Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
5.041
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DIKSI Semantik : Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Fon: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Ihya al-Arabiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Arab Journal of ICSAR SELAPARANG: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Berkemajuan Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia dan Sastra Jurnal Studi Guru dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Prima Ghancaran: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Jurnal Pena Indonesia Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia dan Sastra (Pendistra) Jurnal Pengabdian UNDIKMA Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Jurnal Genre (Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pembelajarannya) Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIn) Kontribusi: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Sastra Indonesia Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Jurnal Inovasi Global Jurnal Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra Alamtana Asa Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Dimar : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Deiksis: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia
Andri Pitoyo
Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri, Kediri, Indonesia
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 32 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Ghancaran: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia

 1 
PERBEDAAN KETERAMPILAN BERBAHASA PRODUKTIF MAHASISWA DITINJAU DARI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BRAIN DAN INVESTIGASI KELOMPOK Pitoyo, Andri
GHANCARAN: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia SPECIAL EDITION: SEMINAR NASIONAL LALONGET I
Publisher : Tadris Bahasa Indonesia, Fakultas Tarbiyah, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/ghancaran.v0i0.3758

Abstract

Coourse learning outcome (CPMK) provide clear direction for the learning process. In addition, it provides a real picture of actions and teaching and learning behavior for univercity students and lecturs.The learning processes and events that are interesting, fun, innovative, and creative will have a positive effec on the echievement of learning objectives. The statement indirectly requires lectures to design and implement intesting learning models. Facts in the fieldshow that there are many learning models applied by lecturers that are not in accordance with the specified learning outcomes. The learning achievement of produktive language skills (KBP) requires univercity students to be able to produce scientific papers are published in the form of academic seminars. This demand has implications for the teacher's obligation to prepare an interesting, effective, and fun learning model. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the BRAIN learning model on Productive Language Skills. This research was conducted at the Nusantara PGRI Kediri University in the odd semester of the 2019/2020 academic year with a sample of 62 students. The group was divided into 2 namely experiment and control. The experimental group used the BRAIN model and the control class used the Group Investigation model. The results showed that there were differences in the average language skills of students between the experimental class and the control class. If viewed from the KBP, the experimental class has an average value of 65.29 which is better than the control class of 63.88.
PERBEDAAN KETERAMPILAN BERBAHASA PRODUKTIF MAHASISWA DITINJAU DARI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BRAIN DAN INVESTIGASI KELOMPOK Pitoyo, Andri
GHANCARAN: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia SPECIAL EDITION: SEMINAR NASIONAL LALONGET I
Publisher : Tadris Bahasa Indonesia, Fakultas Tarbiyah, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/ghancaran.v0i0.3758

Abstract

Coourse learning outcome (CPMK) provide clear direction for the learning process. In addition, it provides a real picture of actions and teaching and learning behavior for univercity students and lecturs.The learning processes and events that are interesting, fun, innovative, and creative will have a positive effec on the echievement of learning objectives. The statement indirectly requires lectures to design and implement intesting learning models. Facts in the fieldshow that there are many learning models applied by lecturers that are not in accordance with the specified learning outcomes. The learning achievement of produktive language skills (KBP) requires univercity students to be able to produce scientific papers are published in the form of academic seminars. This demand has implications for the teacher's obligation to prepare an interesting, effective, and fun learning model. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the BRAIN learning model on Productive Language Skills. This research was conducted at the Nusantara PGRI Kediri University in the odd semester of the 2019/2020 academic year with a sample of 62 students. The group was divided into 2 namely experiment and control. The experimental group used the BRAIN model and the control class used the Group Investigation model. The results showed that there were differences in the average language skills of students between the experimental class and the control class. If viewed from the KBP, the experimental class has an average value of 65.29 which is better than the control class of 63.88.
Co-Authors Agan, Subardi Ainisya, Avrillya Alfi Laila, Alfi Anik Lestariningrum Anita, Fenny Apriliani, Nuriya Lutfi Armandasari, Devi Auziah, Wahdatul Azizah, Sherly Nur Baharudin Baharudin Chelya Ilham R. P. Chelya Ilham Ramdani Putra Dewi Kusumaningsih Diawati, Prety Dinso, Junio Boy Smara Encil Puspitoningrum, Encil Endang Waryanti Faizah, Filla Aulia Nur Firmansyah, Achmad Fathoni Gigik, Yolanda Rensia Hanggara Budi Utomo Helilintar, Risa Ilma , Alfika Fatkhiyatul Indria Rani, Evika INTAN PRASTIHASTARI WIJAYA Judijanto, Loso Kartika, Rista Amameli Kharunisa, Jesyka Rizki Kinami, Atina Nafi’a Kinasih, Nira Ahyu Kurniawan, David Rindu Kusmiaji, Ingghar Ghupti Nadia Langit, Rony Sabdo Loso Judijanto Maharani, Vivi Marista Dwi Rahmayantis Merdian Yozima Sugeng Abrianto Moch. Muarifin Muhlis Fajar Wicaksana Nafi’ah, Muhtarotun Naimah, Myatun Ningsih, Tiyas Bekti Cahya NUR LAILIYAH Octarina, Nadya Okta Karneli Okta Karneli, Okta Pitaloka, Riska Eka Widya Pratiwi, Wahyu Adi Putra, Chelya Ilham Ramadani Putra, Chelya Ilham Ramdani Putri, Fadila Ardinaning Ramdani Putra, Chelya Ilham Rohmiati, Rohmiati Rosa Imani Khan Sa'diyah, Siiti Chalimatus Salimatul Ummah, Nur Sardjono Sardjono Sardjono Sardjono Sasongko, Sempu Dwi Sempu Dwi Sasongko Septiani, Devi Rahma Siminto Siminto Siminto Siminto, Siminto Sri Sukasih, Sri Subardi Agan Sujarwoko Sujarwoko Sujarwoko Sujarwoko Sujarwoko, Sujarwoko SUJARWOKO, SUJARWOKO Nurwidasa Suparmin Suparmin Supriyadi, Stevanus Gatot Suryaningsih, Sukmawati Adi Tegar Wahyu Nugroho Trisnaning Wahyuni Uswatun Kasanah, Uswatun Vega, Amelia Waryanti, Endang