrin yang dianut sang pengonsep atau pengembangannya. Dalam penelitian ini pendekatan yang akan digunakan adalah Pendekatan konseptual (conseptual approach), Pendekatan perundang–undangan (statute approach), dan Pendekatan komparatif (comparative approach). Analisis bahan hukum dilakukan setelah seluruh bahan hukum terkumpul kemudian dianalisis secara yuridis normatif. Analisis dilakukan dengan mengevaluasi norma-norma hukum yang didasarkan pada konstitusi atas permasalahan yang sedang berkembang sebagai proses untuk menemukan jawaban atas pokok permasalahan. Analisis bahan hukum dilakukan dengan Teknik Inventarisir, Teknik Sistematisasi, dan Teknik Interpretasi. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah perlu dibedakan mens rea terhadap saksi pelaku yang melakukan intersepsi atau penyadapan sehingga perbuatannya tidak dapat dikategorikan ke dalam pertanggungjawaban pidana, serta perlu adanya perlindungan khusus bagi masyarakat yang melakukan intersepsi atau penyadapan dalam rangka kepentingan umum terhadap tindak pidana tertentu, seperti tindak pidana korupsi, tindak pidana perdagangan orang, tindak pidana pencucian uang, dan tindak pidana khusus lainnya.
THE LEGAL ACT ON COUNTERFEITING THE COVID-19 VACCINE IN INDONESIAN HEALTH LAW Lasmadi, Sahuri
International Journal of Law Reconstruction Vol 5, No 2 (2021): International Journal of Law Reconstruction
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/ijlr.v5i2.17545

Abstract

The International Criminal Police Organization has officially issued a global warning to law enforcement officials in 194 member countries to prepare to prevent and deal with various world criminal networks that will seek to utilize the Covid-19 vaccine, both physically. The online form is counterfeiting the Covid-19 vaccine. This study aims to analyze the criminal act of counterfeiting the Covid-19 vaccine from the Health Law in Indonesia. The research method used is the Normative Law research method, which examines library materials or secondary data. Normative legal research is also called doctrinal legal research.  The criminal act of counterfeiting the Covid-19 vaccine is generally regulated in Article 386 Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code relating to acts of fraud and forgery. However, it is specifically regulated in the provisions regarding penalties for distributing fake vaccines in Indonesia as regulated in Articles 196, 197, 198, and 201 Act No. 36 of 2009 concerning health. The ingredients are everyone deliberately and producing and circulating counterfeit vaccine preparations. For the criminal act ofCovid-19 vaccine counterfeiting corporate, the corporation can be subject to additional penalties in the form of revocation of business licenses and revocation of legal entity status.
Amicus Curiae at the Crossroads of Justice: Shaping Fair Court Decisions Sahuri Lasmadi; Angga Aldilla Gusman; Moh Hasyim Asy'ari; Ammar Zul Haidar; Mutia Carolina Fransica
Unnes Law Journal Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): April, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v11i1.3471

Abstract

Judges play an important role in the implementation of law enforcement, as they are tasked with making decisions that reflect the principles of justice. In their decision-making process, judges must consider and align with the values embedded in the community, as the law exists to serve humanity, not the other way around. The concept of Amicus Curiae (friends of the court) refers to input provided by individuals or organizations that are not directly involved in a case but have a vested interest in its outcome. This research explores the significance of Amicus Curiae in the Indonesian legal system, specifically examining its potential to optimize legal justice. It also investigates how judges incorporate Amicus Curiae submissions into their decision-making process to ensure fair and just rulings. The research adopts a normative juridical approach, utilizing legal, case, comparative, and conceptual analyses. The findings reveal that Amicus Curiae can play a crucial role in enhancing the judicial process in Indonesia by providing valuable perspectives on facts and legal issues pertinent to the case. While it does not interfere with the core issues being examined by the judges, Amicus Curiae contributes to the overall understanding of the case, thereby facilitating more informed, equitable decisions. The presence of Amicus Curiae in legal proceedings ultimately supports the realization of justice by shedding light on important legal and factual matters.
Restitution in Juvenile Criminal Cases: A Proposed Amendment to Government Regulation No. 43/2017 in Light of International Legal Principles Vuzio Fernanda; Hafrida; Sahuri Lasmadi
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6293

