p-Index From 2021 - 2026
13.707
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics Format : Jurnal Imiah Teknik Informatika JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization Tech-E Jurnal Ilmiah FIFO Jurnal CoreIT BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan JITK (Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Komputer) Technomedia Journal Riau Journal of Empowerment The IJICS (International Journal of Informatics and Computer Science) JURIKOM (Jurnal Riset Komputer) KOMPUTIKA - Jurnal Sistem Komputer Jurnal Manajemen Informatika Komputasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komputer dan Matematika Jurnal Tekno Kompak Building of Informatics, Technology and Science Jurnal Ilmiah Betrik : Besemah Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer IJAIT (International Journal of Applied Information Technology) Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Jurnal Sisfotek Global Journal of Computer System and Informatics (JoSYC) Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat TIN: TERAPAN INFORMATIKA NUSANTARA Jurnal Teknik Informatika (JUTIF) JiTEKH (Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Harapan) Jurnal Informatika dan Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak Jurnal Ilmiah Infrastruktur Teknologi Informasi Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi Journal Social Science And Technology For Community Service Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi Indonesia Bulletin of Computer Science Research Journal of Informatics Management and Information Technology KLIK: Kajian Ilmiah Informatika dan Komputer EXPLORER J-Intech (Journal of Information and Technology) BEES: Bulletin of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Jurnal Sisfotek Global Jurnal Telematics and Information Technology (TELEFORTECH) Bulletin of Data Science Jurnal Ilmiah Sistem Informasi Akuntansi (JIMASIA) Paradigma Journal of Engineering and Information Technology for Community Service Journal of Computing and Informatics Research JEECS (Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences) Jurnal Ilmiah Informatika dan Ilmu Komputer Journal of Informatics, Electrical and Electronics Engineering Jurnal INFOTEL Bulletin of Informatics and Data Science Jurnal Ilmiah Computer Science CHAIN: Journal of Computer Technology, Computer Engineering and Informatics Journal of Data Science and Information System Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology Information Journal of Information Technology, Software Engineering and Computer Science Jurnal Media Jawadwipa Bulletin of Artificial Intelligence International Journal of Informatics and Data Science Journal of Decision Support System Research Journal of Information Technology
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search
Journal : Building of Informatics, Technology and Science

Application of Support Vector Machine (SVM) Algorithm in Classification of Low-Cape Communities in Lampung Timur Aldino, Ahmad Ari; Saputra, Alvin; Nurkholis, Andi; Setiawansyah, Setiawansyah
Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): December 2021
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (358.539 KB) | DOI: 10.47065/bits.v3i3.1041

Abstract

Classification is a technique for grouping and categorizing specific standards as material for compiling information, making conclusions, or making decisions. This paper discusses data classification for underprivileged communities in Tanjung Inten, Purbolinggo, East Lampung using the Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm, then grouped into two label classes, namely the less fortunate and capable label classes. From the data that has been collected, 1154 data. The data goes through processing, scoring, labeling, and testing, producing two classes of results, namely less fortunate and capable. From the test data using the Support Vector Machine (SVM) method, the accuracy score is 97%, the precision score is 97%, the Recall score is 100%, and the F1-Score is 98%. This test resulted in a proportion of classification with the capable label is 87% and less fortunate label is 13%
Decision Support System for Determining the Best Internship Students Using the Combined Compromise Solution Method Pasaribu, A. Ferico Octaviansyah; Aldino, Ahmad Ari; Surahman, Ade; Setiawansyah, Setiawansyah
Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS) Vol 5 No 3 (2023): December 2023
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/bits.v5i3.4231

