Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.067
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Tambun Bungai Media Syari'ah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CULTURAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Legacy: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundang-undangan Dinamika Hukum Dan Masyarakat Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Journal of Innovative and Creativity Journal of Transcendental Law Palangka Law Review Journal of Law and Humanity Studies
Ivans Januardy
Universitas Palangka Raya
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 49 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 49 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Gratifikasi Sebagai Modus Operandi Korupsi dalam Sistem Peradilan: Analisis Yuridis Kasus Putusan Bebas Gregorius Ronald Tannur dan Perkembangannya Hingga 2026 John Travolta; Ivans Januardy; Claudia Yuni Pramita
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji praktik gratifikasi dalam sistem peradilan Indonesia melalui studi kasus putusan bebas Gregorius Ronald Tannur yang melibatkan tiga hakim Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya pada tahun 2024 dan perkembangannya hingga 2026. Penelitian menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif, menganalisis ketentuan Pasal 12B dan Pasal 12C Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 dalam perspektif Teori Gabungan Pemidanaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketiga hakim terbukti menerima gratifikasi sebesar Rp4,67 miliar yang memenuhi seluruh unsur tindak pidana korupsi. Perkembangan penegakan hukum hingga akhir 2025 memperlihatkan adanya pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap seluruh pihak yang terlibat, termasuk hakim, pengacara, dan pemberi gratifikasi. Analisis Teori Gabungan menunjukkan bahwa putusan-putusan tersebut telah mencerminkan tujuan pemidanaan berupa pembalasan, pencegahan, dan perlindungan masyarakat. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pencegahan gratifikasi di lingkungan peradilan memerlukan penguatan pengawasan, peningkatan integritas hakim, serta penerapan sanksi yang tegas guna menjaga independensi dan kepercayaan publik terhadap lembaga peradilan.
The Role of Bawaslu Palangka Raya City in Maintaining the Neutrality of the State Civil Apparatus in 2024 General Election Pahrina; Suriansyah Murhaini; Ivans Januardy
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i2.1013

Abstract

General Elections (Pemilu) are a means of implementing the sovereignty of the people as stipulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, which is carried out directly, publicly, freely, confidentially, honestly, and fairly. One of the main challenges in organizing elections is maintaining the neutrality of the State Civil Apparatus (ASN), which is legally prohibited from engaging in practical politics. The neutrality of ASN is a serious concern because their non-neutrality can affect the integrity of the election process and reduce public confidence in the results obtained. In the context of the 2024 Election, the role of the General Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu) of Palangka Raya City is very important in ensuring the neutrality of ASN. This study aims to analyze the role of the Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu) of Palangka Raya City in maintaining ASN neutrality during the 2024 Election and to examine the supervision strategy implemented to handle violations of ASN neutrality. Through systematic monitoring, strict law enforcement, and socialization of the importance of ASN neutrality, it is hoped that Bawaslu can ensure the holding of fair and democratic elections.
Legal Analysis, Default in Land Sale and Purchase (Case Study of Decision Number 119/Pdt.G/2024/PN Palangkaraya and Its Implications for Consumer Protection) Frima Klin; Andika Wijaya; Ivans Januardy
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i2.1157

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of civil law related to default in land sale and purchase through a case study of Decision No. 119/Pdt.G/2024/PN Palangkaraya. This study uses a normative legal method with a case study approach, where the primary data used are court decisions and secondary data in the form of laws and regulations and related legal literature. The main findings of this study indicate that the defendant has committed default by not fulfilling his obligations in changing the name of the Land Ownership Certificate, which resulted in losses for the plaintiff. The court decided to grant the plaintiff the right to take care of the name change independently, thus providing effective legal protection for consumers. The contribution of this study lies in an in-depth analysis of the implications of the decision on consumer protection in land sale and purchase transactions. This study enriches the discourse on consumer protection by highlighting the importance of strong law enforcement and simpler administrative procedures to prevent similar disputes in the future. In addition, this study provides a new perspective on the court's role in strengthening consumer legal protection in land disputes.
IMPLEMENTATION OF CRIMINAL ELECTION LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST VOTING RIGHTS ABUSE PRACTICES IN PALANGKA RAYA CITY IN 2024 Putriyani; Januardy, Ivans; Pramita, Claudia Yuni; Istani
International Journal of Cultural and Social Science Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): International Journal of Cultural and Social Science
Publisher : Pena Cendekia Insani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53806/ijcss.v7i2.1365

