Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.958
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Melintas An International Journal of Philosophy and Religion Jurnal Hukum PRO JUSTITIA Insignia: Journal of International Relations JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies) Jurnal Ilmiah HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL Jurnal Studi Diplomasi dan Keamanan Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Global Strategis Jurnal Hubungan Internasional Indonesian Perspective Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Verity: Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional (International Relations Journal) Jurnal Pertahanan : Media Informasi tentang Kajian dan Strategi Pertahanan yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism dan Integrity Mandala: Jurnal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional Andalas Journal of International Studies AEGIS : Journal of International Relations NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Indonesian Journal of International Relations Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Publica: Jurnal Pemikiran Administrasi Negara Academia Praja : Jurnal Ilmu Politik, Pemerintahan dan Administrasi Publik DINAMIKA GLOBAL : JURNAL ILMU HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi Jurnal Syntax Imperatif : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Maritim Indonesia (Indonesian Maritime Journal) Jurnal Politica Dinamika Masalah Politik Dalam Negeri dan Hubungan Internasional Indonesian Journal of Peace and Security Studies East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR) International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (FJMR) Intermestic: Journal of International Studies Indonesian Perspective Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional Aurelia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi Asian Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Art Aksaqila International Humanities and Social Sciences [AIHSS] Journal Jurnal TNI Angkatan Udara International Journal of Education, Culture, and Society International Journal of Education, Management, and Technology International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences
Anak Agung Banyu Perwita
Universitas Pertahanan RI
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 108 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 108 Documents
Search

 7   8   9   10   11 
U.S.-China Rivalry Controls AI-Based Defense Machine in the Natuna Sea and Malacca Strait: Indonesia's AI Governance Diplomacy in Navigating International Regulations Baresi, Muhammad Jordan; Perwita, Anak Agung Banyu; Hendarwoto, Yermia
Asian Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Art Vol 3 No 5 (2025): Asian Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Art
Publisher : Darul Yasin Al Sys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ajstea.v3i5.7594

Abstract

This research examines the intensifying military artificial intelligence (AI) rivalry between the United States and China in the Southeast Asian maritime domain, with a focus on its implications for Indonesia’s sovereignty and regional security, particularly in the Natuna Sea and the Strait of Malacca. Despite the strategic significance of this technological contest, its impact on Indonesia’s defense and diplomatic posture remains underexplored. The study aims to analyze how the U.S.–China military AI competition is reshaping regional security dynamics and how Indonesia’s defense diplomacy navigates international legal frameworks amid emerging AI-based threats. Adopting a qualitative descriptive approach with a comparative case study design, the research draws on diplomatic documents and reports from international institutions such as the UN, ASEAN, SIPRI, and IISS. Data were analyzed using thematic coding via NVivo 14 and triangulated across multiple sources. Findings reveal that military AI has transformed conventional security concerns into an era of algorithmic rivalry that remains largely unregulated under existing international law. In response, Indonesia has pursued a form of AI Governance Diplomacy, a defense diplomacy strategy grounded in the principles of human oversight, algorithmic transparency, and legal accountability. The study concludes that Indonesia’s normative approach contributes to shaping emerging global norms on military AI governance. Theoretically, the findings expand non-traditional security discourse by incorporating algorithmic threats, while practically offering recommendations to strengthen ethical and regulatory frameworks for AI within ASEAN’s regional security architecture.
Safeguarding Maritime Critical Infrastructure: Indonesia’s Defense Diplomacy in the Indo-Pacific Security Architecture under the Joko Widodo Administration (2014–2024) Nurjanah, Ita; Perwita, Anak Agung Banyu; Hendarwoto, Yermia
Asian Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Art Vol 3 No 5 (2025): Asian Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Art
Publisher : Darul Yasin Al Sys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ajstea.v3i5.7607

Abstract

Maritime critical infrastructure (MCI)—comprising undersea data cables, energy pipelines, ports, and shipping lanes—is essential to sustaining global economic stability and digital connectivity. This is particularly critical in Southeast Asia, a region marked by dense maritime traffic and rising geopolitical tensions, including hybrid threats. As the largest archipelagic state in the region, Indonesia plays a pivotal role in safeguarding the security and resilience of these infrastructures. This study analyzes Indonesia’s defense diplomacy in protecting MCI within the broader Indo-Pacific security architecture during the administration of President Joko Widodo (2014–2024). Anchored in Barry Buzan’s Regional Security Complex Theory (RSCT), alongside the concepts of hedging and defense diplomacy, the research employs a qualitative descriptive method to examine Indonesia’s strategic positioning. Findings indicate that Indonesia’s approach emphasizes diplomatic engagement, regional institutional cooperation, and strategic autonomy—enabling it to enhance infrastructure resilience while preserving neutrality amid intensifying U.S.–China rivalry. Key enablers include the adoption of technological innovation, improved inter-agency coordination, and multilateral defense partnerships. The study concludes that Indonesia’s defense diplomacy not only contributes to national infrastructure protection but also reinforces the stability of the Indo-Pacific maritime order.
Law of Armed Conflict and Humanitarian Law (Case Study: U.S. War in Vietnam) Athar Dil, Saqib; Banyu Perwita, Anak Agung; Rishianto, Agung; Hashmi, Hassan Raza
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v4i1.7613

