Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 34 Documents
Search

Restorative Justice Approaches in Criminal Law: Effectiveness and Societal Perceptions in Contemporary Legal Systems I Made Artana; Tomi Apra santosa; Ahmad Aswar Roa; Andi Bustamin Daeng Kunu; Nurul Miqat
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.6459

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the restorative justice approach in the contemporary criminal law system and examine public perception of its application. Restorative justice is an alternative approach to the retributive criminal law system that emphasizes the restoration of relationships between perpetrators, victims, and society through dialogue, mediation, and shared responsibility. In recent decades, this approach has been widely adopted in various countries in response to the limitations of the conventional criminal system in resolving conflicts in an ongoing manner. The research methods used include qualitative studies through legal policy analysis, case studies, and empirical literature review on restorative justice programs in a number of jurisdictions. The results of the study show that the restorative justice approach has significant effectiveness in reducing recidivism rates, increasing victim satisfaction, and strengthening social cohesion. However, public perceptions of this approach still vary, influenced by factors of legal culture, the level of public trust in law enforcement agencies, and the understanding of the concept of inclusive justice. This study recommends the need for strengthening regulations, training for law enforcement officials, and public education as a prerequisite for the effective integration of restorative justice in the modern criminal justice system
Bilateral Investment Treaties in the Digital Era: Implications for Technology and Media Regulation Mira Nila Kusuma Dewi; Nurul Miqat; Susi Susilawati; Ashar Ridwan; Abd. Basir
Indonesia Media Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): July-December, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/imrev.v4i2.37742

Abstract

The rapid expansion of digital technologies has transformed the global investment landscape, prompting states to revisit the structure and objectives of Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs). Initially designed to protect tangible investments through guarantees such as fair and equitable treatment (FET), non-discrimination, and protection against expropriation, BITs now confront a new set of regulatory challenges associated with cross-border data flows, platform governance, and digital sovereignty. The rise of technology and media platforms-characterized by their intangible, mobile, and data-driven nature-raises fundamental questions regarding the definition of “investment,” the scope of investor rights, and the extent of state regulatory space. This article examines the evolution of BITs in the digital era using a normative juridical method, focusing on how international investment law interacts with technology and media regulation. Through analysis of key jurisprudence, particularly Yahoo! Inc. v. LICRA and UEJF and the Schrems I & II decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), the study demonstrates that the digital ecosystem demands more adaptive treaty frameworks capable of balancing investor protection with legitimate regulatory objectives such as privacy, cybersecurity, and content governance. The article also evaluates Indonesia’s regulatory landscape, including the Information and Electronic Transactions Law (UU ITE) and the Personal Data Protection Law (UU PDP), to illustrate national perspectives on digital governance within the broader BIT reform movement. Ultimately, this research argues that BITs must incorporate explicit digital-era provisions-such as data governance carve-outs, cybersecurity exceptions, and right-to-regulate clauses-to safeguard state sovereignty and public interests while maintaining a predictable investment environment.
Legal Issues of Land Rights in Post-Liquefaction Red Zones in Palu City Yanji, Non Sri Febby; Nurul Miqat; Asri Lasatu
Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): JUNE
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v10i2.8269

Abstract

The designation of red zone areas after the 2018 liquefaction in Palu City has generated complex legal consequences for community land rights. This study examines how the red zone policy affects the legal status and protection of land rights holders and identifies the key normative and empirical problems that hinder the realization of legal certainty in the affected areas. A normative-empirical research design was employed, combining a statutory and conceptual approach with field data obtained from the Palu City Land Office and other relevant stakeholders. Data were analyzed qualitatively using deductive and interpretive legal reasoning. The findings indicate that the implementation of the red zone policy has not yet provided substantive legal certainty, as the government tends to prioritize relocation through permanent housing schemes while pressuring owners to relinquish their civil rights through grant-based mechanisms. The research also reveals juridical disharmony between spatial planning regulations and the guarantee of property rights under agrarian law, resulting in a “frozen” legal status of land and prolonged uncertainty. To restore legal protection, a land acquisition scheme with fair compensation is required as a more coherent and rights-based solution. Keywords: Land Rights; Legal Certainty; Liquefaction; Red Zone
TheValidity of Marriage Agreement Regarding Properties in Unregistered Marriages Miqat, Nurul; Ikbal, Muhammad; Fadjar, Adfiyanti; Korompol, Ratu Ratna; Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi; Syamsuddin, Adiesty S.P.
Yustisia Vol 10, No 2: August 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v10i2.48751