Abstract

Interns are individuals who are undergoing a period of practical learning in an organization or company as part of their educational curriculum. During the internship, students have the opportunity to apply the knowledge they learn in class to real-world situations, as well as gain valuable work experience. The selection of the best intern can involve several problems or challenges. One of them is the difficulty in evaluating students' practical skills based solely on their academic performance. The Decision Support System (DSS) to determine the best internship students using the Combined Compromise Solution Method provides a holistic approach in the selection process. This method combines elements of the Compromise Solution Method that consider compromise solutions between alternatives. With this comprehensive approach, DSS can assist institutions or companies in selecting internship students that best suit their needs and expectations, as well as ensure the success of internships that are beneficial to both parties. The results of the ranking of the best internship student alternatives showed that rank 1st with a value of 5.7847 was obtained by Jonathan, rank 2nd with a value of 5.2625 was obtained by Handoko R, and rank 3rd with a value of 4.6117 was obtained by M. Ali Fikri. The results of this ranking help companies determine the best internship students by applying the combine compromise solution method
Decision Support System for Tourist Attraction Recommendations Using Reciprocal Rank and Multi-Objective Optimization on the basis of Ratio Analysis Ariany, Fenty; Suryono, Ryan Randy; Setiawansyah, Setiawansyah
Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS) Vol 5 No 3 (2023): December 2023
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/bits.v5i3.4663

Abstract

A tourist attraction is a destination or place visited by tourists to enjoy a variety of attractions, natural beauty, culture, history, or recreation. Attractions can be beaches, mountains, lakes, national parks, historical buildings, museums, amusement parks, and much more. One common problem is confusion in choosing the right attraction, where the information available is incomplete or inaccurate, causing tourists difficulty in making the right decision. Therefore, there needs to be a holistic and integrated approach in choosing tourist attractions, taking into account these aspects so that the tourist experience becomes more meaningful and meaningful for all parties involved. The research objective of the Attraction Recommendation Decision Support System Using Reciprocal Rank and MOORA is to develop a system that can provide optimal attraction recommendations to users based on their preferences against diverse criteria, such as distance, cost, travel time, and cleanliness level. By using the Reciprocal Rank approach to take into account the user's subjective preferences towards each criterion. Meanwhile, by applying MOORA, this study aims to optimize the relative performance of alternative attractions based on the relationship between criteria. Thus, this research is to provide useful tools for users to make better and more informed decisions. The ranking results provide recommendations for alternative krui beach with a final value of 0.3752 to rank 1, alternative tanjung setia beach with a final value of 0.3558 to rank 2, alternative klara beach with a final value of 0.3512 to rank 3
Combination of CRITIC Weighting Method and Multi-Attribute Utility Theory in Network Vendor Selection Dwi Satria, M. Najib; Setiawansyah, Setiawansyah; Mesran, Mesran
Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS) Vol 6 No 1 (2024): June 2024
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/bits.v6i1.5342

Abstract

The main problems in the selection of network vendors include uncertainty regarding the credibility and reliability of the vendor, which can result in the risk of product or service failure. Choosing a network vendor requires a thorough evaluation of the vendor's credibility and track record to ensure their reliability and experience in the industry. In addition, the technology compatibility and flexibility of the product need to be checked to ensure seamless integration with existing infrastructure and the ability to adapt to evolving needs. The combination of the CRITIC weighting and MAUT methods can result in a robust and holistic approach in the decision support system. CRITIC is used to determine the relative weight of each criterion based on the correlation analysis between the criteria, thus helping to reduce subjectivity and improve the objectivity of the assessment. Once the criterion weights are set using CRITIC, MAUT can be used to calculate the utility score of each alternative based on the weights of that criterion. MAUT allows the integration of decision-maker subjective preferences into the analysis, thus allowing for a more thorough and accurate evaluation of the alternatives being evaluated. The results of the network vendor ranking show that Nusanet gets the first rank with a final score of 0.6214, Zitline gets the second rank with a final score of 0.5317, MMS gets the third rank with a final score of 0.5276, TMS gets the fourth rank with a final score of 0.4147, and JPDN gets the fifth rank with a final score of 0.3677. This combination of the CRITIC and MAUT methods provides a comprehensive approach to network vendor selection, ensuring that decisions are based on structured, transparent, and measurable analysis, resulting in the most optimal vendor selection for the organization's needs.
Penerapan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Cleaning Servis Terbaik Menggunakan Kombinasi Metode Pembobotan Entropy dan COPRAS Nuari, Reflan; Setiawansyah, Setiawansyah; Mesran, Mesran
Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS) Vol 6 No 2 (2024): September 2024
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/bits.v6i2.5796

