Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

FORMULASI HUKUM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) DALAM SISTEM KETENAGAKERJAAN INDONESIA SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN PERLINDUNGAN HAK PEKERJA Kadek Hera Dwi Wahyuni; Anak Agung Putri Krisnadewi; I Wayan Gde Wiryawan; I Ketut Sukewati Lanang Putra Perbawa
Jurnal Yusthima Vol. 6 No. 01 (2026): YUSTHIMA : Jurnal Prodi Magister Hukum FH Unmas Denpasar
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has brought significant transformations to employment systems, ranging from recruitment processes and performance evaluation to termination of employment. On the one hand, AI offers efficiency and objectivity; on the other hand, it poses potential risks to workers’ rights, such as algorithmic discrimination, privacy violations, and job insecurity. This article aims to analyze the urgency of formulating legal regulations for the use of AI in Indonesia’s employment system as an instrument for protecting workers’ rights. The research method employed is normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s labor law framework has not explicitly regulated the use of AI, thereby necessitating a legal formulation grounded in the principles of the rule of law, human rights, and social justice to ensure that AI is utilized responsibly and oriented toward the protection of workers.
URGENSI SIDANG TIM PENGAMAT PEMASYARAKATAN (TPP) DALAM PEMENUHAN HAK-HAK NARAPIDANA DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN NARKOTIKA KELAS IIA BANGLI Anak Agung Gd Agung Kresna Astina; I Wayan Gde Wiryawan; Lis Julianti
Jurnal Yusthima Vol. 6 No. 01 (2026): YUSTHIMA : Jurnal Prodi Magister Hukum FH Unmas Denpasar
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The new paradigm of correctional system is the transformation from a prison system to a correctional system. One effort to avoid arbitrary behavior and subjective assessments in the implementation of training, then every decision to be given to individual inmates must be approved and approved through the Correctional Observation Team (TPP) Session. Although the legal framework has clearly established the TPP Session as a standard procedure, in operational practice there are still strong indications of procedural discrepancies. The research method used in this study is an empirical legal research method with qualitative research characteristics and analytical descriptive specifications. Data were collected through interviews, literature, and documentation. The collected data were analyzed using qualitative analysis methods. The results of the discussion obtained indicate that the Implementation of the TPP Session at the Class IIA Bangli Narcotics Prison prioritizes the principles of objectivity, transparency, and accountability. The TPP Session is held for the process of coaching and determining sanctions for violations. In its implementation, the presence of inmates in the session uses a representative system for training, while for violation cases it is mandatory to be included in the TPP session. The urgency of ensuring the rights of inmates through the implementation of TPP hearings is to fulfill human rights indicators, including 1) Procedural Justice & Non-Discrimination, 2) Rights to Self-Development & Rehabilitation, 3) Rights to be Heard and Accountable, 4) Rights to Health and Humane Treatment. Obstacles encountered in providing inmates' rights through TPP hearings include, first, overcapacity and second, inadequate human resources with assessment competencies. Efforts are being made to overcome these obstacles through employee competency in the TPP hearing mechanism to ensure the proper fulfillment of inmates' human rights.
Integrated Spatial Governance for Sustainable Tourims in Bali I Wayan Gde Wiryawan; Lis Julianti; Putu Lantika Oka Permadhi; Nurhidayah binti Abdullah
Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues (JSDERI) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues
Publisher : Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jsderi.v4i1.135

Abstract

Tourism development in Bali increasingly confronts structural challenges generated by the persistent tension between economic growth imperatives, environmental sustainability, and the preservation of local cultural identity. However Bali’s Spatial Planning Regulation (RTRW) 2023–2043 integrates the Tri Hita Karana philosophy and the principle of “one island, one plan, one management,” its implementation remains constrained by fragmented inter-agency coordination, limited law enforcement capacity, and a development orientation that privileges economic interests over socio-ecological balance. In response, this study examines how an integrated spatial governance framework can harmonize national legal instruments with local wisdom to support sustainable tourism development in Bali. Using a normative juridical research method, the study employs conceptual analysis, statutory review, and comparative legal approaches. The findings demonstrate, first, that local regulatory instruments, particularly awig-awig and community-based zoning mechanisms, contribute significantly to maintaining spatial equilibrium and protect cultural identity and environmental values at the community level. Second, the study finds that the effectiveness of these local instruments remains limited by inadequate formal regulatory recognition and weak alignment with central government mechanisms, including risk-based business licensing systems and spatial conformity approval processes. Third, comparative analysis of Thailand’s sustainable tourism governance, especially the Designated Areas for Sustainable Tourism Administration (DASTA) model, reveals that effective spatial governance depends on robust multi-actor collaboration and institutional coherence that formally integrates local governance structures within designated tourism areas.