Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Encouraging Compliance and Integrity: Building a Civil Servant Discipline System in terms of the Legal System Aspect Irma Purwaningsih; Nanik Prasetyoningsih
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 1 (2023): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i1.4767

Abstract

Civil Servant (PNS) discipline is a fundamental pillar in creating a state apparatus with integrity and high performance. This article discusses the urgency of building an effective civil servant discipline system based on statutory Law to encourage compliance and integrity. This research uses normative juridical methods by examining statutory regulations related to civil servant discipline, such as the ASN Law and PP 94/2021. The research results show that the current civil servant discipline system still has several areas for improvement, such as a need for firmness in enforcing sanctions and inadequate coaching mechanisms. To build an effective civil servant discipline system, several strategic steps need to be taken, including Strengthening regulations related to civil servant discipline by evaluating and revising existing regulations, Increasing the effectiveness of enforcing disciplinary sanctions by prioritizing the principles of justice and proportionality, Strengthening the role of the Government's internal oversight apparatus in supervising and following up on civil servant disciplinary violations, building a culture of discipline and integrity within government agencies through ongoing education and training. Effective and consistent enforcement of civil servant discipline will encourage the creation of a state apparatus that is professional, has integrity, and has high performance so that it can ultimately support the achievement of national development goals.
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SIYASAH SYAR’IYAH PRINCIPLES IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION REGARDING TO THE SIMULTANEOUS ELECTION 2019 Prasetyoningsih, Nanik; Wijayanti, Septi Nur; Syaroni, Anang; Lailam, Tanto
Jurnal Hukum Progresif Vol 7, No 2 (2019): Oktober 2019
Publisher : Doctoral of Law Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (164.836 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/hp.7.2.108-128

Abstract

This study aims to examine the Constitutional Court's Decision which carries out General Elections simultaneously from the Syiyasah Syar'iyah perspective, especially on the principle of justice. This research is a doctrinal research and uses two approaches namely the statutory approach and the concept approach. Based on Syiyasah Syar'iyah's perspective, the decision of the Constitutional Court is fair for political parties participating in elections for people who are willing to become candidates/vice presidents, and for people who want to test their electability. This decision also aims to reduce the number of non-voter groups. The Constitutional Court's decision also contains the principle of unity and alliance, because it aims to stop the practical political interests that lead to the collapse of unity.
PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD AS A LEGAL POLITICAL INSTRUMENT FOR SIMPLIFYING THE PARTY SYSTEM Shaim Muhtasib Amnur; Nanik Prasetyoningsih
International Conference on Health Science, Green Economics, Educational Review and Technology Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): 10th IHERT (2025): IHERT (2025) SECOND ISSUE: International Conference on Healt
Publisher : Universitas Efarina

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Presidential Threshold (PT) is formally constructed as a legal instrument to strengthen the presidential system by simplifying the political party system. However, this research argues that the PT has experienced a functional shift from an instrument of stability to a mechanism of political cartelization that hinders the circulation of the national elite. This study aims to analyze the legal-political ambivalence of the PT within the context of simultaneous elections and its implications for the quality of democracy. Employing a normative-juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, this research finds that the 20% of PT substantively creates a candidacy oligopoly that undermines popular sovereignty. The novelty of this article lies in its critical analysis of the "pseudo-stability" generated by oversized coalitions post-PT, which ultimately triggers a deadlock in parliamentary accountability. This article concludes that to preserve the integrity of simultaneous elections, the PT must be recalibrated or abolished to end the consolidation of power by party elites.
Reconstructing Indonesia’s Legislative Politics Following Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020: Between the Omnibus Law, Legislative Delegation, and Constitutional Control: Rekonstruksi Politik Legislasi Indonesia Setelah Putusan MK NO. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020: Antara Omnibus Law, Delegasi Legislasi, dan Kontrol Konstitusional Prasetyoningsih, Nanik; Wardhana, Allan Fatchan Gani
Lex Renaissance Vol. 10 No. 2 December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/JLR.vol10.iss2.art6

