Articles
<![CDATA[Penguasaan Tanah Sebagai Barang Milik Daerah oleh Pemerintah Kota Padang ]]>
<![CDATA[Hardi, Imelda]]>;
<![CDATA[Warman, Kurnia]]>;
<![CDATA[Andora, Hengki]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.941
<![CDATA[This research focuses on; 1) control and management of Government Land by the Regional Government, 2) control of Regional Government Land by the Padang City Government, and 3) control and security of Regional Government Land which can create legal certainty and provide maximum benefits. The research method in this study uses a normative juridical, empirical, and conceptual approach. The data sources used come from regulations, documents relating to the management of land assets as well and the results of interviews with parties involved in the management of Regional Property in the form of land of the Padang City Government. Based on research that has been carried out, the implementation of the management of Regional Government land assets has been carried out by the Padang City Government through regulations governing the management of Regional Property. However, several obstacles cause less than optimal management of land assets by the Padang City Government by OPD land users. Furthermore, 3 (three) efforts to secure land assets must be implemented as an inseparable unit, so that legal certainty of land assets of the Padang City Government can be achieved which can provide maximum benefits.]]>
<![CDATA[Pendaftaran Peralihan Tanah Milik Kaum yang Sudah Terdaftar atas Nama Mamak Kepala Waris di Kota Padang ]]>
<![CDATA[Yahya, Ilham]]>;
<![CDATA[Warman, Kurnia]]>;
<![CDATA[Andora, Hengki]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.963
<![CDATA[Land title certificates are strong evidence as confirmed in Article 19 paragraph (2) letter c UUPA and Article 32 paragraph (1) Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. The problem formulation in this research is: How is family land registered in the name of the head of the heir in Padang City? Why do disputes arise in recording the transfer of land rights belonging to registered people to third parties in Padang City, and how are these disputes resolved? The research method used is qualitative research and empirical juridical research. The results of the research are the Registration of clan-owned land in the name of the chief heir in Padang City. Land originating from clan customary rights can be transferred in the name of clan members based on the Approval/Statement of Clan Approval that has been given by the Agency Agency. Land. The process of transferring rights to customary community land in the name of the chief heir is by submitting an application to the Head of the Land Office so that the community's customary land is registered in the name of the clan or Chief. The Heirs use a Statement of Physical Control of the Land Plot signed by the Head of the Heirs.]]>
<![CDATA[Pelaksanaan Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan Perusahaan (Corporate Social Responsibility) oleh PT. Transco Energi Utama Di Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan ]]>
<![CDATA[Afif Alfianda, Muhammad]]>;
<![CDATA[Azheri, Busyra]]>;
<![CDATA[Andora, Hengki]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.965
<![CDATA[PT. Transco Energi Utama is engaged in palm oil processing. The company was founded in 2018 and is one of the companies under PT. Incasi Raya Group. History of PT. Transco Energi Utama in distributing Corporate Social Responsibility (Corporate Social Responsibility) is not only concerned with the profits received, therefore in terms of distributing CSR PT. Transco Energi Utama wants to realize its social responsibility through careful planning. The research method used is Empirical Juridical, namely an approach based on field research to obtain primary data as the main data. In addition to field research, library research was also carried out to obtain supporting secondary data. The results of the research show that the implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility by PT. Transco Energi Utama in Pesisir Selatan Regency is implemented through the Community Care Program (PPM), with the first distribution carried out in 2019. PT. Incasi Raya Group as the parent company has the authority to decide on approval of the proposed forms of programs and the amount of CSR funds that have been determined by PT. Transco Energi Utama.]]>
