Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : indo-mathedu intellectuals journal

Analisis Kritis dan Komparatif Pendekatan Mixed-Method dalam Evaluasi Asesmen Kompetensi pada Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan Berbasis Outcome Ali, Muttaqin Kholis; Nasution, Ichsan; Anwar, Muhammad; Simatupang, Wakhinuddin
Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal
Publisher : Lembaga Intelektual Muda (LIM) Maluku

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54373/imeij.v7i2.5239

Abstract

The transformation towards Outcome-Based Education (OBE) requires an authentic assessment system that is capable of fully representing competency achievements, particularly in Technology and Vocational Education (TVE) which emphasises graduate work readiness. This study aims to analyse the effectiveness of the mixed-method approach in evaluating outcome-based competency assessments that cover cognitive, psychomotor, and soft skills aspects. The study used a convergent parallel mixed-method design with simultaneous quantitative and qualitative data collection. Quantitative data were obtained from 139 Year 12 Software Engineering students at a vocational school in Mandailing Natal Regency using an outcome-based assessment rubric with 30 indicators that had met construct validity and reliability. Qualitative data were collected through interviews with 21 participants consisting of students, teachers, and industry supervisors. Regression analysis results showed that psychomotor competencies and soft skills had a significant effect on students' work readiness. Thematic analysis revealed a perception gap between school and industry standards, the importance of formative feedback, and the role of work culture in competency formation. Data integration showed convergence in the aspect of adaptive problem solving, but there were still differences in collaborative competencies.
Evaluasi Program Pendidikan di SMK: Systematic Literature Review Terhadap Logic Model dan Theory-Based Evaluation Yul, Fadlul Amdhi; Saputra, Hadi Kurnia; Yuberta, Andre; Arianto; Simatupang, Wakhinuddin; Anwar, Muhammad
Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal (In-Press)
Publisher : Lembaga Intelektual Muda (LIM) Maluku

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54373/imeij.v7i3.5532

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of the Logic Model and Theory-Based Evaluation in evaluating educational programs at Vocational High Schools (SMK), as well as to identify the advantages, limitations, and effectiveness of both approaches. The method used is a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) referring to PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches were conducted through scientific databases with a publication range from 2019 to 2026. From the selection process, 15 articles that met the inclusion criteria were obtained and analyzed qualitatively using a narrative synthesis. The research results indicate that the Logic Model approach is effective in mapping program structures systematically through the relationships between inputs, processes, outputs, and outcomes, making it easier to understand program flow and result achievements. Meanwhile, Theory-Based Evaluation is superior in explaining the mechanisms of change and the cause-and-effect relationships underlying program success. Nevertheless, this approach has a higher level of complexity and requires more in-depth data. The conclusion of this research shows that there is no single approach that is entirely superior, so the integration of Logic Model and Theory-Based Evaluation becomes the most effective strategy in producing a comprehensive, systematic, and evidence-based program evaluation. This integrative approach is recommended to improve the quality of educational program evaluations in vocational high schools (SMK).