Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 38 Documents
Search

Building Rights Over Management Rights In The Batam Free Trade Area: Perspectives On Certainty And Legal Protection Setiawan, Anjas; Helmi, Helmi; Rosmidah, Rosmidah
Ipso Jure Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Ipso Jure - February
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/8gpgyf88

Abstract

Hak Guna Bangunan (HGB) above the right of Management (HPL) is a form of state land utilization that develops in the practice of managing national strategic areas, especially in the Free Trade Area and free port of Batam. However, this practice raises complex juridical issues, especially with regard to the vagueness of the legal status of HPL which is not explicitly regulated in the agrarian Basic Law, resulting in weak certainty and legal protection for HGB holders. This study aims to analyze the legal status of HGB above HPL in the land management system in Batam, assess the application of the principles of Indonesian land law in the regulation and management by the Batam Enterprise Board, and formulate reformulation of HGB settings above HPL in order to ensure the protection of the rights of related parties. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and systemic approach, which is analyzed qualitatively with prescriptive reasoning. The results showed that HGB regulation above HPL is still characterized by emptiness and disharmony of norms, dominance of administrative authority of area managers, and not optimal application of the principles of legal certainty, justice, and rights protection. This study concludes that the reformulation of HGB arrangements above HPL is needed through the affirmation of the position of HPL as a state Public Authority, strengthening the status of HGB as a right to legally protected land, as well as the arrangement of Area Management Authority to be in line with the principles of National Land Law and state law.
Building Use Rights Over Management Rights in the Batam Free Trade Zone: A Perspective of Certainty and Legal Protection Setiawan, Anjas; Helmi, Helmi; Rosmidah, Rosmidah
Ipso Jure Vol. 2 No. 12 (2026): Ipso Jure - January
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/5879s384

Abstract

The Building Use Rights (HGB) on top of the Management Rights (HPL) is a form of state land utilization that develops in the practice of managing national strategic areas, especially in the Batam Free Trade Zone and Free Port. However, this practice raises complex juridical issues, especially related to the unclear legal status of HPL which is not explicitly regulated in the Basic Agrarian Law, thus having an impact on the weak certainty and legal protection for HGB holders. This study aims to analyze the legal status of HGB above HPL in the land management system in Batam, examine the application of Indonesian land law principles in its regulation and management by the Batam Business Agency, and formulate a reformulation of HGB regulation on HPL to ensure the protection of the rights of related parties. The research method used is normative legal research with legislative, conceptual, and systemic approaches, which are analyzed qualitatively with prescriptive reasoning. The results of the study show that the regulation of HGB above HPL is still characterized by a void and disharmony of norms, the dominance of the administrative authority of regional managers, and the application of the principles of legal certainty, justice, and protection of rights has not been optimal. This study concludes that it is necessary to reformulate the regulation of HGB above HPL through affirming the position of HPL as a state public authority, strengthening the status of HGB as a legally protected land right, and structuring the authority to manage areas to be in line with the principles of national land law and state law.
Juridical Construction Of Building Rights Over Management Rights In The Land Law System Anjas Setiawan; Helmi Helmi; Rosmidah Rosmidah
JURNAL AKTA Vol 13, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v13i1.51965

Abstract

In the practice of national land administration, the legal instrument known as Land Management Rights (HPL) has emerged as a representation of the State's Sovereign Rights over land. However, their place in the land rights system is still up for discussion, particularly when Building Use Rights (HGB), which are widely utilized in the construction of industrial, residential, and commercial zones, are granted on top of them. Because it deals with legal certainty and protection for the interests of rights holders and investors, this matter is important. The goal of this study is to determine where HPL stands in relation to the land law system and establish the legal connection between HPL holders and HGB holders. Through the examination of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources, the approach utilized is normative juridical legal research with a legislative and conceptual perspective. The discussion's findings indicate that although it is situated inside an HPL management area, HGB continues to be a land right given by the government, but HPL is an administrative authority originating from the State's Right of Control rather than a property right as described by the Basic Agrarian Law. As a result, the connection between HPL and HGB holders is administrative-contractual in character, but the source of authority for issuing HGB is not altered. Therefore, a conceptual clarification is necessary to guarantee legal certainty.
Akibat Hukum Cacat Formil dan Cacat Materiil pada Akta Notaris dalam Pembuktian Hukum di Indonesia M. Adli Afriansyah; Rosmidah Rosmidah; Syamsir Syamsir
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Maret 2026
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v5i3.5922

Abstract

Notarial deeds are a crucial legal instrument in the civil litigation system in Indonesia. The authenticity of a deed depends not only on the proper procedural creation but also on the substance contained within it. This research aims to analyze the legal consequences of formal and material defects in notarial deeds concerning their validity, evidentiary power, and status in civil litigation cases. The main focus of this study is to identify the impact of formal defects, such as non-compliance with procedural requirements, and material defects, which relate to the inconsistency of the deed’s substance with legal facts. The research uses a normative legal methodology, employing legislative, conceptual, and case approaches. The study analyzes court decisions related to formal and material defects in notarial deeds, such as the South Jakarta District Court Decision No. 235/Pdt.G/2013 and the Surabaya District Court Decision No. 157/Pdt.G/2017, to understand the application of the law in practice. The findings show that violations of formal requirements may cause the deed to lose its authentic evidentiary value, while material defects may lead to the annulment of the deed. Therefore, it is essential for notaries to ensure compliance with both formal and material requirements when creating deeds to maintain legal certainty and prevent potential disputes. This study contributes to the understanding of the notary’s role and the impact of defects on the authenticity of deeds in civil law.
Problematika Pembagian Harta Bersama dan Waris pada Perkawinan Campuran Migran Tanpa Perjanjian Pranikah dalam Sistem Hukum Perdata Indonesia Winda Sari Lasmarinta Simanjuntak; Rosmidah Rosmidah
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Juli - Agustus
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/jty5mr11

