Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
9.202
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pembaharuan Hukum Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Didaktika Religia Qawanin: Journal of Economic Syaria Law
Nurbaedah, Nurbaedah
Universitas Islam Kadiri
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 74 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 74 Documents
Search

 3   4   5   6   7 
EFEKTIVITAS PENEGAKAN HUKUM ADMINISTRASI TERHADAP PELANGGARAN IZIN USAHA PENGELOLAAN DI BIDANG PETERNAKAN ( Studi Di Kecamatan Banyakan Kabupaten Kediri ) Rudiana, Rudiana; Nurbaedah, Nurbaedah
MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 13 No 1 (2024): Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/mizan.v13i1.5339

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to obtain a general description of the effectiveness of administrative law enforcement against violations of management business permits in the livestock sector in order to improve the quality of public services at the Licensing Office of Kediri Regency. To answer the above objectives, the method in this study refers to the type of evaluation research that examines the effectiveness of administrative law enforcement against violations of management business licenses in the livestock sector at the Licensing Service of Kediri Regency with technical data collection using in-depth interviews and observations. While the informants in this study were the Head of the Kediri Regency Licensing Service, the Head of the Field, the Head of the Section, and the Staff. To analyze the data using qualitative analysis techniques with interactive analysis models, namely analysis that moves in three components, namely: data reduction, data analysis, drawing conclusions and verification. Based on the research findings, conclusions can be drawn. The formalization aspect shows that licensing regulations often experience changes in accordance with developments in social and economic dynamics of society and not all types of permits are made in the form of Regional Regulations (Perda). The centralization aspect is good, as evidenced by the existence of an intense coordination system every week to address and evaluate issues related to permits that are being processed. In addition, there is also a control sheet (routing slip) which is a control tool from the agency on staff performance related to congestion or delays in the licensing process. Aspects of specialization, in terms of quantity and quality of human resources is very lacking. However, to overcome these problems, the Licensing Service is conducting capacity building with in-house training and staff training. With the effectiveness of administrative law enforcement against violations of management business permits in the livestock sector, the quality of service to farmers has improved with the results of customer assessments based on the Breeder Satisfaction Index (IKP) and being in the good category. Therefore, the suggestions and recommendations in this study are: First, for licensing regulations in the Licensing Service, all types of permits should be regulated/stated in the form of Regional Regulations (Perda), so that the level of supervision and enforcement has certainty by the Kediri District Government. Second, to improve the limited quantity and quality of staff at the Licensing Service, it is necessary to add technical skills for staff related to technical licensing that require competency in accordance with licensing.
PENANGANAN PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PERDATA PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM REGESTER PERKARA NOMOR 13/PDT.G/2019/PN Kdr (Study Kasus Di Pengadilan Negeri Kediri) Hidayah, Fajar Khoirul; Nurbaedah, Nurbaedah
MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 12 No 2 (2023): Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/mizan.v12i2.4851

Abstract

The purpose of the research in the settlement of civil cases is the study of cases of unlawful acts, case registration number 13/Pdt.G/2019/PN Kdr/2019 at the Kediri District Court to study and find out the construction of civil law in the trial process of civil judges in the event of the commencement of unlawful acts. using the birth certificate Number 126/IND/1971 in the name of Endang Murtiningrum as the basis for requesting a Declaration of Inheritance to replace the form of SHM Number 31/Desa Singonegaran on behalf of Toeminah bint Sastrorejo, the wife of Moersad who did not have biological children during her lifetime. Through the method of inheritance, researchers analyzed using empirical methods based on legal identification in civil case court decisions at the Kediri District Court Number 13/Pdt.G/2019/PN Kdr jucto Decision of the Surabaya High Court regester Number 604/PDT/2019/PT.SBY jucto Decision Cassation Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia esia Regester Number 2800 K/Pdt/2020 jucto decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 251 PK/Pdt/2022 which is the basis for consideration of judicial judges in examining, considering and deciding (object of dispute) in civil lawsuits which are null and void. the name of Endang Murtiningrum, Declaration of inheritance and SHM No. 2139/Kelurahan in the name of Endang Murtingrum by returning to the origin of SHM No. 31/Desa Singonegaran on behalf of Toeminah bint Sastrorejo who died in 1994 in Singonegaran Village, Pesantren District, Kediri City.
PELAKSANAAN PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA DI PENGADILAN AGAMA KABUPATEN KEDIRI (STUDI PERKARA NOMOR: 162/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Kab.Kdr) Matsnal Hakim, Muassisil Husna; Nurbaedah, Nurbaedah
MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 14 No 1 (2025): Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/mizan.v14i1.7619