Abstract

This research discusses the implementation of criminal law enforcement against the abuse of voting rights based on Law Number 7 of 2017 and the obstacles faced by the Palangka Raya City Election Supervisory Board (Bawaslu) in the 2024 elections. Using an empirical juridical method thru literature study and interviews, the research found that Bawaslu has handled cases of vote misuse, including double voting by two students, thru the Gakkumdu Center mechanism in accordance with legal procedures. However, the effectiveness of law enforcement is still hindered by time constraints in handling cases, a lack of evidence, low public legal awareness, and suboptimal support in technology and budget for training and political education. This research emphasizes the importance of strengthening institutional capacity, budgetary support, enhancing monitoring technology, and community participation to make election oversight and law enforcement more effective and integrity-driven.
Urgensi Pembentukan Badan Regulasi Nasional Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Legislasi di Indonesia Fuji Syifa Safari; Ivans Januardy; Satriya Nugraha; Eny Susilowati
Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Vol 6 No 1 (2026): Maret
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/jkih.v6i1.832

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji permasalahan struktural dalam sistem pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia, dengan fokus pada tahapan pra-legislasi sebelum pembahasan Rancangan Undang-Undang (RUU) di Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR). Dalam praktiknya, proses pembentukan regulasi pada tahap awal meliputi pembulatan konsepsi, harmonisasi, dan evaluasi yang melibatkan berbagai kementerian dan lembaga negara dengan kewenangan yang tersebar dan tidak terintegrasi. Kondisi tersebut menimbulkan fragmentasi kewenangan yang berdampak pada lemahnya pengendalian kualitas legislasi sejak tahap awal pembentukannya. Fragmentasi ini semakin diperparah oleh penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian oleh masing-masing lembaga, yang mendorong setiap institusi untuk berfokus pada tugas pokok dan fungsi normatifnya masing-masing, sehingga membatasi intervensi lintas sektor dan menyebabkan tidak adanya lembaga yang memiliki kewenangan final terhadap kualitas substansi RUU. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual, melalui analisis terhadap peraturan pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin hukum, serta studi perbandingan kelembagaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mekanisme harmonisasi regulasi yang saat ini dijalankan oleh berbagai lembaga masih bersifat koordinatif dan administratif, sehingga belum mampu menjamin konsistensi norma, kepastian hukum, dan efektivitas kebijakan secara optimal. Oleh karena itu, pembentukan Badan Regulasi Nasional sebagai lembaga terpusat dengan mandat pengendalian kualitas regulasi, termasuk perencanaan, harmonisasi substantif, evaluasi, serta penerapan regulatory impact assessment, merupakan solusi guna mewujudkan sistem legislasi nasional yang terintegrasi, efisien, dan selaras dengan prinsip good regulatory governance.
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR PARKING SERVICE USERS AGAINST THE APPLICATION OF EXONERATION CLAUSES IN STANDARD AGREEMENTS CONTAINED IN PARKING TICKETS Helena Valensia; Ivans Januardy; Elin Sudiarti
SOSIOEDUKASI Vol 14 No 4 (2025): SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universaitas PGRI Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36526/sosioedukasi.v14i4.6401

Abstract

This research delves into the asymmetry of rights and obligations between parking operators and consumers arising from the inclusion of exoneration clauses that absolve operators from accountability for vehicle loss or damage. The primary objective of this inquiry is to scrutinize the legitimacy of such clauses through the lens of the principle of contractual autonomy and the Consumer Protection Act, as well as to elucidate their implications for the legal standing of individuals utilizing parking facilities. This research uses a normative legal method and considers both statutory and conceptual approaches to investigate key legal documents such as the Civil Code and Law No. 8 of 1999 regarding Consumer Protection. The findings reveal that exoneration clauses inscribed on parking tickets lack juridical justification, as they contravene Article 18 of the Consumer Protection Law and engender an inequitable contractual relationship between the parties. These clauses weaken the consumer’s position by eliminating the right to compensation and contradict the principle of the deposit agreement, which requires operators to maintain the security of consumers’ vehicles.
LEGAL ANALYSIS OF KRATOM PLANT USE IN CENTRAL KALIMANTAN UNDER LAW NUMBER 35 OF 2009 ON NARCOTICS Pratiwi, Agnes Vania Chaterina; Januardy, Ivans; Pramita, Claudia Yuni; Fx. Ary Setiawan
SOSIOEDUKASI Vol 15 No 2 (2026): SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universaitas PGRI Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i2.7895

Abstract

Kratom is an endemic plant originating from Southeast Asia that grows wild in Thailand, Malaysia, Vietnam, the Philippines, and Papua New Guinea. In Indonesia, this plant is predominantly found in Kalimantan. An examination of the legal underpinnings for the prohibition of kratom constitutes the primary objective of this study, alongside a determination of whether kratom warrants classification as a Schedule I narcotic. The research adopts a normative juridical methodology, operationalized through a statutory approach and substantiated by peer-reviewed scientific journals and authoritative instruments promulgated by competent institutions. The results indicate that, to date, there is no specific regulation governing kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) under Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics; therefore, kratom has not been classified as a narcotic subject to criminal sanctions. The existing legal basis related to kratom remains limited to the Circular Letter of the Head of the National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) issued in 2016, which prohibits the use of kratom in traditional medicines and health supplements. The conclusion of this study is that the use of kratom in Central Kalimantan cannot yet be subjected to criminal provisions under Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, due to the absence of explicit regulation concerning kratom in the law and the fact that the existing legal framework is still limited to administrative policies issued by BPOM.
Comparative Analysis of the Criminal Justice System in Japan and Indonesia in the Perspective of the Principle of Restorative Justice Binti, Gerald Arnold; Sulastri, Indang; Januardy, Ivans
Journal of Law and Humanity Studies Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Law and Humanity Studies
Publisher : Penerbit Mandalika Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59613/ndba5v52