Abstract

Laporan ini menyelidiki kompleksitas dan kontroversi seputar kepatuhan terhadap prinsip-prinsip HHI di tengah konflik yang berkepanjangan dan kontroversial. Pasal ini menyoroti tujuan inti dari Undang-Undang Konflik Bersenjata (LOAC), yang menekankan pada perlindungan kehidupan dan martabat manusia, pembatasan sarana dan metode peperangan, pembedaan antara kombatan dan non-kombatan, perlindungan terhadap yang terluka, sakit, dan tidak berperang. dan menangkap individu, serta pelestarian kekayaan budaya dan lingkungan. Metodologi penelitiannya menggunakan pendekatan kuasi-kualitatif, yang diambil dari berbagai sumber, termasuk wawancara media, buku, artikel ilmiah, dan dokumenter. Artikel ini mengkaji akar dan pelajaran dari Perang Vietnam dan menyajikan dugaan pelanggaran HHI selama konflik, seperti penargetan yang tidak pandang bulu, penggunaan senjata terlarang, penganiayaan terhadap tahanan, dan penargetan infrastruktur yang melanggar hukum. Buku ini juga mengeksplorasi Teori Perang yang Adil sebagai kerangka penilaian aspek etika perang, dengan fokus pada proporsionalitas. Artikel ini secara kritis mengevaluasi keterlibatan AS dalam Perang Vietnam, menyoroti perdebatan tentang penerapan HHI dalam perang saudara yang diinternasionalisasi. Bab ini menyajikan berbagai perspektif tentang bagaimana HHI harus diterapkan dalam konflik-konflik tersebut dan mengatasi tantangan-tantangan hukum dan etika yang muncul. Artikel ini menyimpulkan dengan menekankan relevansi prinsip-prinsip HHI dalam konflik bersenjata kontemporer, menekankan perlunya penerapan prinsip-prinsip tersebut secara ketat untuk mencegah penderitaan manusia yang tidak perlu dan melindungi hak asasi manusia. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa kesadaran dan pendidikan mengenai HHI harus ditingkatkan, dan penelitian lebih lanjut mengenai konflik bersenjata yang terjadi baru-baru ini harus dilakukan untuk memperluas pemahaman tentang penerapan hukum humaniter internasional.
Building Regional Readiness Indonesia’s Leadership in Enhancing AHA Centre’s Disaster Response Capabilities Rahmadhani, Putri; Perwita, Anak Agung Banyu; Ramsi, Oktaheroe
International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences Vol 3 No 3 (2025): International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences
Publisher : Darul Yasin Al Sys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ijhess.v3i3.6951

Abstract

Indonesia, one of the most disaster-prone countries in the world, plays a strategic role in advancing regional disaster preparedness through its leadership in the ASEAN Coordinating Centre for Humanitarian Assistance on Disaster Management (AHA Centre). This study examines Indonesia’s leadership in the AHA Centre by employing the theoretical frameworks of Security Community (Karl Deutsch) and Norm Life Cycle (Finnemore & Sikkink) to analyze how Indonesia promotes cooperative norms and fosters a collective regional identity in disaster management. Utilizing a qualitative approach, the study evaluates Indonesia’s contributions in policy harmonization, operational readiness, resource mobilization, and norm internalization across ASEAN member states. The findings indicate that Indonesia functions as a norm entrepreneur by leading initiatives such as joint training programs, simulation exercises, information-sharing mechanisms, and the development of early warning systems—efforts that significantly enhance regional resilience and inter-state collaboration. Nonetheless, the study also identifies key challenges, including disparities in national disaster management capacities, inconsistent political commitment, and technological integration gaps, which impede the full realization of a cohesive regional response. The study concludes that Indonesia’s leadership has been instrumental in strengthening both national and regional disaster management frameworks and advancing ASEAN’s vision of a resilient community. Sustained efforts in policy alignment, capacity building, and resource sustainability are essential for deepening ASEAN’s collective disaster preparedness and response mechanisms.
Indonesia’s Defense Diplomacy Toward Fiji on the Papua Issue: Strengthening Bilateral Cooperation and Regional Stability Estirahayu, Ferditania; Perwita, Anak Agung Banyu; Hendarwoto, Yermia
International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences Vol 3 No 3 (2025): International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences
Publisher : Darul Yasin Al Sys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ijhess.v3i3.7153