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the married couples engaged in an unregistered marriage and the position of the marriage agreement regarding the property as well as the concept of equal treatment of couples before and after isbat based on the theory of equality. This is important due to the legal gap observed in the norms, especially in relation to the unregistered legal marriages, despite the recognition of religious and registered marriages in Indonesian laws. This is legal research conducted using a conceptual and regulatory approach and the results defined an unregistered marriage as a legal marriage which fulfills the requirements determined by religion. Therefore, the failure to register a marriage does not invalidate its legality but there is a need for the record to be available with the state charged with such responsibility. Moreover, the agreements made concerning properties in unregistered marriages are valid as long as the parties conducted the process voluntarily and fulfill all the elements required. These agreements can also be recognized through the submission of isbat (marriage authorization) which recognizes and stipulates all activities conducted in the marriage before the isbat
THE RIGHTS OF LAND IN MARRIAGE AGREEMENT ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NUMBER 69 / PUU-XIII 2015 BASED ON THE CUSTOMARY LAW PERSPECTIVE Miqat, Nurul; Patittingi, Farida
Yustisia Vol 7, No 1: April 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v7i1.17532

Abstract

The definition of marriage is provided in Article 1 that: "Marriage is a mental bond between a man and a woman as husband and wife with the aim of forming a happy, eternal, (family) family based on the One Supreme God." The meaning of marriage under the law, Law Number 1 Of 1974 is a marriage has a very close relationship with religion, spirituality, so that marriage not only has the element of birth / body, but the element of spirit / rokhani also has a very important role. The legal consequence of a marriage is the position of a woman who becomes a wife and a man becomes a husband, hence the rights and obligations assumed by both after the legal act of marriage. For those who marry most do not think about the effects of marriage, on their wealth, some of them only think that the consequences of marriage are only the union of two families, and the continuity of their marriage in order to be eternal and happy. Marital Laws Article 35 to Article 37 regulate about the field of marriage property for husbands and wives, Affirmation of Article 35 states that marriage property becomes a common property. While the property of each luggage as a gift or inheritance, is under the control of each. Unless otherwise specified in order to serve as joint property, for this other determination the husband and wife are allowed to make "marriage agreement", this marriage agreement contains about marriage property. Likewise to the perpetrators of miscenegations. Indonesian citizens who marry foreign citizens, not knowing that there are legal consequences of such miscenegations, there is a right to be lost as a result of miscenegation. The rights in question relate to the marriage agreement, which if the perpetrator of a miscenegation does not enter into a marriage agreement will impact on land rights , and it is also known  under costumary law.
The Erosion of Customary Authority and The Riset of Local Ulama In The Normalization of Unregistered Marriages In Indonesian Muslim Communities Safrin Salam; Nurul Miqat; Risma Yulestari; Ibrahim Kayode Muhammed; Callistus Odeh
Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 4 No 1 (2026): Mei
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52496/mjhki.v4i1.72

