Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.708
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE JURE Lentera Hukum FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Diponegoro Law Review Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Pembaharuan Hukum PETITA: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah (PJKIHdS) Jurnal Panorama Hukum Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Jurnal Notariil Unes Law Review PALAR (Pakuan Law review) JURNAL RECHTENS Syntax Idea ADIL : Jurnal Hukum Jurnal Hukum Adigama Jurnal Syntax Transformation Indonesian Journal of Law and Society Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Jurnal Legisia Journal of Economic & Business Law Review QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif Equivalent: Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial Teknik MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Welfare State Jurnal Hukum IIJSE Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum QOSIM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Sultan Adam : Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial PESHUM Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Ermanto Fahamsyah
Faculty Of Law, University Of Jember, East Java, Indonesia
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Automotive Engineering Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 59 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 59 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Ketidaksesuaian Pemberian Upah Minimum Pekerja Di Era Globalisasi Ekonomi Rahman, Irham; Suwadji; Fahamsyah, Ermanto; Kumala Sari, Nuzulia
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1964

Abstract

The influence of economic globalization that is occurring in the current era has become a challenge for developing countries in the progress of national economic growth. To face these challenges, Indonesia made a legal breakthrough by enacting a law using the omnibus law method, namely Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning Job Creation (UU Job Creation). Apart from the polemic in the process of forming this law, the Job Creation Law issued a special Government Regulation relating to the latest minimum wage for workers. However, the legal issue still cannot be resolved because there are still workers who have not received the wages they should. The problem in this research is how to enforce the law regarding discrepancies in providing minimum wages for workers. The research method used in this research is normative research by examining related norms. And this research approach uses a statutory approach and a case approach. The results of this research are that law enforcement regarding non-compliance with the minimum wage for important workers is carried out by increasing inspections and supervision, namely by carrying out frequent inspections and supervision in workplaces. Administrative sanctions, legal demands. This can be done through courts or employment dispute resolution bodies, and campaigns and Advocacy, namely labor organizations publishing the names of violators as a more transparent form of law enforcement.
Reformulation of the Approval of the Honorary Council of Notaries in Providing Recommendations for the Interests of the Court Tri Wahyudiono; Ermanto Fahamsyah; Bhim Prakoso; Gatot Eddy Pramono
Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE) Vol 8 No 1 (2025): Sharia Economics
Publisher : Universitas KH. Abdul Chalim Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31538/iijse.v8i1.8065

Abstract

The Notary Honorary Council as a new organ that emerged in the Amendment to the UUJN has become a crucial organ in the law enforcement process for the benefit of the judiciary and its efforts to maintain the nobility and dignity of the Notary Office, this is because of the approval or rejection issued by the MKN at the request of investigators, public prosecutors or judges when they want to take a photocopy of the Minutes of the Deed and/or summon a Notary related to the Deed or Notary Protocol that is in the Notary's storage. This article provides an understanding of the actual characteristics of the MKN's authority and what the MKN's recommendation formulation is in order to maintain the honor of the Notary Office and uphold the judicial process. The results of the analysis found that the MKN's authority to provide approval or rejection of requests from investigators, public prosecutors, or judges for the benefit of the judiciary and the authority in terms of guiding as referred to in Article 66 and Article 66A of the Amendment to the UUJN is categorized as attributive authority based on several reasons: Authority granted by law; Authority that cannot be transferred; and Special purpose of authority. Meanwhile, the MKNW recommendation formulation for approval or rejection is in the form of a final and binding state administrative decision, and there are no Administrative Efforts. Clear procedures serve to realize legitimacy, transparency, and responsibility as well as the protection of the rights and interests of Notaries. The structure of the recommendation for approval or rejection made by the MKNW can at least include: the identity of the parties involved, the legal basis for the application, a description of the request, considerations and reasons for approval, limitations and provisions, the validity period of the approval, signatures, and official stamps.
Contemporary Islamic Economic Law on Legal Protection for Bankrupt Guarantors: Comparative Insights from Common Law and Asian Jurisdictions Bambang Sugeng Ariadi Subagyono; Ermanto Fahamsyah; Hariyanto Sururi; Amaliyah
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11897

