Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Legal Certainty For The Judiciary That Is Authorized To Adjudicate Corruption Cases That Occurred In Basarnas RI Putra, Reza Alamsyah; Arafat, Zarisnov; Abas, Muhamad
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2419

Abstract

Article 42 of the Corruption Eradication Commission Law grants the KPK (Corruption Eradication Commission) coordinating authority to oversee the investigation, inquiry, and prosecution of corruption crimes jointly committed by legal subjects under the jurisdiction of both military and general courts. The normative juridical research method, as a legal research approach, bases its analysis on literature review or secondary data sources as the primary foundation of the study, conducted through an in-depth examination of legal regulations and various literature references relevant to the issue under review. Based on an analysis of the relevant statutory provisions, it can be concluded that the Basarnas corruption case involving military personnel should be adjudicated by the Corruption Court, with several legal considerations. The Corruption Court is the competent body to try corruption cases within the National Search and Rescue Agency of the Republic of Indonesia, while maintaining institutional coordination between the KPK and the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI) as mandated by the Constitutional Court's decision. An in-depth analysis of the applicable statutory provisions indicates that the legal provisions regarding jurisdiction over corruption cases involving military personnel have undergone a paradigmatic shift from a personal jurisdiction approach to a subject matter jurisdiction approach. Based on this ruling, and considering that the Basarnas corruption case was initially investigated and discovered by the KPK, the Corruption Court is the competent body to adjudicate the case, including that of Air Marshal Henri Alfiandi as an active member of the TNI.
Judges' Considerations On Traffic Accident Cases In Relation To The Law On Road Traffic And Transportation (Decision Study Number: 35/Pid.Sus/2022/Pn.Pwk) Sampurna Banyuaji, Sampurna; Guntara, Deny; Abas, Muhamad
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2410

Abstract

This study analyzes law enforcement in traffic accident cases resulting in fatalities, focusing on Article 310 paragraph (4) of Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation. The main objective is to examine how the law is applied and how judges make considerations in handing down verdicts. Using a normative legal research method, this study analyzes Judgment No. 35/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Pwk. The results show that the defendant, who was negligent and caused the victim's death, was indeed charged under this article, which carries a maximum sentence of six years in prison. However, an interesting finding from this study is the gap between the maximum penalty and the sentence imposed. Although the defendant's actions were proven to violate the article and cause death, the judge imposed a sentence of 4 years in prison, which is lighter than the maximum penalty. This decision was based on legal and non-legal considerations, including mitigating and aggravating factors. It is concluded that this lighter sentence than the maximum penalty is considered contrary to the spirit of Article 310(4) of the LLAJ Law.
Law Enforcement By The Satpol PP Against Violations Of Regional Regulation Number 10 Of 2021 Concerning The Control, Supervision And Restrictions Of The Distribution Of Alcoholic Beverages Without A Permit In Karawang Regency Ramadani, Trisna; Guntara, Deny; Abas, Muhamad
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2411

Abstract

The distribution of alcoholic beverages without a permit in Karawang Regency has become a serious issue affecting public order and community health. To address this matter, the local government enacted Regional Regulation Number 10 of 2021 concerning the Control, Supervision, and Restriction of Unlicensed Alcoholic Beverages. This study aims to examine the regulation on the control, supervision, and restriction of unlicensed alcoholic beverages in Karawang Regency, as well as the law enforcement efforts by Civil Service Investigators (PPNS) of the Karawang Public Order Agency (Satpol PP), and the obstacles faced in implementing the regulation. This research uses a qualitative method with a descriptive approach. Data collection techniques include interviews and observations. The results of the study indicate that The regulation on the control, supervision, and restriction of unlicensed alcoholic beverages in Karawang Regency is governed by Regional Regulation Number 10 of 2021, which classifies alcoholic beverages into Group A, Group B, and Group C. It also stipulates administrative sanctions in Article 16, including written warnings, temporary business closures, business license revocations, and business closures. Criminal sanctions are regulated in Article 18, which states that violators may be fined up to IDR 50,000,000 (fifty million rupiahs) or face imprisonment for up to 3 (three) months. Law enforcement efforts by the Karawang Satpol PP against violations of Regional Regulation Number 10 of 2021 are carried out through field operations, confiscation of evidence, and the imposition of sanctions. In addition, PPNS officers prepare investigation reports and coordinate with the public prosecutor’s office for further legal proceedings. The challenges faced include the lack of authority to detain suspects by PPNS officers, lengthy investigation processes due to the need for coordination with the prosecutor’s office, and changes in administrative systems such as the implementation of the e-Berpadu application, which requires official letters for searches and seizures.
PERAN KEJAKSAAN NEGERI KARAWANG DALAM UPAYA PREVENTIF MENANGGULANGI TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI KABUPATEN KARAWANG Abas, Muhamad; Irwanto, Danang; Dewi, Sartika
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6223

