Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Perbedaan hasil belajar fisika siswa antara model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) dengan model pembelajaran Prediction, Observation, and Explanation (POE) di kelas X SMA Negeri 5 Lubuklinggau Ariani, Tri
Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika Vol 3, No 2 (2016): Vol 3: Oktober 2016
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (288.378 KB) | DOI: 10.12928/jrkpf.v3i2.5145

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa antara Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) dengan Model Pembelajaran Prediction, Observation, And Explanation (POE) di Kelas X SMA Negeri 5 Lubuklinggau Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif dengan metode penelitian eksperimen semu yang dilaksanakan dengan membandingkan kelompok eksperimen I dan kelompok eksperimen II desain penelitian  ini pre-test post-test group design. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 5 Lubuklinggau Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016, yang terdiri dari 314 siswa dari 9 kelas. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan secara acak (Simple Random Sampling) dengan cara pengundian nomor kelas populasi. Pengumpulan data berupa tes, data tes yang sudah dianalisis dengan uji-t, pada taraf  a= 0,05, diperoleh thitung > ttabel (2,17 > 2,00). Rata-rata akhir hasil belajar fisika kelas eksperimen I sebesar 73,4 sedangkan pada kelas kelas eksperimen II  sebesar 69,14. Sehingga dapat disimpulkan ada Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa antara Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) Dengan Model Pembelajaran Prediction, Observation, And Explanation (POE) Di Kelas X SMA Negeri 5 Lubuklinggau Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016. The aim of this research was to find out the Comparative Results Between Students Studying Physics Learning Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) with Learning Model Prediction, Observation, And Explanation (POE) in the Class X SMAN 5 Lubuklinggau 2015/2016 Academic Year . This research was a quantitative research methods of experimental research conducted by comparing the experimental group I and group II experimental research design was a pre-test post-test group design. As the population in this research were all students of class X SMA Negeri 5 Lubuklinggau Academic Year 2015/2016, consisting of 314 students from the ninth grade. Sampling is done randomly (Simple Random Sampling) by means of the draw number population class. The collection of data in the form of the test, the test data that were  = 0.05, obtained a analyzed by t-test, t-test based on the level of  t> t table (2.17> 2.00). The average end result of learning physics class experiment I of 73.4 while the experimental class II class at 69.14. So, it can be concluded that there Comparative Results Between Students Studying Physics Learning Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) With Learning Model Prediction, Observation, And Explanation (POE) In Class X SMAN 5 Lubuklinggau in academic year 2015/2016.
EFEKTIVITAS BAHAN AJAR FISIKA BERBASIS SCIENTIFIC MATERI TERMODINAMIKA Ariani, Tri
JURNAL INOVASI DAN PEMBELAJARAN FISIKA Vol 6, No 1 (2019): JURNAL INOVASI DAN PEMBELAJARAN FISIKA
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hasil belajar siswa kelas XI di SMA Negeri 6 Model Lubuklinggau Tahun Pelajaran  2018/2019 setelah menggunakan bahan ajar Fisika berbasis scientific materi termodinamika dan untuk mengetahui respon siswa terhadap pembelajaran menggunakan pendekatan scientific materi termodinamika siswa kelas XI di SMA Negeri 6 Model Lubuklinggau Tahun Pelajaran 2018/2019. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI dan subjek penelitian ini terdiri dari 27 siswa kelas XI IPA 1 SMA Negeri 6 Model Lubuklinggau. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan teknik wawancara, angket, tes, dan observasi. Persentase keseluruhan komponen bahan ajar adalah 84,81% (sangat baik). Persentase respon siswa terhadap bahan ajar berbasis scientific yaitu 82,55% (sangat baik). Selain itu dari hasil tes ulangan harian memiliki persentase keefektifan 88,89% (sangat baik) siswa yang memperoleh nilai di atas 70 dari 10 butir soal tes. Nilai t­hitung > ttabel dengan nilai thitung = 6,86 dan ttabel = 1,706. Hasil presentase rata-rata siswa dalam ranah afektif sebesar 89,35% (sangat baik) dan hasil presentase rata-rata siswa dalam ranah psikomotor sebesar 91,67% (sangat baik). Persentase respon siswa terhadap pembelajaran menggunakan pendekatan scientific yaitu 94,4% (sangat baik). Sehingga penggunaan bahan ajar berbasis scientific dapat dikatakan valid, praktis dan efektif.
PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN STUDENT TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) DI SMP NEGERI AIR LESING Ariani, Tri
Jurnal Sains dan Pendidikan Fisika Vol 14, No 2 (2018): JURNAL SAINS DAN PENDIDIKAN FISIKA
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (370.266 KB) | DOI: 10.35580/jspf.v14i2.10819