Abstract

This article analyses how Government Regulation Number 43/2017 shall be amended on international human rights law. It is needed since this regulation does not further regulate the offender's responsibility due to the offender's economic inability. The article implements normative research based on the UNCRC, the Chorzow Factory Case, jurisprudence from the ECHR Case Law, and the UNGA Resolution 40/34. This article consists of three discussions. The first discussion implements the provisions of the UNCRC in proposing how the government regulation shall be amended. Meanwhile, the second discussion suggests how the regulation shall be amended based on international case laws. Finally, the third discussion enhanced the previous two discussions by implementing the UNGA Resolution 40/34. Indonesia shall amend the provisions under Articles 19-22 of the regulation to ensure the full reparation of the victim and the perpetrator’s responsibility is fulfilled. This article also suggests that Indonesia shall consider the offender's and the victim’s conflicting interests. The third discussion suggested the LPSK to be the authorized organ to pay the restitution to the victim in the case where the offender or convicted is unable to fulfill the responsibility.
Politik Kriminal Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Lasmadi, Sahuri; Wahyuningrum, Kartika Sasi
JURNAL YURIDIS UNAJA Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): JURNAL YURIDIS UNAJA
Publisher : Universitas Adiwangsa Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35141/jyu.v6i1.787

Abstract

Anak sebagai pelaku tindak pidana, akan dilakukan tindakan hukum atau proses hukum. Dalam tindakan hukum tersebut, yang masih anak-anak lebih didepankan pada aspek perlindungan hak-hak anak tersebut dalam tiap tingkat pemeriksaannya.Anak sebagai salah satu sumber daya manusia merupakan generasi penerus bangsa, sudah selayaknya mendapatkan perhatian khusus terutama anak yang berperkara dengan hukum, untuk itu hak-haknya harus dilindungi. Menurut Maidin Gultom bahwa anak tidak dapat melindungi sendiri hak-haknya, banyak pihak yang mempengaruhi kehidupannya.Negara dan masyarakat berkepentingan untuk mengusahakan perlindungan hak-hak anak. Penelitian ini membahas mengenai Politik Kriminal Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan berdasarkan hasil penelitian Kasus Pidana anak Dalam praktek satu satunya solusi adalah menitipkan ke dinas sosial di bawah kemensos, namun ada kesulitan pertama, tidak semua wilayah juga ada lembaga sosialnya. Kedua, jika terkait keamanan (misalnya potensi anak lari dari tempat penitipan) Polisi setempat tidak bisa melakukan penjagaan setiap hari di dinas sosial, dan ada pula soal birokrasi pengamanan di Polri yang harus dilakukan, intinya untuk penempatan di dinas sosial belum ada peraturan yang mewadahinya. Akibatnya anak-anak juga berpotensi dititipkan ke Rumah Tahanan, yang justru ditolak oleh UU SPPA.
Bargaining for Punishment in Corruption Crime: Toward Justice from a Victimology Perspective Gussman, Angga Aldilla; Hafrida, Hafrida; Usman, Usman; Lasmadi, Sahuri; Sudarti, Elly; Rahayu, Sri
Ipso Jure Vol. 1 No. 11 (2024): Ipso Jure - December
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/be8qn325

Abstract

Corruption is an extraordinary crime that causes significant losses to the state, both materially and immaterially, which has a broad impact on the economic, social and political stability of a country. As the main victim in corruption crimes, the state bears the burden of recovering the losses incurred. The concept of bargaining for punishment offers an alternative approach in corruption law enforcement by allowing the perpetrator to reduce the sentence through the return of state losses. This research aims to analyze the application of the concept of bargaining for punishment in the context of Indonesian criminal law, especially in realizing justice and benefits for the state as a victim. The method used is Normative Juridical legal research, this research discusses the relevance of bargaining for punishment in bridging the interests of the state for the recovery of losses with the principles of criminal justice. The results show that the application of this concept can accelerate the case settlement process, reduce the burden on the justice system, and maximize the return of lost state assets. However, the application of bargaining for punishment must be closely monitored so as not to harm the principle of justice, especially in dealing with perpetrators with a significant level of guilt. Bargaining for punishment has the potential to become a strategic mechanism in eradicating corruption in Indonesia, provided that it is applied proportionally by considering aspects of justice, expediency, and legal certainty. This research recommends strengthening regulations and guidelines for the implementation of bargaining for punishment to ensure optimal recovery for the state as victims of corruption crimes
The Concept of Bargaining for Punishment in Resolving Corruption Cases Drived by Technological Developments Gussman, Angga Aldilla; Usman, Usman; Sudarti, Elly; Lasmadi, Sahuri; Liyus, Herry
Ipso Jure Vol. 1 No. 11 (2024): Ipso Jure - December
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/1dmfwz07