Abstract

The legal protection of guarantors declared bankrupt or suspended from debt payment obligations (PKPU), together with the principal debtor, remains a critical yet underexplored issue in Indonesian insolvency law. This study examines the scope and adequacy of such protections under contemporary Islamic economic law, providing comparative insights from selected common law and Asian jurisdictions. Employing a normative juridical approach combined with comparative legal analysis, the research analyses statutory provisions, judicial precedents, and doctrinal interpretations. The study highlights the imbalance of liability between guarantors and debtors, the absence of explicit safeguards under Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and PKPU, and the resulting implications for creditor rights and economic justice. Comparative analysis draws from the United Kingdom and United States (standard law systems) and Singapore, Japan, and Malaysia (Asian jurisdictions), revealing more structured protections for guarantors, including mechanisms such as independent liability, automatic stay, and negotiated debt restructuring. The findings indicate that Indonesia's current framework inadequately recognises the secondary and derivative nature of guarantor obligations, exposing them to disproportionate risk. This study contributes to the academic discourse by integrating contemporary Islamic economic principles into the analysis of insolvency law, providing a normative framework for reform and offering comparative insights that can inform both legislation and future research on guarantor protection. The study recommends legislative reform to explicitly regulate guarantor protection, integrating principles of proportionality, good faith, and balanced creditor–debtor relations, in line with contemporary Islamic economic law.
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Penyedia Atas Pemutusan Sepihak Kontrak Konstruksi Dalam Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah Ramadhani, Khaulah Sayu; Fahamsyah, Ermanto; Ali, Mohammad
Equivalent: Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial Teknik Vol. 6 No. 1: Equivalent: Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial Teknik
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jequi.v6i1.168

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap penyedia pada kontrak konstruksi yang diputus secara sepihak, dan mengetahui bagaimana konsep kedepan agar kontrak konstruksi memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi penyedia. Metode penelitan yang digunakan yakni yuridis normatif (legal research). Pendekatan masalah yang digunakan dalam penelitan ini yaitu pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan ialah bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan non hukum. Pelaksanaan pekerjaan konstruksi diatur melalui Kontrak Kerja Konstruksi, yang secara hukum mengikat pengguna dan penyedia jasa konstruksi. Hal itu diatur dalam Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018, PerLKPP Nomor 12 Tahun 2021, UU Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Jasa Konstruksi. Kontrak Konstruksi sering kali dihadapkan pada berbagai masalah. Bahkan, hampir tidak ada Kontrak Konstruksi yang bebas dari masalah. Kontrak Konstruksi sering kali dihadapkan pada berbagai masalah seperti pemutusan kontrak secara sepihak. Salah satu penyebabnya adalah penyedia lalai menyelesaikan pekerjaan sebagaimana tercantum dalam kontrak atau tidak memperbaiki kelalaiannya setelah pemberian kesempatan. Meski klausul pemutusan kontrak telah tercantum dalam surat perjanjian. Namun, pemutusan kontrak secara sepihak banyak menuai permasalahan karena pertimbangan pemberian kesempatan masih belum diatur secara tegas. Oleh karena itu, perlu perlindungan hukum bagi penyedia untuk meminimalisir permasalahan tersebut.
LIMITS OF DIRECTOR LIABILITY: BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULES, PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL, AND BREACH OF CONTRACT Kiswah, Maftuha; Ermanto Fahamsyah; Fendi Setyawan
Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 16 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jbengkoelenjust.v16i1.48580