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 marked a significant turning point in Indonesia’s legislative politics. For the first time, the Court declared a statute conditionally unconstitutional on the grounds of procedural defects, while simultaneously affirming the importance of meaningful public participation and due process in law-making. Nevertheless, subsequent developments have revealed an ambivalent trajectory. The Government issued Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 2 of 2022, which was later enacted as Law No. 6 of 2023, while the amendment to the Law on the Formation of Laws and Regulations through Law No. 13 of 2022 effectively institutionalized the omnibus method as a permanent legislative technique. This article examines the reconstruction of Indonesia’s legislative politics following Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/2020, particularly in relation to the omnibus law method, legislative delegation, and constitutional control. It employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, drawing on an analysis of the 1945 Constitution, the Job Creation Law, the Law on the Formation of Laws and Regulations, the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law on the Job Creation, and relevant Constitutional Court decisions issued after 2020. The study identifies three principal tendencies. First, the omnibus method has undergone a process of normalization within Indonesia’s legislative framework. Second, delegated legislation has reinforced a pattern of executive-heavy law-making, shifting substantial normative authority toward the executive branch. Third, constitutional control over formal judicial review remains inconsistent in its application. At the same time, although the Constitutional Court has normatively strengthened the principle of public participation, such participation has not yet been adequately institutionalized in legislative practice. This article argues that the reconstruction of Indonesia’s legislative politics should be directed toward limiting the use of the omnibus method, tightening the scope of normative delegation, strengthening meaningful public participation, and developing more robust mechanisms of checks and balances and constitutional dialogue. Such measures are necessary to ensure that the legislative process is brought back into alignment with the principles of the rule of law and constitutional democracy.
The Effect of the Nusantara Capital City Authority on East Kalimantan’s Regional Autonomy: A Constitutional Analysis Nanik Prasetyoningsih; Cyabriena Asela; Rajali Haji Aji
Constitutionale Vol 6 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/constitutionale.v6i2.4455

Abstract

Law Number 3 of 2022 on the Nusantara Capital City has sparked constitutional debate, particularly regarding its effects on regional autonomy in East Kalimantan. The debate centers on the extensive authority granted to the Nusantara Capital City Authority, which functions outside the conventional framework of decentralized local governance. This study evaluates whether the NCCA’s legal structure and powers align with the constitutional principles of decentralization set out in Article 18 of the 1945 Constitution. Through normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches, the study finds that the NCCA’s governance model diverges from democratic local governance standards due to the absence of a regional legislative council and an elected regional head. Consequently, the establishment of the NCCA has effectively reduced the autonomous authority of the East Kalimantan provincial government. The study recommends instituting a regular constitutional review mechanism to ensure alignment between national strategic priorities and regional autonomy.
A Comparison of Supreme Court Justices’ Legal Argumentation in Deciding Disputes on Transfer Pricing Management Fees in Indonesia Agus Suharsono; Nanik Prasetyoningsih; Nur Aida Ikrima
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 14, No. 2, December 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i2.5874

