Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Analisis Yuridis Penggunaan Rekening Pribadi Orang Lain dalam Tindak Pidana Judi Online (Studi Putusan No 138/PID.SUS /2024/PN. BTM): Penelitian Jasmine Azura Nasution; Gousta Feriza
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Volume 4 Nomor 3 (Januari 202
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jerkin.v4i3.4438

Abstract

This research examines the juridical aspects of utilizing third-party personal bank accounts in online gambling crimes, focusing on the study of Decision Number 138/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Batam. The study is prompted by the increasing prevalence of online gambling practices that exploit third-party accounts to disguise financial transaction flows. The legal problem investigates the application of criminal liability under the Personal Data Protection Law and evaluates the judge's legal considerations through the lens of John Rawls' theory of justice. This study employs a normative juridical method with a case study approach, drawing from primary legal materials such as statutory regulations and court decisions, as well as secondary legal materials including legal doctrines and literature. Data analysis is conducted descriptively by applying Gustav Radbruch's theory of legal certainty to assess the consistency of legal norm application, and John Rawls' theory of justice to evaluate substantive justice for the aggrieved parties. The results indicate that the unauthorized use of bank accounts fulfills the elements of unlawful personal data processing, specifically regarding personal financial data as regulated under the Personal Data Protection Law. However, the court only applied the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law and the Money Laundering (TPPU) Law without integrating the Personal Data Protection Law, leading to normative inconsistencies and a failure to provide optimal protection for personal data subjects.
Penerapan Asas Lex Specialis dalam Kasus Penipuan Berbasis Manipulasi Bukti Transfer Digital: Penelitian Gabriel Regina Christian; Gousta Feriza
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Volume 4 Nomor 3 (Januari 202
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jerkin.v4i3.4527

Abstract

This research examines the application of Article 35 of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) in cases involving manipulated digital transfer receipts, as adjudicated in Decision Number 358/Pid.B/2023/PN Yogyakarta. The study is motivated by the increasing prevalence of cybercrimes involving falsified electronic data, while law enforcement practice remains inconsistent in determining whether the lex specialis provision under the ITE Law or the general fraud provision under Article 378 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) should apply. This research addresses two main issues: the analysis of criminal elements based on trial facts, and the application of electronic evidence as well as its implications for legal certainty in enforcing the ITE Law. A normative legal research method is employed, using statutory, case, and document approaches through examination of the court judgment. The results reveal that the elements of electronic data manipulation under Article 35 of the ITE Law were actually fulfilled, but the judges applied Article 378 KUHP by treating the falsified transfer receipt merely as an auxiliary tool rather than the core of the offense. This approach creates normative inconsistency and weakens the function of the ITE Law as lex specialis. The study concludes that the enforcement of the ITE Law in digital fraud cases has not been optimized, highlighting the need for standardized digital evidence examination and judicial guidelines to strengthen legal certainty.