Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.332
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MUQODDIMAH : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hummaniora Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities Jurnal Hukum Sehasen Journal Evidence Of Law Dewantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum TOFEDU: The Future of Education Journal Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Journal of Innovative and Creativity Social Sciences Journal JURNAL KELUARGA SEHAT SEJAHTERA International Journal of Society and Law
Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar
Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 41 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 41 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
MEDIASI SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERCERAIAN DAN DAMPAKNYA TERHADAP KESEHATAN Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar
Jurnal Keluarga Sehat Sejahtera Vol. 23 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL KELUARGA SEHAT SEJAHTERA
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24114/jkss.v23i2.69781

Abstract

Mediation as an alternative way to resolve marital disputes is one way to create a more equitable resolution process. The process emphasizes communication and mutual agreement between the parties, thereby reducing the emotional tension that often arises in litigation. Through mediation, disputing couples are given space to express their opinions and find mutually beneficial solutions without having to go through a lengthy court process. From a health perspective, mediation has a positive impact because it can reduce stress, depression, and psychological distress commonly experienced by divorcing couples. Furthermore, mediation also contributes to the mental health stability of children affected by divorce, as the process is more peaceful and prioritizes family well-being. Thus, mediation serves not only as an alternative legal instrument but also as a means of psychological and social recovery for the disputing parties. This research confirms that the application of mediation in divorce disputes can be an effective and healthy solution, both from a legal perspective and for the health of individuals and families.
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Terhadap Driver Transportasi Online Ireny Natalia Putri Sihite; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar; Ismaidar Ismaidar
Jurnal Ilmiah Muqoddimah: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hummaniora Vol 10, No 2 (2026): Mei 2026
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/jim.v10i2.2026.1141-1148

Abstract

Keberadaan layanan transportasi online di Indonesia telah membuka kesempatan kerja yang luas dan meningkatkan efisiensi mobilitas masyarakat yang berdampak positif bagi sebagian masyarakat. Namun, perkembangan tersebut membawa potensi berupa meningkatnya risiko kekerasan terhadap para pengemudi driver  transportasi online.Dimana insiden penganiayaan sering terjadi,  dari pertengkaran kecil hingga tindak kekerasan berat yang disertai ancaman atau perampokan, menunjukkan bahwa driver transportasi online menghadapi situasi kerja yang rentan. Meski tercantum dalam KUHP kenyataannya dalam praktik penegakannya tidak selalu berjalan efektif dan sesuai harapan.Penelitian ini  memperlihatkan bahwa perlindungan hukum bagi driver tidak hanya bergantung pada penegakan hukum pidana yang tertulis dalam KUHP, namun perlu adanya peran perusahaan dalam menyediakan mekanisme keamanan yang memadai terhadap driver transportasi online. Maka dari itu, diperlukan sinergi antara aparat penegak hukum, penyedia layanan transportasi online, dan masyarakat untuk bekerja sama memperkuat upaya pencegahan serta memberikan efek jera melalui tindakan represif terhadap pelaku kekerasan
The Existence of Customary Criminal Law within National Criminal Law after the Enactment of the New Criminal Code Andronius Basado Siahaan; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar; Ismaidar Ismaidar; Martinus Bosko Sinaga; Sonya Evalin Br. Silalahi
The Future of Education Journal Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Continued
Publisher : Lembaga Penerbitan dan Publikasi Ilmiah Yayasan Pendidikan Tumpuan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61445/tofedu.v5i2.1812

