Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR)

LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST THE POLICE PROFESSIONAL CODE OF ETHICS DUE TO DESERTION COMMITTED BY POLICE MEMBERS ENDING IN DISHONORABLE DISCHARGE Putra, Alghoni Bumantara; Kadaryanto, Bagio; Pardede, Rudi
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2025
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v6i3.459

Abstract

The police disciplinary code reflects a noble ideal and aspiration—namely, to uphold and maintain the image of the Indonesian National Police (Polri) as a noble profession (officium nobile). Every member of the police force is expected to preserve their dignity and honor as individuals entrusted by society to maintain public order and security, to enforce the law in times of legal conflict, and ultimately, to offer protection and guidance to the community. This study aims to analyze the enforcement of the Police Professional Code of Ethics in response to cases of desertion by police officers that result in dishonorable discharge within the jurisdiction of the Riau Regional Police (Polda Riau). Specifically, the study examines the legal enforcement process, the barriers faced, and the efforts made to overcome those obstacles. This research employs a sociological legal approach. The findings reveal that enforcement of the Police Code of Ethics in desertion cases that end in dishonorable discharge is carried out firmly in accordance with Chief of Police Regulation Number 7 of 2022 on the Police Code of Ethics. Each proven case of severe desertion leads directly to an ethics tribunal, where—if found guilty—the officer is sanctioned with dishonorable discharge. The process begins with attendance verification, clarification, and the preparation of documents for the ethics hearing. This firm stance reflects the professionalism and institutional commitment of Polri. However, it also highlights a lack of preventive and developmental approaches, particularly in the early stages before violations occur. The main barriers in enforcing the code include: (1) systemic weaknesses in attendance reporting, where desertion cases are often detected too late due to unmonitored absenteeism; (2) organizational structural issues, where the guidance and mentoring functions remain reactive rather than proactive; and (3) organizational cultural tendencies to treat violations solely as grounds for punishment, without addressing underlying causes such as psychological stress, family problems, or work fatigue. Efforts to overcome these challenges include: (1) digitalizing the attendance and reporting systems to enable real-time monitoring; (2) strengthening moral and mental development, especially for personnel in remote or high-stress areas; (3) establishing internal preventive support systems, such as communication forums, counseling services, and informal coaching activities; (4) introducing tiered sanction policies, with dishonorable discharge reserved for repeated or severely intentional desertion; and (5) reforming organizational culture to foster more open, communicative, and supportive interactions between superiors and subordinates.
JURIDICAL REVIEW MOTOR VEHICLE NOISE THRINGS IN INDONESIA'S POSITIVE LAW Suparyo; Ardiansyah; Bagio Kadaryanto
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), February 2021
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (205.164 KB) | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v2i2.47

Abstract

As referred to in Article 106 paragraph (3) in conjunction with Article 48 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) shall be sentenced to a maximum imprisonment of 1 (one) month or a maximum fine of Rp. 250,000.00 (two hundred and fifty thousand rupiah). As for the formulation of the problem in this study is HowMean Motor Vehicle Noise Threshold, HowJuridical Overview Motor Vehicle Noise Threshold, and HowLegal SettlementMotor Vehicle Noise Threshold in Indonesian Positive Law. The method used is normative legal research. Data sources consist of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. In this study the data were analyzed qualitatively and in drawing conclusions the authors applied the method of deductive thinking. Based on the results of the study it is known thatMean Motor Vehicle Noise Threshold that is in the Regulation of the State Minister of the Environment Number 7 of 2009 concerning the New Type Motor Vehicle Noise Threshold. In the attachment of the Minister of Environment Regulation Noise Threshold confirms that the motorcycle noise threshold under 175cc is 80 dB and above 175cc is 83 dB.Juridical Overview Motor Vehicle Noise Threshold that in Article 285 of Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation paragraph (1) that everyone who drives a Motorcycle on the Road that does not meet the technical and road-worthy requirements which includes rearview mirrors, horns , headlights, brake lights, directional lights, reflecting devices, speed measuring devices, exhaust, and tire groove depth as referred to in Article 106 paragraph (3) in conjunction with Article 48 paragraphs (2) and (3) shall be punished with imprisonment for a maximum of 1 (one) month or a maximum fine of Rp. 250,000.00 (two hundred and fifty thousand rupiah). Legal SettlementMotorized Vehicle Noise Threshold In Indonesian Positive Law that in taking action by law enforcement in this case the police and the Transportation Agency in carrying out enforcement in terms of noise testing, they never test how much noise is produced and law enforcers do not have the tools to measure the noise level generated from exhaust of motorized vehicle users on the highway.
Co-Authors Andrew Shandy Utama andrew shandy utama, andrew shandy Andriansah Ansah, Ardi Ardiansah Ardiansah, Ardiansah Ardiansah, Ardiansah Ardiansah, H. Ardiansyah ARDIANSYAH ARDIANSYAH Ardiansyah Ardiansyah Arifin, Dhani Fratama Ariyanto, Yuli Armen Armen Aryanto, Dedy Asnawi, Eddy Azmi, H. Bahrun Bery Juana Putra Boy Muhammad Putra Budiarto, Yusuf Burhanuddin Burhanuddin Dela Rahma Disa Lubis Deriansyah Deriansyah Dewiwaty Dewiwaty Eddy Asnawi Eddy Asnawi Fakhlevi, Raja Ferza Fendri Gunawan Gunawan, Fendri Gurning, Rijen Gustian, Leo Hanipah Happy Ariyanto Harahap, Irawan Helena Sumiati Hendrik Hendro Wahyudi Irawan Harahap Iriansyah Iriansyah Koto, Arsyad Kurniawan, Ardian luken ferisman lubis Lutfi Wijaya Akmal M Hary Rubianto Manulang, Johanes Gabe Saputra Manurung, Fernando Markoni Marliawati, Sari Masri Masri Maulana Ghalib As Shidqie Maulana Ghalib As Shidqie Meinecky, Ryan Nabella Puspa Rani Nabella Puspa Rani, Nabella Nainggolan, Awet Lestari Nuzul Abdi Oktapani, Silm Pardede, Rudi Poni Wahyudi Prihati Purba, Desi Valentianna Br Putra, Alghoni Bumantara Qadri, Rahmat Tul Rizki Hidayat Rohim Kusuma Putra Roly Irvan Sandra Dewi Sinaga, Candra Herianto Sinaga, Richard Siregar, Anta Arief Siregar, Marito Sitompul, Hasran Irawadi Sormin, Yohanes Untung Sri Dharmayanti Sudargo, Ryan Sudi Fahmi Sudi Fahmi Suparyo Syahri, Alfi Tampubolon, Subiarto Aprido Tamsir, Muhamad Tri Adiyatmika Winstar, Yelia Nathassa Yohanes Iddo Adventa Yoyok Prasetiyo Heru Laksono Lubis Yulhairi Yulhairi