Abstract

The main problem in choosing the best cleaning service is often a challenge because it involves a variety of complex and subjective criteria. Cleaning service performance assessments are not only based on factors such as speed and efficiency in work, but also include other aspects such as cleanliness of work results, interpersonal skills, and the ability to comply with safety procedures. The purpose of this research is to implement a system that is able to evaluate and select cleaning service providers objectively and effectively. The Entropy method to measure and assign weights to relevant criteria in the assessment of cleaning service providers, based on the information contribution of each criterion. The COPRAS method to assess and compare various alternative cleaning service providers based on the weight of predetermined criteria, so as to identify the service provider that best meets the desired needs and standards. Based on the results of the ranking that has been carried out by applying the entropy and COPRAS weighting methods, Hadi Santoso occupies the top position with a perfect score of 100, showing that he is the best cleaning service employee among other candidates. Dewi Lestari is ranked second with a score of 96.07, which also shows a very good performance but slightly below Hadi. Meanwhile, Haryani occupies third place with a score of 92.46. Even though it is in last place, this score still reflects a fairly satisfactory performance. This difference in scores indicates a variation in the performance aspects assessed, so that it can be used as a basis for decision-making for awards or service quality improvement.
Modification of the Grey Relational Analysis Method in Determining the Best Mechanic Arshad, Muhammad Waqas; Sulistiani, Heni; Maryana, Sufiatul; Palupiningsih, Pritasari; Rahmanto, Yuri; Setiawansyah, Setiawansyah
Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS) Vol 6 No 3 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/bits.v6i3.5678

Abstract

Determining the best mechanics in the industry has an important role to ensure the quality and reliability of the products and services offered. Competent and experienced mechanics are able to diagnose and repair accurately and efficiently, thereby minimizing operational downtime and increasing productivity. Without a structured system, mechanical performance appraisals tend to be subjective and inconsistent, which can lead to dissatisfaction among employees and customers. Mechanics may not get clear and constructive feedback on their performance, thus hindering skill development and professionalism. The purpose of the research of the modified Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) using standard deviation is to improve the accuracy and reliability of the decision-making process in situations where the data has a high degree of variability or significant uncertainty. By integrating standard deviations into the GRA, the study aims to account for variations and fluctuations in the data, which allows for more accurate and representative assessment of the criteria. This modification is expected to overcome the weaknesses of traditional GRAs that may not adequately consider data uncertainty, as well as produce more robust and realistic alternative rankings. The results of the best ranking of mechanics, Mechanic FR ranks first with a value of 0.11, followed by Mechanic HS with a value of 0.104. The third place was occupied by Mechanic AY with a score of 0.099.
Modifikasi Metode Simple Additive Weighting Dalam Rekomendasi Restoran Terbaik Berdasarkan Ulasan Pengunjung Prastowo, Kukuh Adi; Sulistiani, Heni; Setiawansyah, Setiawansyah
Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS) Vol 6 No 3 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/bits.v6i3.5679

