Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.311
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW GUYUB: Journal of Community Engagement Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) Jurnal Ranah Publik Indonesia Kontemporer (Rapik) International Journal of Social Science, Educational, Economics, Agriculture Research, and Technology (IJSET) PETITA Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Pendidikan Siber Nusantara Jurnal Manajemen dan Pemasaran Digital Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum Journal of Law and Social Politics Siber Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy
Rizki Tri Anugrah Bhakti
Universitas Riau Kepulauan
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mechanical Engineering Social Sciences Other

Published : 26 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : siber journal of advanced multidisciplinary

 1 
The Principle of Objectivity in the Discretionary Powers of Municipal Police (Satpol PP): An Administrative Law Analysis of Regional Regulation Enforcement Daman Arsa Nova; Rizki Tri Anugrah Bhakti; Dwi Afni Maileni
Siber Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): (SJAM) Siber Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary (July - September 2026)
Publisher : Siber Nusantara Research & Yayasan Sinergi Inovasi Bersama (SIBER)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/sjam.v4i2.1024

Abstract

Abstract: The enforcement of Regional Regulations by the Civil Service Police Unit (Satpol PP) frequently involves the exercise of discretionary authority due to regulatory gaps, ambiguous norms, and complex field conditions. However, such discretion carries the risk of arbitrariness and abuse of authority if it is not guided by clear legal standards. This article examines how the principle of objectivity functions as a legal benchmark in the exercise of Satpol PP discretion under Indonesian administrative law. Using normative legal research with statute, conceptual, and limited case approaches, the study analyzes the framework of Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration, Law No. 23 of 2014 on Regional Government, Government Regulation No. 16 of 2018 on Satpol PP, relevant administrative law doctrines, and judicial interpretations. The analysis demonstrates that discretionary authority is lawful only when it is grounded in verifiable facts, rational decision-making, impartial treatment of similar cases, careful consideration of risks and impacts, and transparent reason-giving supported by adequate documentation. The study concludes that objectivity operates as an operational legal standard that transforms the abstract principles of good governance (AUPB) into measurable criteria for evaluating Satpol PP enforcement actions. By formulating indicators such as factual basis, rationality, non-partisanship, due care, and transparency, this research provides a normative framework for assessing whether discretionary enforcement actions are consistent with legality, proportionality, and accountability within the rule-of-law and good governance framework
Objectivity in Law Enforcement by Indonesia’s Civil Service Police Unit in Maintaining Public Order Rio Winata; Dwi Afni Maileni; Rizki Tri Anugrah Bhakti
Siber Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): (SJAM) Siber Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary (July - September 2026)
Publisher : Siber Nusantara Research & Yayasan Sinergi Inovasi Bersama (SIBER)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/sjam.v4i2.1028

Abstract

Selective public-order enforcement in Indonesia continues to erode public trust and generate recurrent allegations of discriminatory practice. This article clarifies the legal meaning of ‘objectivity’ in enforcement by the Civil Service Police Unit (Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja, Satpol PP) and proposes an operational framework for assessing whether non-judicial public-order measures comply with the requirements of administrative justice. Using doctrinal legal research and statutory and conceptual approaches, the study examines the normative framework governing Satpol PP’s authority and standards of conduct. Particular attention is given to the multi-layered mandate derived from the 1945 Constitution, Law No. 23 of 2014, Government Regulation No. 16 of 2018, Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration, and the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB). The findings show that objectivity is not merely an ethical aspiration; it is a binding administrative standard that must be demonstrated through verifiable procedures and reasons. The study formulates eight interlocking parameters that translate this mandate into auditable practice: (1) a clear legal basis; (2) consistent enforcement criteria; (3) non-discrimination; (4) verified and documented facts; (5) proportional escalation; (6) minimum transparency through the provision of reasons; (7) traceable command accountability; and (8) accessible channels for objection and internal review. Together, these parameters provide a practical framework for designing, supervising, and auditing standard operating procedures and for distinguishing lawful, accountable enforcement from selective or abusive action, thereby strengthening the legitimacy of local public-order governance.
Strengthening MSME Legal Compliance by Examining Legal Literacy, Licensing Readiness and Contract Quality Jemi Jemi; Rizki Tri Anugrah Bhakti; Dwi Afni Maileni; Edwar Kelvin
Siber Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): (SJAM) Siber Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary (July - September 2026)
Publisher : Siber Nusantara Research & Yayasan Sinergi Inovasi Bersama (SIBER)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/sjam.v4i2.1084

Abstract

Abstract: Legal compliance among Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) remains a critical issue in strengthening business governance, as many business actors operate adaptively without being adequately supported by legal preparedness. This study analyzes the effects of legal literacy, licensing readiness, and contract quality on MSME legal compliance. A quantitative approach with a cross-sectional survey design was employed. Data were collected through Likert-scale questionnaires administered to 120 MSME actors selected purposively according to the research criteria. The data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). The measurement model assessment indicates that all constructs satisfy the required validity and reliability criteria. In the structural model, an R² value of 0.694 shows that 69.4% of the variance in MSME legal compliance is explained by legal literacy, licensing readiness, and contract quality. Hypothesis testing demonstrates that legal literacy has a positive and significant effect on MSME legal compliance (β = 0.241; p = 0.006), licensing readiness has a positive and significant effect (β = 0.287; p = 0.002), and contract quality has a positive and significant effect (β = 0.356; p = 0.000). Among the three predictors, contract quality emerges as the most dominant determinant. These findings affirm that MSME legal compliance should not be understood merely as the fulfillment of administrative obligations, but as the outcome of interaction among legal understanding, legal-administrative preparedness, and the quality of contractual arrangements in business relationships. This study contributes to empirical business law scholarship and provides a practical basis for designing legal education programs, licensing assistance, and contract-drafting support for MSMEs.
Co-Authors Agus Riyanto Alwan Hadiyanto Anto Anto ARTANTO, TRI Ayu Nurhayati Oktavia Bahtiar Bahtiar Banar Maejaya Daman Arsa Nova Dian Wiris Woro Wardani Dwi Afni Maileni Dwi Afni Maileni Edwar Kelvin Edward Kelvin Evy Yusriani Frans Borgias Gugi Gustamam Hary Suwenda Hasiholan Gultom Ibrahim Ridwan Hasibuan Indra Indra Indra Sakti Irma Solvia Isfandir Hutasoit Jemi Jemi Juanda Andika Agustian Lindu Deni Luciana Luciana Lucky Imam Santoso Muhammad Arif Muhammad Zulkifli Rabu Rabu Rabu Rio Winata Roja Roja Sariyanto Sariyanto Seftia Azrianti Ukas Padrisan Jamba - Yamamoni Telaumbanua Yusniarti