Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
6.625
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Jurnal Cita Hukum jurnal niara Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Nagari Law Review Unes Law Review Al Hurriyah : Jurnal Hukum Islam Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Jurnal Tunas Agraria UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Al Hurriyah : Jurnal Hukum Islam Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dharma Andalas Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)
Azmi Fendri
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 59 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 59 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Kekuatan Pembuktian Surat Dibawah Tangan yang Dilegalisasi oleh Notaris (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 362/PID.B/2020/PN PDG) Novitra Nanda; Ismansyah Ismansyah; Azmi Fendri
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.900

Abstract

Humans as social beings are always in contact with other humans, where in human relations they often make agreements both verbally and in writing which lead to an agreement. An agreement made in writing intends to provide legal certainty and legal protection for both parties if a dispute occurs between them at any time. In a written agreement, the subject and object of the agreement will be clearly visible. While the object can be described as something that is done by the subject, namely things that are obligatory to the authorities against which party has the right. A written agreement can be made by private deed or by authentic deed. Authentic deed made by a Notary. Notary as a public official who is the only one authorized to make authentic deeds and other authorities determined by law. In court, if what is presented as evidence is only an underhanded deed considering the limited strength of evidence, then other supporting evidence is still being sought so that evidence is obtained which is considered sufficient to reach the truth according to law. Based on this, problems arise regarding: 1) What is the judge's consideration of Decision Number 362/Pid.B/2020/PN Pdg regarding private letters legalized by a Notary. 2) What are the legal consequences of private letters legalized by a Notary against Decision Number 362/Pid.B/2020/PN Pdg. This study uses the Normative method, namely by examining primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Based on the results of the research, the judge's consideration of Decision Number 362/Pid.B/2020/PN Pdg is related to private letters legalized by a Notary, proof of letters, namely the legalization of private deeds which only have formal evidentiary strength, namely the strength of evidence which provides certainty that an incident has actually occurred which is contained in the private deed by the parties and public officials have acknowledged it. single public prosecutor. The legal consequence of private documents legalized by a notary is that private deeds do not have perfect evidentiary legal consequences because they lie in the signatures of all parties to the agreement. An underhand deed only gives legal consequences of proof that are perfect for the benefit of the party to whom the signatory wants to provide evidence, while for third parties the legal consequences of proof are free.
Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Dibawah Tangan yang Disahkan oleh Notaris pada Perkara Perdata (Studi Kasus Perkara Nomor 75/Pdt.G/2020/PN Pdg) Rinaldi Sarza; Ismansyah Ismansyah; Azmi Fendri
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.938

Abstract

This study aims to find out and analyze how the power of underhanded deeds legalized by a notary as evidence in the trial process at court in civil cases, to find out and analyze the judge's consideration of civil case decisions, and to find out and analyze the notary's responsibility for the deed has been legalized in the Civil Code. The research method in this research is the normative research method. Normative legal research is legal research carried out by examining library materials or secondary data. The results of this study, want to show how the power of underhanded deeds legalized by a notary in civil cases, basically the strength of proof of underhanded deeds legalized by a notary the power of proof cannot be equated with an authentic deed, underhanded deed legalized by a notary if denied the power changes as proof of the beginning of writing.
Pelaksanaan Penyerahan Protokol Notaris yang Meninggal Dunia Kepada Majelis Pengawas Daerah Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Tentang Jabatan Notaris Studi Kasus di Kabupaten Padang Pariaman Junaldi Ihsan; Azmi Fendri; Delfiyanti Delfiyanti
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.948

Abstract

For this reason, this research aims to explain: 1. How is the implementation of the handing over of protocols for notaries who have died in Padang Pariaman District? In this writing, empirical juridical legal research (sociolegal research) is used. The Juridical Approach is used to analyze various Legislative Regulations related to the above problems. In contrast, the Empirical Approach is used to analyze law by looking at legal realities in society. The implementation of the submission of the notary protocol begins with notification of the death of a notary by the heirs to the Padang Pariaman Regency MPD. Then the MPD appoints a notary recipient of the protocol to forward it to the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia to issue a ministerial decision as a basis for the legality of the protocol holder.
Implementasi Kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Daerah Notaris dalam Pemeriksaan Protokol Notaris di Kota Solok Reza Putri; Azmi Fendri; Syofirman Syofyan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.949

