Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
12.555
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Kertha Patrika JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sains dan Humaniora (JPPSH) Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Jurnal Akta Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Indonesian Journal of Global Health research Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Sibatik Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Journal Of World Science POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) Kertha Widya : Jurnal Hukum Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Yuris: Journal of Court and Justice Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law Asas wa Tandhim: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan, dan Sosial Keagamaan West Science Interdisciplinary Studies Vyavahara Duta West Science Interdisciplinary Studies Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan
I Nyoman Bagiastra
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Neuroscience Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 86 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA

 1 
The Ontological of State of Law of Pancasila as The Basis of Welfare State in Indonesia I Nyoman Bagiastra
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 9 No 4 (2020)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i04.p03

Abstract

The rule of law as stated in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, namely article 1 Section 3 of the 1945 Constitution which states explicitly that the State of the Republic of Indonesia is a rule of law, of course, has juridical consequences that must be accounted for in the practice of community life, nation, and state. By claiming to be a rule of law, Indonesia must fulfill and realize all the requirements and principles contained in a rule of law, namely the state has the obligation and provides legal certainty for protection to realize the welfare of its citizens. The research method used is normative legal research. the welfare state is briefly described as a series of public policies and state activities in integrating economic policies and social policies for the sake of achieving prosperity.
Kedudukan Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah terkait Berlakunya Sistem Publikasi Negatif di Indonesia Putu Astika Yasa; I Nyoman Bagiastra
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 4 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i04.p12

Abstract

The purpose of writing this article aims to provide an understanding related to how the status of property rights certificates with the enactment of the negative publication system. The research method used is a normative research method. The results of the research are (1) The regulation of land ownership rights by the people in Indonesia is regulated in Law no. 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian Principles which was later explained in more detail through Government Regulation no. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration as the legal basis and contains procedures for the process and settlement and, (2) Legal certainty regarding land ownership rights with the application of a negative publication system is evidenced by a land certificate which will have a permanent position after 5 (five) years. ) years no one has sued or proved otherwise. Tujuan dari penulisan artikel ini bertujuan untuk memberikan pemahaman yang berkaitan dengan bagaimana kedudukan sertipikat hak milik dengan berlakunya sistem publikasi negatif. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian normative dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitiannya adalah (1) Pengaturan hak atas kepemilikan tanah oleh masyarakat di Indonesia diatur dalam Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Pokok – Pokok Agraria yang kemudian dijelaskan lebih detail melalui Peraturan Pemerintah No. 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah sebagai dasar hukumnya dan memuat mengenai tata cara proses dan penyelesaiannya dan, (2) Kepastian hukum mengenai hak atas kepemilikan tanah dengan berlakunya sistem publikasi negatif dibuktikan dengan sertipikat tanah yang dimana akan memiliki kedudukan yang tetap ketika setelah 5 (lima) tahun tidak ada yang menggugat atau membuktikan sebaliknya.
Studi Perbandingan Legalitas Pengaturan E-Cigarettes di Indonesia dengan Beberapa Negara Asia Tenggara I Made Kresnayana; I Nyoman Bagiastra
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i01.p10

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the provisions of e-ciggarette in several countries in Southeast Asia and then to examine the existing regulations in Indonesia to date. The research method used in this study is a normative legal research method with an invitation approach and a comparative approach. Results from smoking studies (show) that in neighboring countries, policies towards e-cigarettes vary. In Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia, Singapore and Vietnam, e-cigarettes are equated with tobacco cigarettes so that they use existing regulations in terms of importation, sale, and so on. Meanwhile in Cambodia, there are new regulations at the level of a Circular, Ministry of Assistance that increase sales, and places where e-cigarettes are not permitted. Thailand chose to combine existing regulations and issue new regulations related to e-cigarettes. However in Indonesia this has not been done and is only profit-oriented 57% of the customs according to the country. Tujuan studi ini adalah untuk menganalisis ketentuan e-ciggarette pada beberapa Negara di Asia Tenggara yang kemudian dikaitkan dengan regulasi yang ada di Indonesia hingga saat ini. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam studi ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan perbandingan. Hasil dari penelitian menyatakan (menunjukkan) bahwa di negara-negara tetangga, kebijakan terhadap rokok elektrik bervariasi. Di Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia, Singapura dan Vietnam rokok elektrik disamakan dengan rokok tembakau sehingga menggunakan aturan yang sudah ada baik itu dalam hal importasi, penjualan, dan sebagainya. Sementara di Kamboja, ada ada aturan baru setingkat Surat Edaran Kementerian yang mengatur impor, penjualan, dan tempat-tempat yang tidak diperbolehkan mengonsumsi rokok elektrik. Thailand memilih mengombinasikan antara aturan yang sudah ada dan menerbitkan regulasi baru terkait rokok elektrik. Namun di Indonesia hal tersebut belum dilakukan dan hanya berorientasi pada keuntungan 57% dari bea cukai yang dibayarkan kepada negara.
Authority of a Notary Related to Marriage Agreements After the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 Ida Bagus Kade Wahyu Sudhyatmika; I Nyoman Bagiastra
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 4 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the arrangements related to marriage agreements in Indonesia and examine the authority possessed by notary related to marriage agreements after the Constitutional Court Decision. This paper is a normative legal research method since the focus of the study departs from the vagueness of norms by using several approaches: statute approach, conceptual approach, and analytical approach. The results of the study indicated that arrangements related to marriage agreements are subject to the provisions of the Marriage Law and the Civil Code. Referring to the provisions in Article 29 of the Marriage Law, it is understood that at or before the marriage takes place both parties with mutual consent can enter into a written agreement ratified by the civil registration officer, after the contents also apply to third parties. Furthermore, there has been a change in the authority of the Notary after the Constitutional Court’s Decision, however, until now the Notary has not been able to ratify the marriage agreement as referred to in the Constitutional Court’s Decision. For that we need a new mechanism that can be regulated in implementing regulations related to the authority of a Notary to ratify a marriage agreement, which the result that the ratification of a marriage agreement made by anNotary can be accessed by the public and can provide legal certainty for the parties involved in the marriage agreement, including third parties and also notaries who ratify.
Scopping the Dispute Submitted Before Indonesia Arbitration I Gusti Agung Ayu Gita Pritayanti Dinar; I Nyoman Bagiastra; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 3 (2023)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i03.p02

