Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Justice Voice

Analysis of the Supreme Court Decision that Canceled the Decision of the Jakarta Commercial Court in the PKPU Case of PT Asuransi Jiwa Kresna Asri, Meidi; Noerhadi, Cita Citrawinda; Mardani, Mardani
Justice Voice Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Justice Voice
Publisher : Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37893/jv.v2i2.787

Abstract

This study aims to analyze 1) the Judge’s legal considerations in granting the application for Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) against PT Asuransi Jiwa Kresna filed by Policyholders, 2) the suitability of Decision Number 647 K/Pdt.Sus-Bankruptcy/2021 dated June 8, 2021, with Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations. Normative juridical research with a statutory approach and case approach. Primary and secondary legal data are analyzed by concluding a general problem to the concrete problem at hand. The results showed that 1) The Panel of Judges granting PKPU applications in civil procedural law must be proven by the parties to civil litigation, not the law, but the event or legal relationship. In civil cases, the judge must conduct an assessment of the events submitted by the litigants, and then separate which events are important and which are not important. It is the important events that must be proven. The means of evidence include written letters, evidence by witnesses, and presumptive evidence. 2) The conformity of Decision Number 647 K/Pdt.Sus-Bankruptcy/2021 with Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and PKPU in this case, which is a bankruptcy case, follows the procedure for civil proceedings in general. However, evidence was provided simultaneously with the submission of the application to the clerk. The evidence was that the transactions carried out by the respondent were not following the homologation agreement, regardless of whether the debt owed by the respondent to the applicant was paid off.
Co-Authors Abdan Rahim Abdan Rahim, Abdan Adiyono Adiyono Adiyono Ahmad Fauzan Alfian, Rika Ali Maftuuh Mutaqiin Ali Ridlo Almakki, M. Arsyad Almas Shafira Mayzahira Anis Syamsu Rizal Apriyanti Apriyanti Aqil Dhiya Ulhaq Aslan Aslan Aslan Aslan Asri, Meidi Atha, Nasruddin Chrisanto, Eka Yudha Cita Citrawinda Noerhadi Darjanto, Dodi Dewi Anggraini, Mega Dewi Kusumaningsih Dwi Sogi Sri Redjeki Elliya, Rahma Elvania, Dewa Ayu Neli Eshariyani, Eshariyani Fathia, Suci Furqoni, Prima Dian Halim Zaini, Halim HARIYANTO HARIYANTO Harlofida, Demsie Hartati, Sawitri Yuli Hartono Widodo Hasan Mustofa Al-Baihaq Hirohito, Alfonico Husnusyaziah, Husnusyaziah Irwan Irwan Jupriadi Jupriadi Keswara, Umi Romayati Kusnadi Lubis, Zulham Effendi M. Iman Santoso M. Rasuli Mardeli, Iis Mardiani, Wiwin Mas Diding Eki Sukmadadi Mohamad Jaenudin Muhamad Musonif Muhammad Ichsan Murendah Tjahyani Mutia, Rara Mutiarany Nepiana, Nurul Nirwanto Nirwanto, Nirwanto Noprianti, Noprianti Novikasari, Linawati Nurhidayah Nurhidayah Palupi, Antika Prabowo, Rhesa Yusuf Prabowo, Sukma Prasetyono Hendriarto Pratiwi, Siswantar Qonitah Elghina Dzakiyyah Kamilah R. Jossy Belgradoputra Rahmi, Agustina Rara Mutia Rasuna Rasuna, Rasuna Riska Wandini, Riska Rita, Desi Risna Rizwan, Al Khairul Rochyana, Amir Rachman Romdani Rosyanto, Diding Tri S Siswanto Saefullah Saefullah, Saefullah Safitri, Aida Sardjana Orba Manullang Sari, Husna Selvianti, Utari Aditia Setiawati Setiawati Siswantari Pratiwi Siswantri Pratiwi Siti Khoiriah Soekmana Soma Suci Fathia Suharto, Ambarwati Sutrisno, Sutrisno Tri Kusmita Triyono, Taufiq Hidayat Veithzal Rivai Zainal Warasman Marbun Wibisana, Audie C. Widjaja, Rommy Windiani, Arovah Wisnu Nugraha Yesi Mutia Basri Yessy Kusumadewi Yulyani, Vera Yuniarti Yuniarti Zefri Zefri Zulhijra, Zulhijra