Articles
POLA HUBUNGAN HUKUM DALAM PEMANFAATAN TANAH ULAYAT DI SUMATERA BARAT
Kurnia Warman;
Hengki Andora
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 26, No 3 (2014)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (339.038 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16031
Communal land is the identity of indigenous communities whose existence is protected by the Constitution. Customary land is not only used for the purposes of indigenous peoples, but also exploited by the outsiders. This study examines how the pattern of the legal relationship between the indigenous people and to outsiders by using socio-legal research. This study was conducted in West Sumatera by limiting the study to the four natural resource sectors, namely plantations, water resources, mining and forestry. The results of this study indicate that the legal relationships that are not obvious to trigger disputes between indigenous people and outsiders. Tanah ulayat merupakan identitas masyarakat hukum adat yang diakui dan dilindungi keberadaannya oleh UUD 1945. Tanah ulayat tidak hanya digunakan untuk keperluan masyarakat hukum adat, namun juga dimanfaatkan oleh pihak luar. Penelitian ini mengkaji bagaimana pola hubungan hukum antara masyarakat hukum adat dengan pihak luar dalam pemanfaatan tanah ulayat dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis empiris. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Sumatera Barat dengan membatasi kajian pada 4 (empat) sektor sumberdaya alam, yaitu perkebunan, sumberdaya air, pertambangan dan kehutanan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa ketidakjelasan hubungan hukum menjadi pemicu munculnya sengketa antara masyarakat hukum adat dengan pihak luar di dalam pemanfaatan tanah ulayat.
PENINGKATAN KAPASITAS LEGAL DRAFTING PEMERINTAHAN MELALUI PENYUSUNAN PERATURAN NAGARI DI SUMANIAK KECAMATAN SALIMPAUNG KABUPATEN TANAH DATAR
Ade Suzana Eka Putri;
Hengki Andora;
Jendrius Jendrius;
Masrizal Masrizal
BULETIN ILMIAH NAGARI MEMBANGUN Vol 5 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : LPPM (Institute for Research and Community Services) Universitas Andalas Padang
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25077/bina.v5i2.378
Nagari Sumaniak has so much potential in various aspects that it can be developed. This potential has been utilized well, but there is still some potential that has not been fully utilized. In the aspect of governance, it was identified that the Sumaniak government had difficulties in drafting nagari regulations due to the lack of information obtained by the nagari governments related to the preparation of nagari regulations. Meanwhile, the readiness of human resources (governments) is needed as actors in the regions in carrying out government affairs. For this reason, it is necessary to increase the capacity of the nagari governments in drafting nagari regulations through legal drafting training for the nagari governments. The aim of this activity is to increase the understanding and ability of the nagari governments through drafting regulations in the nagari. The activity was carried out in 2020-2021 at Nagari Sumaniak. The target of this activity is the entire Nagari government in Sumaniak. The method used in this activity is the PRA (Participatory Rural Appraisal) method to prepare a CAP (Community Action Plan). Activities are carried out through various stages, such as FGD / brainstorming with nagari governments, revision and drafting of nagari regulations, as well as training related to legal drafting for nagari governments. From the various activities that have been carried out, it can be seen that there is motivation throughout the nagari governments to make a real contribution in providing ideas and support in the preparation of the nagari. Then, increase the capacity of the nagari governments in preparing the nagari after the training. All resources are committed to being able to assist in the development of the nagari. It is recommended for the nagari government to always carry out regular training and improve its quality and capacity in carrying out work professionally. Then, it is hoped that the local governments can provide further understanding to the community, especially regarding the nagari governments in making a nagari regulations.
