Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

Kebijakan Kawasan Tata Ruang dalam Rangka Pembangunan Pertambangan di Provinsi Jambi Firdaus, Rizki; Elita Rahmi; Raden Sarwani
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.1609

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kebijakan tata ruang daerah pasca berlakunya Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja, dengan menitikberatkan pada upaya sinkronisasi kebijakan untuk menjamin kepastian hukum dan keberlanjutan pembangunan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif yang dipadukan dengan data empiris melalui wawancara dan telaah dokumen resmi, sehingga diperoleh gambaran komprehensif mengenai implementasi kebijakan tata ruang di Provinsi Jambi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa masih terdapat ketidaksesuaian antara regulasi daerah dengan praktik lapangan, khususnya dalam penetapan kawasan pertambangan yang belum sepenuhnya selaras dengan Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah (RTRW). Kondisi ini menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum bagi pelaku usaha sekaligus risiko konflik ruang dengan masyarakat lokal. Kesimpulannya, harmonisasi kebijakan tata ruang perlu diperkuat melalui koordinasi antar sektor, penegakan regulasi yang konsisten, serta mekanisme pengawasan terpadu, sehingga kepastian hukum dan keberlanjutan lingkungan dapat terjamin dalam mendukung investasi di Provinsi Jambi.
The Crossroad of Notary Organizations in Indonesia: Is There Any Government Guidance and Supervision? Rahmi, Elita; Amir, Diana; Nehemia Toscany, Afrizal; Inayah, Rts. Fanny; Pratama Putra, Rifqi
APHTN-HAN Vol 5 No 1 (2026): JAPHTN-HAN, January 2026
Publisher : Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara dan Hukum Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55292/japhtnhan.v5i1.207

Abstract

This study addresses the crossroads facing notary organizations in Indonesia and emphasizes the need for the government to anticipate this situation in order to preserve the role of notaries as public officials and holders of a noble legal profession, as well as their function as makers of authentic deeds. The study critically examines the extent of governmental decisiveness regarding the division of notary organizations, which has emerged as both a challenge and a potential opportunity, particularly in the debate between a single-bar and a multi-bar organizational model. This issue is significant given that notaries are public officials whose guidance and supervision are closely linked to the government through delegated authority exercised by the National Supervisory Council (Majelis Pengawas Notaris) and professional notary organizations. This research employs a normative juridical method, incorporating historical, conceptual, legislative, and comparative approaches, including comparisons with other professional legal organizations. The analysis is conducted through legal reasoning aimed at realizing the fundamental objectives of law, namely order, legal certainty, and societal welfare. The study finds that the division of notary organizations in Indonesia may generate both internal and external impacts. Internally, such division creates disharmony among notaries and undermines professional solidarity, thereby disrupting the effectiveness of routine supervisory mechanisms, including annual notarial examinations. Externally, organizational fragmentation risks producing deeper institutional divisions, as observed in other legal professions, which may weaken ethical enforcement mechanisms, erode adherence to the notarial code of ethics, and ultimately diminish the dignity of the notarial profession as a public office entrusted with public responsibility. This study concludes that maintaining a unified notary organization under a single-bar model is essential to safeguarding professional integrity, strengthening supervision, and enhancing the institutional credibility and public trust in the notarial profession in Indonesia.
The Crossroad of Notary Organizations in Indonesia: Is There Any Government Guidance and Supervision? Rahmi, Elita; Amir, Diana; Nehemia Toscany, Afrizal; Inayah, Rts. Fanny; Pratama Putra, Rifqi
APHTN-HAN Vol 5 No 1 (2026): JAPHTN-HAN, January 2026
Publisher : Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara dan Hukum Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55292/japhtnhan.v5i1.207

Abstract

This study addresses the crossroads facing notary organizations in Indonesia and emphasizes the need for the government to anticipate this situation in order to preserve the role of notaries as public officials and holders of a noble legal profession, as well as their function as makers of authentic deeds. The study critically examines the extent of governmental decisiveness regarding the division of notary organizations, which has emerged as both a challenge and a potential opportunity, particularly in the debate between a single-bar and a multi-bar organizational model. This issue is significant given that notaries are public officials whose guidance and supervision are closely linked to the government through delegated authority exercised by the National Supervisory Council (Majelis Pengawas Notaris) and professional notary organizations. This research employs a normative juridical method, incorporating historical, conceptual, legislative, and comparative approaches, including comparisons with other professional legal organizations. The analysis is conducted through legal reasoning aimed at realizing the fundamental objectives of law, namely order, legal certainty, and societal welfare. The study finds that the division of notary organizations in Indonesia may generate both internal and external impacts. Internally, such division creates disharmony among notaries and undermines professional solidarity, thereby disrupting the effectiveness of routine supervisory mechanisms, including annual notarial examinations. Externally, organizational fragmentation risks producing deeper institutional divisions, as observed in other legal professions, which may weaken ethical enforcement mechanisms, erode adherence to the notarial code of ethics, and ultimately diminish the dignity of the notarial profession as a public office entrusted with public responsibility. This study concludes that maintaining a unified notary organization under a single-bar model is essential to safeguarding professional integrity, strengthening supervision, and enhancing the institutional credibility and public trust in the notarial profession in Indonesia.