Abstract

The problem of equating the concepts of dispute and default results as legal practitioners tending to assume that every case with an arbitration clause is a dispute that must be examined at an arbitration institution even though the case is not necessarily a dispute because cases, disputes and default have different concepts, nature and causes. According to international instrument, arbitration clause is mandatory for cases that submitted to the arbitration. It shall have clearly regulated under agreement of the parties to the dispute. Thus if there a dispute when implementing their agreement then the settlement brought before arbitration. Unfortunately in the reality is different. This research is used normative legal research methods with approaches: (1) Analitical and Conceptual Approach, and (2) The Statue Approach. The result of this research is between arbitration institutions and general justice must implimentated in harmony and must contribute to each other in creating justice, certainty and benefit of the law in carrying out their duties. Only with this harmony will creating a suitability of judicial competence which is fair to all parties. Regulation regarding the definition of arbitration dispute should be clearly and explicitly stipulated in the general provisions of the Arbitration Law and Alternative Dispute Resolution so that all parties may understanding to and the justice, legal certainty in determining in related cases of the competence of arbitration can be achieved.
Formulasi Kewenangan Notaris dalam Menerima Titipan Uang dalam Transaksi Berkaitan dengan Akta yang Dibuatnya Anastasya, Dewa Ayu Julia; Bagiastra, I Nyoman
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 14 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i01.p15

