Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 29 Documents
Search

Efektivitas Langkah Pemerintah Indonesia dalam Mengatasi Ancaman Terorisme di Papua Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Bambang Agus Pariyono; Suci Ramadani; Sumarno Sumarno; Alfonso Pahala Manihuruk; Doni Sabdan Tanjung
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Vol 5 No 5 (2026): Mei
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v5i5.1014

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis efektivitas langkah Pemerintah Indonesia dalam mengatasi ancaman terorisme di Papua ditinjau dari perspektif hukum nasional dan hak asasi manusia. Papua merupakan wilayah yang menghadapi tantangan keamanan kompleks akibat gangguan bersenjata, kekerasan terhadap masyarakat sipil, serta hambatan pembangunan yang berdampak pada stabilitas sosial. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Sumber data diperoleh dari peraturan perundang-undangan, jurnal ilmiah, buku, serta laporan lembaga resmi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa langkah pemerintah telah memiliki dasar hukum yang kuat melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2018 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme dan kebijakan keamanan nasional. Implementasinya dilakukan melalui penegakan hukum, pengamanan wilayah rawan, koordinasi antar lembaga, serta program deradikalisasi dan pembangunan sosial. Namun, efektivitas kebijakan tersebut belum sepenuhnya optimal karena dipengaruhi kondisi geografis, keterbatasan infrastruktur, dinamika sosial lokal, dan belum meratanya rasa aman masyarakat. Dari perspektif hak asasi manusia, kebijakan pemerintah pada dasarnya bertujuan melindungi hak hidup dan rasa aman, tetapi tetap memerlukan pengawasan agar sejalan dengan prinsip proporsionalitas, akuntabilitas, dan due process of law. Penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya pendekatan keamanan yang tegas, manusiawi, dan berkelanjutan.
Criminal Law Policy in Addressing Transnational Crimes Against Cases of Human Trafficking Jesslyn Elisandra Harefa; Suci Ramadani; Muhammad Arif Sahlepi
Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities Vol 5, No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Utan Kayu Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47679/jrssh.v5i4.470

Abstract

Human trafficking is a form of transnational crime that has a broad impact on security, public order, and human rights. This crime involves cross-border networks with increasingly complex modus operandi, necessitating comprehensive and adaptive criminal law policies. This study aims to analyze criminal law policies addressing human trafficking in Indonesia, with an emphasis on prevention, prosecution, and victim protection. The method used is normative legal research with legislative, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The analysis shows that combating human trafficking requires synergy between national regulations, international cooperation, increased capacity of law enforcement officials, and effective victim protection mechanisms. Furthermore, integrating criminal law policies with social, economic, and employment policies is crucial to addressing the root causes of this crime. This study concludes that the success of criminal law policies in addressing human trafficking is largely determined by consistent implementation, official commitment, and public participation.
Legal Analysis of The Criminal Acts of Village Fund Budget Corruption (Study of The Simalungun District Prosecutor's Office Reza Fikri Dharmawan; Rahmayanti Rahmayanti; Suci Ramadani
Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities Vol 5, No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Utan Kayu Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47679/jrssh.v5i4.473

Abstract

This research, entitled “A Juridical Analysis of Village Fund Corruption Crimes (A Case Study at the Simalungun District Prosecutor’s Office),” is motivated by the increasing number of cases involving the misuse of village funds that have caused state financial losses and eroded public trust in village governments. The study aims to analyze how the law is applied in cases of village fund corruption handled by the Simalungun District Prosecutor’s Office, to identify the obstacles encountered by prosecutors in handling such cases, and to evaluate the effectiveness of law enforcement in eradicating corruption involving village funds. The research adopts a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, focusing on the Kardianto case handled by the Simalungun District Prosecutor’s Office. The data sources consist of primary legal materials, such as legislation and indictment documents; secondary legal materials, including books, journals, and previous research; and tertiary legal materials, such as legal dictionaries and encyclopedias. The findings reveal that the application of law in cases of village fund corruption has been carried out in accordance with Law No. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law No. 20 of 2001 on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes and Law No. 6 of 2014 on Villages. However, the effectiveness of law enforcement remains hindered by overlapping regulations, limited human resources, weak inter-agency coordination, and low levels of legal awareness among the community. Nevertheless, the Simalungun District Prosecutor’s Office has demonstrated progressive measures through the implementation of the Jaksa Garda Desa (Village Guardian Prosecutor) program and the digitalization of public-fund monitoring. The study concludes that law enforcement against village fund corruption in the jurisdiction of the Simalungun District Prosecutor’s Office has been relatively effective in its repressive aspects but needs strengthening in preventive and participatory dimensions. Institutional reform, capacity building for law enforcement officers, and active community participation are essential to establishing transparent, accountable, and corruption-free village governance.
The Role of Law Enforcement Officers in Handling Domestic Violence Cases in The Criminal Investigation Unit of The Southeast Aceh Police Rahmayanti Rahmayanti; Suci Ramadani
Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities Vol 6, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Utan Kayu Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47679/jrssh.v6i1.569

