Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.779
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Undiksha Asas: Jurnal Sastra Semantik : Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia KEMBARA Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Linguista: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pembelajarannya Jurnal Basicedu SASTRANESIA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Journal of Primary Education Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Aksis : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra Lateralisasi Journal of Elementary School (JOES) Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang KLITIKA Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Kalam Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Bastra (Bahasa dan Sastra) Jurnal Basicedu JBSI: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia
Suwito, Wagiran
Jurusan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Bahasa Dan Seni, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 35 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama

 1 
EVALUATION OF ONLINE LEARNING MATERIALS DEVELOPMENT OF BIPA USING THE CIPP EVALUATION MODEL Mahda Haidar Rahman; Wagiran Wagiran; Subyantoro Subyantoro
Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama Vol 9, No 1 (2022): January 2022
Publisher : IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30734/jpe.v9i1.1864

Abstract

During the pandemic, lectures that were originally conducted face-to-face switched to online, including learning the development of BIPA teaching materials based on the destination country. This change certainly brings several impacts that affect the lecture. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate learning. The evaluation used is the CIPP evaluation model. The CIPP evaluation model is known as formative evaluation with the aim of making decisions and improving the program. The purpose of this research is to find out how effective the online learning of developing BIPA teaching materials is based on the destination country. This research is an evaluative research that uses a qualitative descriptive approach. The data in this study are primary and secondary data. Data was collected by using interview and questionnaire techniques. Overall aspects of the evaluation of the CIPP model as a result of this study are 1.5% very ineffective, 16.15% ineffective, 55.52% effective and 26.35% very effective. From this percentage, it can be seen that this lecture has been effective, but there needs to be improvements and developments to make it better.
Evaluasi Perkuliahan Daring Mata Kuliah Analisis Kesalahan Berbahasa Indonesisa dengan Model Diskrepansi Meilan Arsanti; Wagiran Suwito; Subyantoro Subyantoro; Cahyo Hasanudin
Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama Vol 9, No 2 (2022): July 2022
Publisher : IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30734/jpe.v9i2.2553

Abstract

Abstract: During the Covid-19 pandemic, lectures at the Indonesian Language and Literature Education Study Program (PBSI), Faculty of Teacher Training and Education (FKIP), Sultan Agung Islamic University (Unissula) were held online. Language Error Analysis is one of the courses conducted online. The problems studied include planning, implementing, and evaluating the process and results of online lectures for these courses. The method used in this study is a policy research program evaluation type with a qualitative and descriptive approach with a discrepancy model. Data in the form of scores of all variables were analyzed using the Wilcoxon tiered sign test procedure, with this technique a large difference sign will be obtained indicating that at the online lecture planning stage an average score of 79.9% is obtained with a large difference of 20.1 then there is a gap of 20, 1% with a small category (K). At the stage of implementing online lectures, the average score obtained is 76.4% with a large difference of 23.6, so there is a discrepancy of 23.6% with a small category (K). In the process and results assessment stage, an average score of 80.3% was obtained with a large difference of 19.7, so there was a discrepancy of 19.7% and was classified in the very small category (K). This gap is generally caused by technical factors such as poor internet facilities, limited internet quota, and inadequate online course equipment.  Keywords: online lectures, language error analysis, discrepancy model  Abstrak: Selama pandemi Covid-19 perkuliahan di Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia (PBSI), Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (FKIP), Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (Unissula) dilaksanakan secara daring. Analisis Kesalahan Berbahasa merupakan salah satu mata kuliah yang dilaksanakan secara daring. Masalah yang diteliti meliputi perencanaa, pelaksanaan, dan penilaian proses dan hasil perkuliahan daring mata kuliah tersebut. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian kebijakan jenis evaluasi program dengan pendekatan kualitatif dan deskriptif dengan model diskrepansi. Data berupa skor semua variabel dianalisis dengan menggunakan prosedur uji tanda berjenjang wilcoxon, dengan teknik ini akan didapatkan tanda beda besar yang menunjukan bahwa pada tahap perencanaan perkuliahan daring diperoleh rata-rata skor 79,9% dengan besar beda 20,1 maka terjadi kesenjangan sebesar 20,1% dengan kategori kecil (K). Pada tahap pelaksanaan perkuliahan daring rata-rata pemerolehan skor sebesar 76,4% dengan besar beda 23,6 maka terjadi diskrepansi sebesar 23,6% dengan kategori kecil (K). Pada tahap penilaian proses dan hasil diperoleh rata-rata skor sebesar 80,3% dengan besar beda adalah sebesar 19,7 maka terjadi diskrepansi sebesar 19,7% dan tergolong dalam kategori sangat kecil (K). Kesenjangan tersebut secara umum disebabkan karena faktor teknis seperti kurang bagusnya fasilitas internet, terbatasnya kuota internet, dan perangkat perkualiahan daring yang kurang memadai.  Kata kunci: perkuliahan daring, analisis kesalahan berbahasa, model diskrepansi
Co-Authors Adhetia Sukmafitriani Adnin Mutiara Afwah Zaenul Fidloh Agus Milu Susetyo Agus Nuryatin Ahmad Fahmi Saifudin Ahmad Nur Cahyo Ai Sumirah Setiawati Alfi Khoiru An Nisa Alfi Yalda Ayumi Alfien Sanjaya Alfiyatur Rohmaniyah Anita Rachmawati Antonius Nesi Astrid Lekatompessy Cahyo Hasanudin Citra Amelia Sudiyati Deby Luriawati Deby Luriawati M. Denis Alfian Denis Ekasari Ekasari, Anisa Diyah Faktur Rokhmand Fathur Rokhman Fathur Rokhman Fathur Rokhman Fetro Muhammad Finda Septina Munjariyati Gesti Sekar Santiwi Ghaisyah Dwi Mayandri Guntur Warisman Hana Sumiati Widjaja Hartono Hartono Hartono Haryadi - Junaidi Junaidi Klemens Maksianus Lenga Leni Salindri Mahda Haidar Rahman Maulana Phaundra Tegar Irawan Maulida Laily Kusuma Wati Meilan Arsanti Michael Johan Sulistiawan Muhamad Haryanto Muhammad Jahfal Hanan Naili Rohmawati Naryatmojo, Deby Luriawati Nufi Azam Mutaqin Nurhamidah Nurhamidah Rahayu Pristiwati Rifa Aulia Rini Dwi Susanti Rusdarti - Seylla Arifeni Sifa Fauziah Sinta Dayyana St. Naisa Hehanussa Subyantoro Suharyo Suharyo Sukarismanti Sukma Nabilah Daulay Tati Sri Uswati Vera Wardani Yoga Adi Pratama Zuhra Sl. Datu