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to gain insight and knowledge related to why the notary's authority is needed to receive money deposits in transactions between parties related to deeds made and to find out about the formulation of the notary's authority to receive money deposits in transactions between parties related to deeds made in the future. The type of research used in this study is a normative legal research. The urgency of the need for the notary's authority to receive money deposits in transactions between parties related to deeds made, if an official takes action outside his authority, it is called an unlawful act. The formulation of the notary's authority to receive money deposits in transactions between parties related to deeds made in the future by prioritizing the prudential principle or the principle of caution which is a principle that requires a notary to pay attention to and consider all possible impacts or risks that may occur due to his actions in carrying out his duties as a notary. Tujuan penelitian ini ialah guna mendapatkan wawasan dan pengetahuan terkait mengapa diperlukannya kewenangan notaris dalam menerima titipan uang dalam transaksi para pihak berkenaan dengan akta yang dibuatnya serta untuk mengetahui mengenai formulasi kewenangan notaris dalam menerima titipan uang dalam transaksi para pihak berkaitan dengan akta yang dibuatnya di masa yang akan datang. Jenis penelitian yang dipergunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah jenis penelitian hukum normatif. Urgensi diperlukannya kewenangan notaris dalam menerima titipan uang dalam transaksi para pihak berkaitan dengan akta yang dibuatnya, apabila seorang pejabat melakukan tindakan diluar wewenangnya, maka disebut sebagai perbuatan melanggar hukum. Formulasi kewenangan notaris dalam menerima titipan uang dalam transaksi para pihak berkaitan dengan akta yang dibuatnya di masa yang akan datang dengan mengedepankan prudential principle atau prinsip kehati-hatian yang merupakan prinsip yang mengharuskan seorang notaris untuk memperhatikan dan menimbang segala kemungkinan dampak atau risiko yang mungkin terjadi atas tindakannya dalam menjalankan tugasnya sebagai notaris.
Co-Authors A. A. Gede Raka Putra Adnyana Adhi Saputra, I Made Hendra Adi Putra, Salit Ngurah Bagus Anak Agung Ayu Agung Devi Anjani Jelantik Anak Agung Istri Ari Atu Dewi Anak Agung Ketut Sukranatha Anak Agung Ngurah Deva Ekada Saputra Anak Agung Ngurah Putra Satria Kusuma Anak Agung Titah Ratihtiari Anastasya, Dewa Ayu Julia Angga, Dewa Aristya Putra, I Kadek Krisnandika Bagus Gede Ari Rama Bagus Putu Wisnu Mandala W Bagus Putu Wisnu Mandala Weisnawa Budhi Mahayana, I Gede Candra, I Gusti Ayu Agung Dwi Chiara, Ni Putu Ayu Mandalay Shasa Alba Dananjaya, Nyoman Adi Arya Putra Danyati, Ayu Putu Laksmi Darmawan, I Made Yogi Dewa Gede Prawira Buwana DEWI, Ni Luh Putu Yuni Sartika Dwirama Wiguna, I Made Ananda Farel Aditya Maksum Franasia, Franasia Gede Hardiyana Putra Gita Lestari, Made Ayu Gunawan, Made Gerry Holys Abdiel Lumira I Dewa Made Anom Jagadhita I Gede Agus Ngurah Gede I Gede Artha I Gede Arya Kusuma I Gede Dharma Eka Yudarsa I Gusti Agung Ayu Gita Pritayanti Dinar I Gusti Ayu Putri Kartika, I Gusti Ayu I Gusti Ayu Widiadnyani I Gusti Ketut Bagusdharma Liran I Kadek Dwi Wisma Putra I Ketut Markeling I KETUT SUDANTRA I Komang Gede Jaya Artha Kusuma I Made Arya Utama I Made Dedy Priyanto I Made Kresnayana I Nyoman Darmadha I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Sudana I Putu Donny Laksmana Putra I Putu Raka Wijaya Putra I Wayan Gede Artawan Eka Putra I Wayan Novy Purwanto I Wayan Parsa I Wayan Putra Nugraha I Wayan Wardiman Dinata Ida Bagus Adhitya Prayoga D Ida Bagus Anindya Jaya Keniten Ida Bagus Gede Pratama Ida Bagus Indra Mahardika Ida Bagus Kade Wahyu Sudhyatmika Ida Bagus Putra Atmadja Ida Bagus Putu Sutama Intan Pratiwi Justitio, Andrean Darven Kadek Arya Putra Gunawan Kadek Arya Putra Gunawan Kadek Julia Mahadewi Kadek Lilyani Kadek Radhitya Vidianditha Kartika, I G A Putri Ketut Leona Trida Yuliani Kirana Wiguna, Ni Komang Cahya Komang Tri Sundari Dewi Komang Wahyuni Purnama Ningrum Krista, I Kadek Laksmi, Ida Ayu Dinda Lani Eka Kumala Dewi Luh Kurnia Dharma Pertiwi, Ni Luh Nyoman Alit Aryani, Luh Nyoman Alit Made Arie Wiedhayanti Made Dita Widyantari Made Ray Adityanata Made Sintya Wahyu Wulan Astari Madeni Apriliani, Ni Putu Eka Madia, Putu Bella Mania Mahardika, Muhammad Panji Mahendra Junior, Gde Putra Mahendra, I Wayan Agus MANGGALA, Ni Kadek Erika Marheni, Lily Ni Kadek Ditha Angreni Ni Luh Dina Yuliana Ni Luh Gede Astariyani Ni Made Adinda Wikan Dewi NI MADE ARI YULIARTINI GRIADHI Ni Made Asri Alvionita Ni Made Deby Anita Sari Ni Made Rian Ayu Sumardani Ni Nyoman Trisnadi Piranti Sari Dewi Ni Putu Ayu Yuliana Murni Ni Putu Meiliana Dewantari NOHANA, Ni Gek Ayu Septi Nugraha, Putu Bagus Satya Nyoman Edy Febriana Nyoman Rexa Danandhika Pangestu, Gede Hadi Pramana, Gede Pasek PRATIWI, I Gusti Agung Istri Ranya Astri Putra Gunawan, Kadek Arya Putu Astika Yasa Putu Gede Arya Sumertayasa Putu Novi Pujayanti Putu Putri Nugraha Putu Tasya Ratna Elisabeth Kusumaedi Putu Tissya Poppy Aristiani Raja Tua Hamonangan Ria Tri Harini Dwi Rusiawati Riana Putra Intaran, Galih Saputra, Komang Yoga Sastra Nugraha, I Made Aditya Selvi Marcellia Sri Deviani Putri, Ni Kadek Ayu Mega Suatra Putrawan sukmayasa, kadek Sukmayoga Wiweka, Gede Rhama Tjokorda Gde Indraputra Udiana, Gede Krisna Wahyu Tantra Setiadi Wayan Agus Singid Adnyana Widyaningrum, Cokorda Istri Sri Dharma Widyasari Susrama Putri, Ni Luh Vita Widyatama, Pande Made Mahatma Wijaya, I Ketut Reksa Windi Dianti Agustin Yustiawan, Dewa Gede Pradnyana