Abstract

The existence of customary law in the reform of national criminal law is a critical issue within the context of Indonesia’s pluralistic legal system. As the indigenous law of the Indonesian people, customary criminal law is, in essence, an integral part of the Indonesian legal system. The reform of Indonesian cri minal law to replace colonial criminal law has accommodated customary criminal law as the basis for its legalization or recognition within the New Criminal Code (KUHP). This study examines the existence of customary criminal law within the national criminal legal system following the enactment of the new Criminal Code (Law No. 1 of 2023). This topic was chosen because it highlights the urgency of recognizing local legal values (living law) within the national system. The research employs a literature review method with a normative legal approach. These findings are crucial for strengthening the synergy between national law and local wisdom to foster an inclusive legal system.
Reverse Evidence System in Corruption Crime: Critical Analysis, Obstacles and Challenges Fitra Mamanda Tarigan; Muhammad Arif Sahlepi; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar
International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) (Special Issue) - International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) - January
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/ijhess.v7i1.6491

Abstract

This research aims to discuss the legal arrangements of reverse evidence in corruption trials and comprehensively examine the obstacles and challenges of reverse evidence in corruption cases. The type of research is normative juridical, which discusses certain legal phenomena and analyses them based on laws or norms that live in society. The results of this study show that the reverse proof system is regulated in the provisions of Article 37, Article 37A, and Article 38B of Law Number 31 of 1999 as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption, which states the defendant's obligation to prove otherwise against property owned not derived from the proceeds of corruption crimes. Reverse proof of corruption crimes has obstacles and challenges such as legal substance factors, focus of proof, inconsistency, violation of rights, and resistance of law enforcement. The challenges of reverse proof are: improving the performance, professionalism, and integrity of law enforcement officials, as well as the clarity of regulations to apply reverse evidence outside of corruption crimes such as narcotics and terrorism.
Paradoks Pembaruan Hukum Pidana terhadap Pengurangan Ancaman Pidana Minimum Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Aswindari Harahap; Ismaidar Ismaidar; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar; Alfonso Pahala Manihuruk; Bambang Agus Pariyono; Briski Viktor Sinaga; Derta Simbolon
Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Juni: Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Universitas 45 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30640/dewantara.v5i2.6992

Abstract

Corruption has long been regarded as an extraordinary crime due to its extensive impact on state finances, the national economy, and public trust in government institutions. As part of Indonesia's commitment to combating corruption, Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes established relatively severe special minimum penalties, particularly under Article 2 paragraph (1). However, through Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code, corruption offenses were reformulated under Articles 603 to 606, including changes to the minimum criminal sanctions for certain corruption offenses. This study aims to analyze the reformulation of corruption offenses in the Criminal Code and to examine the paradox arising from the reduction of minimum criminal penalties within Indonesia’s criminal law reform policy. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The data utilized are secondary legal materials collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively. The findings reveal that Article 603 of the Criminal Code substantially adopts the provisions of Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law Number 31 of 1999, while reducing the minimum imprisonment from four years to two years. This change reflects a new orientation emphasizing sentencing flexibility and individualization of punishment. Nevertheless, it also creates a paradox because the reduction applies to corruption, an offense that has long been classified as an extraordinary crime. Therefore, Indonesia’s criminal law reform continues to face challenges in balancing the modernization of the sentencing system with the consistency of anti-corruption policies.
Reformulasi Living Law dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dan Tantangannya terhadap Asas Legalitas Haris Habibi; Ismaidar Ismaidar; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar; Khairuddin Siregar; Jhoni Muda Pratama Barus; Medi Islamta Sembiring; Doni Sabda Tanjung
Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Juni: Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Universitas 45 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30640/dewantara.v5i2.7285

Abstract

The enactment of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code recognizes living law as part of Indonesia’s criminal justice system through Articles 2, 96, and 597. This reform reflects a significant shift in Indonesia’s criminal law by accommodating legal pluralism and the diverse values existing within society. This study examines the reformulation of living law in the Criminal Code, analyzes the resulting paradigm shift in criminal law, and evaluates its implications for the principle of legality. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials were collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that the recognition of living law moves Indonesia’s criminal law from a strictly formal legality approach toward a more pluralistic framework by incorporating societal norms into the national legal system. Nevertheless, this recognition raises challenges concerning legal certainty, consistency in the application of criminal law, and the protection of the principle of legality. Therefore, effective implementation requires balancing respect for legal diversity with the need to maintain legal certainty and uphold the fundamental principles of modern criminal law.
The Role of The Asahan District Prosecutor’s Office in Terminating Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice in Traffic Accidenct Cases Resulting in Death Clara Hotmaida Siregar; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar; Rahmayanti Rahmayanti
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v5i2.2654

