Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
10.426
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) JURNAL DERIVAT: JURNAL MATEMATIKA DAN PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA Pedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematika Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika) Wacana Akademika : Majalah Ilmiah Kependidikan Pi: Mathematics Education Journal JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri) Buana Matematika : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika CARADDE: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika MEJ (Mathematics Education Journal) Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika (JRPIPM) J-PiMat : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Abdi: Media Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Journal Intellectual Sufism Research SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains Prima Abdika: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dharmas Education Journal (DE_Journal) MATH LOCUS: Jurnal Riset dan Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Kependidikan Edukasia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Pi: Mathematics Education Journal MATHEdunesa Journal of Medives: Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang Journal on Education and Teacher Professionalism Journal of Mathematical Pedagogy (JOMP) Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Journal of the Indonesian Mathematics Education Society Jurnal Didaktik Matematika
Pradnyo Wijayanti
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 75 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 75 Documents
Search

 4   5   6   7   8 
ANALISIS BERPIKIR KRITIS PESERTA DIDIK DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL SETARA ASESMEN KOMPETENSI MINIMUM (AKM) ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK Aliyah Yasmin Rahmah Dillah; Pradnyo Wijayanti
Madrasah: Journal on Education and Teacher Professionalism Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Januari-Maret
Publisher : Al-Shobar Publisher, Yayasan Islam Al-Shobar Rawaurip

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan berpikir kritis peserta didik dalam menyelesaikan soal setara AKM ditinjau dari jenis kecerdasan majemuk. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kualitatif deskriptif. Subjek penelitian terdiri atas tiga peserta didik kelas VII dengan kecerdasan dominan berbeda, yaitu linguistik, logis matematis, dan ruang visual. Instrumen penelitian berupa soal setara AKM dan pedoman wawancara, yang dianalisis berdasarkan indikator berpikir kritis Facione, yaitu interpretasi, analisis, evaluasi, inferensi, eksplanasi, regulasi diri. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa peserta didik dengan kecerdasan linguistik dapat memahami stimulus dengan menuliskan informasi penting, merumuskan model matematika, menarik kesimpulan dari hasil pekerjannya, menjelaskan istilah matematika dengan bahasa yang jelas, serta dapat mengendalikan proses berpikir. Peserta didik dengan kecerdasan logis matematis dapat memahami stimulus dengan menuliskan informasi penting, merumuskan model matematika yang tepat dan menyusun langkah yang sistematis, melakukan perhitungan tepat dan melakukan evaluasi secara menyeluruh, dapat menarik kesimpulan sesuai dengan konteks pertanyaan, dan dapat menjelaskan istilah matematika yang terdapat pada soal serta dapat mengendalikan proses berpikir. Sementara itu, peserta didik dengan kecerdasan ruang visual dapat memahami stimulus melalui visualisasi tabel, merumuskan model matematika, melakukan perhitungan tepat, serta menjelaskan dan mengendalikan proses berpikir.
Penalaran Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Realistik Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Matematika Hanifah, Nur; Wijayanti, Pradnyo
MATHEdunesa Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 15 Nomor 1 Tahun 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/mathedunesa.v15n1.p148-165

Abstract

Mathematical reasoning is the process of thinking in drawing logical conclusions regarding mathematical problems based on statements that are proven to be true and known previously. This research is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach which aims to describe the mathematical reasoning of students who have high, medium and low mathematical abilities in solving realistic problems. The research subjects were 3 class VII junior high school students in Surabaya who represented each category of mathematical ability. The instruments used are mathematical ability tests, mathematical reasoning tests, and interviews. The research results show that students with high and moderate mathematical abilities analyze problems by identifying important information in the problem, proposing conjectures using assumptions based on important information in the problem, and constructing arguments by carrying out detailed calculations on the problem given. In drawing logical conclusions, students with high mathematical abilities draw conclusions based on the completion steps that have been carried out, while students with moderate mathematical abilities draw conclusions based on assumptions and completion steps that have been carried out. Students with low mathematical abilities analyze problems by identifying important information in the problem, put forward conjectures regarding the solution steps taken but do not explain the reasons for choosing the assumptions made, and experience difficulty in constructing arguments because the solution steps are not appropriate so they do not provide accurate conclusions. regarding the correctness of the solution.
Literasi Matematika Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Kontekstual Ditinjau dari Self-Efficacy Andini, Ditasari Putri; Wijayanti, Pradnyo
MATHEdunesa Vol. 15 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 15 Nomor 2 Tahun 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/mathedunesa.v15n2.p364-376

