Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : DE JURE

Cancellation of Marriage Due to Apostasy in Islamic Law and Human Rights: A Comparative Analysis of Indonesia and Malaysia Sholehudin, Miftahus; Fadli, Moh; Sulistyarini, Rachmi; Djumikasih, Djumikasih
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 17, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Shariah Faculty UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v17i1.31465

Abstract

The issue of apostasy, especially the annulment of marriage on the grounds of apostasy, is a highly intricate and contentious issue at the intersection of Islamic law and human rights. This article seeks to undertake a critical comparative analysis of the legal frameworks, jurisprudence, and practical applications surrounding this issue within Indonesia and Malaysia—two prominent Muslim-majority countries. Through in-depth insight into the relevant laws and court cases with scholarly literature reviews, this paper examines the different approaches taken by these countries and the deeply entrenched challenges in resolving the principles of Islamic legal doctrine with the main tenets of international human rights. This examination requires treading the line carefully, as religious traditions and individual freedoms clash. An inclusive and balanced dialogue can be done to further the protection of human rights and respect the rich tapestry of religious and cultural perspectives. Indeed, the proper application of Islamic law can be viewed as a fundamental human right since the freedom to practice one’s faith is part and parcel of the core tenets of international human rights standards. It is in a holistic approach—one that respects both Islamic legal principles and universal human rights—that apparent tensions can be resolved and fair treatment can be ensured for everyone. Moreover, the Islamic jurisprudents take the invalidation of marriage by way of apostasy as unanimous since it is a permissible action in case of a defect or some damage in the marriage. However, clear and specific regulations are urgently needed with a view to legal certainty and unity within the community.
Justice, Land, and Sharia: Conceptualizing Agrarian Courts in the Settlement of Land Ownership Disputes Tambunan, Rico J.R.; Safa'at, Rachmat; Permadi, Iwan; Sulistyarini, Rachmi
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 17, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Shariah Faculty UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v17i2.32486

Abstract

Agrarian disputes remain pervasive and complex, frequently involving violations of land rights, land grabbing, and overlapping claims. Such disputes often span civil, administrative, and even criminal dimensions, resulting in fragmented litigation before the General Courts and the State Administrative Courts. This fragmented adjudication has produced inconsistent and conflicting judicial decisions, thereby undermining legal certainty and justice in the land sector. These conditions underscore the urgency of establishing a specialized agrarian court with a clear institutional and procedural framework. This study aims to formulate a conceptual model of an agrarian court and to propose its future institutional mechanism in order to ensure legal certainty in the resolution of agrarian disputes. From the perspective of Islamic law, land ownership constitutes a protected right (ḥifẓ al-māl) that necessitates an effective and just dispute-resolution mechanism. This research employs a normative legal methodology using statutory, case, comparative, and conceptual approaches, supported by primary, secondary, and non-legal materials. The findings propose the Agrarian Court Concept based on the “3Ps” framework—Position, Procedure, and Professionalism—which emphasizes institutional clarity, specialized procedural rules, and competent adjudicators. This model is designed to prevent future disputes, harmonize judicial decisions, and resolve agrarian conflicts in a manner that promotes legal certainty, justice, and the broader objectives of law, including the principle of enjoining good and preventing harm.
Co-Authors Abdul Madjid ABDUL RACHMAD BUDIONO Adityadarma Bagus Priasmoro Suryono Putro Afifah Kusumadara Akib, Muhammad Kibar Aris Tri Wibowo Ayu Putu Kusuma Wardhani Budi Santoso Budianto, Willy Budiono, Abdul Rachmat Cindy Olivia Susanto Cyrilus Bomas Bolok Werang Dhia Al Uyun Dhiana Puspitawati Dian Dombat Pejoreza Dian Dombat Pejoreza Djumikasih Dwi Budi Santoso Dyah Ayu Wisnuwardhani FADLI, MOH Fathanah, Rahdinal Fuad, Helmy Ziaul Ganindha, Ranitya Halim, Bima Ridho Hamidah, Siti Hamidi Masykur Hanif Nur Widhiyanti Hashifah, Adinda Salwa Hasnadewi, Nada Hayati, Asna Nurul Hidayat, Fitri I Nyoman Nurjaya I. Nyoman Nurjaya Imam Koeswahyono Ira Nur Istiqomah Istiqomah, Ira Nur Iwan Permadi Januar, Inri Kodir, Abdul - Luth, Tohir Miftahus Sholehudin MOH FADLI Mohammad Fadli Mohammad Hamidi Masykur Muhtadhy, Jailani Muktiono Muktiono Naufal Anfasa Firdaus Nugraha, Sigit Nurhadi Nur Chanifah Nurwijayanti Pearl Princila Br. Manurung Prasada, Dewa Krisna Putri, Dinae Qurbani , Indah Dwi Ramdhan, Syaffi' Rangga Raditya Ridwan Fariz Maulana Riskawati, Shanti Rosyida Tri Yunita Safa'at, Rachmat Safa’at, Rachmad Saleh, Farah Labita Putri Insyira Maharani Salsabila, Shindy Nabila Samuel Fajar Hotmangara Tua Siahaan Santoso, Budi Satria Amiputra Amimakmur Semadi, I Komang Yoga Sinar Tamba Tua Pandiangan Siti Hamidah Siti Rohmah Sugiri, Bambang Sulistyorini, Hastuti Tahir Luth Tahir Luth Tambunan, Rico J.R. Thohir Luth Ummu Salamah Ummu Salamah Ummu SALAMAH Utami Widiati Wico, Standy Winnugroho Wiratman, Manfaluthy Hakim, Tiara Aninditha, Aru W. Sudoyo, Joedo Prihartono Yenny Eta Widyanti Zamiatun, Arda Zham-Zham, Lelly Muridi