Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.023
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Jurnal Basicedu Jambura Law Review JURNAL KESEHATAN DELIMA PELAMONIA Jurnal Eduscience (JES) Jurnal Analisis Hukum International Journal of Educational Management and Innovation (IJEMI) Journal Of Human And Education (JAHE) Jurnal Basicedu Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Journal of Muhammadiyah’s Application Technology INTERACTION: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa AIQU: Journal Multidiscipliner of Science
Agusalim, Agusalim
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Impact of Criminal Code’s Articles 263 & 264: A Critical Look at Press Freedom and Human Rights Nova, Efren; Fernando, Zico Junius; Putra, Panca Sarjana; Agusalim, Agusalim
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 24, No 2 (2024): July Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2024.V24.133-146

Abstract

The public, human rights advocates, and media practitioners have engagedin significant debate regarding Articles 263 and 264 of the new CriminalCode (KUHP). These articles establish laws that criminalize spreadingfalse news that could cause social unrest. The punishments for spreadingsuch information vary depending on the severity and intention behind itsdissemination. Articles 263(1) and (2) differentiate between intentionallyspreading false information that the perpetrator knows is untrue andspreading information that is reasonably believed to be false. The punishmentfor this offense can be imprisonment for up to six years or a maximumfine of category V. Article 264 specifically addresses the act of spreadingfalse information that the perpetrator knows is untrue. Meanwhile, Article264 specifically addresses the act of spreading ambiguous, exaggerated,or incomplete news. Those found guilty can face a maximum penalty oftwo years in prison or a category III fine. This study utilizes normativelegal methodologies, which include statutory, conceptual, comparative,and futuristic approaches. The research design is characterized by bothdescriptive and prescriptive elements. Content analysis was conductedto evaluate the collected data. The study’s findings illustrate that theprimary objective of Articles 263 and 264 of the new Criminal Code is tomaintain public order and deter riots that may arise as a consequence of thedissemination of incorrect information. Nevertheless, these provisions havebeen criticized for their potential to be used as a means to suppress pressfreedom and limit public expression, both of which are fundamental aspectsof democracy and the protection of human rights. Concerns have beenraised about the potential impact of the implementation of these articles onthe protection of press freedom as guaranteed by the Press Law.
Implementation SQ3R Method To Improve Students’ Comprehension Of Reading English Textbook (E-Book) Of Muhammadiyah University Of Buton Said, Ratna; Agusalim, Agusalim
INTERACTION: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Vol. 7 No. 2 (2020): INTERACTION: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Pendidikan Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aimed to determine the improving of students' comprehension in reading English textbook (e-book) through SQ3R at Communication Science Study Program, Muhammadiyah University of Buton. This research was classroom action research. Respondence of this research are 28 students in class B odd semester of 2018/2019 of academic year. The results of this research was to increase reading comprehension of English-language e-book was not too big. This is shown in the written test evaluation results in the second cycle, 5 students got a score of 82 and 5 students got a score of 28 students, and the average value is 66.25 Then, the SQ3R method can not only improve the ability to understand reading, but, the ability to read verbally where students have the opportunity to correct their reading. This is shown by the results of the second cycle evaluation, where 7 students got a score of 80, 6 students got score of 78 and 7 students got score of 75 of 28 students, and the average value was 72,60714286.
Neurolaw: A Concept in Development and Enforcement of Criminal Law in Indonesia Fernando, Zico Junius; Agusalim, Agusalim; Utami, Ria Anggraeni; Albariansyah, Hamonangan; Sacipto, Rian
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 7 NO. 1 JANUARY 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v7i1.24144

Abstract

Neurolaw is an interdisciplinary field that combines law and neuroscience to enhance the understanding of human behavior, decision-making, and their legal implications. This approach is gaining global attention and has potential for application in Indonesia's criminal law system. Neurolaw sheds light on how factors related to the brain and nervous system like impulsivity, mental health issues, and environmental influences can affect criminal behavior and personal accountability. This research, using normative legal method, finds that neurolaw could be valuable in Indonesia's justice system for evaluating testimony, truth, and fairness. Techniques like brain scans and neuropsychological tests offer scientific support for statements made by defendants and witnesses, helping to ensure legal decisions are more objective and just. While neurolaw offers potential advancements for criminal law, it faces challenges in Indonesia. Neuroscience is a complex field that requires specialized knowledge, yet Indonesia currently has few experts in this area. Additionally, the required infrastructure such as brain scanning technology, advanced laboratories, and research funding is limited.
Co-Authors Agus, Jufri Akbar, Azaz Al Hidayat, Taufik Albariansyah, Hamonangan Ali, A Muh Alma Yulianti Arsyad, Zulfikar Defid Fathur Rohman Efren Nova Elianti, Lani Farisatma, Farisatma Farouk Maricar Faslia, Faslia Fathir Mz., Muh. Fernando, Zico Junius Habibudin, Amril Ibanga, Isaac John Irwan Irwan Irwan, Hadriani Jamir, Muh Kamarudin Kamarudin Khafifa, Khafifa Kuba, Muhammad Syafa’at S La Ode Onde, Mitrakasih Lestarika, Dwi Putri Mahmud, Rajib Mahmuddin Mahmuddin Manan, Manan Maricar, Faraouk Nanda, Abd. Rakhim Nasrullah Nasrullah Nurnawaty, Nurnawaty Putra, Panca Sarjana Rachman Saleh Rapi Pajri Ratna Said Riniati, Wa Ode Sacipto, Rian Suarti, Suarti Sukmawati, Dina Sulistyono, Puji Sumantri, Sri Supardi Supardi Suryanti Syamsiar, Syamsiar Syamsuri, Andi Makbul Tarno Tarno Tongeng, Andi Bunga Tria, Tria Usmar, Titin Utami, Ria Anggraeni Yusnan, Muhammad Yusril Yusril