Abstract

Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah Adakah perbedaan hasil belajar fisika menggunakan model pembelajaran Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) dan model pembelajaran Teams Games Tournament (TGT) Di SMP Negeri Air Lesing. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kuantitatif dengan metode penelitian eksperimen. Populasinya yaitu seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri Air Lesing. Pada penelitian ini seluruh populasi dijadikan sebagai sampel, sehingga penelitian ini merupakan penelitian sampel dengan kelas VIII. 1 sebagai kelas ekperimen I dan VIII. 2 sebagai kelas eksperimen II. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan teknik tes yang terdiri dari 7 soal essay. Data yang terkumpul kemudian dianalisis menggunakan uji-t adalah thitung = 2,104 dan ttabel = 2,021. dengan kriteria thitung> ttabel, maka H0 ditolak Ha diterima. Dengan demikian hipotesis yang diajukan dalam penelitian ini diterima kebenarannya. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasannya dapat disimpulkan bahwa Ada perbedaan hasil belajar fisika menggunakan model pembelajaran Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) dan model pembelajaran Teams Games Tournament (TGT) Di SMP Negeri Air Lesing tahun pelajaran 2013/2014.
The Effect of Quantum Teaching Learning Model on the Physics Learning Outcomes of Class X SMK Negeri 3 Lubuklinggau Wita Romita Ayu; Tri Ariani; Wahyu Arini
Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ) Vol 2, No 1 (2019): June 2019
Publisher : Universitas Papua, Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika FKIP Unipa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (268.016 KB) | DOI: 10.37891/kpej.v2i1.98

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine "The Effect of Quantum Teaching Learning Model on Physics Learning Outcomes of Class X Students of SMK Negeri 3 Lubuklinggau in 2018/2019 Academic Year". This research is motivated by the low student physics learning outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the pre-test post-test group design model. The population in this study were all grade X class of SMK Negeri 3 Lubuklinggau in the 2018/2019 academic year. Two classes were chosen by random sampling, namely class X TKJ II as an experimental class and class X TKJ I as a control class. Data collection techniques using test techniques. Student test score data were analyzed using the t test. Based on the results of post-test data analysis of the experimental class and the control class with a 0.5% confidence level obtained tcount = 6.9 and ttable= 2.00 because tcount>ttable, means the average score of the experimental class is greater than the control class, then it was concluded that there was a significant effect of the Quantum Teaching learning model on physics learning outcomes of class X students of SMK Negeri 3 Lubuklinggau in the 2018/2019 academic year.
Development of Physics Modules Based on Inquiry in Business and Energy Subjects Ovilia Putri Utami Gumay; Tri Ariani; Gita Aprilya Putri
Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ) Vol 3, No 1 (2020): June 2020
Publisher : Universitas Papua, Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika FKIP Unipa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37891/kpej.v3i1.128