Abstract

Domestic Violence (DV) is a crime that has serious impacts on victims, both physically, psychologically, and socially. Case data in the jurisdiction of the Southeast Aceh Police shows an increase in the number of domestic violence cases from 2020 to 2024. This increase indicates low public legal awareness, strong patriarchal cultural factors, and a suboptimal victim protection system. This study formulates the problem regarding the obstacles faced by law enforcement officers, the legal efforts undertaken, and the role of law enforcement officers in handling domestic violence cases in the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Southeast Aceh Police. The purpose of this study is to analyze obstacles, examine the forms of legal efforts, and assess the effectiveness of the role of law enforcement officers based on the provisions of applicable laws and regulations. The research method used is empirical normative legal research with a statutory approach and a case approach, supported by domestic violence case data over the past five years. The results of the study indicate that obstacles to handling domestic violence include limited facilities and infrastructure, limited human resources, low victim participation in the legal process, and socio-cultural factors in the community. Legal efforts undertaken by law enforcement officers include preventive, repressive, and combined measures in accordance with the provisions of Law Number 23 of 2004 and criminal procedural law. The role of law enforcement officers is a determining factor in ensuring victim protection and the effectiveness of law enforcement. Therefore, strengthening institutional capacity, increasing the professionalism of officers, and increasing public legal awareness are necessary to ensure just and victim-oriented domestic violence law enforcement.
Legal Analysis of The Legitimacy of Law Enforcement Intelligence Activities by The Indonesian Prosecution Service Based on The Attorney General’s Instruction No. 7 of 2023 in Handling Corruption Cases in Indonesia Erwin Efendi Rangkuti; Muhammad Azhali Siregar; Suci Ramadani
Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities Vol 5, No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Utan Kayu Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47679/jrssh.v5i4.472

Abstract

Corruption constitutes an extraordinary crime due to its pervasive and destructive impact on political stability, economic integrity, and the social order of society. In combating this crime, the Office of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia plays a crucial role not only as a public prosecutor but also as an institution vested with the authority to conduct law enforcement intelligence activities. This authority is generally regulated under Law No. 16 of 2004, as amended by Law No. 11 of 2021 on the Prosecution Service of the Republic of Indonesia. However, such provisions remain too general and fail to provide clear technical guidelines regarding the scope, mechanisms, and oversight of prosecutorial intelligence operations. To optimize this function, the Attorney General issued Instruction No. 7 of 2023, which emphasizes the intelligence function of the Prosecution Service in supporting general criminal law enforcement, special criminal acts, and corruption prevention. Nevertheless, the Instruction remains an internal administrative directive with no binding external legal force. This research adopts a normative juridical method, employing statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case study approaches. The findings reveal that the prosecutorial intelligence function is strategically significant in supporting anti-corruption efforts. However, juridical weaknesses persist, potentially resulting in normative conflicts and risks of human rights violations. Therefore, the study concludes that a statutory-level regulation is necessary to strengthen the legality and accountability of prosecutorial intelligence within Indonesia’s criminal justice system.
Kajian Yuridis Tindak Pidana Cyberbullying Terhadap Remaja di Media Sosial Peter Valentino Munthe; Suci Ramadani; Muhammad Harimanka S; Renaldo Sianturi
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 4 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i4.7301