Abstract

Notaries in carrying out their duties for the general public are required to be under the supervision of an institution that is neutral, impartial, and independent. The purpose of this supervision is so that the Notary seriously carries out the duties of his office in accordance with applicable rules and codes of ethics in order to maintain the security of the public who make deeds to the public. Notary Public. Another aim is to avoid Notaries who are irresponsible and do not comply with the Notary's code of ethics. The establishment of a supervisory institution is referred to in Article 1 point 6 of the UUJN which states that the Notary Supervisory Council, hereinafter referred to as the Supervisory Council, is a body that has the authority and obligation to carry out guidance and supervision of Notaries. In Solok City in 2022 there will be eight Notaries, whereas in the examination carried out by the Solok City Regional Supervisory Council in 2022 only four Notaries were examined. Based on this, researchers are interested in conducting further research by analyzing: 1) the implementation of the authority of the Regional Notary Supervisory Council in examining Notary Protocols in Solok City. 2) the obstacles and efforts of the Regional Notary Supervisory Council in carrying out inspections of Notary Protocols in Solok City. This research is descriptive analytical, using an empirical juridical approach. Using primary data as the main material with a study of secondary legal materials. Based on research, it was found that: the implementation of the authority of the Solok City MPD in examining Notary protocols has carried out guidance and supervision related to the implementation which was carried out in 2022, there were around four out of eight Notaries who were not examined. The problem with MPD is that when MPD carries out inspections, several Notaries are not in their offices at the time of the inspection. Which results in Notaries not being checked by the MPD. Efforts made by the MPD were to summon the Notary concerned to appear at the Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights to have the protocol checked by the Chair of the MPD and notaries who were not examined were made a priority in the examination for the following year.
Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Mengenai Unsur Melawan Hukum dalam Pasal 2 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Angga Pratama; Elwi Danil; Azmi Fendri
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.964

Abstract

This research will examine the analysis of the judge's considerations regarding the element of unlawfulness in Article 2 Paragraph 1 of Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. Study of the Padang District Court Corruption Court. The research method used is normative research or literature study assisted by interviews as supporting data. This research is a descriptive analysis because this research is expected to provide a concrete picture regarding the interpretation of the unlawful element in Article 2 paragraph 1 of Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. The results of the research are that the element of unlawfulness in material terms no longer has binding legal force, while formally the element of unlawfulness in criminal acts of corruption still has binding legal force, which means that a person can be punished if the act is committed. violate statutory regulations.
Perlindungan Pekerja Anak sebagai Anak Buah Kapal (Studi Anak Buah Kapal Nelayan Juragan di Teluk Kabung Tengah Bungus) Nora Aisa; Khairani Lubis; Azmi Fendri
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.985

Abstract

Child labor is a child who does any type of work that has a nature or intensity that can interfere with education, endanger safety, health and growth and development can be classified as child labor. The prohibition to employ children is contained in Article 68 of Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower which regulates the prohibition of employers employing children. However, the fact is that there are many child laborers, one of which is child labor as crew members in Teluk Kabung Tengah Bungus. The prohibition of working for children is intended to provide protection for children, child protection is all activities to ensure and protect children and their rights so that they can live, grow, develop, and participate optimally in accordance with the dignity of humanity, and receive protection from violence and discrimination. The problems in this study are (1); How is the protection of child laborers as crew members in Teluk Kabung Tengah Bungus (2); What are the factors that cause the existence of underage crew members employed in Teluk Kabung Tengah Bungus. This research is a type of empirical normative research that uses secondary data (literature) and is supported by primary data based on field research, such as observations, interviews, and surveys. Based on the results of the research, it can be described that the legal protection system for child laborers as crew members has not been implemented in accordance with the law.
Pendaftaran Akta Wasiat Ke Pusat Daftar Wasiat oleh Notaris di Kota Padang Devia Rahma Pratisa; Azmi Fendri; Syofiarti Syofiarti
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.990

Abstract

Registration of a will at the will registration center by an online notary in the city of Padang is a notary's obligation as regulated in article 16 paragraph 1 letter j UUJN, whether there is a will or not, a notary is still obliged to register the will within the first 5 (five) days of every week. the following month, as for notaries in the city of Padang who do not register a register of wills or a register of zero wills caused by the notary's negligence, this can cause losses to third parties or heirs, besides that the notary has also been deemed negligent in his obligations as regulated in the UUJN. This study proposes a formulation of the problem, namely: 1. What is the urgency of registering a will at the center of the testament register by a notary in the city of Padang? 2. How is the practice of registering a will at the center of the register of wills by a notary in the city of Padang? 3. How is the supervision of the notary's obligation to register a will at the testament register center in the city of Padang? This study uses a juridical-empirical approach.The research results show that: 1. The urgency of registering a will deed is apart from the notary's obligations in article 16 paragraph 1 letter j UUJN, registration of a will is very important because if the will deed is not registered, the notary in his SKW will not be able to calculate the distribution of the heirs, the notary will experience difficulties when making the APHW so that the recipient of the will will experience difficulties in obtaining inheritance rights, therefore the inheritance returns to ab intestate inheritance so that the recipient of the will in the SKW cannot be named 2. The process of implementing will registration according to several notaries in the city of Padang is in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, namely Ministry of Law and Human Rights Regulation No. 60 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Reporting Wills and Applications for Electronic Issuance of Will Certificates.The notary no longer sends a physical list manually as proof of a report regarding a will that has been made, the notary only needs to register to be able to enter the Director General of AHU's website and send a report regarding the will online 3. In carrying out supervision the MPD conducts an examination on the basis evaluation is then carried out coaching, during the examination if the person concerned (notary) still violates it then the MPD makes a recommendation to the MPW to be followed up on.
Kewenangan dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Wasiat yang di Buat Dihadapannya di Kota Padang Salma Hayaturrahmi; Azmi Fendri; M Hasbi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.991

