Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Sainteks

KAJIAN YURIDIS TERHADAP JAMAAH HAJI SEBAGAI KONSUMEN JASA PELAYANAN PENYELENGGARAAN IBADAH UMROH DAN HAJI PLUS BERDASARKAN UU NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN Suyadi Suyadi
Sainteks Vol 8, No 2 (2011): SAINTEKS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/sainteks.v8i2.313

Abstract

Law Of Number 17 1999 With Regulation Change Had Been Law Of Number 13 2008 About Pilgrimage Organization Which Be Held By Government (Department Of Religion). In This Study, Can Be Asserted That Pilgrimage Have Been Responsible Government Because It Was National Duty. People Participation, Especially Private Party, In The Pilgrimage Organization Was A Separated Part Of Pilgrimage Organization System. This Is Significant That Private Pilgrimage Bureau Have Different Responsibility. Pilgrimage Is Consument Which Can Not Getting Loose By Law Of Number 8 1999 About Consument Protection, Particularly Consument Rights As Meritorious Service Consument Of Pilgrimage Organization. Keywords: Juridically Study, Consument, Pilgrimage.
PENERAPAN PASAL 4 UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 8 TAHUN 1999 TERHADAP PRODUK BERAS YANG MENGANDUNG KLORIN (PEMUTIH) DI KABUPATEN BANYUMAS Suyadi Suyadi
Sainteks Vol 8, No 1 (2011): SAINTEKS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/sainteks.v8i1.309

Abstract

Technology and science development influenced the producers to give various innovation in their products. This innovation did not often coincide with the product guarantee quality to consume, that is by mixing dangerous chemical substances. Rice, the steple food, is also mixed with chlorine which is very dangerous. That is why, this research aim is to know how law protection for consumers towards rice containing the chlorine in Banyumas Regency. The result of the research showed that basesd on the norms which were supported by the interviews with related informants, so most consumers’ rights had been fulfilled because of the obligation of the product quality standard fulfillment represented in Act No. 7, 1996, prohibition of dangerous chemical substance in Permentan No. 32/Permentan/OT.140/3/2007, and product supervision and development represented in Kepmenperindag Nomor 634/MPP/Kep/9/2002, and sanction or administration punishment for the producers who break the law. Keywords: implementation, chlorine, Act No 8, 1999