p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.274
P-Index
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : SALTeL Journal (Southeast Asia Language Teaching and Learning)

Peer Feedback in Reviewing Essay Dewi, Utami
SALTeL Journal (Southeast Asia Language Teaching and Learning) Vol 2, No 2: July 2019
Publisher : Association of Language Teachers in Southeast Asia (ALTSA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (345.78 KB) | DOI: 10.35307/saltel.v2i2.26

Abstract

Peer feedback is the comment or advice from equal partner, which can help the writer to improve their product of the writing. The aim of this study was to find out the types of peer feedback most frequently given by students in reviewing their classmates? essay. The total participants of this study were 178 students of English education department. The data of this study was taken from peer feedback given by students in reviewing essay, which applied in the class of writing. The design of this study was descriptive quantitative. The peer feedback given by students in reviewing their classmates? essay was analyzed and categorized based on Hyland and Hyland?s classification: praise, criticism, and suggestion. As the result, suggestion was most frequently given by students in reviewing essay because most of the students gave constructive comment or asking the improvement as their feedback rather than gave praise and criticism. It was seen that the total suggestion which given by students to the classmates was 208 feedback. Then, 108 praise was given which expressed the positive comments or positive impression, though there is some empty praise without constructive comments. 107 criticisms were also given by students in expressing their negative comment or dissatisfaction with the essay written by their classmates. In addition, some combinations of the feedback were also given in reviewing essay.  There are 30 combinations of praise and criticism, 51 combinations of praise and suggestion, and 25 combinations of criticism and suggestion. In conclusion, the reviewers expressed positive and negative comments, positive and constructive comments, the negative and constructive comments in same time.
Peer Feedback in Reviewing Essay Dewi, Utami
SALTeL Journal (Southeast Asia Language Teaching and Learning) Vol. 2 No. 2: July 2019
Publisher : Association of Language Teachers in Southeast Asia (ALTSA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35307/saltel.v2i2.26

Abstract

Peer feedback is the comment or advice from equal partner, which can help the writer to improve their product of the writing. The aim of this study was to find out the types of peer feedback most frequently given by students in reviewing their classmates’ essay. The total participants of this study were 178 students of English education department. The data of this study was taken from peer feedback given by students in reviewing essay, which applied in the class of writing. The design of this study was descriptive quantitative. The peer feedback given by students in reviewing their classmates’ essay was analyzed and categorized based on Hyland and Hyland’s classification: praise, criticism, and suggestion. As the result, suggestion was most frequently given by students in reviewing essay because most of the students gave constructive comment or asking the improvement as their feedback rather than gave praise and criticism. It was seen that the total suggestion which given by students to the classmates was 208 feedback. Then, 108 praise was given which expressed the positive comments or positive impression, though there is some empty praise without constructive comments. 107 criticisms were also given by students in expressing their negative comment or dissatisfaction with the essay written by their classmates. In addition, some combinations of the feedback were also given in reviewing essay.  There are 30 combinations of praise and criticism, 51 combinations of praise and suggestion, and 25 combinations of criticism and suggestion. In conclusion, the reviewers expressed positive and negative comments, positive and constructive comments, the negative and constructive comments in same time.
L1 Cognitive Skills Transfer in the Process of Learning L2 of Dependent Scripts Dewi, Utami; Sibarani, Berlin; Sumarsih, Sumarsih
SALTeL Journal (Southeast Asia Language Teaching and Learning) Vol. 3 No. 2: July 2020
Publisher : Association of Language Teachers in Southeast Asia (ALTSA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35307/saltel.v3i2.52

Abstract

Language transfer is one of the important areas in second language acquisition research. This study aims to describe the process of transfer L1, Bahasa Indonesia, cognitive skills to L2, English, cognitive skills of dependent scripts. Cognitive skills are the skills that support decoding, such as rapid automatized naming (RAN) and working memory (WM). This research was conducted with descriptive qualitative research design, with case study.  The subjects of the study were 15 students who speak Bahasa as the first language (L1) and learn English as the second language (L2). Bahasa and English are the language which have the same scripts, dependent scripts. The subjects were given the rapid automatized naming (RAN) test and working memory (WM) test. The data of this study was analyzed with two data analysis techniques, they were non-parametric statistics and qualitative data analysis. The finding of this study was that there was no significantly transfer of cognitive skills from L1, Bahasa, to L2, English. It can be seen from the process of transfer RAN and WM as the subskills, that most of the students made different errors both in L1 and L2 RAN and WM, and they have different levels of achievement in L1 and L2 cognitive skills.
Co-Authors Abas Asyafah, Abas Abdillah Abdillah Achmad Ramadhan Afrida, Windy Agus Tri Wibowo, Agus Tri Ainan Ningrum Ananda, Dea Riska Andana, Yosi Apriani, Maimunah April Liani, Lorensa AR, Mhd. Faisal Abadi Asmutiar Asmutiar, Asmutiar Aswatdi, Hazhar Atik Prihatini Aulia, Nabila Pasya Batubara, Teguh Amanda Berlin Sibarani Berutu, Hotma Dalimunthe, Ahmad Amin Dalimunthe, Muhammad Daulay, Sholihatul Hamidah Deby Astria Lubis, Rini dwi hartanto Fahrezi Munthe, MHD. Husri Zaini FARADILLA, FARADILLA Farida Repelita Waty Kembaren Fenorika, Edina Fidyah Aminin, Fidyah Fransiska , Widia Harahap, Addinul Kamil Harahap, Arfita Wahyuni Harahap, Hilyati Fitria Harvensica Gunnara Henry Maksum, Henry Heri Rustanto, Heri Ikhwan Fauzi Ilham Surya Fallo Ilmi, Vivi Nurul Irham, Novia Robeitah ISKANDAR Iskandar Iskandar Izar, Julisah Julaika, Siti Khairul Ibad Rangkuti, Muflih Metasari Sihaloho Mira Fuzita, Mira Mohammad Sabransyah Muhammad Suhairi, Muhammad Nabila, Afanin Nasution, Muhammad Muslim Nasution, Nurul Oktari Neneng Aminah Neneng Aminah Ningsih, Fitri Randia Noor, Zulfikar Nst, Anggi Rahmanida Nur Hasanah Nurhaliza, Titik Nurniati Tianastia Rullyni Panjaitan, Suhaida Zain Prihatini, Atik Pujiarti, Vidya Purnama, Surya Wijaya Putri, Sabtini Ika Ramadhani, Nazwa Ramadhani, Nurhakiki Ridayani, Rita Ristina Rosauli Harianja Saepul Anwar Safitri, Bujing Sakinah, Radyah Salmiah, Maryati Salsavira, Faliza Layla Sambas, Ela Carmelia Mukti Samosir, Sri Aulia Sinulingga, Elwan Ridhonta Siregar, Sabila Khoiroh Siswanto Agus Wilopo Sri Dewi Lestari, Sri Dewi Stephani Yane, Stephani Sugi Rahayu Suhada, Herlisa Sumarsih . . Suria Saputri, Nurul Aini Surya Amami Pramuditya Syahrul R, Syahrul Syilla, Salsabilla Tasya Putri, Anna Tunjung Wibowo Vina Jayanti, Vina Wardhani, Rio Whalsen Duli Agus Lauh Zainal Arifin