Desa Sebagai Unit Pemerintahan Terendah Di Kota Pariaman
Hengki Andora
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 1, No 2 (2010)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (5111.716 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30652/jih.v1i02.1152
Pariaman apply two system of lowest government inits region, namely the system of Desa and system ofKelurahan. Number of desa is 55 Desa and number ofKelurahan is 16 Kelurahan. Pariaman not want to applythe system of Nagari, with arguing: i) in ruralcommunities have felt comfortable with the system ofDesa (status quo); i) the establishment of Nagarigovernment system will cause a reduction in theallocation of development fund from the goverment;iii) Pariaman already heterogenous society; and iv)the establishment of Nagari system will cause losspublic office and employment for people who sit in theDesa institutional structures. Desa in Pariamanperformed in accordance with Local Regulation No. 7of 2007 on Desa. Institutional Desa consist of Desagovernment, Badan Permusyawaratan Desa (BPD),and another Desa Institutional.
POLA PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH ULAYAT DI SUMATERA BARAT (Sengketa antara Masyarakat dengan Investor)
Titin Fatimah;
Hengki Andora
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (156.945 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30652/jih.v4i1.2085
As other territories in Indonesia, theusing of communal land by privateenterprise has been also creatingdisputes in West Sumatra. Accordingto the law of land procurement inIndonesia, for getting land, a privateenterprise should contact the landowners (or traditional communities)as the subject of communal land formaking contract directly. As amatter of fact, they have got the landfrom the Local Government not fromthepeople.Thecommunitiesprotested to the corporate activitieson their land. Beside that, the privateenterprises have got agrement withcommunities, but they did not followit, for instance building plasmaplantation for the communities. Thecorporates have been doing disputessettlements, but it is not effisien tosolve the problem. The communitieshave also done everything forstruggling their land, such asnegotiation even into the court. But,they have not got their rights yet. Inthe field, it has involved poverty andenvironmental degradation.Keyword : dispute settlement
Desa Sebagai Unit Pemerintahan Terendah Di Kota Pariaman
Hengki Andora
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2, No 2 (2011)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30652/jih.v2i02.1016
Pariaman apply two system of lowest government in its region, namely the system of Desa and system of Kelurahan. Number of desa is 55 Desa and number of Kelurahan is 16 Kelurahan. Pariaman not want to apply the system of Nagari, with arguing: i) in rural communities have felt comfortable with the system of Desa (status quo); i) the establishment of Nagari government system will cause a reduction in the allocation of development fund from the goverment; iii) Pariaman already heterogenous society; and iv) the establishment of Nagari system will cause loss public office and employment for people who sit in the Desa institutional structures. Desa in Pariaman performed in accordance with Local Regulation No. 7 of 2007 on Desa. Institutional Desa consist of Desa government, Badan Permusyawaratan Desa (BPD), and another Desa Institutional.
Pengangkatan Anggota Tentara Nasional Indonesia dan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Aktif Menjadi Penjabat Kepala Daerah
Egip Satria Eka Putra;
Khairul Fahmi;
Yuslim Yuslim;
Khairani Khairani;
Hengki Andora
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.822
The Assignment of members of the Indonesian National Army and the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia active as acting regional heads by the Minister of Home Affairs reaped polemics. Law Number 10 of 2016 concerning Regional Elections even though it has clearly regulated the filling of vacancies in the positions of governor, regent and mayor, where acting (Pj.) are appointed from the position of intermediate leaders for the Acting Governor and primary leaders for the Acting Regent and Mayor. However, the Minister of Home Affairs issued Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 4 of 2023 concerning Acting Governors, Regents and Mayors as a reference to fill the position of Acting Regional Head. Article 3 paragraph (b) of Permendagri Number 4 of 2023, contains norms stating that the acting regional head is from an ASN official or an official in a certain ASN position who occupies JPT Madya within the Central Government or within the Regional Government for candidates for Pj. Governor and occupies JPT Pratama within the Central Government or within the Regional Government for candidates for Pj. Regent and Pj. Mayor. Therefore, there is an addition of position criteria and an expansion of meaning in Permendagri Number 4 of 2023 which then becomes a gap and opportunity for the Minister of Home Affairs to appoint active TNI and Polri members to become Acting (Pj.). The formulation of the problem in this study is: (1) How is the validity of the appointment of members of the Indonesian National Army and members of the Negatra Police of the Republic of Indonesia active as Acting Regional Heads? (2) What are the criteria for the ideal official who can be appointed as Acting Regional Head? (3) What is the ideal mechanism for appointing and appointing acting regional heads to fill regional head vacancies ahead of the 2024 simultaneous regional elections? This research is a normative legal research or literature, with the research specifications used are analytical descriptive research. The results of this study are: (1) The appointment of members of the Indonesian National Army and active members of the Indonesian National Police to become Acting Regional Heads is not legally positive Indonesia at this time. (2) The position of the official who should be appointed as Pj. Regional Head shall be JPT Madya within the Central Government or within the Regional Government. (3) the ideal mechanism for the appointment and appointment of acting regional heads is to involve the people through the Senators so that the appointed PJ. still has legitimacy from the people.
