Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.335
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE JURE Jurnal Art Nouveau Rekayasa Sipil Jurnal Akta Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JURNAL ILMIAH LIVING LAW Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Otentik's : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan Jurnal Optimalisasi JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Jurnal Hukum Sasana Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum International Journal of Community Service (IJCS) Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH) Abdi Implementasi Pancasila: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Media Hukum Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review (GRLSPR) Jurnal Pendidikan Olahraga Journal of Legal Contemplation
Ali Abdullah, Ali
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 36 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 36 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Upaya Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pihak Ketiga yang Asetnya Termasuk dalam Harta Pailit Violenza Alif; Ali Abdullah; Dian Purwaningrum
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 12 (2025): Tema Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i12.2378

Abstract

Such actions by the curator could potentially fall under the category of unlawful acts (PMH) as stipulated in Article 1365 of the Civil Code. These actions are considered unlawful if they are carried out without a clear legal basis and without adequate verification of ownership. To be declared an unlawful act, the following elements must be fulfilled: the existence of an act, the act is unlawful, there is fault, loss has been incurred, and there is a causal relationship between the act and the loss incurred. This phenomenon indicates a gap between norms and practices in the administration of bankruptcy. The definition of the descriptive analytical method is a method that serves to describe or provide an overview of the object being studied through data or samples that have been collected as they are, without conducting analysis and making conclusions that apply to the general public. The curator's action of including third-party assets in the bankruptcy estate without a valid legal basis constitutes an unlawful act (PMH). This action violates the principles of property rights protection and legality in civil and bankruptcy law. The curator must ensure that the assets included in the bankruptcy estate truly belong to the debtor based on strong and valid legal evidence. Legal protection for third parties whose assets are included in the bankruptcy estate can be sought through commercial court proceedings, such as other lawsuits (Article 217 of the Bankruptcy Law) or third-party opposition (derden verzet). Third parties acting in good faith can submit proof of legal ownership through official documents such as a Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB), Deed of Sale and Purchase (AJB), or proof of full payment for the disputed object. Supreme Court Decision Number 311 K/Pdt.Sus–Pailit/2024 shows that the Supreme Court is increasingly consistent in providing protection for the property rights of third parties who have no debt relationship with the bankrupt debtor. This sets an important precedent in bankruptcy practice in Indonesia to prevent curators from exceeding their authority.
UPAYA HUKUM DAN PEMULIHAN HAK SAHAM MINORITAS PASCA PUTUSAN PENGADILAN: STUDI ATAS PERLINDUNGAN INVESTOR DI INDONESIA Abdullah, Ali; Liesmawati, Liesmawati
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 4 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v13i4.7869

Abstract

Restoration of minority shareholder rights in private limited companies is often ineffective, despite court decisions confirming a breach of fiduciary duty. This situation indicates a gap between the legal protection norms in Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies and their implementation in practice. This study analyzes the effectiveness of the mechanism for restoring minority shareholder rights following a court decision. The results show that court decisions are generally declarative and poorly enforced, making them difficult to implement. Key obstacles include resistance from majority shareholders, weak institutional coordination, and low transparency in private companies. This study recommends the formulation of more operational rulings, strengthening implementation oversight, and integrating legal technology with a restorative justice approach. Using a juridical-empirical approach, this study contributes to strengthening legal protection for minority shareholders and increasing legal certainty in corporate practice.Keywords: Minority Shareholders, Fiduciary Duty, Legal Remedies
Unlawful Acts in Sales and Purchase Agreements and the Protection of Good-Faith Buyers Zahra, Nabilla; Abdullah, Ali; Kesuma, Diani
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/10.46924/jihk.v7i2.431

Abstract

Sales and Purchase Agreements (Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli—PPJBs) frequently give rise to disputes when legal defects arise in the transfer of land rights, particularly where such defects prejudice buyers acting in good faith. The tension between legal certainty of land ownership and the protection of good-faith parties remains a legal problem that has yet to be fully resolved in judicial practice. This study examines the application of the doctrine of unlawful acts in PPJBs and evaluates the form and effectiveness of legal protection afforded to landowners and good-faith buyers. Employing a normative legal research method, the study adopts statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, with particular attention to judicial decisions concerning PPJB disputes. The findings demonstrate that unlawful acts in PPJBs predominantly originate from the bad faith of one of the contracting parties or third parties. At the same time, courts tend to provide proportional protection to good-faith buyers without disregarding the rights of the lawful owner. The study concludes that effective legal protection in PPJB disputes can only be achieved through a balanced application of the principles of good faith and legal certainty within the agrarian law framework.
Juridical Study on the Transfer of Shares in a Limited Liability Company That Is Decided to Be Free from All Legal Claims Hendra Setiawan Siburian; Ali Abdullah; Fitra Deni
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 8 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v8i1.449