Abstract

Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) is a method in DSS that is used to solve multi-criteria problems by adding up the value weights of each alternative. The weakness of SAW is its sensitivity to weight determination and value which can significantly affect the final result. If the weight or value of the criteria is not determined correctly or does not reflect reality well, the results of the decision can be less accurate. The purpose of this study is to modify the SAW method with the name SAW-C to be more effective in providing the best restaurant recommendations based on visitor reviews. SAW modification using a change driven approach not only improves accuracy in decision-making, but also improves adaptability and responsiveness to dynamic and complex environments. The SAW-C method not only improves decision-making accuracy, but also improves adaptability and responsiveness to dynamic and complex environments. SAW-C integrates flexibility and adaptability in managing changes in visitor preferences or the weighting of relevant criteria, which often change over time. With this approach, the recommendation system can dynamically update restaurant ratings based on recent reviews and changing visitor preferences, providing more personalized and relevant recommendations. The results of the ranking of the best restaurants using the SAW-C method show that the results of rank 1 with a final score of 0.92135 are obtained by Flamboyant Restaurant, rank 2 with a final score of 0.70548 obtained by Zozo Garden, and rank 3 with a final score of 0.70312 obtained by Square Restaurant.
Combination of PIPRECIA and Multi-Attributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis for the Determination of Scholarship Students Hadad, Sitna Hajar; Chandra, Iryanto; Maryana, Sufiatul; Setiawansyah, Setiawansyah
Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS) Vol 6 No 3 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/bits.v6i3.6313

Abstract

Scholarships are a form of financial assistance given to individuals to support their education. Criteria considered in the determination of scholarship recipients may include academic achievement, special talents, financial need, participation in extracurricular activities, and potential contributions to the community. The combination of weighting using PIPRECIA and MAIRCA can be a powerful approach in determining scholarship recipients. With PIPRECIA, scholarship providers can gather preferences from various relevant parties to determine the relative weight of each evaluation criterion. Furthermore, by applying MAIRCA, scholarship recipients can be evaluated based on these criteria by comparing between ideal attributes that reflect expected standards with real attributes that reflect the actual conditions of each recipient. By integrating these two methods, the process of determining scholarship recipients becomes more structured, transparent, and takes into account diverse preferences and priorities, ensuring that aid is distributed to the most deserving and needy individuals. The results of alternative rankings in determining scholarship recipients are 1st place with a final score of 0.071 obtained on behalf of Yusuf Maqdis, 2nd place with a final score of 0.068 obtained on behalf of Kurniawansyah, and 3rd place with a final score of 0.062 obtained on behalf of Ketut Purwanti.
Comparison of Certainty Factor, Dempster Shafer, and Bayes' Theorem in Expert Systems for Diagnosing Female Reproductive System Diseases Mesran, Mesran; Rasli, Roznim Mohamad; Setiawansyah, Setiawansyah; Arshad, Muhammad Waqas
Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS) Vol 7 No 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/bits.v7i2.8334