Abstract

Limited liability companies inherently separate corporate assets from personal wealth, thereby providing legal protection for their management. However, directors remain strictly bound by fiduciary duties and legal restrictions to ensure the protection of third parties and stakeholders. This article analyzes the legal limits of directors' liability by examining the balance between the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) doctrine, which protects business decisions made in good faith, and the piercing the corporate veil doctrine, which holds directors personally liable for corporate misconduct. Using a normative legal research method with a legal and conceptual approach, this study examines corporate law theories and the latest jurisprudence related to commercial contract violations. The research shows that although the Companies Act protects the BJR, courts have the authority to pierce the corporate veil if a director acts ultra vires, acts in bad faith, or fails to fulfill commercial obligations that result in a breach of contract. Furthermore, the introduction of micro-enterprises with sole directors under the Job Creation Act creates a higher risk of personal liability due to the tendency for asset commingling. The validity of BJR protection requires compliance with procedural safeguards, particularly regarding conflicts of interest.  While prior scholarship has examined these doctrines independently, the intersection of BJR protection and veil-piercing liability in commercial contract disputes — particularly following the structural reforms introduced by the Job Creation Act — remains analytically underexplored. This article contributes a systematic normative analysis of how these protective and accountability mechanisms interact, and proposes clearer legal criteria for distinguishing protected business risk from culpable corporate misconduct under Indonesian law. Consequently, corporate management must maintain strict financial separation and transparency to avoid personal legal consequences in commercial disputes.
Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Kegagalan Legal Due Diligence dalam Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas Pramesti, Mirza Cyntia; Setyawan, Fendi; Fahamsyah, Ermanto
Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Desember
Publisher : Penerbit Jurnal Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53697/iso.v6i2.4060

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui batas kewenangan dan tanggung jawab Notaris sekaligus merumuskan konstruksi hukum yang dapat memberikan perlindungan bagi pihak ketiga yang dirugikan akibat kegagalan Notaris terkait legal due diligence dalam rangka pendirian perseroan terbatas. Penelitian ini berjenis yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual yang kemudian dijabarkan dengan metode deduktif. Hasil penelitian menujukkan bahwa Notaris selaku pejabat umum memiliki kedudukan strategis sebagai gatekeeper dalam pendirian PT. Kewenangan Notaris tidak hanya bersifat formal dalam membuat akta autentik, tetapi juga mengandung kewajiban untuk memastikan bahwa akta yang dibuat tidak mengandung cacat hukum. Terkait dengan legal due diligence, Notaris dituntut untuk melakukan verifikasi yang wajar terhadap data dan fakta hukum dalam pendirian PT. Kegagalan Notaris dalam menjalankan kewajiban ini menunjukkan bahwa Notaris tidak memenuhi standar profesional dan berpotensi menimbulkan kerugian bagi pihak ketiga. Konsekuensinya Notaris dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban hukum secara perdata, administratif, dan kode etik profesi. Berdasarkan penelitian tersebut di atas, dapat disarankan bahwa perlu dilakukan penguatan norma dalam UUJN dengan memasukkan secara eksplisit kewajiban legal due diligence sebagai bagian dari standar pelaksanaan jabatan Notaris, Notaris perlu menginternalisasi legal due diligence sebagai bagian inheren dari kewajiban profesional, serta Ikatan Notaris Indonesia (INI) dan Majelis Pengawas Notaris (MPN) perlu memperkuat standar operasional dan pedoman teknis terkait pelaksanaan legal due diligence dalam pendirian PT.
Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Korporasi Berdasarkan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian dan Good Corporate Governance Cahyaningsih, Jeaneta; Setyawan, Fendi; Fahamsyah, Ermanto
Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Desember
Publisher : Penerbit Jurnal Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53697/iso.v6i2.4061