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the Study: to of the Supreme Court Justice in deciding transfer pricing disputes related to the payment of management fees in Indonesia so that tax authorities and taxpayers understand its implementation to prevent similar cases. Methodology: This doctrinal research using statutory, conceptual, cases, and interpretive approaches; The data is secondary, namely laws, Supreme Court decisions, and concepts in relevant literature. Results:  The Supreme Court Justice's argument in deciding the management fee transfer pricing law and existing law in the international community, evidence, and the judge's knowledge of legal philosophy, legal principles and previous decisions. Taxpayers must document all evidence of transactions and conduct functional analysis by Arm's Length Principle to prove the correctness of payment of management fees. Applications of this study: Taxpayers and tax authorities can understand the argument of the Supreme Court Justice in deciding the dispute over transfer pricing management fees to be considered in making laws and regulations implementing it, and encourage further research by comparing in other countries. Novelty: Substantive truth is the primary basis for the Supreme Court Justice's argument in the transfer pricing management fee dispute. Keywords: Legal Argumentation; Management Fee; Supreme Court; Tax-Payers; Transfer Pricing.   ABSTRAK Tujuan: menganalisis argumentasi Hakim Agung dalam memutus sengketa transfer pricing terkait pembayaran management fee di Indonesia, agar otoritas pajak dan wajib pajak memahami implementasinya untuk mencegah ada kasus serupa. Metodologi: Penelitian doktrinal ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konsep, dan interpretasi, datanya berupa undang-undang, putusan Mahkamah Agung, dan studi pustaka yang relevan. Temuan: Argumentasi Hakim Agung dalam agung dalam memutus sengketa transfer pricing management fee  mengutamakan kebenaran substansif, berdasarkan hukum positif tertulis maupun hukum yang hidup dalam masyarakat internasional, alat bukti, serta pengetahuan hakim tentang filsafat hukum, asas hukum, dan putusan sebelumnya. Wajib pajak harus mendokumentasikan semua bukti transaksi dan melakukan analisis fungsional sesuai Arm's Length Principle untuk membuktikan kebenaran pembayaran management fee. Kegunaan: wajib pajak dan otoritas pajak dapat memahami argumentasi Hakim Agung memutus sengketa transfer pricing management fee, untuk dipertimbangan dalam membuat undang-undang dan peraturan pelaksananya, serta mendorong penelitian lanjutan dengan membandingkan di Negara lain. Kebaruan: Kebenaran substantif lebih diutamakan oleh Hakim Agung dalam menyususun argumentasi putusan sengketa transfer pricing management fee. Kata Kunci: Argumentasi Hukum; Management Fee; Mahkamah Agung; Wajib Pajak; Transfer Pricing        
The Dissolution of Community Organizations in Indonesia: Is Court Involvement Necessary? Ichsan , Muchammad; Prasetyoningsih, Nanik
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jphk.v7i1.29273

Abstract

The dissolution of community organizations in Indonesia under Law No. 16 of 2017 remains controversial, particularly regarding the absence of judicial involvement. This study employs a normative juridical approach to examine the issue from three perspectives—human rights, Islamic law, and Indonesian positive law. The research relies on statutory, conceptual, and comparative analyses using primary and secondary legal materials, including the 1945 Constitution, Law No. 16 of 2017, and relevant Constitutional Court decisions. Findings reveal that although the law is constitutionally valid, it does not fully satisfy the principles of justice and due process, as it allows the government to dissolve organizations unilaterally without judicial review. From the perspective of siyasah syar’iyyah (legitimate policy), such authority must be grounded in maslahah (public interest) and fairness to prevent social discontent. Therefore, to uphold constitutional democracy and protect fundamental rights, court involvement should be reinstated as an essential mechanism in the dissolution of community organizations.
SOLUSI MENGATASI DUALITAS PENGATURAN SANKSI ADMINISTRASI ATAU SANKSI PIDANA DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG KETENTUAN UMUM PERPAJAKAN Agus Suharsono; Nanik Prasetyoningsih
Jurnal Yuridis Vol 10 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Yuridis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jyur.v10i1.6394

Abstract

This study analyzes the duality of the provisions for imposing administrative sanctions or criminal sanctions for taxpayers who do not register themselves to be given an Taxpayer Identification Numbers or do not report their business to be confirmed as Taxable Persons for VAT Purposes, causing state losses because it can lead to legal uncertainty and injustice. This paper is a doctrinal research that analyzes primary and secondary sources of law with statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches. The results of the research show that the Law on General Provisions and Procedures for Taxation already regulates administrative sanctions for taxpayers who do not register themselves to be given a Taxpayer Identification Number or do not report their business to be confirmed as a Taxable Persons for VAT Purposes, causing state losses, namely by granting a Taxpayer Identification Number and inauguration of a Taxable Persons for VAT Purposes as a position and issuing Notice of Tax Underpayment Assessment along with administrative sanctions. Based on the principles of establishing laws and regulations and the legal principles of hulprecht, una via, ultimum remedium, and nullum delictum, nulla poena, sine praevia lege poenali, because there are provisions for the imposition of administrative sanctions, for legal certainty and justice the provisions of Article 39 paragraph (1) letter a of the General Provisions and Tax Procedures Act should be abolished so that there is no duality in the imposition of sanctions for the same violation.
Law Enforcement of Cyber Pornography of Children on Social Media Based on Human Rights in Indonesia Sheila Hamdah Hanum Ritonga; Nanik Prasetyoningsih
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.4511

