Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.663
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL HUKUM Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Jurnal Cita Hukum PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Pembaharuan Hukum The 2nd Proceeding Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW STUDIES Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC) JHCLS IBLAM Law Review Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management JURNAL DISCRETIE Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice Law and Justice Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Pendidikan International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 34 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : JHCLS

 1 
The Role of the Corporate Penalty System on Environmental Regulation Torodji, Rais; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Handayani, I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi; Nur, Muhammad
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v3i3.179

Abstract

Criminal acts Indonesia's environmental law has numerous issues and has long been regulated in Indonesia. However, the question is whether the Corporate Penalty System on Environmental Regulation can implement this policy. This research aims to analyze the role of the corporate penalty system in environmental regulation. This is normative legal research with secondary data from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The research results show, first, that the Corporate Penalty System on Environmental Regulation has overlapping regulations and the need for more clarity regarding corporate punishment, substantive issues, and law enforcement. The Indonesian government must focus on this to achieve an integrated corporate punishment system. In environmental regulations, the overlapping provisions of administrative and criminal law contribute to the unjust nature of the corporate punishment system. Therefore, it tends to vary from one location to the next. Second, the threat of punishment is not proportional to the heinousness of the act. Third, the absence of harmonization with prior legal arrangements resulted in disparate sentences. The best way to enforce environmental crimes committed by corporations is to have adequate regulations to work from; encouraging harsher penalties for social and economic losses will be detrimental to environmental justice; and implementing an integrated system of corporate punishment requires a variety of measures, such as enacting new regulations and focusing on ecological criminal law enforcement.
Judges' Philosophical Orientation in Resolving Anti-SLAPP Disputes Rachmawaty, Rachmawaty; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Rachmi Handayani, I Gusti Ayu Ketut; Danendra, Ravi
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v4i1.215

Abstract

The Anti-SLAPP mechanism in Indonesia still needs to fulfill the four fundamental dimensions of effective Anti-SLAPP. Deciding on Anti-SLAPP in an interim decision is a progressive step because it is a translation of the Anti-SLAPP mechanism in the form of a case dismissal procedure as early as possible. Because no complete rules govern it, this creates confusion for judges. This research aims to analyze the philosophical orientation of judges in resolving disputes for anti-strategic lawsuits against public participation fighters based on Pancasila justice. This research is normative legal research employing two approaches—a philosophical approach and a conceptual approach—and collects and obtains data through direct interviews with judges. This research shows that the Judge's decision in resolving anti-SLAPP disputes based on Pancasila values still needs to be stronger. So, development that damages the environment and benefits the government and corporations will continue. Based on these facts, it is known that the regulation and implementation of anti-SLAPP in Indonesia still do not provide justice for all elements of it because one of the causes is the limitations of the existing anti-SLAPP rules in Indonesia. The factors that caused the Judge's decision not to be based on Pancasila justice can be seen from the lack of legal protection for environmental fighters in Indonesia. Then, the Judge's philosophical orientation in resolving Anti-SLAPP disputes with Pancasila justice refers to the five principles of Pancasila.
Rethinking Subsidiary in Corruption Cases: Indonesian Experiences Nugroho, Fendi; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v5i2.714

Abstract

The imposition of additional penalties in the form of restitution in corruption cases in Indonesia continues to reveal significant conceptual and practical weaknesses. A primary issue is the tendency of convicted individuals to opt for subsidiary imprisonment rather than paying restitution, which undermines the effective recovery of state financial losses. Furthermore, inconsistencies in interpretation between prosecutors and judges, weak asset tracing mechanisms, and ambiguities in existing regulations exacerbate the problem. This study examines the legal significance of restitution in corruption cases, identifies the shortcomings in its current implementation, and proposes a ius constituendum model to reconstruct the restitution system to enhance substantive justice and improve state financial recovery. The research employs a normative juridical method, combining statutory analysis, doctrinal review, and case studies, complemented by a comparative study of legal frameworks in the United States and the United Kingdom to highlight gaps in Indonesia’s asset recovery mechanisms. The findings indicate that first, current regulations fail to provide adequate deterrence; second, there is insufficient alignment between state interests and the rights of convicts; and third, existing mechanisms for asset tracing and execution are ineffective. Accordingly, this study recommends legal reconstruction through strengthening the prosecutorial role in execution, ensuring consistency between prosecution demands and judicial decisions, and incorporating the time value of money in determining restitution amounts.
Real Justice, Real Impact with the Prosecutors in Action Yofhan Wibianto, Muhamad; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani, I
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v5i3.804

