Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.386
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Jurnal Hukum Legalita JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum JURNAL LAWNESIA (Jurnal Hukum Negara Indonesia) Horizon: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Polit Journal
Ferika Nurfransiska
Universitas Bakti Indonesia
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Automotive Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Pengaturan Artificial Intelligence (AI) Dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia: Analisis Normatif Atas Tntangan, Implikasi, Dan Model Regulasi Ideal Moh. Hasanuddin; Ferika Nurfransiska; Maryuliyanto
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 06 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i06.1632

Abstract

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology presents significant challenges for Indonesia’s legal system, which currently lacks a comprehensive regulatory framework. This study aims to identify normative gaps in AI governance, analyze the legal implications of AI’s autonomous and adaptive nature, and evaluate the effectiveness of existing legal instruments governing the development and application of AI in Indonesia. Furthermore, the study compares global regulatory approaches to provide evaluative insights for shaping a responsive national model. The research employs a normative legal method, focusing on statutory analysis, academic literature, and international regulatory frameworks. The findings reveal that AI regulation in Indonesia remains sectoral and fragmented, scattered across various laws that were not specifically designed to address the complexity of AI technology. Key legal challenges include issues of social justice, algorithmic accountability, and digital sovereignty. This study recommends an integrated regulatory strategy, encompassing the enactment of a national AI law, harmonization with international standards, establishment of an independent supervisory body, and engagement of multisectoral stakeholders. The proposed strategy aims to build a legal ecosystem that is adaptive, inclusive, and globally competitive.
Studi Komparatif Sistem Pembuktian pada Peradilan Umum dan Peradilan Agama di Indonesia Maryuliyanto, Maryuliyanto; Nurfransiska, Ferika; Mustariyanto, Wahyu
HORIZON: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): HORIZON: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary (In-Press)
Publisher : Lembaga Intelektual Muda (LIM) Maluku

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54373/hijm.v4i4.6924

Abstract

Evidence is the basis for judges in assessing facts and determining legal truth in resolving civil cases. Although General Courts and Religious Courts both use national civil procedural law, the characteristics of the Religious Courts' authority in handling cases of marriage, inheritance, and Islamic economics give rise to specificities in the application of evidence. This study aims to analyze the similarities and differences in the evidentiary systems in General Courts and Religious Courts and examine the challenges of evidence in the development of digital justice. The study uses normative legal methods with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials are obtained through literature studies and analyzed qualitatively through inventory, classification, interpretation, and comparison of legal norms. The results show that both judicial environments have similarities in the recognition of civil evidence based on national civil procedural law. The main findings indicate that differences in evidentiary practices lie more in the context of the application and assessment of evidence according to the characteristics of the case under the authority of each court. In addition, the development of e-Court, e-Litigation, and electronic evidence requires harmonization of evidentiary law to ensure legal certainty, justice, and the effectiveness of the judicial process.  
Co-Authors Abdul Hamid Andika, Cahya Apriyani Livinea , Demu Budiharto, Didik Cahya Andika Dairani, Dairani Dian Prasetyo Fikri, Moh. Lazim Firdaus, Achmad Touwil Gaho, Karsena Hartopo, Arie Mukti Hasanuddin, Moh. Indrajaya, N. Jampung, Higinus Teodosius Kemalasari, Ervira KHOIRUN NISAK Krisno Jatmiko Lelly Muridi Zham-Zham Lutfianidha, Redyana Maryuliyanto Maryuliyanto Maryuliyanto Maryuliyanto, Maryuliyanto Megawati, Ryantha Moh. Hasanuddin Mulya, Bathara Mustariyanto, Wahyu Nuri Hidayati Putra, Vingky Dwi Redyana Lutfianidha Redyana Lutfianidha Redyana Lutfianidha Sutiyani, Sutiyani Wahyu Mustariyanto Wahyu Mustariyanto Wahyu Setyo Nugroho Yosep Heristyo Endro Zham-Zham, Lelly Muridi