Abstract

A will is a ideed that contains a person's statement about what he wants to happen after he dies, and which can be revoked by him. Notary as a public official is given by laws and regulations the authority to make all agreements and deeds as well as what is desired by those concerned. One of the powers of a notary is to make a deed relating to a will, this is in accordance with the provisions in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter j and k of the Notary Office Law. This study proposes the formulation of the problem, namely: 1 What is the authority of a notary regarding a will made before him in the city of Padang? 2. What are the notary's obligations regarding the will made before him in the city of Padang? 3. What is the form of the Notary's responsibility for the will made before him in the icity of Padang? This research uses a juridical-empirical approach. The results of the research that has been carried out are: 1. The notary's authority over a will made before him in the city of Padang, namely the authority granted by law to a notary is to make a deed related to a will as mandated in UUJN which is related to Article 16 paragraph (1) letter i which reads: "make a list of ideeds relating to the will according to the order in which the deed was drawn up every month". A will includes a deed drawn up before a notary. A will made directly before a notary is a public will or open will. In this case, the party who wants to make a will comes personally before the notary and states his will. Furthermore, the notary makes the will desired by the person facing it. 2. The notary's obligation to the testamentary deed drawn up before him in the city of Padang is to notify, report and register all wills he makes to the Central List of Probates (DPW) and the Probate Court (BHP) both open wills (openbaar itestament), written wills (olographis testament) as well as a closed or secret testament. 3. Responsibilities of the Notary regarding the will made before him in the City of Padang, include the following: a.) Moral responsibility. b.) Ethical responsibility. c.) Legal responsibility (formal and material).
Tanggung Jawab PPAT dalam Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah di Kota Padang Dilon Scandhiva Ramadi; Azmi Fendri; M. Hasbi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1002

Abstract

The responsibility borne by PPAT is not only to the parties in terms of making land deeds but is also responsible for managing the deed effectively so that it is completed quickly, monitoring land sale and purchase transactions, and carrying out PPAT obligations by PMNA/Kep BPN RI No. 3 of 1997 concerning provisions for the implementation of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning land registration as amended by the regulation of the head of the land agency Number 8 of 2012. An empirical juridical approach method was used, where data collection was carried out by field research which can support existing theories after analysis conclusions are drawn. Based on the research results, it was found that there were still PPATs carrying out their duties not based on the provisions of the statutory regulations written above.
Pendaftaran Izin Usaha Perseroan Terbatas Melalui Sistem Online Single Submission di Kabupaten Solok-Selatan Kharina Aggita Putri; Azmi Fendri; Muhammad Hasbi
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 7 No 3 (2023): UNES Journal of Swara Justisia (Oktober 2023)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ujsj.v7i3.411