Abstract

The prosecution service, as dominus litis, plays a pivotal role in ensuring the balance between the principle of legality and the pursuit of substantive justice within the criminal justice system. The enactment of the 2023 National Criminal Code, which formally recognizes the concept of living law, represents a significant paradigm shift by requiring criminal law enforcement to respond to social values and local community norms rather than relying solely on a rigid textual framework. This study addresses two central research questions: first, how the Criminal Procedure Code structurally constrains prosecutorial authority at the investigation and pre-prosecution stages; and second, how the formal recognition of living law generates implementation challenges, including normative conflict, discriminatory application, and legal uncertainty. Using a normative juridical research method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this study finds a fundamental paradox within the prosecutorial function. Although prosecutors possess formal legitimacy as controllers of criminal cases, they lack adequate legal instruments to exercise this authority substantively. The absence of clear operational standards for applying living law risks undermining legal certainty and weakening the principle of equality before the law. Comparative analysis of prosecutorial practices in Canada, the Netherlands, and Germany demonstrates alternative models that integrate restorative justice, legal pluralism, and prosecutorial supervision more effectively. This study concludes that strengthening the prosecutorial role requires not merely procedural reform of the Criminal Procedure Code, but also ethical reinforcement, professional capacity building, and judicial verification mechanisms to ensure alignment with constitution, and universal human rights principles.
Co-Authors Adi Kusuma, Hanif Adi, Elizabeth Ayu Puspita Aminuyati Andri Winjaya Laksana, Andri Winjaya Anis Mashdurohatun Anita Zulfiani, Anita Annisa , Intan Baretta Nur Bambang Santoso Barkhuizen, Jaco Budi Setyanto Danendra, Ravi Dian Esti Pratiwi Diana Lukitasari, Diana Diana Lukitasari, Diana Dyah Kusumawati, Erna Edwin Setiawan Fendi Nugroho Fitriono, Riska Andi Ginting, R Ginting, R. Gunawan, Matthew Marcellinno Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani, I Hari Purwadi, Hari Hartono, Teguh Herlin Setyorini, Erny Hufron Hufron, Hufron I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani Isharyanto Isharyanto Johan Widjaja Junendyan Haryosatrio Dewandaru Manikingrat Katagiri, Kazuaki Keysa Astiara Lego Karjoko Manumayoso, Bambang Maskyur Alkhuseri, Muchamad Mochamad Ananda Wyman Wahid Mufidah Mufidah Muhammad Abdillah Muhammad Nur Muhammad Rustamaji Mukminah, Lily Solichul Najicha, Fatma Ulfatun Otto Yudianto Padmarini, Maria Rosa Lunetta Parwitasari, Tika Andarasni  Permatasari, Wulan Pramidazzura Alifa Rifqi Putra, Ivan Erranza R Ginting Rachmawaty Rachmawaty, Rachmawaty Rahmadi, Aji Rahmawati, Rahmawati Raya, Bella Cinu Rehnalemken Ginting Ria Safitri Riska Andi Fitriono Seno Wibowo Gumbira, Seno Wibowo Subekti Subekti Subekti Subekti Sulistiyanta, Sulistiyanta Sulistyanta Sulistyanta Sulistyanta Sulistyanta SULISTYONO, JOKO Supanto Supanto Suwadi, Pujiono Tarigan, Fransisco Torodji, Rais Waluyo Waluyo Wardi, Musa Winarno Budyatmojo Yofhan Wibianto, Muhamad