Abstract

The low mathematics literacy scores of Indonesian students in the PISA international survey indicate their weak ability to understand and solve mathematics problems. One contributing factor is self-efficacy, which is students' belief in their own ability to solve problems. This study aims to describe the mathematics literacy of junior high school students with high and low self-efficacy in solving contextual problems. This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach involving two student subjects selected based on the results of a self-efficacy questionnaire and a mathematics ability test. The research instruments included contextual problems based on personal, social, and scientific contexts with first-order context and second-order context levels, with PISA competency levels 4–6, and semi-structured interview guidelines. The results showed that students with high self-efficacy formulated problems mathematics, by identifying problem information and representing information in mathematics form. Students applied problem-solving strategies appropriate to the problem context and interpreted and evaluated the results by linking them to the problem, although some information in the scientific context had not been considered. Meanwhile, students with low self-efficacy formulate problems, use incomplete solution strategies, and provide answers based on intuition or guesswork without using calculations. Evaluation of results is also often not linked to the context of the problem. These findings reinforce the important role of self-efficacy as an affective factor influencing students' mathematics literacy in solving contextual problems.
Research Trends of Critical Thinking in Mathematics Problem Posing: A Bibliometric Study and Descriptive Content Analysis   Febriani, Indri Rohmatul Fakhri; Wijayanti, Pradnyo; Manuharawati; Rahaju, Endah Budi
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): JRPIPM APRIL 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jrpipm.v10n1.p103-119

Abstract

This study aims to systematically review the development of research on critical thinking in problem posing through bibliometric analysis and descriptive content analysis of Scopus-indexed publications from 2015 to 2025. The results indicate that China, Indonesia, and the United States are the most influential countries in this field, with China occupying the leading position in both publications and citations. The most productive affiliation is the National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, and Hwang, G. emerges as the author with the greatest contribution. Publication trends show a sharp increase after 2020, reaching a peak in 2024 with seven published articles. Although critical thinking is strongly connected to problem posing, its relationship with creativity, problem solving, and critical pedagogy remains weak. Content analysis reveals a dominance of quantitative approaches, particularly quasi-experimental designs, with university students as the most frequently studied subjects, purposive sampling as the primary sampling method, and tests as the main measurement instruments. The most commonly used data analysis techniques include descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, and n-Gain. These findings highlight clear opportunities for further research, particularly in integrating critical pedagogy, creativity, and learning technologies, as well as in more deeply exploring the cognitive processes underlying critical thinking in problem posing.
From computation to justification: Prospective mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof in learning limits Purnomo, Heri; Rosyidi, Abdul Haris; Wijayanti, Pradnyo; Abdullah, Abdul Halim
Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 17 No 2 (2026): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
Publisher : Universitas Islam Raden Intan Lampung, INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/ajpm.v17i2.30888