Abstract

This study analyzes Indonesia’s defence diplomacy towards Fiji through the combined lenses of neorealism and soft power to explain Jakarta’s strategic conduct in the South Pacific. In a regional environment where states prioritize security and survival, Indonesia’s engagement with Fiji represents a calculated, non-coercive approach to advancing national interests, particularly regarding the Papua issue. Defence diplomacy initiatives include officer training programmes, high-level visits, joint military exercises, and institutionalised strategic dialogues designed to promote trust, transparency, and mutual understanding. Empirical evidence highlights the participation of Fijian officers in Indonesia’s Army Staff and Command College and Peacekeeping Centre, as well as bilateral commitments to expand cooperation across the army, navy, and air force. These activities have coincided with a moderation of Fiji’s stance on Papua in regional forums, aligning more closely with Indonesia’s position. Humanitarian assistance, capacity-building measures, and regional security collaboration have further enhanced Indonesia’s diplomatic image and supported its free and active foreign policy. The study concludes that Indonesia’s defence diplomacy towards Fiji serves both as a structural security strategy and a normative engagement tool, generating mutual benefits while strengthening Jakarta’s strategic influence in the Pacific.
Integrated Deterrence in Practice: The 2022 United States National Defense Strategy Towards the Russia-Ukraine War Masitoh, Yuniar Tri; Perwita, Anak Agung Banyu; Rudy, Elphis
International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences Vol 3 No 3 (2025): International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences
Publisher : Darul Yasin Al Sys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ijhess.v3i3.7317

Abstract

This paper analyzes the implementation of integrated deterrence by the United States, as articulated in the 2022 National Defense Strategy (NDS), in response to the Russia–Ukraine War. The central issue examined is how a strategy originally tailored to counter China was adapted to address Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Integrated deterrence seeks to align military and non-military instruments across domains and in coordination with allies, yet its real-world application presents complex challenges. The objective of this study is to assess how integrated deterrence was operationalized, evaluate its effectiveness, and identify key lessons for future defense planning. Employing a qualitative case study approach grounded in the framework of neoclassical realism, the research draws on official policy documents, expert commentary, and academic analyses. The findings reveal that the United States effectively leveraged integrated deterrence to support Ukraine without direct military engagement, utilizing a combination of economic sanctions, cyber defense, intelligence sharing, and diplomatic coordination. While the strategy did not prevent the initial invasion, it contributed to denying Russia a swift victory and reinforced NATO cohesion. The study concludes that integrated deterrence offers strategic flexibility and strengthens coalition responses in an increasingly complex global security landscape. However, its success is contingent upon domestic political consensus, sustained resource commitments, and a nuanced understanding of adversary behavior. The research underscores the need to adapt integrated deterrence for varying threat environments, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region, where escalation dynamics and regional contexts differ significantly.
Gold Rush 2.0: US Defense Political Economy Amid Dollar Decline and Bullion Rise Simamora, Yohana Meyrida; Perwita, Anak Agung Banyu; Ramsi, Oktaheroe
International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences Vol 3 No 3 (2025): International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences
Publisher : Darul Yasin Al Sys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ijhess.v3i3.7395

Abstract

The global financial system is undergoing a profound shift that challenges the reserve currency dominance of the US dollar, driven by escalating national debt, persistent inflation, and intensifying geopolitical tensions. This environment has triggered what can be described as “Gold Rush 2.0,” marked by rising gold prices and declining confidence in fiat currencies. A critical inflection point is evident in the fact that US debt servicing costs ($970 billion in FY2024) have surpassed defense spending ($886 billion), crossing the so-called “Ferguson Limit,” where great powers face heightened risks of decline. This fiscal strain is further compounded by the “Triffin Dilemma,” which requires persistent trade deficits to sustain global dollar liquidity while simultaneously eroding confidence in the currency and deepening debt accumulation. Against this backdrop, the study examines how these dynamics reshape the US defense political economy by constraining budgetary flexibility, hindering modernization, and influencing strategic priorities. Empirical analysis reveals a negative correlation between rising debt servicing obligations and defense budget growth, alongside evidence of central banks increasing gold reserves as a sign of de-dollarization. The study concludes that weakening US economic hegemony carries significant implications for national security and global stability, underscoring the need for strategic recalibration in defense and fiscal policy.
Defence Industry Policy of Indonesia: A Lesson Learned from India Huliyani, Tri; Perwita, Anak Agung Banyu; Ramsi, Oktaheroe
International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences Vol 3 No 3 (2025): International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences
Publisher : Darul Yasin Al Sys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ijhess.v3i3.7509