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi informasi dan media sosial telah memunculkan berbagai bentuk kejahatan siber, salah satunya cyberbullying yang banyak dialami oleh remaja. Cyberbullying merupakan tindakan perundungan melalui media elektronik yang dapat berupa penghinaan, ancaman, pencemaran nama baik, maupun penyebaran konten yang merugikan korban. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pengaturan cyberbullying dalam hukum pidana Indonesia serta bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi korban cyberbullying. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Data diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan dengan menggunakan bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan cyberbullying di Indonesia belum diatur secara khusus dalam satu undang-undang tersendiri, namun dapat dijerat melalui ketentuan dalam Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP), terutama terkait penghinaan, pencemaran nama baik, dan ancaman melalui media elektronik. Perlindungan hukum bagi korban diberikan melalui UU ITE, UU Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, serta UU Perlindungan Anak dalam bentuk perlindungan hukum, pendampingan, dan rehabilitasi psikologis. Namun, penegakan hukum masih menghadapi kendala dalam pembuktian dan rendahnya kesadaran masyarakat terhadap bahaya cyberbullying.
CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF A MOTHER FOR THE MURDER OF HER CHILD: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE BETWEEN THE OLD CRIMINAL CODE AND THE NEW CRIMINAL CODE (LAW No. 1 Of 2023) Sari Sania Tampubolon; Suci Ramadani; Ismaidar
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the criminal liability of a biological mother who commits the murder of her child, as well as to compare the regulation and sentencing approaches between the former Criminal Code (KUHP) and the new KUHP under Law No. 1 of 2023. The research questions include: first, how criminal liability for a biological mother who kills her child is assessed from the elements of fault (mens rea) and capacity for responsibility (toerekeningsvatbaarheid) under Indonesian criminal law; and second, what are the differences in regulation and sentencing approaches for the crime of child murder by a biological mother in the former and new KUHP. The research method used is normative legal research with a comparative approach, through the study of statutory regulations, legal literature, and jurisprudence. The results show that the criminal liability of a biological mother who commits child murder is highly influenced by the analysis of the elements of fault and capacity for responsibility, including considerations of psychological disorders and social factors. The new KUHP under Law No. 1 of 2023 provides significant changes in the classification of offenses, sentencing limits, and a restorative justice approach that emphasizes the protection of children and victim recovery, compared to the former KUHP, which is more formalistic and retributive. Thus, this study emphasizes the need for a comprehensive understanding of the psychological aspects of the perpetrator and the harmonization of the application of criminal law in the context of child protection in Indonesia.
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan yang Membebaskan Terdakwa dari Segala Tuntutan Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Putusan Nomor 454/Pid.B/2024/PN.Sby) Rio Aginta Ginting; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar; Suci Ramadani
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 12 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i12.2532

Abstract

Putusan bebas (vrijspraak) dalam perkara tindak pidana pembunuhan merupakan salah satu bentuk putusan yang sering menimbulkan perdebatan karena berkaitan dengan perlindungan hak terdakwa di satu sisi dan pemenuhan rasa keadilan bagi korban serta masyarakat di sisi lain. Perbedaan penafsiran terhadap unsur kesengajaan, hubungan kausalitas, dan standar pembuktian menyebabkan putusan bebas dalam perkara pembunuhan menjadi isu penting dalam perkembangan hukum pidana Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis penerapan hukum pidana dan pertimbangan hukum majelis hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 454/Pid.B/2024/PN.Sby yang membebaskan terdakwa dari dakwaan tindak pidana pembunuhan. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Data diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, doktrin hukum, serta literatur ilmiah yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa putusan bebas dijatuhkan karena majelis hakim menilai unsur kesengajaan, hubungan kausalitas, dan pembuktian tidak terpenuhi secara sah dan meyakinkan sebagaimana dipersyaratkan dalam Pasal 183 KUHAP, sehingga diterapkan asas in dubio pro reo. Namun, pada tingkat kasasi Mahkamah Agung menilai telah terjadi kekeliruan penerapan hukum oleh judex facti karena fakta persidangan dan alat bukti telah cukup membuktikan terpenuhinya unsur penganiayaan yang mengakibatkan kematian berdasarkan Pasal 351 ayat (3) KUHP. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa perbedaan penilaian terhadap alat bukti, unsur kesalahan, dan hubungan kausalitas menjadi faktor utama terjadinya disparitas putusan antar tingkat peradilan, sehingga diperlukan konsistensi penerapan prinsip pembuktian dan pertimbangan hukum untuk mewujudkan kepastian hukum, keadilan, dan kemanfaatan dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia.
Asesmen Risiko Sebagai Instrumen Kebijakan Pemasyarakatan Dalam Pemberian Hak Bersyarat Bagi Narapidana Tindak Pidana Narkotika Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas IIA Binjai Nadia Novitri Hasibuan; Suci Ramadani; Ismaidar
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 12 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i12.2533