Abstract

This study aims to examine the role of the Asahan District Prosecutor’s Office in implementing the termination of prosecution based on restorative justice in traffic accident cases resulting in fatalities. This research adopts a normative legal approach, focusing on the analysis of applicable positive legal norms, including statutory regulations, legal principles, and legal doctrines related to the role of the Prosecutor’s Office in applying restorative justice mechanisms. The findings indicate that the Asahan District Prosecutor’s Office plays a significant role in facilitating case resolution through a restorative justice approach by considering humanitarian values, reconciliation between the offender and the victim’s family, and the restoration of the original condition. The termination of prosecution is carried out in accordance with prevailing legal provisions, particularly the Regulation of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia concerning the termination of prosecution based on restorative justice. However, in practice, several challenges remain, including differing public perceptions of justice, limited understanding among the parties involved, and emotional factors experienced by the victim’s family in accepting reconciliation. This study concludes that the application of restorative justice in fatal traffic accident cases can serve as an effective alternative dispute resolution mechanism, provided that both formal and substantive requirements are fulfilled and supported by mutual agreement between the parties. Therefore, it is necessary for the Prosecutor’s Office to enhance its role through increased public outreach, strengthening the capacity of law enforcement officers, and developing clear guidelines to ensure legal certainty and a sense of justice within society.
Legal Analysis of Judges Considerations on The Differences in Decisions of Acuitting All Legal Claims at The District Court Level and The Cassation Level in Cases of Illegal Plantation Land Control Erlina Damanik; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar; Ismaidar Ismaidar
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v5i2.2655

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the judicial reasoning underlying the differences in decisions of acquittal from all legal charges (onslag van alle rechtsvervolging) between the District Court and the cassation level in cases involving unlawful control of plantation land. These differing decisions indicate variations in legal interpretation, particularly regarding the application of the elements of criminal offenses and the assessment of evidentiary facts presented during trial. The research employs a normative legal method with both statutory and case-based approaches. Data were collected through library research, including the analysis of court decisions, statutory regulations, and relevant legal literature. The findings reveal that judges at the District Court level, acting as judex facti, tend to focus on factual examination and conclude that the defendant’s conduct does not fulfill the elements of a criminal offense, resulting in a decision of acquittal from all charges. In contrast, at the cassation level, the Supreme Court, as judex juris, identifies errors in the application of law by the judex facti, particularly in interpreting the element of unlawfulness and the relationship between the defendant’s actions and the applicable criminal provisions. These differences in judicial decisions reflect the existence of interpretative space within criminal law, as well as the importance of consistency in the application of legal norms.This study concludes that such discrepancies in judicial decisions are influenced not only by the factual circumstances of the case but also by the perspectives of judges in interpreting the law. Therefore, clearer guidelines are required to ensure legal certainty and uniformity in judicial decisions within criminal justice practice.
Legal Certainty Regrading the Authority to Calculate State Losses in Corruption Cases Sakramen Sembiring; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar; Sumarno Sumarno
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v5i2.2656