Abstract

Corruption is a serious issue that has a broad impact on economic stability, social structures, and public trust. Karawang Regency, as a region with rapid economic growth, also faces a high risk of corruption. The Karawang District Prosecutor’s Office holds a strategic role in preventive efforts through various educational and supervisory programs. The research problem or main discussion in this study is how the Karawang District Prosecutor’s Office plays a role in preventing corruption crimes and whether the relationship between the legal structure, legal substance, and legal culture can support efforts to prevent corruption by the prosecutor's office. This research is normative legal research with a juridical-normative approach, encompassing statutory and conceptual approaches. The data used are secondary data obtained through literature studies of legislation, prosecutorial policies, and relevant legal literature. Data analysis is carried out descriptively-analytically using legal interpretation techniques and comparative analysis. The research results show that the Karawang District Prosecutor’s Office has implemented various preventive strategies, such as the "Prosecutors Enter Schools" (Jaksa Masuk Sekolah/JMS) Program, the "Prosecutors Guard Villages" (Jaksa Jaga Desa) Program, and the "Prosecutors as Fishermen's Friends" (Jaksa Sahabat Nelayan) Program. In addition, supervision of regional strategic projects is carried out to prevent abuse of authority. However, there are challenges such as limited human resources, lack of coordination between institutions, and low public legal awareness. By strengthening regulations, transparency, and accountability, it is expected that corrupt practices can be minimized and the integrity of government governance can be enhanced
PROBLEMATIKA UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA MENYERANG KEHORMATAN DAN NAMA BAIK DIKAITKAN DENGAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM Devi Arviani Arinta; Guntara, Deny; Abas, Muhamad; Arisa Wongchai
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6305

Abstract

Defamation through electronic media has become an increasingly complex issue amid the rapid development of information technology. Social media facilitates information dissemination but also opens opportunities for the misuse of freedom of expression that may harm others. Article 27A of Law Number 1 of 2024 on Electronic Information and Transactions (EIT Law) has sparked debate due to its ambiguous wording and potential misuse to suppress legitimate criticism. This research employs a normative juridical method by analyzing relevant legislation, legal doctrines, and court decisions. Secondary data were obtained through literature studies and qualitatively analyzed to assess the legal certainty and compatibility of Article 27A with human rights principles, particularly freedom of expression. The findings indicate that Article 27A of the EIT Law remains weak both in its drafting and implementation, especially regarding the phrase "another person," which creates ambiguity and may criminalize public criticism. Such provisions risk being used as a tool of criminalization, contradicting the principle of legal certainty and democratic values guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution. Therefore, a more precise interpretation and revision of Article 27A are necessary to ensure consistency with the principles of legality, legal certainty, and the protection of freedom of expression. .
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENJUALAN OBAT KERAS TANPA RESEP DOKTER DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 17 TAHUN 2023 TENTANG KESEHATAN (Studi Putusan Nomor 302/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Cjr) Prilly Larasati, Dwiana; Guntara, Deny; Abas, Muhamad; Mohamad ArdinSuwandi
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6626

Abstract

This study examines law enforcement mechanisms against the illegal distribution of drug solvents without medical prescription under Law No. 17 of 2023 concerning Health, analyzing the legal framework, enforcement challenges, and policy implications through Decision No. 302/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Cjr. The proliferation of illegal drug sales without medical prescription remains a persistent challenge in Indonesia, driven by factors including public demand for convenient access, cost considerations, and systemic weaknesses in pharmaceutical oversight, creating a critical gap between regulatory provisions and effective law enforcement implementation. Employing a normative legal research approach, this study analyzes positive law provisions, particularly Law No. 17 of 2023 concerning Health and relevant criminal law provisions, to evaluate the legal basis and enforcement mechanisms against unauthorized pharmaceutical distribution. Article 435 of Law No. 17 of 2023 provides a robust legal foundation for prosecuting both individual perpetrators and corporate entities involved in producing or distributing drug solvents without compliance with regulatory requirements. This study finds that Decision No. 302/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Cjr demonstrates the application of the ne bis in idem principle, ensuring defendants are not tried twice for the same criminal act. However, the case reveals significant structural weaknesses in the pharmaceutical regulatory and supervisory systems that continue to undermine effective enforcement. While law enforcement efforts against unauthorized drug distribution have commenced, current mechanisms remain insufficient without comprehensive systemic reform. The judiciary has correctly applied fundamental criminal law principles, yet enforcement success depends on strengthening digital oversight systems, harmonizing cross-sector regulations, and enhancing law enforcement capacity and digital forensics capabilities. This study contributes to legal scholarship by demonstrating the need for an integrated approach combining criminal prosecution, regulatory reform, and institutional capacity building, recommending that policymakers and law enforcement agencies prioritize modernizing pharmaceutical surveillance through digital systems, harmonizing regulations across relevant agencies, and developing specialized law enforcement units equipped with advanced forensic capabilities to effectively combat pharmaceutical crimes.
A Legal Analysis of Simple Verification and Legal Protection for Concurrent Creditors in the Bankruptcy of a Developer (A Case Study of Decision No. 20/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022/PN.Niaga.Smg) Safitri, Diana Alpiani; Rahmatiar, Yuniar; Abas, Muhamad
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2479

