Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

The Role and Legal Responsibilities of Directors and Commissioners in Facing Administrative, Criminal and Civil Risks Indra Utama Tanjung; Vivian Alyssa Chandra; Khania Amanda Salsabila; Ryan Fahri Rangkuti; Aufiya Muhammad Syukri Al Ghiffary
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): ISNU Cendikia September
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v2i2.844

Abstract

This article examines the roles and legal responsibilities of directors and commissioners in corporate law, particularly regarding administrative, criminal, and civil risks. Directors, as the managing body, and commissioners, as supervisors, have legal obligations inherent in their strategic functions. In the Indonesian legal system, violations of the principles of prudence and good faith can give rise to personal liability. This study uses a normative juridical approach by analyzing relevant laws and regulations and jurisprudence. The results of the study indicate that there is still a lack of clarity in the application of accountability standards, particularly in distinguishing between corporate and individual management responsibilities. This lack of clarity can create legal uncertainty and risks for company managers. Therefore, this article recommends updating legal norms and strengthening the principles of good corporate governance as preventive measures to clarify the boundaries of responsibility and minimize legal risks for directors and commissioners.
The Prosecutor's Pre-Prosecution And Prosecution In Accordance With The Criminal Procedure Code Indra Utama Tanjung; Dinda Suciana Rambe; Chintya Jiliani; Gilang Septian Firjatullah
ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Nine Star Mei
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/ins9mj.v3i1.1331

Abstract

This article examines the legal construction and practical implementation of the prosecutor’s authority in pre-prosecution and prosecution under the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). The study departs from the normative ideal of an integrated criminal justice system that positions the prosecutor as dominus litis, responsible for controlling the flow of criminal cases from investigation to adjudication. Using a normative juridical method with a statute-based and conceptual approach, this research critically analyses the regulatory framework governing pre-prosecution and prosecution, as well as its application in practice. The findings indicate that although KUHAP formally grants prosecutors a strategic role in ensuring the completeness of case files and the legality of prosecutions, the existing regulatory design, particularly under the old KUHAP, tends to produce procedural formalism, weak coordination between investigators and prosecutors, and limited mechanisms of accountability. The article further argues that recent reforms introduced in the new KUHAP reflect a paradigm shift towards strengthening judicial control and due process safeguards, especially through the reconfiguration of pretrial mechanisms. However, these normative improvements still face structural and institutional challenges that may hinder their effectiveness. This study contributes to the development of criminal procedural law by highlighting the normative–practical gap in prosecutorial functions and offering a critical foundation for evaluating prosecutorial reform in Indonesia’s evolving criminal justice system.
Undang-Undang Perkawinan dan Nikah Beda Agama Hukum islam dan Hukum Positif Indra Utama Tanjung; Dhiauddin Tanjung
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 4 No 2 (2020): Desember 2020
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v6i4.4255

Abstract

Abstrak lndonesia adalah Negara plural yang terbangun dari keragaman suku, budaya, ras, dan agama. Salah satu sisi pluralisme bangsa Indonesia yang paling mendasar adalah adanya kemajemukan agama yang dianut oleh penduduknya. Agama maupun aliran kepercayaan yang hidup dan berkembang di Indonesia tidaklah tunggal namun beragam. Pemerintah Indonesia telah mengakui enam agama, yaitu Islam, Kristen, Katolik, Hindu, Buddha, dan Konghucu. Sejatinya, Indonesia belum memiliki payung hukum yang eksplisit mengatur persoalan perkawinan beda agama yang sangat kompleks. Sehingga selama ini pasangan perkawinan beda agama harus berjuang lebih, baik melalui upaya legal maupun ilegal agar perkawinannya mendapat legalitas di Indonesia. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui Perspektif Pernikahan Beda Agama menurut Undang-undang Hukum Positif dan Hukum islam. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode analisis konten dengan pendekatan normatif, untuk data yang diperoleh berasal dari studi literatur dan data analisanya menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini, Hukum Islam secara tegas mengatakan bahwa Nikah beda Agama adalah Haram. Namun, kacamata peraturan perundang-undangan terdapat inkonsistensi yuridis antara Undang-undang No 1 tahun 1974 Tentang perkawinan dengan Undang-undang No 23 tahun 2006 Tentang pencatatan Sipil. Kata Kunci: Perkawinan, Beda Agama, Undang-undang, Hukum islam.