Abstract

Social media is beneficial as a medium of communication between users and users. Another advantage of social media is that it can expand relationships and knowledge. However, social media can be harmful if social media is used to damage, insult, and harass, which is why cyberporn emerged. Many children are perpetrators and victims of cyberporn on social media. This research aims to analyze cyberporn law enforcement on children on social media based on human rights in Indonesia. This research is normative research that looks at Legislation and cases. This research found that law enforcement in Indonesia is based on legal substance based on Law (U.U.) Number 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions, Law No. 44 of 2008 concerning Pornography, Law No. 12 of 2022 concerning Crimes of Sexual Violence, the Criminal Code, and the Child Protection Law.
The Relevance Of Election Organizing Institutions In Resolving Presidential Election Disputes Ahmad Nur Rohadi; Nanik Prasetyoningsih
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.4624

Abstract

The General Election Commission (KPU) is an election organizing institution that is national, permanent, and independent in organizing elections. Holding direct presidential elections is a democratic instrument to create a more democratic government and a step toward realizing people's sovereignty. In this research activity, the type of research used is normative juridical research (legal research), which prioritizes library research. However, along the way, various accompanying problems arose. Ultimately, these things must be considered challenges and part of the maturation process to create a more mature state government. As explained above, the various disputes in the final stages of voting for the elected candidate pairs in the Presidential Election show that we still have a lot of democratic agenda that needs to be resolved regarding regulations, institutions, and law enforcement. Thus, the disputes that occur should become part of the election maturation process as the period changes. 
Co-Authors Agus Suharsono Agus Suharsono Ahmad Catur Adinugroho Ahmad Nur Rohadi Aji, Dodi Setya Al Fath, M. Reformis Allan Fatchan Gani Wardhana, Allan Fatchan Gani Amirullah, Muhammad Nur Rifqi Ardhanaisvara, Putri Adinda Arie Kusuma Paksi Ascobat Gani Banuaji, Muhammad Rahul Cyabriena Asela Dede Kania Diandra, Aditya Rizki Dianita Sugiyo, Dianita Dyah Pikanthi Diwanti Fadholah, Arno Fathi, Muhammad Fauzi, Muhammad Oky Ferdin Okta Wardana Fuadi, Gumilang Gunawan Wibisono Hazar Kusmayanti, Hazar Hendrix Adinata Hikmah Zougira Ichsan , Muchammad Ilham Putra Irma Purwaningsih Irrynta, Dwilani Iswandi, Kelik Iwan Satriawan Iwan Satriawan Junaidin Kelik Iswandi Leli Joko Suryono Lis Noer Aini, Lis Noer M Adi Setiawan M. Reformis Al Fath Mahbub Pasca Al Bahy Marlinda, Ajeng Puspa Moh. Lubsi Tuqo Romadhan Muchammad Ichsan Muhammad Oky Fauzi Muhammad Rakha Ramadhan Muhari Muhari Mujiyana Mujiyana Nikko Budiman Nur Aida Ikrima Nur Fadilah Al Idrus Oktaviana, Adelia Haninditya Paksi, Arie Kusuma Pratama, Sazia Aushar Chazradj Pujiono Pujiono Putri, Windy Virdinia R. Yulianus Gatot Rahayu Werdiningih, Sri Rahmaddhani, Tiara Wiji Rajali Haji Aji Riyanto, Aisyah Ajeng Putri Rufaidah Rufaidah Rukmanda, Madha Agsyanohabi Sahara, Oktavia Putri Salma Aulia Farahdina Ariani Sambora, Riky Sari, Meilyana Cipta Septi Nur Wijayanti Shaffira, , Kiran Nathania Shaim Muhtasib Amnur Shandy Herlian Firmansyah Sheila Hamdah Hanum Ritonga Sri Indah Astuti Sunyoto Usman Syaroni, Anang Tamara, Amelia Puspa Tanto Lailam Wardhana, Allan Wempy Setyabudi Hernowo Wicaksono, Annas Wrediningsih, Sri Yudi Setiawan Yulianto Achmad Yulianto Achmad Zaid Zaid Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol Zulfakar, Andi Ahmad Zulianto, Restu Andi