Abstract

This research aims to develop an inquiry-based physich module on the subject of Effort and Energy and produce inquiry-based physics module on the subject of Effort and Energy which are valid, practical, and effective. The population of this study were all students of class X by using purosive sampling technique (subjects were taken according to the needs of researchers). Data collection were carried out using the instrument module technique, observation sheets, documentation and questionnaires. The development of this research uses the Dick and Carey model with 10 stages. Module validity was obtained from the results of expert validators namely material experts with a percentage of 81.94% in the excellent category, media experts with a percentage of 87.49% in the excellent category, and linguists with a percentage of 75.00% in the good category. The practicality of the module reached 87.07% with the category of strongly agree. The effectiveness of the module obtained by the results of the test students reached 78.64%. Teh results of the study found that Ha is accepted and Ho is rejected. So that inquiry-based modules can be said to be valid, practical and effective.
Analysis of Students' Critical Thinking Skills in Physics Problems Tri Ariani
Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ) Vol 3, No 1 (2020): June 2020
Publisher : Universitas Papua, Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika FKIP Unipa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37891/kpej.v3i1.119

Abstract

This study aims to determine the proportion of students' level of critical thinking skills on the subject of Impulse and Momentum, any difficulties experienced by students to reach the level of critical thinking skills, and solutions to overcome the difficulties of students achieving critical thinking skills. This research uses descriptive qualitative research methods. The subjects of this study were 27 students taken by purposive sampling technique. Data collection techniques in this study are tests of critical thinking skills, interviews, and observation. Data analysis techniques using descriptive statistics. The results showed that each student's ability, high ability students 36.84%, medium ability 34.50%, low ability 22.80% divided into two categories of KBK 2 with a percentage of 52.63% and KBK 1 with a percentage of 23, 94%. From the results of the study also obtained the achievement of students every KBK indicator. Student achievement in the Interpretation indicator of 51.58% Analysis 18.75% Evaluation 13.87% Inference 31.48% Explication 14.19% and Self Regulation 26.85%. So KBK students as a whole are in the low category with a percentage of 31.38%. The cause of students 'difficulties in fulfilling CBC indicators is the limited ability of students to formulate and find other alternatives, the completion of students' answers is difficult to draw conclusions and connect substance between materials, and has not been studied in depth so students tend to be careless in solving problems. The solution that can be used is to provide more experience to students in terms of critical thinking skills and additional learning outside school hours.
Effectiveness of Physics Teaching Material Based on Contextual Static Fluid Material Tri Ariani; Yaspin Yolanda
Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ) Vol 2, No 2 (2019): December 2019
Publisher : Universitas Papua, Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika FKIP Unipa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37891/kpej.v2i2.99

Abstract

This study aims to determine the learning outcomes of class XI students in Lubuklinggau 6 Model State Senior High School 2018/2019 Academic Year after using contextual-based Physics teaching material for Static Fluid students and to find out the students' response to learning using contextual learning material Static Fluid class XI students in high school Negeri 6 Lubuklinggau Model 2018/2019 Academic Year. The sample of this study consisted of 23 students of class XI IPA 4 of State Senior High School 6 Model Lubuklinggau. Data collection is done by interview techniques, questionnaires, tests, and observations. The overall percentage of teaching material components is 81.82% (very good). The percentage of student responses to contextual-based teaching materials is 79.78% (very good). In addition, from the results of daily test results, the effectiveness percentage of 86.95% (very good) of students who received scores above 70 out of 10 test items. Data analysis technique used was t-test Calculated value> t table with the value of t count = 3.69 and t table = 1.717. The results of the average percentage of students in the affective realm of 89.40% (very good) and the results of the average percentage of students in the psychomotor realm of 91.30% (very good). The percentage of student responses to learning using contextual learning is 91.07% (very good). So that the use of contextual based teaching materials can be said to be valid, practical and effective.
PERBANDINGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED INSTRUCTION DAN INQUIRY TERBIMBING TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA Tri Ariani; Ovilia Putri utami gumay
JPF (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika) Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar Vol 8 No 2 (2020): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Pendidikan Fisika UIN Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jpf.v8i2.15267