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of the application of restorative justice principles within the criminal justice systems of Japan and Indonesia. Employing a normative juridical method with a comparative, statutory, and conceptual approach, the study explores how each country integrates restorative practices into their legal frameworks. Japan applies restorative justice informally through culturally rooted mechanisms such as chōtei (community mediation), shazai (apology), and baishō (compensation), emphasizing social harmony without explicit codification. In contrast, Indonesia adopts a formal legal approach through various regulations, including Law No. 11 of 2012 and the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia Regulation No. 15 of 2020. However, the Indonesian implementation remains limited to juvenile and minor offenses. Despite the existence of sectoral rules, the country lacks a comprehensive legal framework for general and adult crimes, leading to a normative vacuum and inconsistent enforcement across regions. To address this, the study proposes the development of a dedicated restorative justice law applicable across all categories of crime. This paper contributes to the discourse on building a more humanistic and justice-oriented criminal law system by advocating a contextually relevant restorative approach.
Tilang Elektronik sebagai Mekanisme Pencegahan Kejahatan Lalu Lintas: Analisis Kriminologis atas Pertanggungjawaban Pemilik Kendaraan Rulya Cahyati, Desy; Ivans Januardy; Rizky Sangalang
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 2 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i2.3701

Abstract

Penerapan sistem tilang elektronik (Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement / ETLE) di Indonesia merupakan inovasi dalam penegakan hukum lalu lintas yang memanfaatkan teknologi informasi dengan tujuan meningkatkan efisiensi, akurasi, dan transparansi penindakan pelanggaran. Meskipun demikian, mekanisme penentuan pelanggar yang bertumpu pada data registrasi kendaraan menimbulkan persoalan hukum, khususnya ketika pelanggaran dilakukan oleh pihak yang bukan merupakan pemilik kendaraan. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pengaturan hukum positif di Indonesia terkait pelaksanaan ETLE serta menganalisis pertanggungjawaban hukum yang dibebankan kepada pemilik kendaraan dalam situasi tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan telaah terhadap berbagai peraturan perundang-undangan, antara lain Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 80 Tahun 2012, dan Peraturan Kepolisian Nomor 2 Tahun 2025. Hasil kajian menunjukkan adanya kekosongan pengaturan yang berpotensi bertentangan dengan prinsip fundamental hukum pidana, khususnya asas nulla poena sine culpa. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pembaruan regulasi yang secara tegas dan komprehensif mengatur mekanisme pertanggungjawaban hukum yang berkeadilan, akuntabel, serta sejalan dengan prinsip-prinsip keadilan dalam hukum pidana
Co-Authors Abditama, Marcel Aditya Chandra Saputra Ali, Nuraliah Ananta, Helga Citta Andika Wijaya Andika Wijaya, Andika Arifudin arifudin Aster Yansen Basah, Desty Bangas, Karlinae D Binti, Gerald Arnold Bobby Thyas Erlangga Budi Iman Santoso Cindi Kristian Mantikei Claudia Yuni Pramita De Aprilia, Desti Deddy Winarwan Duta Erlangga Edwan Devka Pratama Edy Conceciao, Michael Elin Sudiarti Eny Susilowati Etriani, Etriani Evi F. Martono, Yacob Farina, Thea Frima Klin Fuji Syifa Safari Fx. Ary Setiawan Helena Valensia Indang Sulastri Istani John Travolta Karlinae D. Bangas Kirstanto, Kiki Kristanto, Kiki Kristian Muhammad Izwar Fradiva Novea Elysa Wardhani Novia Nuraliah Ali Pahrina Pramita, Claudia Yuni Pratiwi, Agnes Vania Chaterina Putri, Anggelia Widya Putriyani Regina Lu Amanda Rina Astuti Rizki Setyobowo Sangalang Rizky Sangalang Ronggo Wicaksono, Restu Rulya Cahyati, Desy Rumahorbo, Veni Theresya Fortuna Rustianto, Maulana Yusuf SALSABILA, ANNISA Salsabila, Marisa Sari, Teresa Indah Puspita Satriya Nugraha Selvi Septie Sibot, Yessiarie Silvany Simanjuntak, Manat Suriansyah Murhaini Susanti, Deva Thea Farina Thea Farina Untung Surapati Valentia, Ennisa Vicka Prama Wulandari Vleotri, Ribka Wahyudi, Fachriannur Wulandari, Vicka Prama Yestati, Ariani