Abstract

Putusnya hubungan perkawinan karena perceraian akan berpengaruh dalam harta perkawinan yang diperoleh selama ikatan perkawinan. Harta bersama biasanya baru dipersoalkan oleh pasangan suami isteri ketika adanya putusan perccerian dari pengadilan. Bahkan dalam proses pembagian harta bersama sering terjadi keributan dikarenakan masing-masing pihak mengklaim bahwa harta ini dan itu merupakan bagian atau hak-hak para pihak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana pengaturan hukum pembagian harta bersama menurut Kompilasi hukum Islam, mengetahui pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus perkara oembagian harta bersama akibat perceraian dan mengetahui hambatan-hambatan dalam pelaksaan pembagian harta bersama akibat perceraian pada putusan nomor 162/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Kab.Kdr. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis empiris. Penelitian bersifat deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini adalah pelaksanaan pembagian harta bersama diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomro 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan Pasal 35 sampai 37, Kompilasi Hukum Islam Pasal 85 sampai 97. Apabila dalam pelaksanaan pembagian harta bersama tidak bisa secara damai maka dapat menyelesaikannya di Pengadilan Agama. Pembagian harta bersama akibat perceraian pada putusan nomor 162/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Kab.Kdr menyatakakan bahwa harta bersama berupa sebidang tanah dengan bangunan rumah di atasnya dan satu uni kendaraan roda 4. Hambatan-hambatan dalam pelaksanaan pembagian harta bersama diantaranya kehadiran pihak Tergugat, ada dendam yang tidak terselesaikan, faktor orang luar yang ikut masuk dalam masalah harta bersama seperti ibu, ipar, dsb. Selain itu terdapat pula hambatan berupa unsur non hukum dengan menghalang-halangi atau memperumit proses pembagian harta bersama sehingga pengadilan kemudian melakukan langkah selanjutnya berupa eksekusi
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI AHLI WARIS PEMEGANG LETTER C ATAS TANAH YANG BELUM MELAKSANAKAN PENDAFTARAN TANAH (Studi Di Desa Getas Kecamatan Tanjunganom Kabupaten Nganjuk) Budiono, Bambang; Nurbaedah, Nurbaedah
MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 13 No 1 (2024): Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/mizan.v13i1.5330

Abstract

This study examines the legal protection for heirs of letter c holders on land who have not carried out land registration. Land is something that is very important and has a high value, because land is synonymous with running the wheel of people's lives. Ownership of land rights which has been explained by the UUPA must go through registration of ownership rights to the land so as to give rise to legal certainty over these rights. The purpose of this study is to analyze how the legal rights for heirs to land with proof of letter c have never been carried out by land registration and how land rights are transferred to heirs in connection with the obligation to register land which is still registered as evidence of letter c. This research method uses empirical legal research. The results of this study explain that where letter c is proof of the right to ownership of a land before the existence of the UUPA which regulates certificates as proof of legal land rights and has been regulated therein so that people currently use legal certificates for ownership of land rights. And the legal transfer of ownership from Letter C to a certificate has been regulated in Article 19 of the UUPA, through the National Land Agency so that the proof of ownership of the land which was originally letter c changed to form in the form of a certificate, due to the existence of the UUPA which regulates certificates as land ownership rights to make letter c has no definite legal force
PELAKSANAAN PENDAFTARAN TANAH UNTUK PERTAMA KALI PENGAKUAN HAK SECARA SPORADIK DI KABUPATEN KEDIRI Agustina, Inge; Nurbaedah, Nurbaedah
MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 12 No 2 (2023): Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/mizan.v12i2.4852