Abstract

Expert systems are one application of artificial intelligence used to mimic the ability of an expert in diagnosing a disease. This study aims to compare the performance of three inference methods Certainty Factor, Dempster-Shafer, and Bayes' Theorem in the diagnosis of female reproductive system diseases. Symptom data and expert knowledge values were obtained from medical experts to support the system's validity. Each method was implemented on the same symptom data, and the results were analyzed to assess the consistency of the diagnoses produced. The results show that the Certainty Factor method produced a diagnosis of Cervical Cancer with the highest confidence value of 0.9999, followed by the Dempster-Shafer method with the same diagnosis and a confidence value of 0.852. However, the Bayes Theorem method produced a different diagnosis, namely Ovarian Cyst, with a confidence value of 0.911. These differing results indicate that the characteristics and approaches of each method significantly influence the final diagnosis outcome. This study contributes insights to expert system developers regarding the strengths and weaknesses of each inference method. The selection of the appropriate method must be tailored to the system's requirements, data complexity, and the level of uncertainty in the medical information used.
Co-Authors Abhishek R Mehta Ade Dwi Putra Ade Surahman Adhie Thyo Priandika Adi Sucipto, Adi Aditia Yudhistira Agus Perdana Windarto Agus Wantoro Agustina, Intan Ahdan, Syaiful Ahmad Ari Aldino Ahmad Ari Aldino Ahmad Ari Aldino Ahmad Ari Aldino Ahmadfauzy Alfry Aristo Jansen Sinlae Alita, Debby Amalia, Zahrina Andi Nurkholis Andika, Rio Aniyanti Tafonao An’ars, M. Ghufroni Arfinia Rahma Ari Sulistiyawati Ari Sulistiyawati Ari Sulistiyawati Ariany, Fenty Arie Qur’ania Arief Budiman Arshad, Muhammad Waqas Arsi Hajizah Asistyasari, Ayuni Ayu Megawaty, Dyah Bustanul Ulum Chandra, Iryanto Damayanti Damayanti Damayanti, Damayanti Daniarti, Yeni Daniel Prasetyo Tarigan Deas Andrian Dwijaya Debby Alita Dedi Darwis Dedi Triyanto Desyanti Dinda Titian Lestari Dodi Siregar Dodi Siregar Dwi Satria, M. Najib Dyah Aminatun Dyah Ayu Megawaty Eko Bagus Fahrizqi Erlin Windia Ambarsari Fadila Shely Amalia Fajar Irvansyah Faruk Ulum Febrianus Gea Ferico Octaviansyah Pasaribu, Ahmad Fernando, Yusra Fikri Hamidy Gibtha Fitri Laxmi Hamdan Sobirin, Muhammad Heni Sulistiani Heni Sulistiani Ida Mayanju Pandiangan Imam Ahmad Imam Ahmad Isnain, Auliya Rahman Jumaryadi, Yuwan Junhai Wang Junhai Wang Junhai Wang Kiki Septiani Kurniawan, Arsy Laurent Nababan Mahendra, Ferdian Jerry Mahesa Raihan Rifqi Mandasari, Berlinda Marzuki, Dwiki Hafizh Megawaty, Dyah Ayu Merlin Puspita Sari Mesran Mesran Mesran, Mesran Mohammad Taufan Asri Zaen Muhaqiqin muhaqiqin Ni Komang Ratih Kumala Nirwana Hendrastuty Nuari, Reflan Nuralia Nuralia Nurman Fadhlullah nurnaningsih, Desi Nuzuliarini Nuris Octaviansyah, A. Ferico Oprasto, Raditya Rimbawan Palupiningsih, Pritasari Parjito Parjito Pasaribu, A. Ferico Octaviansyah Pasha, Donaya Permata, Permata Pramuditya, Andri Prastowo, Kukuh Adi Purbha Irwansyah, Irsyad Pustika, Reza Putra, Ade Dwi Putra, Rulyansyah Permata Putri Sukma Dewi Putri Sukma Dewi Qadhli Jafar Adrian R Metha, Abhishek Rahmadianti, Fitrah Amalia Rahman, Miftahur Rasli, Roznim Mohamad Reflan Revife Purba Rilo Nur Devija Rini Nuraini Riska Aryanti Riska Aryanti Rohmat Indra Borman Romadhoni, Randi Roswita Daeli Ruziana binti Mohamad Rasli Ryan Randy Suryono S. Samsugi Safi, Mudar Sanriomi Sintaro Saputra, Alvin Setiawan, Dandi Setyani, Tria Sinta, Ratna Sari Roma Siti Mahmuda Sitna Hajar Hadad Sofiansyah Fadli Sri Agustiani Br Siburian Subhan Subhan Sufiatul Maryana Sufiatul Maryana Sumanto, Sumanto Surahman, Ade Susanto, Erliyan Redy Syaiful Ahdan Trisnawati, Fika Ulum, Faruk Untoro Adji Very Hendra Saputra Very Hendra Saputra Wahyudi, Agung Deni Wang, Junhai Waqas Arshad, Muhammad Wibawa, Yohanes Eka Widiyanti, Adella yasin, ikbal Yuliani, Asri Yuri Rahmanto