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated the conceptions of proof of prospective mathematics teachers’ learning limits, with a particular focus on how these conceptions were manifested in representational activity. Method: A qualitative teaching-research design was used to collect data from 82 first-year prospective mathematics teachers enrolled in a Calculus I course at a public university in Indonesia. The main data were prospective mathematics teachers’ written responses to an ε–δ limit proof task, classroom discussions, and reflective teaching notes. Data was analysed using iterative, thematic coding and constant comparative analysis, following a representational-epistemic framework. Findings: Four qualitatively different conceptions of proof were identified: proof as computation, proof as algebraic procedure, proof as formal display, and proof as logical argument. Most participants used computational or procedural approaches and a small proportion of participants constructed logically coherent deductive arguments. The results indicate that prospective mathematics teachers’ difficulties are not only related to algebraic manipulation but also to understanding the epistemic function of proof in university mathematics. Specifically, ε–δ notation was often taken as a formality of notation rather than as a relational structure for reasoning. Significance: The study adds to research on the secondary–tertiary transition in mathematics education by demonstrating the relationship between prospective mathematics teachers' representational practices and different conceptions of proof. The findings are also relevant to designing introductory calculus instruction to support prospective mathematics teachers’ transition from verifying procedures to deductive justification.
Co-Authors ABADI Abadi Abadi Abdul Haris Rosyidi Abdullah, Abdul Halim Aditama, Fauziyah Kartika Agung Lukito Agung Lukito Ahmad Junaidi Hutama Putera Aina Saidah Aini, Rahmawati Nur Alia, Hilma Aliyah Yasmin Rahmah Dillah Alvinaria Alvinaria Andini, Ditasari Putri Andriani, Danica Patricia ANGGI VATMIKE PUTRI, FEBBRYOLLA Anisa'a Faradilla Anwari, Nabilah Chairunisa Ardianzah, Mochamad Andy Atik Winarti Atik Wintarti, Atik Bias Nadilia Burhanudin Sugiyono, Aswin Cahyati, Vania Idelia Candra Ainur Rofiq Choirunisa Firda Haryanti Chyntia Dewi Puspita Rini Didik Suliswanto Dinda Putri Rubiyanti Dwi Juniati Dwi Juniati Dwi Juniati DWI VIDIA NINGSIH, SISKA Elgiyan, Naili Fauziyah Endah Budi Rahaju ENDANG SUSANTINI Faiq, Wang Achmad Althof FAJRIATI, MIRA Falah, Bintari Nur Faradilla, Anisa'a fathikhin, nurul Febriani, Indri Rohmatul Fakhri Fiangga, Shofan Firdausa Yanuar GIGIH MAHARGA, YESAYAKA Gurit Wulan Jagadianti Halizah, Tsania Rahmah Heri Purnomo Heri Purnomo Ika Kurniasari Ika Kurniasari Ikka Ananda Hakiki Indan Afifah Rahmawati Indrawatiningsih, Nonik IRA IRZAWATI, IRA Irma Zahrotul Jamilah Ismail Ismail Ismail, Ismail Jagadianti, Gurit Wulan Khumairoh, Binta kuirinus iventri KUSUMA ANGGRAINI, RINI Lisnani Lisnani Lisnani Lisnani Manuharawati Maria Ulfa Marwah, Aulia Putri MASRIYAH Mawardi, Arnindia Via MAY MAHARENI, DINA Ma’rifah, Ummi Mega Fatimah Rosana Mega Teguh Budiarto Mirza Geraldine Mohamad Gufron Muchammad Khafith Octafian Purnomo Nikmarocha Nina Prihartiwi Noviari, Rahma Nur Hanifah NUR HIDAYANTI, ALFI Nur Izzatul Isslamiyah Oktaviana Ainun Ratnawati Oktaviana Ainun Ratnawati Pakpahan, Milka Rosabella Marito Prasetyo Kurniawan PRIANGKA TANJUNG, MEYRNI Proboretno, Setyaning Purwadhani, Dea Annice Putera, Ahmad Junaidi Hutama Putri, Alifia Rachma Putri, Anggi Adelia Putri, Astrie Karina Putri, Cika Noviana Raden Sulaiman Rahaju, Endah Budi Rahmawati Nur Aini Rahmawati Nur Aini Rahmawati Nur Aini Ramadhani, Safira Putri Ratih Puspasari Ratu Mauladaniyati Renata Nurlaily Rowdlotul Jannah Reny Wahyuni Riky Prasetia Wijaya Rini Setianingsih Rini Setianingsih RUSLY HIDAYAH Saadah, Nurus Sa’diyah, Mukhtamilatus Setyo Hartanto Shofan Fiangga Siti Maghfirotun Amin Sopian Sugi Hartono Sumarni Sumarni Sumarni Susanah Susanah Susanah Tatag Yuli Eko Siswono Tatag Yuli Siswono Toni Phibeta Wadhon Eka Shabrina Yanti, Liza Puspita YUNI SRI RAHAYU Yusril Rahmat Hidayat Yusrina, Siti Laiyinun Zhalsadilah Yuniar Kristanti