p-Index From 2021 - 2026
14.341
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Masyarakat Informatika Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics JUTI: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi Format : Jurnal Imiah Teknik Informatika JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization Tech-E Jurnal Ilmiah FIFO Jurnal CoreIT BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan JITK (Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Komputer) Technomedia Journal Riau Journal of Empowerment The IJICS (International Journal of Informatics and Computer Science) JURIKOM (Jurnal Riset Komputer) KOMPUTIKA - Jurnal Sistem Komputer Jurnal Manajemen Informatika Komputasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komputer dan Matematika Jurnal Tekno Kompak Building of Informatics, Technology and Science Jurnal Ilmiah Betrik : Besemah Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer IJAIT (International Journal of Applied Information Technology) Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Jurnal Sisfotek Global Journal of Computer System and Informatics (JoSYC) Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat TIN: TERAPAN INFORMATIKA NUSANTARA Jurnal Teknik Informatika (JUTIF) JiTEKH (Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Harapan) Jurnal Informatika dan Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak Jurnal Ilmiah Infrastruktur Teknologi Informasi Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi Journal Social Science And Technology For Community Service Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi Indonesia Bulletin of Computer Science Research Journal of Informatics Management and Information Technology KLIK: Kajian Ilmiah Informatika dan Komputer EXPLORER J-Intech (Journal of Information and Technology) BEES: Bulletin of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Jurnal Sisfotek Global Jurnal Telematics and Information Technology (TELEFORTECH) Bulletin of Data Science Jurnal Ilmiah Sistem Informasi Akuntansi (JIMASIA) Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Inovasi Paradigma Journal of Engineering and Information Technology for Community Service Journal of Computing and Informatics Research JEECS (Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences) Jurnal Ilmiah Informatika dan Ilmu Komputer Journal of Informatics, Electrical and Electronics Engineering Jurnal INFOTEL Bulletin of Informatics and Data Science Jurnal Ilmiah Computer Science CHAIN: Journal of Computer Technology, Computer Engineering and Informatics Journal of Data Science and Information System Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology Information Journal of Information Technology, Software Engineering and Computer Science Jurnal Media Jawadwipa Bulletin of Artificial Intelligence International Journal of Informatics and Data Science Journal of Decision Support System Research Journal of Information Technology
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology Information

Penerapan Metode SWARA dan Grey Relational Analysis Dalam Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik Saputra, Very Hendra; Setiawansyah, Setiawansyah
Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology Information (JAITI) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Volume 2 Number 1 March 2024
Publisher : PT. Tech Cart Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58602/jaiti.v2i1.107

Abstract

The best employees are individuals who not only have exceptional expertise in their work, but also stand out in their attitude, dedication, and engagement towards the job and the company. One of the problems that often arises in the selection of the best employees is the lack of congruence between the skills possessed and the lack of transparency and communication in the best employee appraisal process to understand what is expected by the company. This study aims to select the best employees by applying a combination of the SWARA method for determining the weight of criteria and the GRA method for selecting the best employees based on the data from the assessment results that have been carried out. The final score ranking results recommend for the best employee 1 with a final score of 0.1799 on behalf of Desi Puspasari, the best employee 2 with a final value of 0.1147 on behalf of M. Budianto, and the best employee 3 with a final score of 0.1082 on behalf of Akhmadi.
Penerapan Metode Logarithmic Percentage Change-Driven Objective Weighting dan Multi-Attribute Utility Theory dalam Penerimaan Guru Bahasa Inggris Setiawansyah, Setiawansyah; Sulistiyawati, Ari
Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology Information (JAITI) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Volume 2 Number 2 June 2024
Publisher : PT. Tech Cart Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58602/jaiti.v2i2.119