Abstract

Pendaftaran tanah diselenggarakan dengan mengingat keadaan Negara dan masyarakat, keperluan lalu lintas sosial ekonomi serta kemungkinan penyelenggaraannya. Tanah merupakan hajat hidup setiap orang, itu benar adanya. Setiap jengkal tanah di mata hukum keagrariaan harus jelas status hak dan pemegang haknya. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah : 1) Untuk menganalisis pelaksanaan pendaftaran tanah pertama kali secara sporadik di Kabupaten Kediri; 2) Untuk menganalisis faktor hambatan pelaksanaan pendaftaran tanah pertama kali secara sporadik di Kabupaten Kediri Pendekatan penelitian adalah yuridis empiris dengan cara menelaah dan mempelajari peraturan-peraturan yang ada, disamping itu dengan memperhatikan aspek-aspek pelaksanaan, baik praktek maupun operasionalnya, dan kejadian-kejadian yang ada dimasyarakat Hasil penelitian dan pembahasan menyimpulkan bahwa : 1) Pelaksanaan kegiatan pendaftaran tanah untuk pertama kali secara sporadik pada tanah yang belum bersertipikat di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Kediri telah dilaksanakan sesuai dengan prosedur ketentuan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 dan Peraturan pelaksanaanya; 2) Hambatan-hambatan yang ditemui sehingga pelaksanaan pendaftaran tanah di Kabupaten Kediri, dapat dibagi atas 2 kelompok yaitu: a) Kondisi internal di kantor pertanahan Kabupaten Kediri, letaknya jauh, kekurangan tenaga pelaksana di lapangan dan terbatasnya anggaran untuk mengadakan penyuluhan. B) Kondisi masyarakat, yaitu masih rendahnya pengetahuan dan tingginya biaya yang harus dikeluarkan untuk pendaftaran tanah.
PELAKSANAAN SENGKETA GUGATAN WARIS DI PENGADILAN AGAMA KABUPATEN KEDIRI ( STUDY KASUS PERKARA NOMOR: 1113/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Kab.Kdr ) Susilo Raga, Dimas Hendrawan; Nurbaedah, Nurbaedah
MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 14 No 1 (2025): Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/mizan.v14i1.7613

Abstract

Penulisan ini mengkaji pelaksanaan sengketa gugatan waris di pengadilan agama kabupaten kediri (studi kasus perkara nomor:1113/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Kab.Kdr ). Tujuan dari penelitian ini antara lain untuk menganalisis bagaimana jalannya pelaksanan pada sengketa gugatan waris beserta hambatan apa saja yang di alami saat terjadinya proses sengketa waris di pengadilan agama kabupaten Kediri. Karena dalam proses persidangan akan menghasilkan putusan/penetapan yang dapat mengakomodir keinginan penggugat/pemohon,yang harus dllaksanakan pihak-pihak dalam perkara yang di ajukan ke pengadilan. Dapat diketahui bahwa pelaksanaan sengketa gugatan waris di Pengadilan Agama memperlihatkan tantangan yang signifikan. Beberapa faktor yang memengaruhi efektivitas proses penyelesaian sengketa antara lain ketidaksepahaman antara pihak-pihak yang bersengketa, kompleksitas hukum waris, dan kekurangan sumber daya manusia serta sarana prasarana di Pengadilan Agama. Selain itu, pendekatan mediasi dan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa perlu lebih dipromosikan dan diterapkan secara luas dalam penyelesaian sengketa waris. Hal ini dapat mengurangi beban kerja Pengadilan Agama dan memberikan kesempatan bagi pihak-pihak yang bersengketa untuk mencapai kesepakatan yang saling menguntungkan.
PERAN PENYIDIK DALAM MENGUNGKAP TINDAK PIDANA PENGALIHAN OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA (Studi di Polres Kediri) Kurniawan, Candra Surya; Nurbaedah, Nurbaedah
MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 12 No 2 (2023): Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/mizan.v12i2.4848

Abstract

This research, if in the process of investigation activities are slow to complete, then this is contrary to the Chief of Police Regulation Number 6 of 2019 concerning Investigation of Criminal Acts and the Chief of Police Regulation No. 12 of 2009 concerning Supervision and Control of the Handling of Criminal Cases within the Republic of Indonesia Police, article 31 which regulates the time limit for examining and settling cases, namely 120 days for investigations of very difficult cases, 90 days for investigations of difficult cases, 60 days for investigations of medium cases, 30 day for easy case investigations. For this reason, regarding this issue we as writers are interested in conducting legal research entitled The Role of Investigators in uncovering criminal acts of transferring fiduciary objects (Studies at the Kediri Police) with the formulation of the problem The Role of Investigators in Revealing the Crime of Transferring Collateral Objects Fiduciary and investigators' obstacles in uncovering cases of transfer of fiduciary guarantee objects. This type of research uses empirical research with interviews. Data collection techniques use books, legislation, decisions, the internet, and journals. Data analysis techniques use inductive methods to take problems and conclusions obtained from the field. The results of this study in the Role of Investigators in Exposing the Crime of Diversion of Fiduciary Guarantee Objects in the process of investigation and investigation are as follows: Summons, Arrests, Detentions, Confiscations, Examinations. Investigators' obstacles in disclosing cases of transferring fiduciary objects are as follows: The suspect was not present during the investigation process, lost evidence; Investigators cannot detain perpetrators of crimes if they use Article 36 of Law number 42 of 1999 concerning fiduciary guarantees so investigators apply Article 372 of the Criminal Code because in fact the elements in Article 372 of the Criminal Code and Article 36 of Law Number 42 of 1999 are the same, for the investigator applies Article 372 of the Criminal Code to the suspect so that investigators can restrain the suspect; The suspect loses evidence, thus making investigators slow in handling the case and unable to make an arrest. Eliminating evidence makes the object difficult to find
PELAKSANAAN GUGATAN SEDERHANA (SMALL CLAIM COURT) DI PENGADILAN NEGERI KEDIRI Rofi'an, Moh; Nurbaedah, Nurbaedah
MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 14 No 1 (2025): Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/mizan.v14i1.7620

