Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
8.304
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ensiklopedia of Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Ensiklopedia Education Review Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science Bulletin of Community Engagement Collegium Studiosum Journal Al-MIKRAJ: Jurnal studi Islam dan Humaniora Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Journal of Social And Economics Research Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum Jurnal Hukum Prioris Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Amicus Curiae journal of social and economic research
Ermania Widjajanti
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 73 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 18 Documents
Search
Journal : Amicus Curiae

 1   2 
PERBANDINGAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DATA PRIBADI ANTARA NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA DENGAN NEGARA SINGAPURA: Comparison Of Personal Data Theft Criminal Actions Between The Republic Of Indonesia And The State Of Singapore Emmanuela, Michele; Widjajanti, Ermania
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19756

Abstract

Personal data is certain personal data that is stored, maintained, maintained true and protected confidentially. Currently, there is a rampant theft of personal data to get financial benefits. Indonesia regulates in Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection which has just been passed. Singapore has had regulations since 2012, namely the PersonaI Data Protection (Amendment) Act No. 40 of 2020. Research is carried out normatively, the nature of analytical descriptive research and drawing deductive logic conclusions. In Indonesia, the crime is regulated in Article 67 of Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection and Singapore is regulated in PersonaI Data Protection (Amendment) 2020 section 51. There are 4 similarities and 8 different elements of the criminal act of personal data theft. The focus of discussion in this paper is how to regulate the criminal act of personal data theft, how the similarities and differences in the elements of personal data theft in Indonesia and Singapore.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA ANAK PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PERSETUBUHAN SECARA BERSAMA-SAMA (PUTUSAN NO. 18/PID.SUS-ANAK/2021/PN SRG): Criminal Responsibilities Of Children Who Commit The Crime Of Sexual Intercourse Together (Study Of Decisions Number 18/Criminal.Specific-Children/2021/District Court.Serang) Margaretha, Rade Dian; Widjajanti, Ermania
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19771

Abstract

Criminal responsibility does not only apply to adults in general, but can also apply to children as perpetrators. Criminal responsibility for children is based on the maximum age limit of the child himself. The writing of this article examines Decision No. 18/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN Srg. The formulation of the problem in the research is how the form of criminal liability of children and the form of participation in the case of joint child sexual intercourse. In the preparation of this article, the author uses normative legal research methods, with the nature of analytical descriptive research. In the preparation of this article using secondary data. The method used is qualitative method. The results of the research analysis are that the two child perpetrators can be held criminally responsible, which they are subject to Article 82 Paragraph (1) of Act Number 17, 2016, with imprisonment for 1 year and 8 months. The form of participation imposed on the two child perpetrators is participation in committing (medepleger), with the condition of physical action as evidenced by the two child perpetrators inviting the victim to go to boarding houses by force, then committing a series of acts of sexual intercourse and fornication, as well as the condition of awareness of cooperation as evidenced by the cooperation of the two child perpetrators to invite the victim to join the two child perpetrators.
SANKSI TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN SECARA FISIK DI LINGKUP RUMAH TANGGA YANG TIDAK MENGHALANGI PEKERJAAN (STUDI PENGADILAN NEGERI PALEMBANG NOMOR 100/PID.SUS/2021/PN PLG): Sanctions for Criminal Actions of Physical Violence in the Household Wich Do Not Blow Work (Study of Palembang State Court Number 100/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn Plg Faradilla, I Gusti Agung; Widjajanti, Ermania
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19786

Abstract

Physical violence is an act that causes in pain, falling sick or serious injury committed within the household between husband and wife and vice versa. A criminal sanction is a causal punishment for someone committing a crime that will receive criminal sanctions or other punishment from the authorities. Case Number 100/Pid.Sus/2021/PN. PLG contained acts of domestic violence that did not hinder work, in which the defendant physically assaulted the victim-witness who had caught the defendant checking-in with another woman which resulted in bruises on his hands and abdominal and pelvic cramps, in the imposition of articles and the sanctions imposed were inappropriate . In this case, the creation of a thesis using a research method which contains the object of research in the form of sanctions for domestic violence crimes that do not hinder work. The type used is the normative type, with analytical descriptive characteristics, with secondary data and data analysis using qualitative analysis methods. The conclusions drawn from this study are that the indictment given to the defendant is not appropriate based on Article 44 paragraph (1) of Law Number 23 of 2004. The sanction given to the defendant for 6 (six) months is not appropriate based on the purposes of 3R and 1D punishment, and the defendant should have been given an additional 3 (three) years of probation so that the defendant would feel deterrent.
GABUNGAN TINDAK PIDANA PADA NYAWA DAN HARTA YANG DILAKUKAN SECARA BERSAMA-SAMA: A Combination of Crimes Against Life and Property Committed Jointly Afianiesa, Savira; Widjajanti, Ermania
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/ntstjg65