Abstract

The development of information technology has provided new challenges in the fight against corruption, especially in terms of technology-based crimes that are difficult to detect. This research aims to analyze the application of the concept of bargaining for punishment in handling digital corruption cases and evaluate the challenges and benefits arising from its application. The method used in this research is a literature study and analysis of applicable legal concepts in the context of technology-based crimes. The results show that the application of this mechanism can accelerate the process of disclosing corruption cases involving technology, by offering incentives to reduce sentences to defendants who are willing to cooperate. However, the application of this concept also faces a number of challenges, such as the potential for abuse of the justice system, the complexity of obtaining valid evidence, and the need for regulatory updates and capacity building of law enforcement agencies. Overall, while bargaining for punishment offers great potential to accelerate the disclosure and recovery of state losses, its success relies heavily on the integrity of the legal system and strict oversight.
Penegakan Hukum Pidana terhadap anak sebagai pelaku dalam kekerasan jalanan di wilayah Polresta Jambi Hadian, Iyad Rizqul; Lasmadi, Sahuri; Rahayu, Sri
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v7i1.52126

Abstract

This article discusses the enforcement of criminal law against children as perpetrators of street violence (gangsters) in the Jambi Police area. This research method is empirical juridical, this study dissects the field reality and the implementation of applicable regulations. The results of the study indicate that the enforcement of criminal law against children as perpetrators of street violence has not been running optimally because the application of diversion and restorative justice has not been implemented optimally. This is caused by the less than optimal implementation of the principles of diversion and restorative justice in the investigation process. This is caused by 4 factors, namely: (1) There are significant obstacles in reaching an agreement or consent between the parties involved; (2) The characteristics of street violence crimes which are often classified as serious crimes, making it difficult to meet the qualifications for diversion; (3) lack of support from victims and the community for the implementation of diversion; and (4) weak coordination between related institutions. The main obstacle in the enforcement of criminal law against children as perpetrators of street violence lies in the less than optimal application of the principles of diversion and restorative justice in the investigation process. ABSTRAK Artikel ini membahas penegakan hukum pidana terhadap anak sebagai pelaku dalam kekerasan jalanan (gangster) di wilayah Polresta Jambi metode penelitian ini bersifat yuridis empiris, studi ini membedah realitas lapangan serta implementasi regulasi yang berlaku. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penegakan hukum pidana terhadap anak sebagai pelaku dalam kekerasan jalanan belum berjalan secara optimal karena penerapan diversi dan keadilan restoratif belum dilaksanakan secara maksimal. hal tersebut disebabkan oleh belum maksimalnya implementasi prinsip diversi dan keadilan restoratif dalam proses penyidikan. Hal tersebut disebabkan oleh 4 faktor, yaitu: (1) Adanya hambatan signifikan dalam mencapai kesepakatan atau persetujuan antara pihak-pihak yang terlibat; (2) Karakteristik tindak pidana kekerasan jalanan yang sering kali tergolong kejahatan serius, sehingga sulit memenuhi kualifikasi diversi; (3)kurangnya dukungan dari korban dan masyarakat terhadap pelaksanaan diversi; serta (4)lemahnya koordinasi antar lembaga terkait. Kendala utama dalam penegakan hukum pidana terhadap anak sebagai pelaku kekerasan jalanan terletak pada belum optimalnya penerapan prinsip diversi dan keadilan restoratif dalam proses penyidikan.
Validitas Bukti Digital Closed Circuit Television Dalam Praktik Penegakan Hukum Pidana Indonesia M Nanda Setiawan; Sahuri Lasmadi; Elly Sudarti; Herry Liyus; Akbar Kurnia Putra
Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Teuku Umar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35308/jic.v9i2.12661

Abstract

Abstrak. Perkembangan teknologi informasi telah membawaa perubahan besar dalam sistem penegakan hukum pidana di Indonesia, khususnya melalui pemanfaatan rekaman Closed Circuit Television sebagai alat bukti elektronik. Artikel ini menganalisis keabsahan rekaman CCTV dalam praktik peradilan pidana Indonesia dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif, mengkaji peraturan perundang-undangan, dokumen hukum, dan literatur akademik terkait. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun KUHAP belum secara eksplisit mengatur alat bukti elektronik, legitimasi hukum terhadap rekaman CCTV telah diperkuat melalui Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronikdan yurisprudensi Mahkamah Konstitusi. Pengakuan ini didukung oleh konsep functional equivalent approach, yang menempatkan bukti elektronik setara dengan alat bukti konvensional. Namun, keabsahan rekaman CCTV sangat bergantung pada keaslian, integritas, serta prosedur perolehan dan penyajian yang sesuai dengan hukum acara pidana, termasuk aspek forensik digital dan chain of custody. Tantangan utama meliputi sinkronisasi regulasi, pemahaman teknis aparat penegak hukum, dan perlindungan hak asasi. Artikel ini merekomendasikan penguatan regulasi, peningkatan kapasitas teknis, serta harmonisasi antara KUHAP dan UU ITE untuk mengoptimalkan penggunaan CCTV sebagai alat bukti yang sah, efektif, dan berkeadilan dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia.Kata Kunci: Validitas: alat bukti elektronik; Digital Forensik; Hukum Pidana