Abstract

This study examines the erosion of customary authority and the repositioning of local clerics in legitimizing unrecorded marriage in the Indonesian Muslim community in the context of legal pluralism and modernization. The research is directed to understand how the relationship between customary institutions, religious authorities, and state law reshapes the legitimacy of marriage and legal awareness in contemporary Islamic family law. This study uses a qualitative socio-legal approach based on legal anthropology and sociology of religion, with a comparative case study design on several Muslim communities in Indonesia where the practice of marriage is not recorded as still persisting. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, document analysis, and limited participatory observation. The results show that customary authorities are weakened due to modernization, bureaucratization of marriage administration, migration, generational change, and declining effectiveness of collective sanctions. In this situation, local clerics increasingly occupy a central position as determinants of the legitimacy of marriage through mosque-based authority, religious education networks, and moral leadership. This configuration gives birth to a layered legal landscape, where state law, customary practices, and religious norms coexist unequally, so that social legitimacy by scholars can outweigh weakened customary sanctions and uneven enforcement of state law. This study concludes that the normalization of marriage is not just an administrative failure, but a manifestation of a shift in normative authority in Indonesia's plural legal order. In practice, the study recommends strengthening cooperation between state institutions, indigenous actors, and scholars to improve marriage registration, strengthen legal awareness, and protect the rights of women, children, and families.  
E-Government dalam Perspektif Hukum: Penguatan Aksesibilitas Pelayanan Publik di Tangerang dan Shanghai Safrin Salam; Rizki Mustika Suhartono; Nurul Miqat; Adfiyanti Fadjar; Upik Mutiara
Prosiding University Research Colloquium Proceeding of The 22nd University Research Colloquium 2026: Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi dan Psikologi
Publisher : Konsorsium Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Perguruan Tinggi Muhammadiyah 'Aisyiyah (PTMA) Koordinator Wilayah Jawa Tengah - DIY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini berfokus pada penerapan e-government di Kabupaten Tangerang, yang menghadapi tantangan signifikan dalam hal infrastruktur digital, literasi digital, dan perlindungan data pribadi. Sementara itu, Shanghai, Tiongkok, telah berhasil menerapkan e-government dengan efisiensi tinggi, yang menciptakan aksesibilitas layanan publik yang sangat baik. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis penerapan e-government di Kabupaten Tangerang dari perspektif hukum dan membandingkannya dengan keberhasilan Shanghai. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan hukum normatif dengan analisis peraturan perundang-undangan dan perbandingan kebijakan e-government antara kedua daerah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun Kabupaten Tangerang telah membuat kemajuan dengan aplikasi "Tangerang Gemilang," namun terdapat gap dalam pemanfaatan teknologi dan akses yang terbatas. Sebaliknya, Shanghai berhasil mengimplementasikan sistem e-government dengan infrastruktur yang baik dan tingkat kepuasan pengguna yang sangat tinggi. Kesimpulannya, penguatan infrastruktur digital, peningkatan literasi digital, dan perlindungan data pribadi yang lebih baik sangat diperlukan untuk meningkatkan kualitas e-government di Kabupaten Tangerang. Peneliti menyarankan agar Kabupaten Tangerang belajar dari praktik Shanghai, seperti penguatan kolaborasi publik-swasta dan penerapan teknologi canggih.
Problematik Hukum Hak Atas Tanah Yang Ditetapkan Sebagai Zona Merah Pasca Likuifaksi di Kota Palu Non Sri Febby Yanji; Nurul Miqat; Asri Lasatu
Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Vol 6 No 1: April (2026)
Publisher : Arden Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57250/ajsh.v6i1.2473