Abstract

indak pidana pemerkosaan, serta pembunuhan ialah termasuk kedalam tindak pidana kejahatan pada tubuh dan nyawa, sedangkan tindak pidana pencurian termasuk kedalam tindak pidana kejahatan pada harta benda.Tindak pidana tersebut terjadi di Kabupaten/Kota Rokan Hilir dalam Putusan No.209/Pid.B/2020/PN.Rhl, dengan terdakwa Haris Fadillah Rangkuti bersama dengan saksi (yang dilakukan penuntutan secara terpisah) Handika Yuda Pratama secara bersamaan telah lakukan rangkaian tindak pidana yaitu pemerkosaan, pembunuhan, disertai dengan pencurian. Hakim memutus dengan menggunakan Pasal 340 KUHP Jo. Pasal 55 ayat (1) ke-1 KUHP. Mengenai delik pembunuhan berencana yang diatur dalam Pasal 340 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) yang dimana terdapat unsur ‘direncanakan terlebih dahulu’ yang memiliki arti antara timbulnya maksud guna membunuh dengan pelaksanaannya itu masih ada tempo untuk si pembuat dengan tenang memikirkan seperti bagaimana pembunuhan itu akan dijalankan. Peneliti mengangkat 2 (dua) substansi permasalahan yaitu bagaimanakah bentuk penyertaan yang dilakukan  oleh  pelaku  tindak  pidana  pemerkosaan,  
SURAT DAKWAAN CAMPURANTINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG BERDASARKAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA (STUDI PUTUSANNO..488/PID.B/2021/PN.JKT.BRT): Indictment Letter of Combined Criminal Acts of Money Laundering Based On The Criminal Procedure Code (Study of Decision No. 488/Pid.B/2021/Pn.Jkt.Brt) Nurjanah; Widjajanti, Ermania
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/x1bfc079

Abstract

Drafting a charge is the most important aspect of criminal procedure, as the trial commences based on this document. Therefore, the Public Prosecutor (JPU) must carefully prepare the charge before submitting it to the district court. There are five forms of charges, namely single, alternative, subsidiary, cumulative, and combined charges. In this case, the defendant, Calvin Seidiono, was charged with a combined charge (alternative, cumulative, subsidiary) and was found guilty of money laundering. The problems raised in this journal are: 1) Is the combined charge for money laundering against the defendant appropriate? 2) What are the legal consequences if one of the criminal offences alleged by the JPU in the combined charge is not proven? To answer the research questions, the author conducted a normative study that was descriptively analyzed using secondary data. The data processing was qualitative and the conclusions were drawn using deductive logic. This study found that: 1) The prosecutor did not take the appropriate action in drafting the charge. This is because all elements must be proven when choosing a combined charge (alternative, cumulative, subsidiary). all elements must be proven. However, in the case examined in this study, only one crime was proven, so the form of the charge was inappropriate. 2) Regarding the legal consequences if one of the elements of the combined charge is not proven, the judge should have acquitted thedefendant.
RESTITUSI SEBAGAI HAK PEMULIHAN KORBAN KEJAHATAN: KELEBIHAN DAN KEKURANGANNYA: Restitution as a Form of Recovery For Crime Victims: Strengths and Weaknesses Aisyah, Putri Romadhatul; Widjajanti, Ermania
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/xvy9t556

Abstract

Restitution is also said to be a form of recovery for crime victims that is recognized in the legal systems of many countries, including Indonesia. The concept of restitution aims to return victims to their original position before the crime occurred through providing compensation and other forms of recovery. This journal discusses the importance of restitution as a victim's right to recovery in a criminal act. The research results show that although restitution is recognized as a victim's right, its implementation is often hampered by various factors, including low understanding among law enforcement officials and limited access to information for victims. Other challenges include the economic constraints faced by perpetrators in paying restitution, as well as the lack of effective mechanisms to enforce restitution payments. This journal also highlights the important role of the Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK) in helping victims apply for and obtain restitution as a form of carrying out their duties and permits, although there is still much that needs to be improved in terms of outreach and operational procedures. This article examines 2 (two) legal issues, namely: first, why every perpetrator of a crime must provide restitution to the victim; second, what are the obstacles in implementing the provision of restitution to victims? This journal uses legal research with a normative approach and supporting data in the form of interviews, which aims to find internet-based solutions so that victims can receive their rights, a sense of justice and recovery.
ANALISIS YURIDIS SANKSI PIDANA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN BERAT YANG DIRENCANAKAN TERLEBIH DAHULU (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 92/PID.B/2022/PN LBO): Juridical Analysis of Criminal Sanctions in Planned Serious Persecution Crimes (Decision Study Number: 92/Pid.B/2022/PN LBO) R Sri Fajriah; Ermania Widjajanti
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.24992