Abstract

National defence industry self-reliance has become a strategic imperative for states globally, particularly in an international system characterized by anarchy and self-help dynamics. Within this context, the state emerges as the central actor in safeguarding its sovereignty, and the pursuit of defence industry autonomy represents a key survival strategy. This study analyzes Indonesia’s defence industry policy through the theoretical lenses of realism, the developmental state, and the triple helix framework, drawing comparative insights from India, a country widely regarded as more advanced in this sector. Both Indonesia and India are major emerging powers in the Global South with shared ambitions for defence self-reliance, yet they demonstrate divergent trajectories in institutional capacity and policy outcomes, making them suitable for comparative analysis. Employing a qualitative case study design, the research utilizes secondary data from official documents, academic literature, research institute reports, and credible media sources. The findings indicate that while Indonesia benefits from a solid legal foundation (notably Law No. 16/2012) and political commitment, its defence industrial development is hindered by limited fiscal allocations, the dominance of state-owned enterprises, underdeveloped industrial research capabilities, and weak synergy within the triple helix model. Conversely, India has advanced its defence sector through strategic initiatives such as Make in India and Atmanirbhar Bharat, underpinned by fiscal incentives, deregulation, increased private sector engagement, enhanced research through the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), and a well-integrated triple helix innovation ecosystem. These comparative insights underscore the need for Indonesia to reform its policy paradigm by strengthening its industrial roadmap, fostering private sector participation, enhancing government–industry–academia collaboration, and pursuing export-oriented and technology transfer strategies. Theoretically, the study contributes to the growing literature on defence industry development in emerging states; practically, it offers policy recommendations aimed at improving Indonesia’s defence industrial ecosystem, enhancing global competitiveness, and reducing import dependency through innovation-led self-reliance.
Among Giants: The Military Bases’ Impacts of Great Power Competition on Djibouti’s National Security Silaen, Christo Ariel Mario; Perwita, Anak Agung Banyu; Hendarwoto, Yermia
International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences Vol 3 No 3 (2025): International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences
Publisher : Darul Yasin Al Sys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ijhess.v3i3.7563

Abstract

This study addresses the limited research on the implications of great power competition for small states, with a particular focus on Djibouti’s national security, political autonomy, and economic stability. Despite its strategic location and geopolitical significance, Djibouti remains underexamined in the context of rising global military rivalries. The study investigates how the presence of multiple foreign military bases affects Djibouti’s internal and external security dynamics. Employing a qualitative case study approach, data were drawn from official reports, scholarly literature, and strategic analyses, and examined using thematic content analysis to identify key patterns and trade-offs. Findings indicate that while foreign military bases contribute to national security through deterrence and provide economic gains via lease revenues and infrastructure development, these benefits are unequally distributed and come at the cost of growing dependencies that may limit Djibouti’s foreign policy autonomy. The study concludes that Djibouti strategically adopts an omnidirectional hedging approach, maintaining balanced relations with competing powers to preserve its sovereignty and regional relevance. The research contributes to theoretical discourse on small-state strategies in international relations and offers practical policy recommendations for managing foreign military engagements while safeguarding national interests. It also highlights avenues for future research on the broader socio-economic and political implications of foreign base-hosting in strategically located microstates.
Indonesia’s Defense Diplomacy in Advancing ASEAN Agreement on Disaster Management and Emergency Response (AADMER) as a Regulatory Basis for ASEAN First Responder Formation Ramsi, Oktaheroe; Perwita, Anak Agung Banyu; Hendarwoto, Yermia
International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences Vol 3 No 3 (2025): International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences
Publisher : Darul Yasin Al Sys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ijhess.v3i3.7564