Abstract

In a limited liability company, the General Meeting of Shareholders serves as the highest corporate organ authorized to determine strategic matters, including the transfer of shares. This study examines the legality of share transfer conducted without fulfilling the quorum requirements, as reflected in Surabaya District Court Decision No. 7/Pid.B/2020/PN.Sby in conjunction with Surabaya High Court Decision No. 1476/Pid/2020/PT.Sby. This research employed a normative juridical method with qualitative analysis based on statutory and case approaches. The findings indicate that such transfer is legally defective unless justified through the Circular Resolution of Shareholders mechanism. Notaries play a crucial role in ensuring legal certainty and the validity of the transaction.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Notaris Terhadap Pemalsuan Akta Kuasa Menjual (Studi Putusan MA Nomor 1209 K/Pid/2022): Criminal Liability of Notaries for Forgery of Deeds of Power of Attorney for Sale (A Study of Supreme Court Decision No. 1209 K/Pid/2022) Amallia, Ainun; Edi Tarsono; Ali Abdullah
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Media Hukum (JMH)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tompotika Luwuk Banggai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59414/jmh.v14i1.1354

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk pertanggungjawaban pidana notaris terhadap tindak pemalsuan Akta Kuasa Menjual berdasarkan Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1209 K/Pid/2022. Notaris sebagai pejabat umum memiliki kewenangan untuk membuat akta otentik yang memiliki kekuatan pembuktian sempurna, sehingga setiap tindakan dalam proses pembuatan akta harus dilaksanakan sesuai ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan dan prinsip kehati-hatian. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Sumber data yang digunakan berupa bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa notaris dalam perkara tersebut terbukti melakukan pemalsuan terhadap Akta Kuasa Menjual melalui penggunaan tanda tangan yang tidak sah dan pembuatan akta tanpa kehadiran pihak yang berkepentingan. Perbuatan tersebut memenuhi unsur tindak pidana pemalsuan surat otentik sebagaimana diatur dalam ketentuan KUHP, sehingga notaris dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana. Putusan Mahkamah Agung menegaskan bahwa penyalahgunaan kewenangan oleh notaris tidak hanya menimbulkan konsekuensi administratif dan perdata, tetapi juga berimplikasi pada sanksi pidana demi menjaga kepastian hukum dan kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap akta otentik.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Notaris terhadap Pemalsuan Akta Kuasa Menjual: (Studi Putusan MA Nomor 1209 K/Pid/2022) amallia, Ainun; Tarsono, Edy; Abdullah, Ali
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v11i4.64086

Abstract

Notaris sebagai pejabat umum memiliki kewenangan untuk membuat akta otentik sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN). Akta otentik memiliki kekuatan pembuktian sempurna, sehingga setiap proses pembuatannya harus memenuhi ketentuan formal dan material yang ditetapkan peraturan perundang-undangan. Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf a dan m UUJN menegaskan kewajiban notaris untuk bertindak jujur, saksama, mandiri, tidak berpihak, serta membacakan dan menandatangani akta di hadapan penghadap dan saksi. Menganalisis pemenuhan unsur tindak pidana pemalsuan akta kuasa menjual dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1209 K/Pid/2022. Pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), dengan menelaah ketentuan dalam UUJN dan KUHP khususnya Pasal 264 ayat (1) ke-1 jo. Pasal 55 ayat (1) ke-1 KUHP. Pendekatan kasus (case approach), dengan menganalisis pertimbangan hukum dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1209 K/Pid/2022. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Notaris Madiyana Herawati, S.H., Sp.N. terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan membuat empat Akta Kuasa Menjual tanpa kehadiran penghadap serta menggunakan tanda tangan palsu atas nama pemberi kuasa (Suratinah). Tindakan tersebut memenuhi unsur tindak pidana pemalsuan surat otentik sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 264 ayat (1) ke-1 jo. Pasal 55 ayat (1) ke-1 KUHP. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa pembuatan akta kuasa menjual tanpa kehadiran penghadap dan dengan tanda tangan palsu telah memenuhi unsur tindak pidana pemalsuan surat otentik sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 264 ayat (1) ke-1 jo. Pasal 55 ayat (1) ke-1 KUHP. Notaris dalam perkara Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1209 K/Pid/2022 terbukti bertindak dengan kesengajaan (dolus) sehingga dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana dan dijatuhi pidana penjara selama 1 (satu) tahun 6 (enam) bulan.
Co-Authors A.A. Ketut Agung Cahyawan W Achmad Yanu Aliffianto Agus Suharyanto Ahmad Dahlan Amallia, Ainun Asih, Ayu Lestarining Bagus Setyo Sulaksono Dian Purwaningrum Diana Kesuma Diani Kesuma Diani Kesuma, Diani Dina Rahmawati Dwi Putri Cahyawati, Dwi Putri Edi Tarsono Eka Putri, Pritie Anissa Eko Andi Suryo ELSA FEBRIANI Fahriani, Ipak Febrianto, Satria Fitra, Deni Fitriadi Fitriadi Gracia, Esmeralda Aurelia Hendra Setiawan Siburian Jum Anggriani Jum Anggriani Liesmawati, Liesmawati Maria Regina Ivana Muh. Taufik LaOde Muhammad Sirajuddin Qahtan Hamdan Nadhifa Putri Kinasih Novelza Restu Ayu Putri Prasetyo, Yunan Putra, Gaustama Ramadhan, Ardian Ganet Rini Meliana RR Utji Sri Wulan Wuryandari Rusmawati, Nurlia Subagyo, Panca Suhendar Suwarsit Syahpri Kholik Tarsono, Edy Triwulandari, Endah Violenza Alif Yongky Putut Angki Anata Yoyo Arifardhani Yunianti, Devi Zahra, Nabilla Zulfadli Barus