Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Progressive Law Review

HAK BERDAULAT, KEWAJIBAN YURISDIKSI DAN HAK-HAK LAIN DI ZONA EKONOMI EKSKLUSIF Dwi Ramasari, Risti; Aprinisa, Aprinisa; Ainita, Okta
Progressive Law Review Vol 2 No 02 (2020): November
Publisher : Faculty of Law-Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/plr.v2i02.31

Abstract

The international community has succeeded in compiling a law of the sea to regulate all forms of use of the sea as well as the benefits of the natural resources contained therein as outlined in the form of an agreement between States as known as United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. The sea is divided into several parts / zones, namely the territorial sea, internal waters, contiguous zones, archipelagic waters, the exclusive economic zone and the high seas. The exclusive economic zone is an area beyond and adjacent to the territorial sea, subject to the specific legal regime established in this Part, under which the rights and jurisdiction of the coastal State and the rights and freedoms of other States are governed by the relevant provisions of this Convention. In the exclusive economic zone, coastal countries have sovereign rights for exploration and exploitation purposes, conservation and management of natural resources, both living and non-living, from the waters above the seabed and from the seabed and the land below and with respect to other activities for the purposes of exploration and economic exploitation of the zone, such as energy production from water, currents and wind; jurisdiction as defined in the relevant provisions of this Convention with respect to the creation and use of artificial islands, installations and structures, marine scientific research and the protection and preservation of the marine environment. Other rights and obligations as defined in this Convention Key words: Exclusive Economic Zone, Sovereign Rights, Jurisdictional Obligations
CREDIT SAVING EFFORTS AFFECTED BY CORONA VIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) THROUGH THE CREDIT RESTRUCTURE PROCESS. Aprinisa
Progressive Law Review Vol 2 No 02 (2020): November
Publisher : Faculty of Law-Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/plr.v2i02.32

Abstract

The pandemic over the Corona virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) outbreak is engulfing the world which has left many people dead and all sides of human life affected. Not only is it life-threatening but the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic has also had a significant impact on the survival of the world economy and a country in particular. As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, economic growth was hampered, business activities were forced to close so that there were many layoffs everywhere, the investment climate became sluggish, and people’s incomes were reduced even zero, resulting in the inability of people to meet their needs, especially for credit debtor customers. The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic has caused credit debtor customers to have difficulty carrying out their obligations to pay installments on loans or loans to banking institutions. At the current conditions, the bank in carrying out its operational activities is required to provide relief and policies to credit debtor customers directly affected from the Covid-19 pandemic and one of the efforts that can be made is the implementation of credit Restructure to maintain the health and correctness of the credit provided.
THE URGENCY AND FINANCIAL SERVICES SECTOR DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM THROUGH ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT INSTITUTIONS Aprinisa
Progressive Law Review Vol 4 No 01 (2022): April
Publisher : Faculty of Law-Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/plr.v4i01.69

Abstract

Settlement of disputes that occur between Consumers and Financial Services Providers can not only be done through litigation (court) but there are also other options through Alternative Dispute Resolution (non-litigation) channels which are commonly called APS. The choice of dispute resolution through APS is an answer to the needs of Financial Services Enterprises and consumers since it is efficient, effective, and low cost so that it can reduce operational costs. In addition, with the support of sophisticated dispute resolution technology through the Financial Services Sector Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution, the disputing parties do not have to meet face-to-face but it can be done using electronic media. The method used in this research is a normative juridical study, by examining the norms/rules contained in the legislation and library materials. The study in this research is about the urgency and mechanism of dispute resolution through the Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution in the Financial Services Sector.