Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal La Sociale

Settlement of Traffic Offences: A Shift in the Presumption of Innocence and the Impact on Legal Justice Beny Harkat; Nandang Sambas; Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria
Journal La Sociale Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): Journal La Sociale
Publisher : Borong Newinera Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v5i3.1175

Abstract

Traffic offences are a serious issue in Indonesia, creating complex challenges for the justice system and social costs. Although Law No. 22/2009 has defined the rules, the high number of accidents and offences indicates the ineffectiveness of law enforcement. This study aims to investigate the impact of traffic offences on legal justice, the effectiveness of sanctions, and the shifting presumption of innocence in Indonesia. The research methodology included both quantitative and qualitative approaches, involving analyses of accident data and interviews with authorities. The results showed a high number of offences, a lack of effectiveness of Law No. 22 of 2009, and the phenomenon of "peace in place." The implementation of ETLE cameras became an alternative, despite internet access constraints. Perma No. 12/2016 changed the judicial process, moving from a presumption of innocence to a presumption of guilt. This shift provides uniform sanctions without considering individual circumstances. The limitation of violators' rights in ticket hearings violates the principle of justice. The implementation of e-ticket technology shows advantages, but the dependence on the internet and the potential for misuse are obstacles. The shift to the presumption of innocence in the Perma raises doubts about the fairness of the justice system. Improving fairness requires a re-evaluation of the application of sanctions, technological improvements, and a deeper understanding of the rights of offenders. These recommendations are expected to improve the justice system related to traffic offences in Indonesia.
The Concept of Resolving the Conflict of Norms Between Criminal Confiscation and General Bankruptcy Confiscation of Bankruptcy Assets Viewed from the Perspective of Justice Handayani, Suci Hati; Sambas, Nandang; Jamila, Lina
Journal La Sociale Vol. 5 No. 4 (2024): Journal La Sociale
Publisher : Borong Newinera Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v5i4.1244

Abstract

In the scope of business, business actors, both individuals and legal entities, often borrow money (debt) with the aim of obtaining capital intended for the continuity of their business activities. In practice, often a debtor fails to fulfil his obligations or achievements, not because it is caused by force majeure (overmatch). Such a situation is called default. In Bankruptcy Law, there is a type of confiscation, namely general confiscation. In connection with that, there is a conflict of norms between the provisions of general confiscation in Article 31 paragraph (2) of Law No. 37 of 2004 with the provisions of criminal confiscation / confiscation in Article 39 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This research method uses normative juridical and empirical juridical approaches. The data used in legal research are primary data and secondary data. The results of this study, the Government as the Regulator is expected to immediately make a legal formulation policy in connection with the general confiscation of bankruptcy as regulated in Law No. 37 of 2004 and criminal confiscation as regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code and other related regulations, and in order to seek justice in law enforcement, especially related to confiscation of bankruptcy property, in essence the provisions of laws and regulations do not contradict each other, must be in harmony in order to ensure legal certainty and legal protection in its implementation. Therefore, it is necessary to revise the two confiscation provisions regulated in the two regulations, especially the general bankruptcy confiscation provisions regulated in Article 31 of Law No. 37 of 2004.
Co-Authors A. Harits Nu’man Abdul Wahab Ade Mahmud Adib Gunawan Agus Gede Sutamaya Agus Hadian Rahim Alya Tsania Aprillianti Amri, Qoonitah Anan, Moh. Shofi Arifton, Arifton Arinto Nurcahyono Ashuri Ashuri Atika Sari Beny Harkat Bima Guntara Bulan, Dewi Nawang Caecielia Wagiono Chepi Ali Firman Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria Clarissa Yudhanetta Dey Ravena Dian Alan Setiawan Dias Ayustie Munandar Dini Dewi Heniarti Dini Dewi Heniarti Diva Aulia Rizky Imani Durahman Manurung Edi Setiadi Faizul Idris Farel Mochammad Zafrullah Fitria Rahma Azahra Handayani, Suci Hati Hariyadi, Nazla Shafira Haspada, Deni Havid Zul Aswad Havid Hernawati RAS Herniati, Dini Dewi Hijriani, Adinda Nurrizkia Ida Bagus Nyoman Dhedy Widyabawa Inneke Dwi Cahya Inneke Dwi Cahya Jamila, Lina Kharisma Fajar Ilmperdana Koswara, Indra Yudha Kusumah, R. Windi Rachmawati Mahmud, Ade Mochamad Dendy Anugrah Mochamad Farrel Nurrahman Sahid Mohammad Fakhri Abdul Malik Muchamad Nur Adnan Muhamad Agung Prayoga Muhamad Irfan Florid Muhammad Adhi Yudha Prawira Neni Sri Imaniyati Novianti Nu’mani, Harits Oksidelfa Yanto Oktadiana, Viri Pratama Maulidyawanto Rahmah, Annida Rasinih Ratna Januarita Rimsyahtono Rimsyahtono Rimsyahtono Rini Irianti Sundary Ronggo Prasetyo Rully Hanafi Dahlan Rusyanto, Opan Sari, Nani Widya Sianipar, Ferry Agus Siti Nurjanah Slamet, Amalul Arifin Sri Ratna Suminar Syavira Maharani Kiswanda Syifa Anggita Ahimsa Putri Try Ahmad Mirza Wulandari, Arsem Yeti Sumiyati Yoel Latif Yudha Prawira Ramadhan Zainur Arifin Syah Zhetira Rizkika