Abstract

The admission of English teachers in private schools is an important process in ensuring the quality of education in the institution. This process involves several stages, from the announcement of job vacancies to the selection of candidates who match the established criteria. Problems in the recruitment of English teachers, namely a selection process that lacks transparency or inadequate evaluation tools, can also be an obstacle. Therefore, addressing the problem of English teacher recruitment requires a holistic approach that pays attention to various aspects, including the development of effective recruitment strategies, the provision of training to improve candidate qualifications, and the improvement of the overall selection process. The research objective of applying the LOPCOW (Logarithmic Percentage Change-Driven Objective) Weighting and MAUT (Multi-Attribute Utility Theory) method is to provide a comprehensive and effective framework in the selection process, where LOPCOW is used to analyze objective data related to teacher performance and qualifications, while MAUT is used to integrate the subjective preferences of stakeholders such as principals and school committees in decision making. Thus, the main objective is to optimize the admission process of English teachers by considering these two aspects holistically. The ranking results show that the final results of English teacher admissions recommend the first rank with a final score of 0.7421 obtained by HR Teacher Candidates. This result is the application of the LOPCOW and MAUT methods in the selection process for English teacher admission, and becomes a recommendation for the English teacher admission process.
IT Personnel Recruitment Decision Support System: Combination of TOPSIS and Entropy Weighting Methods Setiawansyah, Setiawansyah
Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology Information (JAITI) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Volume 2 Number 3 September 2024
Publisher : PT. Tech Cart Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58602/jaiti.v2i3.131

Abstract

IT personnel recruitment is an important process that aims to get the best talent in the field of information technology to support operations and innovation in an organization. IT personnel recruitment faces several key challenges that often make it difficult for companies to find the right candidates. One of the main problems is that the recruitment process can also be constrained by difficulties in assessing a candidate's cultural and interpersonal fit, where high technical skills are not necessarily balanced by good communication and teamwork skills. The purpose of this study is to apply DSS that integrates the TOPSIS and entropy weighting methods in the IT recruitment process, so that it can help companies select the best candidates effectively and objectively. The system is designed to improve the accuracy of candidate identification through multi-criteria analysis. An IT personnel recruitment decision support system that combines TOPSIS and entropy methods is an innovative approach designed to increase effectiveness in selecting the best candidates based on relevant criteria. The results of Candidate G ranking were ranked highest with a score of 0.932, followed by Candidate A with a score of 0.7069, Candidate C with a score of 0.645, and Candidate E with a score of 0.6443. Furthermore, Candidate I in the middle position with a score of 0.5023, followed by Candidate D with a score of 0.3417. Candidate B and Candidate H are in a lower position with values of 0.2188 and 0.1817, respectively. Candidate F ranked at the bottom with a score of 0.0519.
Integration of Root Assessment Method and Entropy Weighting in Determining Business Location Selection Setiawansyah, Setiawansyah
Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology Information (JAITI) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): Volume 2 Number 4 December 2024
Publisher : PT. Tech Cart Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58602/jaiti.v2i4.141

