Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.075
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Arena Hukum Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Journal of SouthEast Asian Human Rights Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Unram Law Review Jurnal Budaya Nusantara BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan PEDULI: Jurnal Imiah Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat JURNAL HUKUM dan KENOTARIATAN MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum ADIL : Jurnal Hukum Mulawarman Law Review Majalah Hukum Nasional Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences International Journal of Business, Law, and Education YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Administrative and Environmental Law Review International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Perspektif Hukum Indonesia Law Reform Journal (ILREJ) The Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies Warkat
Imam Koeswahyono
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 49 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Arena Hukum

 1 
TANAH UNTUK KEADILAN SOSIAL : PERBANDINGAN PENATAAN DAN PENGATURAN PERTANAHAN DI BEBERAPA NEGARA Imam Koeswahyono
Arena Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2019)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2019.01201.4

Abstract

AbstractThe essential meaning of the comparison of land management system in several countries: China, Ghana, Ethiopia and Indonesia relates to ideas in the framework of social justice land arrangement in an effort to find similarities and differences between the laws of land being compared. In addition, it provides an objective rational explanation of the causes of differences both in philosophy, conception, legal politics, regulation and equality between land laws in the three countries. With a conceptual and comparative approach, using the theory of access to obtain justice, this study aims to broaden the horizons for the study of land law that philosophy and conception of national land law (HTN) based on Customary Law with methods of adaptation and integration of the philosophy of Pancasila into Customary law and law national land is a necessity so that the goal of reforming the national land law access to reform and asset reform can realize the essence of social justice. AbstrakMakna komparasi pengaturan penataan pertanahan di beberapa negara: Cina, Ethiopia, Ghana serta Indonesia berkaitan dengan ide/gagasan dalam kerangka penataan tanah yang berkeadilan sosial sebagai upaya mencari persamaan dan perbedaan di antara hukum tanah yang diperbandingkan. Di samping itu, memberikan penjelasan secara rasional obyektif penyebab terjadinya perbedaan baik secara falsafah, konsepsi, politik hukum, pengaturan dan persamaan di antara hukum tanah pada tiga negara tersebut. Dengan pendekatan konseptual dan komparatif, menggunakan teori akses untuk memperoleh keadilan, kajian ini bertujuan untuk memperluas cakrawala pandang bagi pengkajian hukum tanah bahwa falsafah dan konsepsi hukum tanah nasional (HTN) berbasis Hukum Adat dengan metode adaptasi dan integrasi filosofi Pancasila ke dalam hukum Adat dan hukum tanah nasional merupakan sebuah keniscayaan agar tujuan pembaruan hukum tanah nasional akses reform dan asset reform mampu mewujudkan esensi keadilan sosial.
A Model of State-Owned Asset Management Based on Pancasila Values: Achieving the Highest and Best Use Koeswahyono, Imam
Arena Hukum Vol. 17 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum2024.01703.1

Abstract

This article discusses the formulation of a model called "Sustainable and Equitable Organization and Management of State/Region/Village-Owned Assets Based on the Pancasila". The authors introduce a “highest and best use” approach to state asset management, aiming to address gaps in existing norms around asset governance, particularly regarding the absence of a mechanism for asset management and dispute resolution. This condition can potentially bring about corruption through the exchange of state land assets that are unequal in value. The model initiated by the authors comes from the need to elaborate the legal politics of Pancasila into laws that specifically regulate the management of state assets with the principle of best utilisation oriented towards the greatest prosperity of the people. This conceptual research aims to formulate and develop a research model with the following outputs: a. to find a paradigm for agrarian legal research that is based on the critical agrarian approach in the perspective of legal science; b. to determine the integrity and harmony with the Pancasila philosophy, and the constitutionality of regulation and institutionalism, of the management of state/region/village-owned assets; c. to formulate an institutional model for conflict resolution in agrarian affairs, primarily for cases of conflict involving state/region-owned assets in the form of an agrarian court that can resolve and eliminate the backlog of cases of agrarian conflicts for both public and private aspects specifically, with legal certainty and justice. Achieving this goal requires establishing a State Asset Management Agency and the existence of an Agrarian Court. The weakness of this idea lies in the realization of forming regulations that need to be in harmony with related laws and regulations. This model is necessary for synergising the roles of legislators, stakeholders, and the public based on the principle of sustainable and just management of state assets according to Pancasila.
Co-Authors Abdul Rachmad Budiono Adji Kuntadewi Afuw, Tanzizal Agusti, Tasya Moedy Ahmad, Arwani aini, Nur’Aini Aiska, Gitta Sabilla Akib, Muhammad Kibar Alexander Dewa Gede Kyle Pranajaya Putra ANGGRAINI, ERNA Anjel Ria Meiliva Kanter Arfandy, Muh Farhan Ariananto Waluyo Adi, Emmanuel Arief Rahman Mahmoud Bagaskoro, Ladito Risang Bakri, Moch Bambang Sugiri Bayu Sagita Damopolii Diah Aju Wisnuwardhani Diah Pawestri Maharani, Diah Pawestri Djumikasih Dwi Qurbani, Indah Dyah Aju Wisnuwardhani Fachrizal Afandi Fitrianingsih, Suci Hadi Prabowo Hairan, Hairan Hamjah Hanif Nur Widhiyanti Haykal, Haykal Hendrarto Hadisuryo Heru Kurniawan I Nyoman Nurjaya Ilham Nugroho Indah Dwi Qurbani Ismudyahwati, Ika Istijab, Istijab Iwan Permadi Kanter, Anjel Ria Meilivia Karina, Ida Ayu Aditya Landya Maria Simatupang Luth, Thohir Lydia Kurnia Putri Rosari M Rizky Aditya Zuhdi Maharani, A Rafika Masykur, Hamidi Masykur, Mohammad Hamidi Moch Bakri Mohammad Fadli Mohammad Hamidi Masykur Muhammad Arsyad Muhammad Dahlan Muhammad Takeshi Yusran Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo Nugrah Maulid perkasa, surya rimba Pratama, LM Alif Puspitasari, Ratna Ayu Putra Pangestu, Hendy Qudsi, Mohammad Syafiq Rachmad Safa'at Rachmad Syafaat Rachmi Sulistyarini Rahmawati, Nadyah Maylika Ramadan, Muhammad Anugrah Ramadhina, Asyifa Aulia Putri Retno Mumpuni Safa’at, Rachmad Sari, Fitrizka Eka Setiawan Wicaksono, Setiawan Setiawan, Endrianto Bayu Shinta Hadiyantina Soekesi, Titik Soeryati Sovia Alfit Sri Kawuryan, Endang Sugiri, Bambang Suhariningsih Sukarmi Sukarmi, Sukarmi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Syahriza Alkohir Anggoro Tanazza Zalsabella Firsty Taufiqurrohman, Moch. Marsa Tunggul Ansari Setia Negara Walid Siagian, Abdhy Wardana, Azna Abrory Wisnuwardhani , Diah Ayu Wiwin Febrianasari Wiwin Febrianasari Yuliana Fatma Ira Crisantika Yuliati Yuliati Yusril, Muh.