Abstract

This study aims to examine legal certainty concerning the authority to calculate state financial losses in corruption cases, while also assessing the implications arising from overlapping institutional mandates within judicial practice. The central issue lies in regulatory inconsistencies and differing interpretations regarding which institutions are authorized to determine state losses, often involving the Audit Board of Indonesia (BPK), the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (BPKP), as well as independent experts. This research employs a normative legal method, utilizing statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by an analysis of court decisions and relevant legal literature.The findings reveal that the absence of clear and consistent regulations governing the authority to assess state losses contributes significantly to legal uncertainty in the evidentiary process of corruption cases. Divergent perspectives between law enforcement agencies and auditing institutions lead to inconsistent judicial decisions, thereby undermining the principles of legal certainty and justice. Furthermore, reliance on loss calculations produced by different institutions without uniform standards raises doubts regarding the validity and reliability of the quantified state losses used as the basis for criminal sentencing. In conclusion, regulatory harmonization and a clear delineation of institutional authority are urgently required to ensure legal certainty in the enforcement of anti-corruption laws. Such measures are essential to promote a fair, transparent, and accountable judicial system.
Legal Analysis Of Personal Data Hacking: Study Of Decision Number 958/PID.SUS/2020/PN PBR Angga Sahputra Sirait; Rahmayanti Rahmayanti; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar
Social Sciences Journal Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): August
Publisher : Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/sosj.v3i2.1847

Abstract

The expansion of digital services has increased exposure to cybercrime, particularly phishing-based hacking and personal data theft. This study analyzes Indonesian criminal-law regulation of illegal access and personal data misuse, evaluates law-enforcement implementation under the Electronic Information and Transactions framework, and examines criminal liability in Decision Number 958/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Pbr. A normative juridical design was applied using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, with secondary legal materials consisting of legislation, legal literature, and the court decision. The analysis shows that current cybercrime regulation operates through an integrated framework combining Law Number 1 of 2024 on Electronic Information and Transactions and Law Number 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection. Enforcement nevertheless remains constrained by offender anonymity, digital-evidence complexity, and cross-border jurisdiction. The examined decision established criminal responsibility for phishing and carding, but the sentence of one year and two months was relatively limited when viewed against the present legal framework. Effective enforcement should therefore combine proportional punishment, stronger digital-forensic capacity, and mechanisms that restore victims' economic and privacy rights.
Co-Authors Abdi Ridho Ahbym Faizan Alberto Paskah Tarigan Alfonso Pahala Manihuruk Andi Gultom Andronius Basado Siahaan Angga Sahputra Sirait Ari Antonius Sibarani Aswindari Harahap Aulia Rahman Hakim Hasibuan Bambang Agus Pariyono Bambang Harianto Bima Lumbanbatu Briski Viktor Sinaga Cindi Patricia Surbakti Clara Hotmaida Siregar Derta Simbolon Dio Dera Darmawan Doni Sabda Tanjung Eddy Eddy Eri Siswanto Erlina Damanik Erwin Juliandi Sipakkar Etty Uyun Farlin Subeki Fauzan Fitra Mamanda Tarigan Freddi Agus Hutapea Haris Habibi Haykal Ramadhan Adrianto Hempi Wanty Saragih Henry Aspan Imam Saputra Ireny Natalia Putri Sihite Ismaidar Ismaidar Ismaidar I, Ismaidar Ismaidar Ismaidar Ismaidar Ismaidar Ismaidar Ismaidar Ismaidar Ismaidar Jhoni Muda Pratama Barus Kaaisar Romolus Deo Sianipar Kevin Maisyan Rizaldi Mendrofa Khairuddin Siregar Leonard Martinus Bosko Sinaga Medi Islamta Sembiring Meutia, Cut Yeni Mhd. Azhali Siregar Muhammad Arif Sahlepi Muhammad Reza Triangga Triangga Musannif Nadia Novitri Hasibuan Nora Elida Manurung Rahmayanti Rahmayanti Rahmayanti Rahmayanti Rahmayanti Rahmayanti Redyanto Sidi Rico Nur Ilham Rifqi Fairuz Ula Rio Aginta Ginting Riza Firdaus Rohasiholan Doloksaribu Sagita Ifani Emri Sagita Purnomo Sakramen Sembiring Sardi Sidi, Redyanto Sonya Evalin Br. Silalahi Sri Devi Zebua Suci Ramadani Suci Ramadani Suci Ramadani Sudarno Hariadi Nasution Sumarno Sumarno Sumarno Syahranuddin Utari Debora Yoshep Ferdinand Sitompul Zulfahmi Harahap