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis ruang lingkup pertanggungjawaban notaris dalam penyusunan akta perusahaan berdasarkan prinsip kehati-hatian serta penerapan prinsip-prinsip Good Corporate Governance dalam pelaksanaan tugas dan tanggung jawab notaris. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan hukum normatif dengan menggunakan kerangka hukum dan kerangka konseptual. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa batas tanggung jawab notaris pada dasarnya terbatas pada kebenaran formal, yaitu memastikan prosedur tindakan hukum korporasi telah sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan, anggaran dasar, dan keputusan RUPS, namun secara moral notaris juga dituntut untuk memverifikasi identitas para pihak dan kewenangan organ perusahaan. Dalam pelaksanaannya, notaris berperan mendukung penerapan prinsip Good Corporate Governance dengan memeriksa dokumen pendukung seperti anggaran dasar, sehingga secara tidak langsung terlibat dalam prinsip transparansi, akuntabilitas, tanggung jawab, independensi, dan keadilan. Oleh karena itu, notaris harus senantiasa menerapkan prinsip kehati-hatian melalui verifikasi kewenangan organ perusahaan, disertai perlunya penyempurnaan regulasi dan komitmen organ perusahaan untuk menjalankan prinsip Good Corporate Governance secara konsisten.
Batas Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa yang Cacat Hukum Nurva, Yunita Pramesti Ardi; Setyawan, Fendy; Fahamsyah, Ermanto
Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Desember
Publisher : Penerbit Jurnal Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53697/iso.v6i2.4062

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menentukan batasan tanggung jawab Notaris terkait Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa PT. Tonia Mitra Sejahtera. Jenis penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif, yaitu penelitian ini dilakukan dengan meninjau dan menganalisis hubungan antara satu hukum dengan hukum lainnya dengan mempertimbangkan titik awal penelitian analitis tentang hukum dan peraturan, menggunakan pendekatan hukum dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa bentuk cacat hukum dalam Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa (RUPS) PT. TMS mengandung kesalahan dalam prosedur pelaksanaan termasuk pemenuhan kuorum dan pemanggilan anggota RUPS sebagaimana diatur dalam UUPT, sehingga keputusan yang dinyatakan melalui Akta Nomor 75 Tahun 2017 dinyatakan tidak sah dan batal demi hukum. Notaris yang berwenang menerbitkan Akta Otentik wajib menjalankan kewenangannya dengan penuh tanggung jawab berdasarkan prinsip kehati-hatian agar memberikan perlindungan hukum dan kepastian hukum kepada pihak-pihak yang terlibat, sehingga tidak terjadi penurunan keabsahan akta menjadi bentuk yang terselubung yang mengurangi kekuatan hukum sebagai bukti di hadapan pengadilan ketika terjadi sengketa.
MEANING OF BANK SECRETS AFTER THE ENACMENT OF LAW NUMBER 9 OF 2017 ON STIPULATION OF GOVERNMENT REGULATION IN LIEU OF LAW NO. 1 OF 2017 ON ACCESS TO FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR THE INTERESTS TAXATION INTO LAW Jamilatus Sholihah; Dyah Ochtorina Susanti; Ermanto Fahamsyah
NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018)
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/jn.3.1.639.38-46

Abstract

Abstract The national economic development in Indonesia is inseparable from the banking role. The existence of the stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (PERPU) Number 1 of 2017 on Access to Financial Information for Tax Purposes will certainly affect the regulation of the banking sector in particular related to bank secrets. The establishment of the Perpu appears to have attracted the attention of the government to immediately pass it into law. It is proven which on 23 August 2017 President Joko Widodo has authorized the Perpu to become a law through Law Number 9 of 2017 on Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (PERPPU) Number 1 of 2017 on Access to Financial Information for Tax Purposes into the Law -What. The policy is a form of Indonesia's commitment to participate in the automatic exchange of information globally for tax purposes. The automatic opening of bank secrets for tax purposes will certainly affect the previous banking arrangements, especially those related to bank secrets. Therefore, in order to avoid overlapping arrangements, the state of Indonesia needs to harmonize all regulations relating to bank secrets and the opening of bank secrets for tax purposes. Keyword: Banking Secrecy, Taxation.
PENERAPAN DOKTRIN ULTRA VIRES PADA PERUSAHAAN DI INDONESIA Wina Febrianti Rukmana Wibisono; Fendi Setyawan; Ermanto Fahamsyah
Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif Vol. 17 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37303/magister.v17i1.152

