Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.246
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JUPIIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-ilmu Sosial PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Sriwijaya Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Hasanuddin Law Review Jambe Law Journal Undang: Jurnal Hukum Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora WAJAH HUKUM PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan TheJournalish: Social and Government Lampung Journal of International Law (LaJIL) Risalah Hukum Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law Indonesian Journal of International Law Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat : Pemberdayaan, Inovasi dan Perubahan Mimbar Hukum Jurnal Karya Abdi Masyarakat Joong-Ki
Akbar Kurnia Putra
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 32 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Validitas Bukti Digital Closed Circuit Television Dalam Praktik Penegakan Hukum Pidana Indonesia M Nanda Setiawan; Sahuri Lasmadi; Elly Sudarti; Herry Liyus; Akbar Kurnia Putra
Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Teuku Umar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35308/jic.v9i2.12661

Abstract

Abstrak. Perkembangan teknologi informasi telah membawaa perubahan besar dalam sistem penegakan hukum pidana di Indonesia, khususnya melalui pemanfaatan rekaman Closed Circuit Television sebagai alat bukti elektronik. Artikel ini menganalisis keabsahan rekaman CCTV dalam praktik peradilan pidana Indonesia dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif, mengkaji peraturan perundang-undangan, dokumen hukum, dan literatur akademik terkait. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun KUHAP belum secara eksplisit mengatur alat bukti elektronik, legitimasi hukum terhadap rekaman CCTV telah diperkuat melalui Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronikdan yurisprudensi Mahkamah Konstitusi. Pengakuan ini didukung oleh konsep functional equivalent approach, yang menempatkan bukti elektronik setara dengan alat bukti konvensional. Namun, keabsahan rekaman CCTV sangat bergantung pada keaslian, integritas, serta prosedur perolehan dan penyajian yang sesuai dengan hukum acara pidana, termasuk aspek forensik digital dan chain of custody. Tantangan utama meliputi sinkronisasi regulasi, pemahaman teknis aparat penegak hukum, dan perlindungan hak asasi. Artikel ini merekomendasikan penguatan regulasi, peningkatan kapasitas teknis, serta harmonisasi antara KUHAP dan UU ITE untuk mengoptimalkan penggunaan CCTV sebagai alat bukti yang sah, efektif, dan berkeadilan dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia.Kata Kunci: Validitas: alat bukti elektronik; Digital Forensik; Hukum Pidana
Asylum Seekers and Refugee Management: (Im)Balance Burden Sharing Case between Indonesia and Australia Arie Afriansyah; Hadi Rahmat Purnama; Akbar Kurnia Putra
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 6 Issue 1, January 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol6.Iss1.1145.pp70-100

Abstract

Since the 1970s, Indonesia has been acting as a transit country for asylum seekers and refugees to reach Australia and New Zealand. Being a non-state party to the Refugee Convention, Indonesia has become the strategic partner for Australia in managing the issue of asylum seekers and refugees. The two countries have been involved in many bilateral and regional arrangements to tackle the issues. The “Bali process” is one of Indonesia and Australia's arrangements to lead the region in tackling forced migration and refugees. Unfortunately, despite their “common” interests, many of Australia's policies towards asylum seekers have negatively impacted Indonesia in many ways. This paper uses desk study research with a normative approach to analyse nationally and internationally relevant laws and policies. This paper analyses the Bali Process as regional cooperation means of burden-sharing in which Indonesia and Australia play dominant roles while scrutinising how both countries implement the policies within their domestic realms. In addition, the dynamics within the two countries will also be examined to understand how they shape their policies. This paper argues that Indonesia has fulfilled its part by managing these protected persons within Indonesia. However, Australia seems to consistently try to shift its burden to Indonesia as its neighbouring state. By revisiting the Bali Process arrangement, it is suggested that Australia needs to respect its commitment and take any means necessary to keep good relations with its neighbours, including Indonesia.
Co-Authors Afrilia Faradilla Ahmad Sandy Dewana Arie Afriansyah Aurora Jillena Meliala Bernard Sipahutar Budi Ardianto Chusnein, Akbar Daud, Sulhi Muhmad Dimas Rizal Efendi, Dori Elly Sudarti Eunike Trisnawati Faradiba, Laetetia Sekar Faradilla, Afrilia Farisi, Mochammad Fauzi Syam Hadi Rahmat Purnama, Hadi Rahmat Hanny Sukma Ardiana Hardyanthi, Try Helmi Helmi Herry Liyus Jufri, Muhammad Ariq Abir Kusuma, Anita Dian Eka M Nanda Setiawan Munandar, Tri Imam Munawir Munawir Nopyandri Nopyandri Novianti Novianti Pebrianto, Dony Yusra Pebrianto, Dony Yusra Purba, Eva Juliana Rahayu Repindowaty Harahap Ramlan Ramlan Ramlan, H. Retno Kusniati Ridwan Arifin Sahuri Lasmadi Sari, Annisa Asfida Sigit Riyanto Sipahutar, Bernard Siregar, Elizabeth Sonny Saptoajie Wicaksono Umar, H. Vrandza Iswenanda