Abstract

Penetapan zona merah pasca likuifaksi di Kota Palu merupakan kebijakan mitigasi bencana yang menimbulkan problematik yuridis terhadap hak atas tanah masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui implementasi kebijakan penetapan zona merah terhadap hak atas tanah serta untuk menemukan problem yang menghambat pemenuhan kepastian hukum bagi pemegang hak di wilayah terdampak. Jenis penelitian adalah normatif-empiris menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, sosiologis dan data lapangan yang diperoleh dari Kantor Badan Pertanahan Kota Palu kemudian teknik analisis menggunakan analisis kualitatif dengan penalaran hukum deduktif dan interpretatif. Rumusan masalah pertama bagaimana perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang hak atas tanah yang lahannya ditetapkan sebagai zona merah pasca likuifaksi, yang ke dua apa problem normatif dan empiris dalam pelaksanaan kebijakan penetapan zona merah terhadap hak atas tanah. Hasil penelitian rumusan masalah pertama menunjukan implementasi kebijakan ini belum memberikan kepastian substansif karena pemerintah cenderung mengedepankan bantuan Huntap namun menekan hak perdata warga melalui wacana hibah. Hasil penelitian rumusan masalah ke dua terdapat disharmoni yuridis antara kebijakan penataan ruang dengan jaminan hak milik warga yang terdampak likuifaksi. Hal ini mengakibatkan ketidakpastian hukum substansif, sehingga diperlukan pemulihan hak melalui mekanisme pengadaan tanah dengan ganti kerugian yang adil guna menjamin perlindungan hak milik warga.
STATUS DAN HAK PENOLAKAN AHLI WARIS MENURUT KUHPERDATA DAN HUKUM ISLAM Moh. Rafli; Nurul Miqat; Ashar Ridwan
PETITA Vol 8, No 1 (2026): PETITA VOL. 8, NO. 1 JUNI 2026
Publisher : Universitas Riau Kepulauan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33373/ptt.v8i2.9360

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahuai status hukum dan hak penolakan ahli waris dalam perspektif Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata) dan hukum Islam. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa KUHPerdata memberikan kebebasan penuh kepada ahli waris untuk menentukan sikap terhadap warisan, sedangkan hukum Islam lebih menekankan pada kepastian pembagian yang telah ditentukan secara syariat. Perbedaan ini mencerminkan dasar filosofis masing-masing sistem hukum, yaitu kebebasan individu dalam KUHPerdata dan keadilan distributif dalam hukum Islam. Oleh karena itu, pemahaman terhadap kedua sistem ini penting dalam praktik pewarisan di Indonesia yang menganut pluralisme hukum. KUHPerdata berakar pada prinsip kebebasan individu dan rasionalitas hukum Barat, sedangkan hukum Islam berlandaskan pada nilai-nilai ketuhanan dan keadilan yang bersifat transendental. Dalam konteks Indonesia yang menganut sistem hukum pluralistik, pemahaman terhadap kedua sistem ini menjadi sangat penting, terutama dalam menyelesaikan sengketa waris yang melibatkan masyarakat dengan latar belakang hukum yang berbeda.
Legal Reform in Interfaith Marriage Under Supreme Court Circular No. 2 of 2023 Nurul Miqat; Safrin Salam; Adfiyanti Adfiyanti; Kayode Muhammad Ibrahim; Abidemi Hassan
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 6 No. 4 (2025): October, 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v6i4.20972

Abstract

Human nature, being composed of different genders—men and women—naturally drives the attraction and union through marriage, fulfilling the desire to live together. As outlined in Article 1 of Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974, marriage is a physical and emotional bond between a man and a woman as husband and wife, intended to establish a happy and lasting family founded on the principles of God Almighty. Marriage, therefore, holds religious significance, uniting a man and a woman as husband and wife. This study examines the Supreme Court’s decision prohibiting court rulings on interfaith marriages. Using normative research methods, the study analyzes Article 2, Paragraph 1 of the Marriage Law, which states that a marriage is valid if conducted according to the laws of each religion and belief. In response to ongoing debates and increasing pressure due to granted applications for interfaith marriage registration by district courts, the Supreme Court of Indonesia issued Supreme Court Circular Letter No. 2 of 2023. This circular guides judges in adjudicating interfaith marriage applications. The issuance of the circular aims to resolve the controversy surrounding interfaith marriages, which have led to various legal and social issues. Previously, judges based their decisions on Law No. 23 of 2006 on Population Administration, leading to the approval of interfaith marriage applications. However, with SEMA No. 2 of 2023, a clear directive has been established to prevent legal uncertainty and ensure uniformity in court rulings regarding interfaith marriages.