Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
6.139
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal MANAJEMEN HUTAN TROPIKA Journal of Tropical Forest Management Journal of Food and Pharmaceutical Science Techno.Com: Jurnal Teknologi Informasi LAW REVIEW Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan (JMDK) ARISTO Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Jurnal Mantik JATI (Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika) Enrichment : Journal of Management Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum & Keadilan Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan JURNAL PENDIDIKAN DASAR FLOBAMORATA Jurnal Otoranpur Jurnal Abmas Negeri (JAGRI) Jurnal Abdimas Kartika Wijayakusuma Constitutionale Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Minfo Polgan (JMP) Indonesian Journal of Digital Business Jurnal SainTekA Jurnal Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi (SINTEK) Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi Klausula: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, Hukum Adminitrasi, Pidana dan Perdata Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law International Journal of Law and Society Journal of Food and Pharmaceutical Sciences kawanad Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Jurnal Riset dan Penalaran Mahasiswa Indonesian Journal of Conservation Jurnal Jurisprudence Sintek Kuwera
yogi prasetyo
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 43 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Jurisprudence

 1 
Analysis of the Reasons for the Judge's Decision Which Relieves Defendants in Corruption Cases prasetyo, Yogi; Ferry Irawan Febriansyah; Alfalachu Indiantoro; Aries Isnandar; Ucuk Agiyanto
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 1, June 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i1.1008

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This research article aims to explain the analysis of several reasons for the judge's decision which is considered to lighten the defendant in corruption cases in Indonesia.  Methodology: This study used a normative research method with a philosophical approach. Results: The results of this study indicate that judges continue to impose light sanctions on state officials who are accused of corruption cases for various reasons that can be taken into consideration. The following is an analysis of some of these reasons: have never been punished; be honest and be kind; have family responsibilities; refund corrupted money; incorrect application of the law; have no authority; motivated by other people; have a sense of justice; serve the community; get public scorn; and refrain from engaging in corrupt behavior. Applications of this study: Theoretically, academics can use this research to add and develop their knowledge of the law. As for practitioners, especially judges, this research can be used as material for conclusions and considerations when making decisions in corruption cases, so that efforts to eradicate corruption can definitely be achieved. Novelty/Originality of this study: The corruption issue in Indonesia is influenced by the judge's decision in addition to the country’s bad bureaucratic culture. The low judge's decision on corruption cases can also affect the number of state officials who commit acts of corruption. Several reasons that could influence the judge's decision to reduce the corruptors’ sentences. In order to find a true legal truth, it would be useful to study the judge’s reasoning for reducing the corruptor’s punishment because the judge's decision is the most decisive stage in the legal status and fate of the defendant. This is why it is critical to do a more in-depth review of the law in order to ensure that it continues to operate as intended
Cumulated Lawsuit And Tort: Legal Reasoning of Judges and Major Decision’s Ratio Decidendi (Study of Supreme Court Decision No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 and Supreme Court Decision No. 2686/Pdt/1985) Isnandar, Aries; Lyandova, Vanka; Prasetyo, Yogi; Febriansyah, Ferry Irawan; Indiantoro, Alfalachu; Agiyanto, Ucuk
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 2, December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i2.1332