Abstract

Provisions regarding the authority of a corporation are set forth in Law No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies, which defines the limits of a corporation’s authority in an exhaustive manner; however, the debate regarding the relevance of the ultra vires doctrine in modern legal systems continues, particularly concerning the need to balance legal certainty with business efficiency. An explanation of the concept and scope of the ultra vires doctrine in corporate law—including its legal basis and application—is necessary in Indonesia. The research questions raised are: (1) What is meant by the ultra vires doctrine?; and (2) How are cases related to the ultra vires doctrine resolved? This study employs a normative legal approach using both statutory and case law analyses. The statutory approach utilizes the Company Law (UUPT) and the Civil Code (KUHPerdata), while the case-based approach examines Judgment No. 352/Pdt.G/2021/PNJkt.Pst. The results of the study indicate that (1) the ultra vires doctrine serves as a mechanism to limit a corporation’s authority, ensuring its activities remain consistent with the purposes and objectives outlined in the articles of association, while also providing legal protection for shareholders and third parties engaged in transactions with the corporation; and (2) The case, which was resolved using the ultra vires doctrine, demonstrates that a commissioner of PT. CGI, identified by the initials RAU, can be said to have acted beyond his authority. The judge who examined and decided this case explicitly stated in Decision No. 352/Pdt.G/2021/PN Jkt.Pst that RAU had committed an unlawful act (PMH) under Article 1365 of the Civil Code. However, there is a caveat: exceeding authority or power beyond those limits is considered invalid and not legally binding on the company. Keywords: : Ultra vires doctrine, Limited Liability Company, Limitation of Authority
Co-Authors Aldi Rinaldi Aldy Valentino Ali Mufthi, Fikri Ance Rimba Andre Scondery Annisa Tanzil K Annisa Zerlina Cindy Gayatri Bagus Eko Tri Cahyono Bambang Sugeng Ariadi Subagyono Bernald Sihite Brigitta Amalia Rama Wulandari Cahyaningsih, Jeaneta Chansrakaeo, Ruetaitip Chindy Yapin Dede Afandi Hamid Deny Akbar Santoso Dewi Masitah, Dewi Dewi Masithoh Dominikus Rato Dyah Ochtorina Susanti Enggita Anggraeni Okta Fendi Setyawan Fendy Setyawan Fidia Maulida Firman Floranta Adonara Fradhana Putra Disantara Galih Husain Fauzi Gatot Eddy Pramono Gustiawan Putra, Ido Hadi Nur Ikhwan Harianti, Isnin Hariyanto Sururi Herowati Poesoko, Herowati I Gede Widhiana Suarda Indra, Rahmadi Inne Christina Irfandianto, Mohammad Irham Rahman Ismail Ismail Iswi Hariyani Ita Erlita Ivan Christian Wijaya Jamilatus Sholihah Kania Venisa Rachim Kiswah, Maftuha Kumala Sari, Nuzulia Like Olivia Shilvya M Arief Amrullah M. Kaisario H. Falah M. Khoidin Melly Yunandita Emaniar Misbahul Ilham Moh. Ali Mohammad Ali Monica Monica Muthar, Achmad Novi Wahyu Riwayanti Nurholis Majid Nurul Hasanah Nurva, Yunita Pramesti Ardi Nuzulia Kumala Sari Permata, Anggia Prakoso, Bhim Pramesti, Mirza Cyntia Pratama, Rino Hardi R.A. Rini Anggraini Rachim, Kania Venisa Rahmadi Indra Tektona Ramadhani, Khaulah Sayu Rhama Wisnu Wardhana Riko Sulung Raharjo Rio Wibowo Agung Prasetiyo Ruetaitip Chansrakaeo Ryan . Santyaningtyas, Ayu Citra Saputra, Ramadhan Dwi Satriya Aldi Putrazta Setyawan, Fendy Sholihah, Jamilatus Sonia Wijaya Putra Suri, Fadillah Atika Suwadji Syahrul R, Syahrul Tamrin, Iqbal Taniady, Vicko Tri Wahyudiono Triasita Nur Azizah Vicko Taniady Wahjuni, Edi Wijaya, Glenn Wina Febrianti Rukmana Wibisono Yundari, Yundari Yusuf Adiwibowo, Yusuf Zakaria Rasyid