Abstract

The O.R.O (Oorsprinkelijke Regins Onterwerp) doctrine defines abuse as acts causing injury and pain. Injury is when changes occur in the shape of a human body that differ from the shape of the body, whereas when it comes to understanding pain, changes in the shape of the body are not a prerequisite, only if they cause pain. A case of such abuse in Limboto, Gorontalo, was adjudicated under decision number 92/Pid.B/2022/PN.Lbo. For secondary data obtained through literature studies, and analyzed qualitatively by drawing conclusions deductively. It is concluded that the commission of severe persecution was premeditated on the penal punishment imposed by the court of judges against the accused under article 355 Paragraph (1) was proved but inadequate as a result of the abuse the victim died after several days of abuse. As a result of the death of such mistreatment, the writer to the accused should be subject to article 355 Paragraph (2) of severe abuse with a plan first that leads to death. In criminal penalties any criminal act must meet the purpose of identity, the penal punishment given to the defendant in this ruling the purpose of his confinement is not met, the imposition of Article 355 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code with a prison sentence of 10 years is not appropriate.
ANALISIS TINDAK PIDANA PERBANKAN YANG DILAKUKAN DALAM BENTUK PENYERTAAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 664/PID.SUS/2021/PN PBR): Analysis of Banking Crimes Committed in the Form of Participation (Study of Decision Number 664/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Pbr) Salsabilla Elfrida; Ermania Widjajanti
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.24995

Abstract

Banking Crimes encompass all actions that violate the provisions stipulated in the Banking Law. In the context of banking crimes, these offenses are characterized by their unique nature, particularly concerning the perpetrators who are employees within the banking sector. An example is the banking crime committed by Andri Syaryusman bin Syarmis, who served as the head teller at PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah Riau. He was proven guilty of committing a banking crime under Article 49 paragraph (2) letter b of Law No. 10 of 1998 concerning Amendments to Law No. 7 of 1992 on Banking, as examined based on the Pekanbaru District Court Decision Number 664/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Pbr. The data used in this analysis were secondary data, analyzed qualitatively, with conclusions drawn deductively. The research findings indicate that the judge did not rule in the form of participation in this banking crime because, in addition to the proven elements of the charged article in the fourth alternative indictment under Article 49 paragraph (1) letter b, the judge also considered the actions of the defendants, Andri Syaryusman and Nurhayati, separately. The form of participation identified in this banking crime is complicity, evidenced by the conscious collaboration and physical execution of the crime between Andri Syaryusman and Nurhayati.
Co-Authors Adinda Putri Elin Afianiesa, Savira Agus Sugiyatmo Aisyah, Putri Romadhatul Alfianto, Dwi Amalin FP, Haekal Anna Maria Tri Anggraini Anselmus Jefri Aldonny Pasaribu Anselmus Jefri Aldonny Pasaribu Arief Baharsyah Audina, Encik Inne Alifia B, Meky Yadi Saputra Baskoro, Novi Eko Bella Annisa Maharani Bella Annisa Maharani Bimo Ilham Wibowo Bintang, Cantika Ramadhani Dava Tubagus Rahmat Dewo Wapa Soembogo Dionysius Ansel Yuswanto Emmanuela, Michele Encik Inne Alifia Audina Faradilla, I Gusti Agung Fikarudin, Wildan Ganjar, Silawati Dayang Hummerson, Andi Widiatno Hutami, Trisya I Gusti Agung Faradilla Indonesia Irfan Maulana Ismet Samuel Tahoran Jeremy Arnold Christian Bangun Joan Rossy Rumbiak Jozevin Elizabeth Juliani, Wenny Kabes, Irianto Kasman Ely Kolono, Sucipto Komeni, Wirdi Hisroh Lase, Sandra Putri Olivia Maharani, Bella Annisa Margaretha, Rade Dian Matatula Zefanya Armando Doeputra Mohammad Yofarrel Mohammad Yofarrel Muchamad Feisal Abduh Muhamad Amin Faiz Muhammad Fadhiil Yashendra Muhammad Fadhiil Yashendra Muhammad Fajar Wasitomo Multiwijaya, Vience Ratna Namira Kinanti Novi Eko Baskoro Nurjanah Nurmayana, Suri Oemyx Wynn Tratabofa Hutasoit Owen Chinua Saragih Pradipta, Firwanda Sandi Putri Tari Septiani Putri Tari Septiani R Sri Fajriah Rade Dian Margaretha Rini Purwaningsih Rofaeda Arisia Salsabila Tanjung Saiful Hananto Salsabilla Elfrida Siska Dwi Andini Sofhan, Dedi Sony Fati Crisitan Gulo Sugiyatmo, Agus Tanjung, Rofaeda Arisia Salsabila Tri Agus Suswanto Trisya Hutami Vience Ratna Multi Wijaya Vience Ratna Multiwijaya Vience Ratna Multiwijaya Wibowo, Bimo Ilham