Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
6.663
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pembaharuan Hukum Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum el-Madib: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam Didaktika Religia Qawanin: Journal of Economic Syaria Law International Journal of Law and Society
Nurbaedah, Nurbaedah
Universitas Islam Kadiri
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 52 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 52 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
KAJIAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN PERKARA CERAI GUGAT TERKAIT DENGAN PEMENUHAN HAK ISTRI PASCA PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA (Perbandingan Putusan No. 575/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Kdr dan Putusan No. 97/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Mtp) Riskawati, Riskawati; Nurbaedah, Nurbaedah
MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 13 No 1 (2024): Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/mizan.v13i1.5337

Abstract

SEMA No. 2 of 2019 which accommodates PERMA No. 3 of 2017 concerning guidelines for trying cases of women dealing with the law makes new legal protection for women seeking justice, including divorced wives. Where the contents of the SEMA and PERMA allow a divorced wife to be sued to ask for her post-divorce rights, one of which is maintenance Iddah and sustenance mut'ah. However, in practice, in several Religious Courts the panels of judges still have differences in the legal considerations used regarding the burden of living Iddah and sustenance mut'ah. As for the focus of this research, namely examining the rights of the wife who filed for divorce and the considerations of the panel of judges regarding the decision of the divorce case, claim No. 575/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Kdr and case No. 97/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Mtp when viewed from SEMA No.2 of 2019. This study uses a type of normative legal research using statutory approaches, case approaches, and comparative approaches in analyzing legal issues. The technique of collecting legal materials in this study was carried out by means of inventorying legal materials, identifying legal discussion, classifying legal materials, systematizing legal materials, and interpreting legal materials. Furthermore, documents in the form of court decisions are analyzed using descriptive analysis techniques using deductive legal reasoning or legal syllogisms. The results of this study can be concluded as follows: First, a wife who in this case is dealing with the law after a divorce, a wife has rights which can be requested from her ex-husband, these rights are contained in KHI 149, namely:Mut'ah, Nakah Iddah, Dowry Owed, Hadhanah fees for children. Second, In the decision of matter No. 575/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Kdr and matter No. 97/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Mtp there is a difference in the warning the decision handed down by the Panel of Judges regarding the imposition of living rights Iddah and sustenance mut'ah. In case decision No. 575/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Kdr, the Panel of Judges decided that the Plaintiff was not entitled to a living Iddah and sustenance mut'ah. Because in the consideration of the panel of judges only referred to KHI. Meanwhile in case No. 97/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Mtp The Panel of Judges decided that the Plaintiff is entitled to these rights. Because in their consideration the Panel of Judges has applied the rules in SEMA No. 2 of 2019.
The Partij Akta Principle vs. Legal Precedent: How Divergent Interpretations in Indonesian Courts Create Uncertainty in Land Dispute Resolution Nurbaedah; Hayeemaming, Marwan
International Journal of Law and Society Vol 4 No 3 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society (IJLS)
Publisher : NAJAHA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59683/ijls.v4i3.131

Abstract

Land disputes in Indonesia continue to pose significant challenges due to structural judicial inconsistencies, overlapping statutory and customary claims, and institutional weaknesses, generating legal uncertainty that undermines equitable land governance and social stability. This study critically examines doctrinal divergences between the Kediri District Court and East Java High Court decisions. It develops policy recommendations to harmonize procedural and substantive justice, including the potential integration of customary law into formal dispute resolution mechanisms. Using a qualitative doctrinal legal research design with descriptive-analytical methods, the study analyzes primary and secondary legal materials through documentary and content analysis, supported by comparative and interpretative approaches to contextualize judicial divergence within Indonesia's broader legal and social framework. The findings reveal a fundamental judicial divergence: the lower court emphasized substantive legal certainty based on prior rulings. In contrast, the appellate court prioritized procedural rigor under the Partij Akta principle, resulting in inconsistent outcomes despite identical factual circumstances. This contrast illustrates the structural tension between legal certainty and procedural fairness, highlighting systemic challenges in Indonesia’s civil law system. The study concludes that resolving land disputes requires an integrated approach combining judicial specialization, harmonized evidentiary standards, and coordinated institutional mechanisms to achieve predictable, equitable, and socially responsive governance. Academically, it offers a conceptual framework for understanding judicial divergence. At the same time, practically, it provides concrete recommendations, including specialized land courts, strengthened mediation pathways, and improved coordination between judicial and land administration bodies. Limitations include the focus on a limited number of cases and the doctrinal emphasis, which does not empirically track reform implementation. Future research should assess the effectiveness of proposed reforms, examine comparative cases in pluralistic legal systems, and explore long-term impacts on investment, social stability, and equitable land governance.
Co-Authors Agustina, Inge Agyl Jatikusuma, R. Maredian Al-Mighfar, Anas Amrulloh, Muhammad Wahyu Anita Rahmawati Anugrah, Eka Fifty Asrori, Mokhamad Ayu Ningsih, Delvia Bambang Budiono Bambang Sugianto Britama, Azriel Putra Candra Surya Kurniawan Dharmawan, Eka Yudha Gusmiarto, Dodik Hayeemaming, Marwan Hendrawan, Rizki Bagus Hermawan, Yudi Hidayah, Fajar Khoirul Indriyanto, Anang Ismail Marzuki Juliati, Atik Lestari, Mega Zuni Eka Listiana, Enik M. Rizal Fahmi M. Saifuddin Zuhri, M. Saifuddin Machmud, Yudhy Marza, Iber Matsnal Hakim, Muassisil Husna Mindarsih, Mindarsih Mubarok, Dzikri Muhammad Nur Rahardian, Alvin Rinto Syahputra, Mochamad Zanu Riskawati Riskawati, Riskawati Rofi'an, Moh Rofik, HIdayatur Rokhim, Moh. Kholilul Rudiana Rudiana, Rudiana Sari, Nawang Dwiparvita Sujatmiko, Iwan Aji Sulistyo, Gagot Suparyanto, Bambang Surnawan, Eko Idya Susilo Raga, Dimas Hendrawan Teguh Ariyanto Tri Oktovia, Mochammad Andrie Trijanto, Mohammad Tustarama, Rekha Widyaningrum, Fitria Ayu Wiwin Narti Wulandari, Kartika Ika Yudhy Machmud