Abstract

Business location is one of the key factors in determining the success of a business. Choosing the right location can affect customer accessibility, operational costs, and a company's competitiveness in the market. Determining the location of a business is often faced with various problems that can affect the success and continuity of the business. One of the main challenges is the accessibility and reach of the market, and un-strategic or hard-to-reach locations can limit customer potential and reduce business appeal. Another problem is that it often arises from the diversity of criteria that must be taken into account and the importance of each criterion varies depending on the type of business. The purpose of this study is to apply a more objective approach in determining business locations by integrating the root assessment method and entropy weighting methods in systematically evaluating various business location criteria and giving fair weight based on their level of importance. By applying this combination of methods, the decision-making process becomes more accurate and in accordance with business needs, and provides solutions that can be adapted by various types of businesses in determining strategic locations that support long-term success. Business location ranking shows the highest rated location is Location 6, with a score of 4.4254. Furthermore, Location 10 is ranked second with a score of 4.3993, followed by Location 2 in third place with a score of 4.3916. These results show that Location 6 is the most superior location in this assessment.
Co-Authors Abhishek R Mehta Ade Dwi Putra Ade Surahman Adhie Thyo Priandika Adi Sucipto, Adi Aditia Yudhistira Agus Perdana Windarto Agus Wantoro Agustina, Intan Ahdan, Syaiful Ahmad Ari Aldino Ahmad Ari Aldino Ahmad Ari Aldino Ahmad Ari Aldino Ahmadfauzy Alfry Aristo Jansen Sinlae Alita, Debby Amalia, Zahrina Andi Nurkholis Andika, Rio Aniyanti Tafonao An’ars, M. Ghufroni Arfinia Rahma Ari Sulistiyawati Ari Sulistiyawati Ari Sulistiyawati Ariany, Fenty Arie Qur’ania Arief Budiman Arshad, Muhammad Waqas Arsi Hajizah Asistyasari, Ayuni Ayu Megawaty, Dyah Bustanul Ulum Chandra, Iryanto Damayanti Damayanti Damayanti, Damayanti Daniarti, Yeni Daniel Prasetyo Tarigan Deas Andrian Dwijaya Debby Alita Dedi Darwis Dedi Triyanto Desyanti Dinda Titian Lestari Dodi Siregar Dodi Siregar Dwi Satria, M. Najib Dyah Aminatun Dyah Ayu Megawaty Eko Bagus Fahrizqi Erlin Windia Ambarsari Fadila Shely Amalia Fajar Irvansyah Faruk Ulum Febrianus Gea Ferico Octaviansyah Pasaribu, Ahmad Fernando, Yusra Fikri Hamidy Gibtha Fitri Laxmi Hamdan Sobirin, Muhammad Heni Sulistiani Heni Sulistiani Ida Mayanju Pandiangan Imam Ahmad Imam Ahmad Isnain, Auliya Rahman Jeperson Hutahaean Jumaryadi, Yuwan Junhai Wang Junhai Wang Junhai Wang Junhai Wang Kiki Septiani Kurniawan, Arsy Laurent Nababan Mahendra, Ferdian Jerry Mahesa Raihan Rifqi Mandasari, Berlinda Marzuki, Dwiki Hafizh Megawaty, Dyah Ayu Merlin Puspita Sari Mesran Mesran Mesran, Mesran Mohammad Taufan Asri Zaen Muhaqiqin muhaqiqin Ni Komang Ratih Kumala Nirwana Hendrastuty Nuari, Reflan Nuralia Nuralia Nurman Fadhlullah nurnaningsih, Desi Nuzuliarini Nuris Octaviansyah, A. Ferico Oprasto, Raditya Rimbawan Palupiningsih, Pritasari Parjito Parjito Pasaribu, A. Ferico Octaviansyah Pasha, Donaya Permata, Permata Pramuditya, Andri Prastowo, Kukuh Adi Purbha Irwansyah, Irsyad Pustika, Reza Putra, Ade Dwi Putra, Rulyansyah Permata Putri Sukma Dewi Putri Sukma Dewi Qadhli Jafar Adrian R Metha, Abhishek Rahmadianti, Fitrah Amalia Rahman, Miftahur Rasli, Roznim Mohamad Reflan Revife Purba Rilo Nur Devija Rini Nuraini Riska Aryanti Riska Aryanti Rohmat Indra Borman Romadhoni, Randi Roswita Daeli Roznim, Roznim Ruziana binti Mohamad Rasli Ryan Randy Suryono S. Samsugi Safi, Mudar Sanriomi Sintaro Saputra, Alvin Setiawan, Dandi Setyani, Tria Sinta, Ratna Sari Roma Siti Mahmuda Sitna Hajar Hadad Sofiansyah Fadli Sri Agustiani Br Siburian Subhan Subhan Sufiatul Maryana Sufiatul Maryana Sumanto Sumanto Sumanto, Sumanto Surahman, Ade Susanto, Erliyan Redy Sussolaikah, Kelik Syaiful Ahdan Temi Ardiansah Trisnawati, Fika Ulum, Faruk Untoro Adji Very Hendra Saputra Very Hendra Saputra Wahyudi, Agung Deni Wang, Junhai Waqas Arshad, Muhammad Widiyanti, Adella yasin, ikbal Yohanes Eka Wibawa Yuliani, Asri Yuri Rahmanto Yusra Fernando