Kepatuhan Kepala Daerah dalam Melaksanakan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Padang yang Telah Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Fegi Fegi;
Khairani Khairani;
Hengki Andora
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.823
Based on Article 67 letter b of Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government, it is explained that the Regional Head as a State Administrative Officer has an obligation to comply with all provisions of the Legislative Law including Decisions issued by the State Administrative Court. In Decision Number 11/G/2020/PTUN.PDG Regarding Dismissal of Wali Nagari Kinari by the Regent of Solok and Decision Number 23/G/2018/PTUN.PDG Concerning Dismissal of the West Pasaman Regional Secretary by the West Pasaman Regent there are forms of non-compliance committed by the Head Regions as State Administrative Officials, among others, do not revoke disputed TUN Decrees, do not revoke and do not issue new TUN Decrees. The absence of the application of strict sanctions and the low level of awareness of the TUN officials concerned are factors in the non-implementation of PTUN decisions that have permanent legal force by the Regional Head. The Administrative Court's procedural law has regulated sanctions against TUN bodies/officials who do not comply with PTUN decisions, but these arrangements are not concrete because they still depend on implementing regulations which have not been realized until now, this condition provides an opportunity for officials to disobey PTUN decisions because there is no things to worry about if you don't comply. This situation is one of the factors for weak law enforcement in Indonesia.
Pengawasan Perdagangan Ilegal Terhadap Trenggiling oleh Balai Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Sumatera Barat
Aulia Khairi, Fidela;
Syofiarti, Syofiarti;
Andora, Hengki
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1870
The Natural Resources Conservation Agency (BKSDA) has one function, namely monitoring the illegal trade in wild animals, especially protected wild animals. The implementation of monitoring of illegal trade in protected wild animals by the West Sumatra BKSDA aims to protect protected wild animals from the danger of extinction and prevent trade in protected animals. However, the implementation of this function has not gone well, judging from temporary observation data showing that there is still a lot of trade in protected wild animals, especially pangolins. So, based on this, the author is interested in conducting research with the title Monitoring the Illegal Trade in Pangolins by the West Sumatra Natural Resources Conservation Agency (BKSDA).
Pembatalan Sertipikat Hak Milik Tanah Kaum Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri pada Kantor Pertanahan Kota Solok
Fadhilla Efriandini, Farah;
Warman, Kurnia;
Andora, Hengki
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2213
Pembatalan Sertipikat Hak Milik Kaum Nomor 1324/kandang Aur, Simpang Rumbio berdasarkan pada Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kota Solok merupakan tindak lanjut dari permohonan penggugat yang merupakan pihak yang menang pada hasil putusan pengadilan negeri kota solok Nomor 13/Pdt.G/2023/PN Slk, yang menyatakan bahwa Sertipikat hak Milik 1324/ kandang Aur dinyatakan tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum yang mengikat. Adapun Rumusan masalah dalam penulisan ini adalah Bagaimanakah proses pendaftaran tanah milik kaum di kantor pertanahan Kota Solok ? Bagaimanakan proses pembatalan Sertipikat tanah milik kaum berdasarkan putusan pengadilan Negeri Kota Solok ? Bagaimanakah Kesiapan Kantor Pertanahan Kota Solok Menuju Kota Lengkap dan Sertipikat Elektronik dan tujuan penulisan ini adalah Untuk menganalisis proses pendaftaran tanah milik kaum di kantor pertanahan Kota Solok, untuk menganalisis proses pembatalan Sertipikat tanah milik kaum berdasarkan putusan pengadilan Negeri Kota Solok, untuk menganalisis Kesiapan Kantor Pertanahan Kota Solok Menuju Kota Lengkap dan Sertipikat Elektronik. Adapun metode yang digunakan adalah metode pendekatan yuridis empiris, dengan sifat penelitian deskriptif analitis, kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah dalam pendaftran tanah milik adat yang dilakukan oleh Datuk Pahlawan Garang ( dalam sertipikat hak milik nomor 1324, Simpang Rumbio pada tahun 1962) telah melakukan perbuatan hukum karena tidak mencantumkan salah satu anggota kaumnya, yang mana ini menjadi dasar gugatan bagi Misdarni selaku penggugat, Pembatalan Sertipikat diajukan secara tertulis ke kantor Pertanahan Kota Solok oleh pihak yang dinyatakan menang oleh pengadilan dan telah dilakukan gelar perkara, Saat ini Kantor Pertanahan Kota Solok sedang berupaya mewujudkan Kota Lengkap dan menerapkan setipikat elektronik, hal ini diharapkan agar tidak adalagi terjadi sengketa pertanahan yang merugikan masyarakat, bahkan hingga harus terjadinya pembatal sertipikat, dan juga diharapkan agar nantinya dalam hal pendaftaran tanah indonesia mampu menerapkan sistem pendaftaran tanah yang positif.
Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah yang Salah Satu Pihaknya Meninggal Dunia (Studi Kasus Akta Jual Beli Nomor 17 Tahun 2019)
Aurelia Vani , Putri;
Ferdi, Ferdi;
Andora, Hengki
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2227
Permasalahan yang sering terjadi adalah Perjnajian Pengikatan Jual Beli tidak dapat ditingkat menjadi Akta Jual Beli dikarenakan Pihak Penjual meninggal dunia dan sebahagian dari ahli warisnya meminta pembatalan terbahadap PPJB tersebut. Berdasarkan ketentuan ahli waris para pihak dikemudian hari menggantikan hak dan kewajiban yang meninggal dunia. Ketentuan yang diatur dalam Pasal 1318 KUHPerdata tersebut, yakni para ahli waris ab intestato hanya merupakan satu kategori dari golongan yang memperoleh hak karena titel umum. Ketentuan tersebut diatur dalam Pasal 833 ayat (1) KUHPerdata tentang ahli waris ab intestato. Penelitan ini menggunakan metode yuridis empiris. Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh yaitu 1. Kedudukan hukum ahli waris dalam PPJB yang dibatalkan secara sepihak oleh ahli waris, Hak dan kewajiban pewaris secara otomatis menjadi hak dan kewajiban ahli waris, sekalipun ahli waris tersebut tidak mengetahui adanya pewarisan, Ahli waris menempati kedudukan si meninggal dalam hal yang menyangkut atas segala barang, segala hak, dan segala piutang dari pewaris, sekaligus berkewajiban membayar utang dan kewajiban-kewajiban pewaris. 2. Akibat hukum pembatalan PPJB secara sepihak oleh ahli waris pengembalian pada posisi semula sebagaimana halnya sebelum terjadi perjanjian yang diatur dalam Pasal 1451 dan 1452 BW. Pihak yang merasa dirugikan atas pembatalan dapat menuntut penggantian biaya (kosten), ganti rugi (schaden), dan bunga (interesten) karena tidak terpenuhinya suatu perikatan. Sedangkan pihak lainnya yang telah terlanjur menerima prestasi dari pihak lain wajib mengembalikannya. 3. Perlindungan hukum terhadap pembeli dalam hal PPJB yang secara sepihak dibatalkan oleh ahli waris bahwa pihak pembeli memiliki kekuatan pembuktian dari akta PPJB yang dibuat oleh notaris dihadapan pengadilan. Pihak pembeli dapat mengajukan tuntutan untuk para ahli waris melaksanakan akta jual beli.