<![CDATA[Kekuatan Hukum Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Perumahan yang Tidak Terlaksana Sebagaimana Mestinya ]]>
<![CDATA[Harefa, Kasran]]>;
<![CDATA[Azheri, Busyra]]>;
<![CDATA[Andora, Hengki]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.971
<![CDATA[The legal force against the PPJB housing that is done by the P.T.Mutiara Peace made not in front of a notary in the form of a standard contract is weak and does not have a perfect legal force as the authentic act made in the presence of the notary. Such an agreement shall remain in force in that it is not contrary to the provisions of the law, the law and the common order. When the property is in the court of justice and because of its nature under the hand, then the proof is relative, that is, when the property has been admitted by the parties to its existence, the PPJB has the full legal force of proof, while for the party that does not admitt it then the power of evidence is handed over to the judge's consideration. And for them the parties of the Peace Mutiara with its buyer who perform PPJB in the presence of a notary in the form of an authentic act then the legal force is very binding and the value of the proof is perfect before the court. The position of PPJB in the sale of housing transactions between PT.Mutiara Peace with its buyer: First, that is made not in the presence of a notary in the form of a standard contract is already an agreement but its position is a preliminary agreement under the hand or called as the Preliminary Agreement for Sale of Sale. Second, for those parties that make the PPGB before the notary then the position is as an act whose nature is authentic in accordance with Article 1868 of the KUHPerdata or which is referred to as a contract of binding sale of sale.]]>
<![CDATA[Pendaftaran Tanah Jalan Umum Sebagai Aset Publik di Kota Pariaman ]]>
<![CDATA[Ditha, Fara]]>;
<![CDATA[Warman, Kurnia]]>;
<![CDATA[Andora, Hengki]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.981
<![CDATA[Public road land is a public asset whose control lies with the state. In accordance with Article 9 paragraph (2) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration, registration of land whose object is state land is carried out by recording the plot of land in the land register. The State Finance Law and the State Treasury Law provide a different understanding. The central and regional governments are required to certify all land they control without distinguishing between private domains or public domains attached to the objects being registered, so that control over public road land which should belong to the state, changes to the property of a government agency. The research method used is a normative empirical approach which is descriptive qualitative in nature. The results and discussion show that the basis for consideration by the Pariaman City Regional Government for registering public road land is based on Pariaman City Regional Regulation Number 14 of 2017 concerning Management of Regional Property and Pariaman Mayor Regulation Number 58 of 2019 concerning Technical Instructions for Management of Regional Property which was born from a KPK Instruction . Initially, the status of public road land in land administration was state land (TN), but because it was registered in KIB A, the status changed to Hak Pakai (P). The process for registering public road land is the same as registering land for government agencies whose objects are used to carry out the duties of the government agency concerned.]]>
<![CDATA[Kepastian Hukum Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli terhadap Tanah yang Belum Turun Waris di Kota Padang ]]>
<![CDATA[Rahmdani, Febry]]>;
<![CDATA[Mardenis, Mardenis]]>;
<![CDATA[Andora, Hengki]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1004