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of Study: This research aimed at analyzing Supreme Court Decision No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 and Supreme Court Decision No. 2686/Pdt/1985 concerning cumulative lawsuits and tort according to the judge's legal reasoning.  Methodology: This is library research using the normative juridical method. The approach used was the statutory approach. The statutory approach was carried out by analyzing Supreme Court Decision No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 and Supreme Court Decision No. 2686/Pdt/1985 in the context of the cumulative lawsuit and tort section. Result: This research found that even though unlawful acts and contracts are conventionally separated, there are still issues regarding overlapping understandings of the concepts of tort, cumulative lawsuit, and default in law. For example, there is an act by one party that, on the one hand, can be classified as an unlawful act, but it also has a contractual element. Similarly, one party’s actions have contractual consequences for the other party, but they can also result in liability based on tort. This condition causes several parties to accumulate lawsuits for unlawful acts and defaults at the same time. Supreme Court accepted the cumulative lawsuit in decision No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 and Supreme Court Decision No. 2686/Pdt/1985, indicating that it does not violate procedural law. Applications of this study:  This research is useful for analyzing Supreme Court Decision No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 and Supreme Court Decision No. 2686/Pdt/1985. These Supreme Court decisions have a ratio decidendi or jurisprudence that a cumulative lawsuit is permitted and it does not violate procedural law. Novelty: There are no previous researchers who conducted a legal analysis of the Supreme Court's decision, even though the Supreme Court is the jurisprudence in cases or legal issues of cumulative lawsuits and tort.   Keywords: Cumulation, Against the Law, Default, Decision, Ratio Decidendi  ABSTRAK  Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 dan Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 2686/Pdt/1985 tentang gugatan kumulatif dan perbuatan melawan hukum menurut penalaran hukum hakim.  Metodologi: Penelitian kepustakaan ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan Perundang-undangan. Pendekatan perundang-undangan dilakukan dengan menganalisis Putusan MA No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 dan Putusan MA No. 2686/Pdt/1985 dalam konteks gugatan kumulatif dan pasal perbuatan melawan hukum.  Hasil: Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa meskipun perbuatan melawan hukum dan perjanjian dipisahkan secara konvensional, masih terdapat permasalahan mengenai tumpang tindih pemahaman tentang konsep gugatan, gugatan kumulatif, dan wanprestasi dalam hukum. Misalnya, ada perbuatan salah satu pihak yang di satu pihak dapat digolongkan sebagai perbuatan melawan hukum, tetapi juga mengandung unsur perjanjian. Demikian pula, tindakan satu pihak memiliki konsekuensi kontraktual bagi pihak lain, tetapi tindakan tersebut juga dapat mengakibatkan pertanggungjawaban berdasarkan kesalahan. Kondisi ini menyebabkan beberapa pihak menumpuk tuntutan atas perbuatan melawan hukum dan wanprestasi secara bersamaan. Mahkamah Agung menerima gugatan kumulatif dalam putusan No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 dan Putusan MA No. 2686/Pdt/1985, yang berarti tidak melanggar hukum acara.  Aplikasi penelitian ini: Penelitian ini berguna untuk menganalisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 dan Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 2686/Pdt/1985. Putusan Mahkamah Agung ini memiliki ratio decidendi atau yurisprudensi bahwa gugatan kumulatif diperbolehkan dan tidak melanggar hukum acara.  Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Belum ada peneliti terdahulu yang melakukan analisis hukum terhadap putusan MA, padahal MA merupakan yurisprudensi dalam perkara atau permasalahan hukum kumulatif gugatan dan perbuatan melawan hukum. Kata kunci: Kumulasi, Melawan Hukum, Wanprestasi, Putusan, Rasio Decidendi
Co-Authors Abdullah Al Mamun Adi Prehanto Adnan, Fahrizal Agiyanto, Ucuk Alfa Faridh Suni Alfalachu Indiantoro Alfitri, Latifahny Aridia Alifia Fatimatun Nazya Andrian Wijaya Arief Budiono Aries Isnandar Arlinto Asep Nuryadin Atih Sundawiati, Atih Azizah, Nur Rokhimatul Azka, Najwa Btari Mariska Purwaamijaya DEDE AULIA RAHMAN Dwi Budi Santoso Elfrida Ratnawati Fadhilah Fadhilah Faris Al Fatih, Mohammad Fathimah, Nusuki Syari’ati Fauzi, Muhammad Alvan Ferry Irawan Ferry Irawan Febriansyah Firdausi, Ulya Shafa Giri, Misbah Satria INDIANTONESIAORO, Alfalachu Indiantoro, Alfalachu Iqbal An Zida, M. Jauharul Isnan, Mohammad Isnandar, Aries KARIZ, Sela Angelita Karlimah Karlimah Khoirudin Fathoni, Khoirudin Kurniawan, Henri Lyandova, Vanka Maesaroh, Syti Sarah Miftahul Jannah, Nadia Muhammad Rizki Nugraha Mustika Rizki, Agung Nazya, Alifia Fatimatun Negara, Komang Metty Trisna Nugrahareni, Hermita Widi Nuraini, Eni Nurhamidah, Lisda Nurjannah Nurjannah Purwaamijaya, Btari Mariska Putro, Budi Laksono Rachman, Eka Fitrajaya Rangga Gelar Guntara RIFALDI, Ahmad Asha Rinekso, Albert Joni Riska Aprilia Rizky Ditya A Rachman Rizky Rachman Judhie Putra Roby Ismail Adi Putra Seinsiani, Izzati Gemi Setiyani, Hendra Dewinta Sodahlan, Mohammad Erlan Subagyo Subagyo Sulistyawan, Vera Noviana Swardana, Ardli Tatyantoro Andrasto Tivany Chella Nur Fitri Ucuk Agiyanto Varinia Azkarin Wahyudin Wardani, Septyan Wijayanti Kusuma Wardhana, Raditya Wisnu Yurniwati Yurniwati Zulkarnaen Zulkarnaen