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan model Pembelajaran Problem Based Instruction dengan Model Pembelajaran Inquiry Terbimbing terhadap Hasil Belajar siswa kelas X MA Al-Muhajirin Tugumulyo Kabupaten Musi Rawas. Desain penelitian yang digunakan  experiment group pre-test post-test design. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam dalam penelitian ini yaitu dengan soal tes berbentuk essay. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X MA Al-Muhajirin Tugumulyo dan sebagai sampelnya adalah kelas X.1 yang berjumlah 33 siswa dan kelas X.2 yang berjumlah 35 siswa dan diambil secara acak dengan teknik simple random sampling. Data yang terkumpul dianalisis dengan menggunakan uji-t pada taraf signifikan α = 0,05, diperoleh nilai thitung = 2,8019  ttabel =1,671. Jadi, dapat disimpulkan bahwa “Hasil belajar siswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran fisika dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Problem Based Instruction secara siginifikan lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar siswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran fisika dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Inquiry Terbimbing kelas X di MA Al-Muhajirin Tugumulyo”.
Perbedaan hasil belajar fisika siswa antara model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) dengan model pembelajaran Prediction, Observation, and Explanation (POE) di kelas X SMA Negeri 5 Lubuklinggau Tri Ariani
Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika Vol 3, No 2 (2016): Vol 3: Oktober 2016
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (288.378 KB) | DOI: 10.12928/jrkpf.v3i2.5145

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa antara Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) dengan Model Pembelajaran Prediction, Observation, And Explanation (POE) di Kelas X SMA Negeri 5 Lubuklinggau Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif dengan metode penelitian eksperimen semu yang dilaksanakan dengan membandingkan kelompok eksperimen I dan kelompok eksperimen II desain penelitian ini pre-test post-test group design. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 5 Lubuklinggau Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016, yang terdiri dari 314 siswa dari 9 kelas. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan secara acak (Simple Random Sampling) dengan cara pengundian nomor kelas populasi. Pengumpulan data berupa tes, data tes yang sudah dianalisis dengan uji-t, pada taraf a= 0,05, diperoleh thitung > ttabel (2,17 > 2,00). Rata-rata akhir hasil belajar fisika kelas eksperimen I sebesar 73,4 sedangkan pada kelas kelas eksperimen II sebesar 69,14. Sehingga dapat disimpulkan ada Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa antara Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) Dengan Model Pembelajaran Prediction, Observation, And Explanation (POE) Di Kelas X SMA Negeri 5 Lubuklinggau Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016. The aim of this research was to find out the Comparative Results Between Students Studying Physics Learning Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) with Learning Model Prediction, Observation, And Explanation (POE) in the Class X SMAN 5 Lubuklinggau 2015/2016 Academic Year . This research was a quantitative research methods of experimental research conducted by comparing the experimental group I and group II experimental research design was a pre-test post-test group design. As the population in this research were all students of class X SMA Negeri 5 Lubuklinggau Academic Year 2015/2016, consisting of 314 students from the ninth grade. Sampling is done randomly (Simple Random Sampling) by means of the draw number population class. The collection of data in the form of the test, the test data that were = 0.05, obtained a analyzed by t-test, t-test based on the level of t> t table (2.17> 2.00). The average end result of learning physics class experiment I of 73.4 while the experimental class II class at 69.14. So, it can be concluded that there Comparative Results Between Students Studying Physics Learning Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) With Learning Model Prediction, Observation, And Explanation (POE) In Class X SMAN 5 Lubuklinggau in academic year 2015/2016.
EFEKTIVITAS BAHAN AJAR FISIKA BERBASIS SCIENTIFIC MATERI TERMODINAMIKA Tri Ariani
JURNAL INOVASI DAN PEMBELAJARAN FISIKA Vol 6, No 1 (2019): JURNAL INOVASI DAN PEMBELAJARAN FISIKA
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36706/jipf.v6i1.10402

Abstract