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas terkait gugatan sederhana di Pengadilan Negeri Kediri. Penelitian ini mengkaji tentang pelaksanaan dan tata cara gugatan sederhana di Pengadilan Negeri Kediri. Hal ini dimaksudkan untuk (1) menganalisis pelaksanaan gugatan sederhana di Pengadilan Negeri Kediri dan untuk (2) menganalisis hambatan tentang pelaksanaan gugatan sederhana di Pengadilan Negeri Kediri. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis empiris. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam pelaksanaan Perma no 4 Tahun 2019 di Pengadilan Negeri Kediri masih memiliki banyak kendala dalam Penerapan asas sederhana cepat dan biaya ringan walaupun kelihatannya sudah sesuai dengan ketentuan hukum yang ada namun masih ditemukannya hambatan dan dalam praktiknya di lapangan, hal ini bisa dilihat dimana masih banyak nya problem yang berasal dari internal dan eksternal pengadilan Negeri Kediri. Pengadilan diharapkan agar dapat memberikan informasi yang disampaikan dengan cara lebih menggiatkan lagi sosialisasi mengenai Perma no 4 tahun 2019 ini, karena masih banyaknya masyarakat yang belum mengetahui tentang Perma ini, hal ini diharapkan agar untuk mempermudah para pencari keadilan dalam menyelesaikan Perkaranya di Pengadilan.
PELAKSANAAN PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA BERDASARKAN PERATURAN LEMBAGA KEBIJAKAN PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA PEMERINTAH NOMOR 12 TAHUN 2019 TENTANG PEDOMAN PENYUSUNAN TATA CARA PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA DI DESA (Studi Kasus Pada Desa Gemenggeng Kecamatan Pace Kabupat Sulistyo, Gagot; Nurbaedah, Nurbaedah
MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 14 No 1 (2025): Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/mizan.v14i1.7614

Abstract

Salah satu aktifitas pemerintah dalam upaya mendukung fungsi-fungsinya adalah melakukan pengadaan barang dan jasa (PBJ). Akan tetapi pelaksanaan PBJ hingga saat ini masih banyak ditemui kecurangan-kecurangan yang dilakukan oleh pelaksananya. Di Tahun 2023 Kepala Desa Gemenggeng Kecamatan Pace Kabupaten Nganjuk, ditahan pihak Kejaksaan Negeri Nganjuk, disebabkan Ia mengambil alih kegiatan pengadaan bangunan serta tidak melibatkan pelaksana kegitan dalam proses PBJ sehingga ditemukan adanya kecurangan dalam laporan pertanggungjawaban. Penelitian ini mengkaji pelaksanaan PBJ di Desa Gemenggeng Kecamatan Pace Kabupaten Nganjuk apakah sesuai dengan Peraturan Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah (LKPP) Nomor 12 Tahun 2019 tentang Pedoman Penyusunan Tata Cara Pengadaan Barang/Jasa di Desa serta faktor timbulnya pelanggaran pelaksanaan pengadaan barang dan jasa pada sektor desa. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian empiris. Sumber data dalam penelitian ini adalah sumber data primer dan sumber data sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa pelaksanaan PBJ di Desa Gemenggeng Kecamatan Pace Kabupaten Nganjuk tidak sesuai dengan Peraturan LKPP Nomor 12 Tahun 2019 tentang Pedoman Penyusunan Tata Cara Pengadaan Barang/Jasa di Desa serta faktor timbulnya pelanggaran pelaksanaan pengadaan barang dan jasa pada sektor desa dibagi menjadi dua yaitu faktor internal dan eksternal.
KAJIAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN PERKARA CERAI GUGAT TERKAIT DENGAN PEMENUHAN HAK ISTRI PASCA PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA (Perbandingan Putusan No. 575/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Kdr dan Putusan No. 97/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Mtp) Riskawati, Riskawati; Nurbaedah, Nurbaedah
MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 13 No 1 (2024): Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/mizan.v13i1.5337