<![CDATA[The impediment to make a sale act by the ppat because its conditions are not met, of course, will create uncertainty for the parties who conduct the sale. The agreement is a binding agreement. The parties entered into an agreement for binding the sale of the land which has not been inherited depending on several factors such as the buyer needs time to carry out the payment of the sale price while the seller takes time to process the inheritance certificate of the right to the land, the purchaser has paid the purchase price but the unity of the rights to the ground has not yet been made to inherit, and/or payment of income tax (PPh) and customs duties on land and building (BPHTB) have not been issued by the parties. The contract of sale of land that has not been inherited is based on the agreement of the parties, which is then continued with the application for the drafting of an act before a notary, the approval of the law by a notar, the submission and inspection of documents, the verification of certificates of the right to the land, the preparation and drawing of acts, and the signing of the act. The Civil Procedure Act against land not inherited made before a notary has legal certainty, because the notary as a public official authorized to make an authentic act subject to the regulations of the laws and the code of ethics of the office of the notar has ensured the validity of the civil procedure act against land that has not been made in heritage made against him and by referring it to a civil proceeding act against the land noted in the notarial act can provide legal protection to the parties in the event of legal protection of an authoritative act.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengawasan Perdagangan Ilegal Terhadap Trenggiling oleh Balai Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Sumatera Barat ]]>
<![CDATA[Aulia Khairi, Fidela]]>;
<![CDATA[Syofiarti, Syofiarti]]>;
<![CDATA[Andora, Hengki]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1870
<![CDATA[The Natural Resources Conservation Agency (BKSDA) has one function, namely monitoring the illegal trade in wild animals, especially protected wild animals. The implementation of monitoring of illegal trade in protected wild animals by the West Sumatra BKSDA aims to protect protected wild animals from the danger of extinction and prevent trade in protected animals. However, the implementation of this function has not gone well, judging from temporary observation data showing that there is still a lot of trade in protected wild animals, especially pangolins. So, based on this, the author is interested in conducting research with the title Monitoring the Illegal Trade in Pangolins by the West Sumatra Natural Resources Conservation Agency (BKSDA).]]>
<![CDATA[Pembatalan Sertipikat Hak Milik Tanah Kaum Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri pada Kantor Pertanahan Kota Solok ]]>
<![CDATA[Fadhilla Efriandini, Farah]]>;
<![CDATA[Warman, Kurnia]]>;
<![CDATA[Andora, Hengki]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2213
<![CDATA[Pembatalan Sertipikat Hak Milik Kaum Nomor 1324/kandang Aur, Simpang Rumbio berdasarkan pada Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kota Solok merupakan tindak lanjut dari permohonan penggugat yang merupakan pihak yang menang pada hasil putusan pengadilan negeri kota solok Nomor 13/Pdt.G/2023/PN Slk, yang menyatakan bahwa Sertipikat hak Milik 1324/ kandang Aur dinyatakan tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum yang mengikat. Adapun Rumusan masalah dalam penulisan ini adalah Bagaimanakah proses pendaftaran tanah milik kaum di kantor pertanahan Kota Solok ? Bagaimanakan proses pembatalan Sertipikat tanah milik kaum berdasarkan putusan pengadilan Negeri Kota Solok ? Bagaimanakah Kesiapan Kantor Pertanahan Kota Solok Menuju Kota Lengkap dan Sertipikat Elektronik dan tujuan penulisan ini adalah Untuk menganalisis proses pendaftaran tanah milik kaum di kantor pertanahan Kota Solok, untuk menganalisis proses pembatalan Sertipikat tanah milik kaum berdasarkan putusan pengadilan Negeri Kota Solok, untuk menganalisis Kesiapan Kantor Pertanahan Kota Solok Menuju Kota Lengkap dan Sertipikat Elektronik. Adapun metode yang digunakan adalah metode pendekatan yuridis empiris, dengan sifat penelitian deskriptif analitis, kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah dalam pendaftran tanah milik adat yang dilakukan oleh Datuk Pahlawan Garang ( dalam sertipikat hak milik nomor 1324, Simpang Rumbio pada tahun 1962) telah melakukan perbuatan hukum karena tidak mencantumkan salah satu anggota kaumnya, yang mana ini menjadi dasar gugatan bagi Misdarni selaku penggugat, Pembatalan Sertipikat diajukan secara tertulis ke kantor Pertanahan Kota Solok oleh pihak yang dinyatakan menang oleh pengadilan dan telah dilakukan gelar perkara, Saat ini Kantor Pertanahan Kota Solok sedang berupaya mewujudkan Kota Lengkap dan menerapkan setipikat elektronik, hal ini diharapkan agar tidak adalagi terjadi sengketa pertanahan yang merugikan masyarakat, bahkan hingga harus terjadinya pembatal sertipikat, dan juga diharapkan agar nantinya dalam hal pendaftaran tanah indonesia mampu menerapkan sistem pendaftaran tanah yang positif.]]>