Abstract

Notaris mempunyai wewenang untuk membuat akta autentik yang diperluas dengan adanya kewenangan lainya. Perluasan wewenang yang telah ada berdasarkan atas perencanaan yang baik dengan mengacu pada kenyataan yang ada ditengah-tengah masyarakat, yaitu tuntunan akan bantuan terhadap jasa notaris. Izin Perseroan Terbatas diterbitkan oleh Lembaga sistem online single submition (OSS) untuk dan atas nama Menteri, Pimpinan Lembaga, Gubernur, atau Bupati dan Walikota setelah pelaku usaha mendapatkan izin usaha dan untuk melakukan kegiatan komersial atau operasional dengan memenuhi persyaratan atau komitmen. Lembaga OSS bertanggung jawab untuk mengeluarkan Nomor Induk Berusaha (NIB). Metode pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis sosiologis, yaitu Penelitian Hukum yang dilakukan terhadap keadaan nyata masyarakat atau lingkungan masyarakat dengan maksud dan tujuan untuk menemukan fakta (fact-finding) dan kemudian diidentifikasi (problem- identification) dan pada akhirnya menuju kepada penyelesaian masalah (problem- solution). Berdasarkan hasil pembahasan pada dan hasil penelitian yakni 1) Notaris tidak memiliki kewenangan dalam menjalankan OSS, hal ini dikarenakan sistem OSS bisa dijalankan oleh setiap orang yang ingin mendaftarkan badan usaha, serta dalam Pasal 1 ayat (7) Peraturan Pemerintah No. 24 Tahun 2018 tentang Pelayanan Perizinan Berusaha Terintegrasi Secara Elektronik menjelaskan bahwa Pendaftaran adalah pendaftaran usaha dan/atau kegiatan oieh Pelaku Usaha melalui OSS. Dalam mendapatkan izin usaha di OSS, terlebih dahulu mendapatkan izin Nomor Induk Berusaha (NIB) yang merupakan identitas pelaku usaha yang di terbitkan oleh lembaga OSS setelah pelaku usaha melakukan pendaftaran. Tata cara membuat NIB Perseroan Terbatas dalam laman resmi pemerintah yang bernama OSS (Online Single Submission). Adapun langkah-langkah dalam cara membuat NIB PT dengan melalui OSS adalah: a.Mendaftarkan Hak Akses, b.Login ke dalam situs, c. Ajukan permohonan pembuatan izin usaha, d. Submit form registrasi pembuatan izin 2) alasan pelaku usaha tidak melakukan pendaftaran perseroan terbatas (PT) melalui sistem online single submition yakni, sistem masih cenderung lemah, Sistem OSS tersebut tidak melakukan proses perizinan secara keseluruhan, Kekurangan lain yang terjadi dalam pengurusan izin usaha melalui OSS adalah, banyak dari pelaku usaha pendirian perseroan terbatas (PT) yang masih membutuhkan bantuan konsultan untuk mengisi form yang ada dalam sistem OSS. 3) Kendala dalam pendaftaran perizinan melalui OSS yakni pengusaha kendala yang dirasakan yaitu waktu pengurusan perizinan usaha yang tergolong cukup lama serta harus menghadapi birokrasi yang menurut pandangan pengusaha hal tersebut sangat menghambat mereka. Upaya yang dilakukan dalam mengatasi masalah pengurusan perizinan usaha yaitu pemerintah dalam menyederhanakan perizinan berusaha dan menciptakan model pelayanan perizinan terintegrasi, cepat dan murah, serta memberi kepastian
Co-Authors Abdi, Israr Abdullah, Risyad Aldyans Rio Pratra Angga Pratama Angrila Putri Anton Rosari Argi Putra Finalo Budiyanto Budiyanto Busyra Azheri Darnis Darnis, Darnis Delfianti Delfiyanti Delfiyanti Devia Rahma Pratisa Dilon Scandhiva Ramadi Dina Shabrina Eko Permana Putra Elvia Puspita Siregar Elwi Danil Ferdi Ferdi, Ferdi Feronika Feronika Feronika, Feronika Fithrina, Hendria Frenadin Adegustara Frenadin Adegustara Gusminarti, Gusminarti Hamda Afsuri Saimar Hasbi Haswin, Olvi Sri Hilda Hengki Andora Hengki Andora Ismansyah Ismansyah Ismansyah Ismansyah Ismansyah Juanda Sari, Vinsa Junaldi Ihsan Khairani Khairani Khairani Khairani Kharina Aggita Putri Luky Kurniawan M Hasbi M. Hasbi Maria Susanti Maron, Yogi Mhd. Lutfi AR Mirwati, Yulia Muammar Kadafi Siregar Muhammad Hasbi Nisaul Hasanah Nora Aisa Novitra Nanda Nurul Astri Haliza Petrolika, Petrolika Pujha Setiawan J Putra, Eko Permana Rahayu Triningsih, Puja Rahman, Fadhil Raji Saputra Rembrandt Rembrandt Reski Novita Syahrul Reza Putri Rinaldi Sarza Romi Romi, Romi Rosari, Anton Rully, Jodie Angelia Salma Hayaturrahmi Shabrina, Dina Sucy Delyarahmi Syahida, Jeri Gunarko Syam, Misnar Syofiarti, Syofiarti Syofirman Syofyan Tatik Kustiati Titin Fatimah Titin Fatimah Tri Nidya Sari Wetria Fauzi Wisnhu Agung Baroto Yasniwati, Yasniwati Yogi Maron Yolanda, Nadiya Yulia Mirwati Yuliandri, Yuliandri Yuliandri, Yuliandri Yuslim Yuslim Yuslim Yuslim Yussy A. Mannas Yussy Adelina Mannas Zulfitri, Amelia