Abstract

Southeast Asia ranks among the most disaster-prone regions globally, owing to its complex geological features and tropical climate. In response, ASEAN established the ASEAN Agreement on Disaster Management and Emergency Response (AADMER), the region’s first legally binding framework for disaster management. Despite its significance, AADMER's implementation faces structural limitations, including the principle of non-interference, disparities in member state capacities, and bureaucratic delays that hinder rapid mobilization during the critical "golden time" of disaster response. This study examines Indonesia’s defense diplomacy in reinforcing AADMER as a regulatory basis for developing a regional First Responder mechanism that is timely, coordinated, and effective. Adopting a descriptive qualitative methodology, the research analyzes Indonesia’s engagement through platforms such as the ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting (ADMM) and ADMM-Plus, alongside the roles of key national institutions including the National Disaster Management Authority (BNPB), the Indonesian Armed Forces (TNI), the Ministry of Defense, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and cooperation with the ASEAN Coordinating Centre for Humanitarian Assistance (AHA Centre). The findings highlight Indonesia’s strategic role as a country frequently affected by disasters in advancing civil-military interoperability, joint disaster response exercises, and rapid deployment mechanisms under AADMER. Indonesia’s defense diplomacy emerges not only as a tool of traditional security but also as a form of soft power that enhances regional solidarity and institutional legitimacy. The study concludes that Indonesia’s leadership is pivotal in realizing the vision of One ASEAN, One Response through the establishment of a regulation-based, consensus-driven, and collectively operational First Responder system for the region.
Co-Authors Abdullah Zulkifli Adelia Wulandari Agung Risdhianto Agung Risdhianto Agung Rishdianto Agus Sudarya Agus Sudarya Akhmad Sultoni Yahya Akmal Nugraha, Deja Akmhad Sultoni Yahya Albubaroq, Hikmat Zakky Andriyanto, Kristoforus Evan Annisa Dipa Pertiwi Arcelinocent Emile Pangemanan Aritonang, Alice Agatha Delfreeta Aritonang, Sovian Asrudin, Muhammad Athar Dil, Saqib Avanantsoa, Harlette Naudy Gea Baresi, Muhammad Jordan Brahmana, Dedy Putra BUDI PRAMONO Dedy Putra Brahmana Denisa Rizkiya Denisa Rizkiya Dewi, Dyah Apriliana Chandra Editha Praditya Eko Hadisancoko, Rizeriu Ernasari, Cici Estirahayu, Ferditania Fadhlur Rivanda Febry Hadiaty Ferditania Estirahayu Frega Ferdinand Wenas Inkiriwang Frega Wenas Inkiriwang Furqon Hananto, Subarkah Hashmi, Hassan Raza Hassan Raza Hashmi Hendarwoto, Yermia Heni Yekti Pamulatsih Herlina Juni Risma Saragih Hikmat Zakky al Mubaroq Huliyani, Tri I Gusti Bagus Dharma Agastia, I Gusti Bagus Dharma Inkiriwang, Frega F. Wenas Inkiriwang Inkiriwang, Frega Ferdinand Wenas Inkiriwang, Frega Wenas Iqbal, Yunizir Ircha Tri Meilisa Irene Irene Jennie Joyce Candice Jennie Joyce Candice Joodael, Kim Joseph Tertia Joseph Tertia Kim, Joodael Kurniawan Kurniawan Firmuzi Syarifuddin Lazuardi Loqman Ar Rahman Luangphane, Chanthaboun Lubis, Lia Aulia M. Adnan Madjid Madjid, M. Adnan Mahroza, Jonni Makarim Wibisono Masitoh, Yuniar Tri Megawati Putri Militia Christi Pandelaki Militia Christi Pandelaki Montolalu, Reynaldo Rudy Kristian Muhamad Hasanuddin Wahid Muhammad Arkan Muhammad Ilham Razak Munif Prasojo Nahadin, Mallini Anthonia Nia Norlyanti Nisrina Nadhifa Norlyanti, Nia Nugraha, Deja Akmal Nurhayati Pakpahan Nurjanah, Ita Oktaheroe Ramsi Pamulatsih, Heni Yekti Pamungkas, Maria Anatasya Sekar Pedrason, Rodon Peni Hanggarini Praditya, Editha Purwantoro, Susilo Adi R, Andana Prawitra Rahma Yustika Dewi Rahmadhani, Putri Reza A.A Wattimena Ria Putri Santoso Riant Nugroho Rishianto, Agung Rizerius Eko Hadi Sancoko Rudy, Elphis Rui Duarte Saleo, Aloycius Chandra Londong Somalinggi Santoso, Ria Putri Saputra, Darma Eka Sekar Hesti Suminar Sembiring, Afri Emilia Br Silaen, Christo Ariel Mario Simamora, Yohana Meyrida Sudibyo Sudibyo Sudibyo Suminar, Sekar Hesti Surachman Surjaatmadja Suyono Thamrin Tertia, Joseph Tia Dikatama Tsania Vania Lalita Wenas Inkiriwang, Frega F. Wicaksono, Tresno Widjayanto, Joni Widya Dwi Rachmawati Wiranto, Surya Yasintha Selly Rossiana Yusuf Ali