Abstract

SEMA No. 2 of 2019 which accommodates PERMA No. 3 of 2017 concerning guidelines for trying cases of women dealing with the law makes new legal protection for women seeking justice, including divorced wives. Where the contents of the SEMA and PERMA allow a divorced wife to be sued to ask for her post-divorce rights, one of which is maintenance Iddah and sustenance mut'ah. However, in practice, in several Religious Courts the panels of judges still have differences in the legal considerations used regarding the burden of living Iddah and sustenance mut'ah. As for the focus of this research, namely examining the rights of the wife who filed for divorce and the considerations of the panel of judges regarding the decision of the divorce case, claim No. 575/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Kdr and case No. 97/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Mtp when viewed from SEMA No.2 of 2019. This study uses a type of normative legal research using statutory approaches, case approaches, and comparative approaches in analyzing legal issues. The technique of collecting legal materials in this study was carried out by means of inventorying legal materials, identifying legal discussion, classifying legal materials, systematizing legal materials, and interpreting legal materials. Furthermore, documents in the form of court decisions are analyzed using descriptive analysis techniques using deductive legal reasoning or legal syllogisms. The results of this study can be concluded as follows: First, a wife who in this case is dealing with the law after a divorce, a wife has rights which can be requested from her ex-husband, these rights are contained in KHI 149, namely:Mut'ah, Nakah Iddah, Dowry Owed, Hadhanah fees for children. Second, In the decision of matter No. 575/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Kdr and matter No. 97/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Mtp there is a difference in the warning the decision handed down by the Panel of Judges regarding the imposition of living rights Iddah and sustenance mut'ah. In case decision No. 575/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Kdr, the Panel of Judges decided that the Plaintiff was not entitled to a living Iddah and sustenance mut'ah. Because in the consideration of the panel of judges only referred to KHI. Meanwhile in case No. 97/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Mtp The Panel of Judges decided that the Plaintiff is entitled to these rights. Because in their consideration the Panel of Judges has applied the rules in SEMA No. 2 of 2019.
Co-Authors Agustina, Inge Agyl Jatikusuma, R. Maredian Al-Mighfar, Anas Alfian, M. Rizki Nur Amrulloh, Muhammad Wahyu Anita Rahmawati Anugrah, Eka Fifty Asrori, Mokhamad Aziz Zamzam, Zanuba Arifia Bagaswara, M. Yoga Bambang Budiono Bambang Sugianto Britama, Azriel Putra Candra Surya Kurniawan Chaliati Dewi, Tutik Mahanani Umi Dharmawan, Eka Yudha Dicky Wahyudi Dimyati, Amalia Ramadhani Gusmiarto, Dodik Hendrawan, Rizki Bagus Hermawan, Yudi Hidayah, Fajar Khoirul Imadhudin, Rizky Ramadhan Indriyanto, Anang Iskandar Zulkarnain Ismail Marzuki Jayanto, Lucky Dwi Juliati, Atik Jumali Jumali Kusuma, Amita Arum Lestari, Mega Zuni Eka Listiana, Enik M. Rizal Fahmi M. Saifuddin Zuhri, M. Saifuddin Machmud, Yudhy Marjuki Marjuki Matsnal Hakim, Muassisil Husna Mindarsih, Mindarsih Mubarok, Dzikri Musafirin, Ardeta Nabil Az Zaidan Mustakim Mustakim Priyastu, Juniar Kintam Rahardian, Alvin Ridwan, Mochammad Robby Rinto Syahputra, Mochamad Zanu Risan Pasha, Rossyda Nurhairy Riskawati Riskawati, Riskawati Rofi'an, Moh Rofik, HIdayatur Rokhim, Moh. Kholilul Rudiana Rudiana, Rudiana Saifudin, Ahmad Ibnu Sari, Nawang Dwiparvita Sasongko, Rama Uji Sokheh, Mohammad Hidayatus Sugeng Supriadi, Sugeng Sujatmiko, Iwan Aji Sulistyo, Gagot Suparyanto, Bambang Surnawan, Eko Idya Susilo Raga, Dimas Hendrawan Sya’bana, Indana Lazulfa Teguh Ariyanto Tri Oktovia, Mochammad Andrie Trijanto, Mohammad Trismawati, Ninik Retno Tustarama, Rekha Wahyudi Wahyudi Widyaningrum, Fitria Ayu Wulandari, Kartika Ika Yudhy Machmud