Abstract

Pemberian hak bersyarat bagi narapidana tindak pidana narkotika merupakan bagian dari kebijakan pemasyarakatan yang bertujuan mewujudkan rehabilitasi dan reintegrasi sosial tanpa mengabaikan perlindungan masyarakat. Dalam praktiknya, pemberian hak bersyarat memerlukan asesmen risiko sebagai instrumen untuk menilai tingkat risiko narapidana serta kelayakannya memperoleh hak integrasi. Namun, implementasi asesmen risiko masih menghadapi berbagai kendala akibat overkapasitas lembaga pemasyarakatan, keterbatasan sumber daya manusia, dan dominannya orientasi administratif dalam proses pengambilan keputusan. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kedudukan dan implementasi asesmen risiko sebagai instrumen kebijakan pemasyarakatan dalam pemberian hak bersyarat bagi narapidana tindak pidana narkotika di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas IIA Binjai. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan hukum normatif-empiris dengan sifat preskriptif-analitis melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, serta didukung data empiris yang diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan dan wawancara dengan petugas pemasyarakatan serta narapidana. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara normatif asesmen risiko telah diposisikan sebagai instrumen strategis untuk mendukung pengambilan keputusan yang berbasis risiko, proporsional, dan akuntabel dalam pemberian hak bersyarat. Namun, implementasinya belum berjalan optimal karena penilaian lebih berfokus pada indikator perilaku dan kepatuhan narapidana di dalam lembaga pemasyarakatan, sedangkan faktor eksternal seperti keterlibatan dalam jaringan narkotika, kesiapan sosial, dan potensi residivisme belum dianalisis secara komprehensif. Kondisi tersebut menyebabkan asesmen risiko cenderung berfungsi sebagai prosedur administratif daripada instrumen substantif kebijakan hukum pidana. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan kapasitas kelembagaan, peningkatan kompetensi asesor, penyempurnaan instrumen asesmen, serta integrasi data antarinstansi agar asesmen risiko mampu mendukung kebijakan pemberian hak bersyarat yang lebih objektif, efektif, dan berorientasi pada keseimbangan antara rehabilitasi narapidana dan perlindungan masyarakat.
Handling Children in Conflict with the Law in Narcotics Crime Cases at the Aceh Tenggara Police Resort Agung Ciptasari Panjaitan; Lidya Rahmadhani Hasibuan; Suci Ramadani
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 11 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i11.2548

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal framework and the implementation of handling children in conflict with the law in narcotics crime cases at the Aceh Tenggara Police Resort, including the obstacles encountered in its implementation. The focus of this research lies in examining how applicable legal provisions are applied in practice and to what extent the protection of children can be optimally realized. The research method employed is empirical legal research with a juridical-empirical approach. Data were obtained through interviews with police officers at the Aceh Tenggara Police Resort as primary data, as well as literature studies covering statutory regulations and scientific literature as secondary data. All data were analyzed qualitatively to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the practice of handling juvenile cases. The results of the study indicate that, normatively, the handling of children has been regulated under Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, which emphasizes the principles of restorative justice, diversion, and the protection of the best interests of the child. In addition, Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics also stipulates the importance of medical and social rehabilitation for drug abusers, including children. In practice, the Aceh Tenggara Police Resort has made efforts to implement these approaches. However, its implementation has not yet been optimal due to several obstacles, such as difficulties in reaching agreements in the diversion process, limited rehabilitation facilities, and a lack of public understanding of the concept of restorative justice. Therefore, it is necessary to enhance the capacity of law enforcement officers, strengthen supporting institutions, and increase public awareness to support the effectiveness of a juvenile criminal justice system that is oriented toward the protection and recovery of children.