Abstract

Bankruptcy is a legal mechanism that provides certainty for creditors when debtors are no longer able to fulfill their payment obligations. This study aims to analyze the legal steps that creditors can take against debtors who are in default based on the Cooperation Agreement Deed, as well as to examine the judge's considerations in deciding bankruptcy cases in the Semarang District Court Decision No. 20/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022/PN.Niaga.Smg in accordance with Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations. The research method used is normative juridical with a constitutional and case approach. The results of the study indicate that the bankruptcy petition was granted because the bankruptcy requirements were met, namely the presence of more than one creditor and debts that had matured as regulated in Article 2 paragraph (1) of the PKPU Law. The panel of judges emphasized the principle of pari passu pro rata parte and the application of the principle of simple proof based on Article 8 paragraph (4) of the PKPU Law as the basis for their considerations. In conclusion, the application of the principle of simple proof in bankruptcy cases effectively provides legal certainty while guaranteeing justice for the parties.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE OLEH PENGADILAN NEGERI DITINJAU DARI UU NO 30 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG ARBITRASE DAN ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA (Studi Kasus Perkara Nomor 861/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2023/PN.Jkt.Brt) Amalia, Lia; Mustika, Mela; Abas, Muhamad; Saprudin
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6195

Abstract

Arbitration as an alternative to resolving business disputes offers a fast, confidential, and final process, but this finality is limited by the provisions of Law Number 30 of 1999 which allows for cancellation under certain conditions. This normative legal research analyzes the legal basis for the cancellation of an arbitration award through a case study of the West Jakarta District Court Decision Number 861/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2023/PN.Jkt.Brt. The results of the study show that cancellation is only permitted based on three limiting reasons in Article 70 of the Arbitration Law. In the case of PT Talkindo Selaksa Anugrah, the judge annulled the BANI decision based on the discovery of important hidden documents and the existence of trickery. The judge's considerations reflect the balance between maintaining the principle of finality of arbitration and upholding substantive justice, although the standard of proof applied is more flexible than international standards. The annulment of an arbitration award must still be seen as an extraordinary corrective mechanism that is applied strictly, without sacrificing the integrity of the arbitration process, because finality should not protect dishonest practices in dispute resolution.
Penerapan Rehabilitasi Bagi Penyalahguna Narkotika Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika (Studi Putusan Nomor: 283/Pid.Sus/2024/Pn Kwg) Suroso, Zulfiansyah Yusuf; Dewi, Sartika; Abas, Muhamad
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v6i1.6246

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas penerapan rehabilitasi terhadap penyalahguna narkotika berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika dengan mengkaji Putusan Nomor 283/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Kwg sebagai objek penelitian. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menilai sejauh mana pertimbangan hakim telah sesuai dengan ketentuan hukum positif, khususnya terkait pemberian rehabilitasi sebagai bentuk pemidanaan alternatif bagi pecandu narkotika. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan konseptual yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa putusan hakim dalam perkara tersebut menjatuhkan pidana penjara terhadap terdakwa meskipun jumlah barang bukti tergolong kecil dan tidak ditemukan indikasi sebagai pengedar. Padahal, Pasal 103 Undang-Undang Narkotika memberikan wewenang kepada hakim untuk menjatuhkan rehabilitasi, baik terhadap terdakwa yang terbukti bersalah maupun tidak. Ketidakhadiran hasil asesmen ketergantungan dari BNN dalam pertimbangan hakim menjadi faktor penghambat diterapkannya pendekatan rehabilitatif. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa masih terdapat ketidaksesuaian antara praktik pemidanaan dan tujuan humanis dalam penanggulangan penyalahgunaan narkotika, sehingga diperlukan peningkatan pemahaman aparat hukum terhadap urgensi rehabilitasi bagi pengguna narkotika.
Pengaruh Judi Online sebagai Penyebab Perceraian Ditinjau dalam Hukum Perkawinan di Indonesia (Studi Putusan No. 2450/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Krw) Latif, Muhammad; Amaliya, Lia; Abas, Muhamad
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v6i1.6287