<![CDATA[Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah yang Salah Satu Pihaknya Meninggal Dunia (Studi Kasus Akta Jual Beli Nomor 17 Tahun 2019) ]]>
<![CDATA[Aurelia Vani , Putri]]>;
<![CDATA[Ferdi, Ferdi]]>;
<![CDATA[Andora, Hengki]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2227
<![CDATA[Permasalahan yang sering terjadi adalah Perjnajian Pengikatan Jual Beli tidak dapat ditingkat menjadi Akta Jual Beli dikarenakan Pihak Penjual meninggal dunia dan sebahagian dari ahli warisnya meminta pembatalan terbahadap PPJB tersebut. Berdasarkan ketentuan ahli waris para pihak dikemudian hari menggantikan hak dan kewajiban yang meninggal dunia. Ketentuan yang diatur dalam Pasal 1318 KUHPerdata tersebut, yakni para ahli waris ab intestato hanya merupakan satu kategori dari golongan yang memperoleh hak karena titel umum. Ketentuan tersebut diatur dalam Pasal 833 ayat (1) KUHPerdata tentang ahli waris ab intestato. Penelitan ini menggunakan metode yuridis empiris. Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh yaitu 1. Kedudukan hukum ahli waris dalam PPJB yang dibatalkan secara sepihak oleh ahli waris, Hak dan kewajiban pewaris secara otomatis menjadi hak dan kewajiban ahli waris, sekalipun ahli waris tersebut tidak mengetahui adanya pewarisan, Ahli waris menempati kedudukan si meninggal dalam hal yang menyangkut atas segala barang, segala hak, dan segala piutang dari pewaris, sekaligus berkewajiban membayar utang dan kewajiban-kewajiban pewaris. 2. Akibat hukum pembatalan PPJB secara sepihak oleh ahli waris pengembalian pada posisi semula sebagaimana halnya sebelum terjadi perjanjian yang diatur dalam Pasal 1451 dan 1452 BW. Pihak yang merasa dirugikan atas pembatalan dapat menuntut penggantian biaya (kosten), ganti rugi (schaden), dan bunga (interesten) karena tidak terpenuhinya suatu perikatan. Sedangkan pihak lainnya yang telah terlanjur menerima prestasi dari pihak lain wajib mengembalikannya. 3. Perlindungan hukum terhadap pembeli dalam hal PPJB yang secara sepihak dibatalkan oleh ahli waris bahwa pihak pembeli memiliki kekuatan pembuktian dari akta PPJB yang dibuat oleh notaris dihadapan pengadilan. Pihak pembeli dapat mengajukan tuntutan untuk para ahli waris melaksanakan akta jual beli.]]>
<![CDATA[Kekuatan Hukum Akta Ikrar Wakaf Dalam Pendaftaran Tanah Wakaf Yang Bersengketa Pada Kantor Pertanahan Kota Pariaman ]]>
<![CDATA[Anafiah, M. Ali]]>;
<![CDATA[Fendri, Azmi]]>;
<![CDATA[Andora, Hengki]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v7i2.2398
<![CDATA[Pasal 36 ayat (1) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 42 Tahun 2006 tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 2004 tentang Wakaf menyatakan: “harta benda wakaf wajib diserahkan oleh Wakif kepada Nazhir dengan membuat berita acara serah terima paling lambat pada saat penandatanganan Akta Ikrar Wakaf yang diselenggarakan dalam Majelis Ikrar Wakaf”. Dalam Pasal tersebut dinyatakan bahwa harta benda wakaf wajib diserahkan paling lambat pada saat penandatanganan Akta Ikrar Wakaf. Akta Ikrar Wakaf merupakan suatu bukti pernyataan yang mencantumkan kehendak Wakif untuk mewakafkan harta benda miliknya guna dikelola oleh Nazhir sesuai dengan peruntukan harta benda wakaf yang dituangkan dalam bentuk akta. Berdasarkan latar belakang di atas maka permasalahan yang hendak diteliti yaitu: 1) Bagaimana kekuatan hukum Akta Ikrar Wakaf yang digunakan sebagai salah satu syarat pendaftaran tanah wakaf, 2) Bagaimana pelaksanaan pendaftaran tanah wakaf yang tanahnya sudah bersertipikat Hak Milik Pada Kantor Pertanahan Kota Pariaman, dan 3) Bagaimana penyelesaian sengketa dalam pendaftaran tanah wakaf dengan adanya sanggahan pada Kantor Pertanahan Kota Pariaman.]]>