Abstract

Artikel ini mengkaji problematika pembagian harta bersama dan waris dalam perkawinan campuran tanpa perjanjian pranikah, khususnya akibat benturan regulasi antara hukum perdata dan hukum agraria di Indonesia. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis risiko hukum yang timbul serta menawarkan pemahaman komprehensif mengenai perlindungan hukum bagi keluarga migran. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan normatif melalui literature review terhadap berbagai jurnal hukum yang diterbitkan dalam 10 tahun terakhir. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketidakhadiran perjanjian pranikah menempatkan WNI pada posisi rentan terhadap pemblokiran sertifikat tanah, pembatalan hak milik, serta hambatan pewarisan bagi pasangan dan anak campuran. Selain itu, ketidakharmonisan regulasi dan lemahnya sosialisasi perjanjian pisah harta memperburuk kepastian hukum, sehingga diperlukan harmonisasi kebijakan dan penguatan administrasi pertanahan.
PUBLIC INTEREST, STATE CONTROL, AND PROPORTIONAL COMPENSATION: CONSTITUTIONAL TENSIONS IN INDONESIA'S LAND ACQUISITION REGIME Rosmidah Rosmidah; Adeb Davega Prasna; Arjun Deswal
Indonesia Private Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/iplr.v7i1.5043

Abstract

This article examines normative distortions arising from the expanded meaning of public interest in land acquisition policies in Indonesia and their impact on compensation proportionality. Data from the Agrarian Reform Consortium show that infrastructure-related agrarian conflicts rose from 212 cases in 2022 to 241 in 2023, indicating that compensation mechanisms fail to meet substantive justice. Using a normative juridical approach with conceptual and constitutional analysis, this article argues that the expansion of public interest under Law No. 2 of 2012, including investment and National Strategic Projects, has weakened proportionality. Compensation has shifted from full restitution of community losses to limited replacement of physical land and assets. This shift fails to satisfy key proportionality requirements: suitability of purpose, necessity of means, and balance between public benefit and individual burden, as mandated by Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution. The article concludes that without redefining the constitutional limits of public interest, land acquisition will continue to favor economic interests at the expense of citizens’ rights, particularly those of indigenous communities.
Studi Putusan Nomor 137/Pdt.G/2021/PN Gianyar Tentang Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah yang diperoleh Berdasarkan Perjanjian Nominee Nazwa Afipa Amar; Rosmidah Rosmidah; Suhermi Suhermi
Wajah Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v9i2.1881

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the rights of land owners due to nominee agreements in Decision Number 137/Pdt.G/2021/PN Gianyar and the legal remedies of land owners due to nominee agreements. The problems discussed include: (1) What are the rights of land owners due to nominee agreements after Decision Number 137/Pdt.G/2021/PN Gianyar? (2) What are the legal remedies of land owners due to nominee agreements after Decision Number 137/Pdt.G/2021/PN Gianyar. The method used in this study is normative juridical (case study). The results of the study indicate that the parties to the land lost their rights because the nominee agreement which was the basis for the purchase of the disputed land was contrary to statutory regulations, namely Article 1320 of the Civil Code and the UUPA, and efforts to resolve disputes were through mediation.
Reconstructing Land Acquisition Law for Indonesia’s National Strategic Projects Rosmidah Rosmidah; Supeno Supeno; Sitta Saraya Sitta Saraya; Rian Saputra Rian Saputra; Seguito Monteiro Seguito Monteiro
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v14i2.1952

Abstract

National Strategic Projects have accelerated infrastructure development but have also exposed a structural tension between development imperatives, state authority, and the constitutional protection of affected communities. Existing land acquisition governance tends to treat project designation and procedural compliance as sufficient grounds for acquisition, while substantive scrutiny of public interest, indigenous rights, participation, compensation, and socio-ecological consequences remains fragmented. This study aims to reconstruct the legal framework of land acquisition for NationalStrategic Projects (PSN) by establishing a constitutionally grounded model that reconciles development with social justice and rights protection. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, the study applies systematic, conceptual, and teleological legal interpretation. The principal novelty of this study is the Constitutional Justice-Based Land Acquisition Model, which seeks to redesign the legitimacy framework of land acquisition rather than merely improve existing procedures. The model introduces a Constitutional Public Interest Test as a substantive threshold; mandatory Indigenous Rights Screening; meaningful participation and Free-Prior-and Informed-Consent (FPIC); replacement-cost compensation and livelihood restoration; integrated social-ecological assessment; effective remedies from the outset; independent review; and post-acquisition restoration monitoring. Critically, PSN status is reconceptualized as creating a rebuttable presumption of public interest rather than serving as conclusive justification for compulsory land acquisition. The model therefore transforms land acquisition from a project-oriented land delivery mechanism into a form of constitutional, rights-based, and sustainable land governance.