Abstract

Judi online semakin marak dan mudah diakses melalui teknologi digital yang memberikan dampak signifikan terhadap stabilitas rumah tangga. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan teknik studi pustaka dan dokumentasi hukum. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengkaji pengaruh judi online sebagai penyebab perceraian dalam perspektif hukum perkawinan di Indonesia melalui studi kasus Putusan No. 2450/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Krw di Pengadilan Agama Karawang. Hasil menunjukkan tergugat kecanduan judi online yang menyebabkan tidak terpenuhinya kewajiban nafkah, penjualan harta bersama, serta munculnya kekerasan verbal dan pengusiran terhadap pihak istri. Keadaan tersebut berujung pada pertengkaran berkepanjangan yang tidak dapat didamaikan, meskipun ada proses mediasi. Dalam pertimbangannya, hakim merujuk pada Pasal 39 ayat (2) UU No. 1 Tahun 1974, PP No. 9 Tahun 1975 Pasal 19 huruf f, serta Pasal 116 huruf a dan f Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI), yang menyatakan bahwa perjudian yang sulit disembuhkan dan perselisihan berkepanjangan dapat dijadikan alasan sah untuk perceraian. Hakim menilai bahwa ikatan perkawinan antara penggugat dan tergugat tidak dapat lagi dipertahankan. Pendekatan yuridis dan sosiologis yang digunakan dalam pertimbangan hakim merefleksikan suatu keputusan yang tidak hanya sah secara hukum, tetapi juga adil secara substantif. Peneliti merekomendasikan adanya penguatan regulasi, edukasi masyarakat, serta pendekatan preventif dari keluarga dan lembaga sosial keagamaan dalam menanggulangi dampak destruktif judi online terhadap keutuhan rumah tangga.
Co-Authors Aditia, Fani Agus Antoni, Mochamad Akbar, Muhamad Gary Gagarin Akbar, Muhammad Gary Gagarin Amalia, Sitti Fadilah Amaliya, Lia Anggraeni, Kiki Arafat, Zarisnov Ardiansyah, Aldi Arisa Wongchai Ayomi, Andreas C. Bintang S, Andi Muhamad Chicka Aircheny Dede Nurhayatie Devi Arviani Arinta Dini Nurfalah Febrian, M. Ibnu Gary Gagarin Akbar, Muhamad Gary Gagarin Akbar, Muhammad Gugun Gunawan, Gugun Guntara, Deny Hariawan, Hariawan Hasrinda, Hasrinda Hidayat, Anwar Hilman Alfiansah Himim, Aldora Ananda Putra I Ketut Suardika Ichsan Maulana Irawan, Angki Irwanto, Danang Ixal, Da'i Safuad Kaimuddin, Sitti Mikarna Lestari, Widya Annisa Pudji LIA AMALIA Lubis, Adyan Machestian, Hario Bismo Maharani, Syahwa Makhron, Fiki Muzaki Marhan, Citra Marpaung, Dorkas Mehue, Bruce Mohamad ArdinSuwandi Muhammad Latif Mustika, Mela Nugraha Putra, Muhamad Nugroho, Gynastiar Pratama, Raka Indra Prilly Larasati, Dwiana Putra, Reza Alamsyah R, La Ode Rafiuddin Rahmalia, Indah Rahmatiar , Yuniar Rahmatiar, Yuniar Ramadani, Trisna Rizal Aripin Robillah, Robillah Rudin, Suci Ramadhani Safitri, Diana Alpiani Sahab, Nurlin Sampurna Banyuaji, Sampurna Sanjaya , Suyono Sanjaya, Suyono Saprudin Saripudin, Asep Sartika Dewi Shidqi Mubarok, Muhammad Sihotang, Alex Antonius Sitorus, Leonardo Sukarta, Dimas Tatang Wiro Suroso, Zulfiansyah Yusuf Sutrisno, Sutrisno Syahida, Nadia Taofik Rohman, Paisal Targana, Tatang Triana Dewi, Liza Viyanda, Karina Yulianti, Yuli Yunior Sanu, Primawan Zahra Maharani Hilman, Hanna