Articles
<![CDATA[Protection of The Notary Position in Monitoring Beneficial Ownership to Prevent The Misuse of Issued Documents ]]>
<![CDATA[Puspita, Lidya]]>;
<![CDATA[Sudirman, Maman]]>;
<![CDATA[Djaja, Benny]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan Vol 8 No 3 (2024): Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Malang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33474/hukeno.v8i3.22618
<![CDATA[A notary is a public official authorized to create authentic deeds and perform other actions in accordance with the law. Given the significant responsibilities they bear, notaries require legal protection while performing their duties, particularly in applying the Principle of Identifying the Ultimate Beneficial Owner of a legal entity. This protection is crucial for reducing legal risks and supporting the implementation of Presidential Regulation Number 13 of 2018, which aims to combat Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing. This paper analyzes issues related to the application of the Principle of Identifying the Ultimate Beneficial Owner by notaries, including the importance of applying this principle and how the Beneficial Ownership Declaration can protect notaries from legal claims. The study uses a normative juridical method with a comparative approach, concluding that the application of this principle is important for notaries. Position of Notary Act as gatekeepers who can help prevent or mitigate undesired risks by obtaining accurate information about the parties involved. However, the legal protection provided by the Beneficial Ownership Declaration is not entirely effective.]]>
<![CDATA[Pertanggung Jawaban Notaris Atas Pembuatan Akta Otentik Berdasarkan Dokumen Palsu Oleh Para Pihak ]]>
<![CDATA[Julianti, Lili]]>;
<![CDATA[Djaja, Benny]]>;
<![CDATA[Sudirman, Maman]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.53935/jim.v1.i1.5
<![CDATA[Notary is a public official authorized to make authentic deeds and has other authorities as referred to in Article 1 point 1 of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position. If there is a denial and/or denial related to the deed made by the Notary regarding the documents and/or information obtained during the making of the deed turns out to be false, then this is the responsibility of the party who submitted the documents or provided the false identity. This is because the deed that has been made by the notary contains written statements from the confrontants. there is no reason whatsoever for the Notary not to apply the precautionary principle in carrying out his/her position because the Notary is obliged to uphold the precautionary principle. This implies that all actions made in the context of making authentic deeds must be in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations so that they can be legally accountable. In making an authentic deed, the Notary must be held responsible if the deed he/she makes contains errors or violations that are intentionally committed by the Notary. Conversely, if the element of error or violation occurs from the confronting party, then as long as the Notary exercises his authority in accordance with the regulations, the Notary concerned cannot be held liable because the Notary only pours into the deed the matters submitted by the client or the parties.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Consequences of Authentic Deed with False Identity Against Notary ]]>
<![CDATA[Moses Nathanael]]>;
<![CDATA[Benny Djaja]]>;
<![CDATA[Maman Sudirman]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (September-October 2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Dinasti Research ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v4i6.838
<![CDATA[Given the very important role of Notaries in upholding justice and truth in society, everyone who participates in law enforcement is obliged to carry out their duties with integrity and devotion, thus raising the degree of the Notary profession to a noble level (officium nobile). This can lead to increasingly complex and challenging tasks amidst the increasingly intense competition between Notaries, which in turn causes some Notaries to be less careful in carrying out their official obligations. The rapid changes in society are accompanied by the increasing need for Notary services, especially in the midst of globalization. People need Notary services in order to carry out their legal obligations, especially in the framework of civil law, where the implementation of a legal action depends on the existence of supporting documents such as letters or documents. This deed is often made by a Notary in the form of an original deed, so that it has more legal weight because of its official and legal existence. Notaries are public officials who have the authority to make Deeds and other legal authorities, as stated in Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Offices. In Indonesia, the legal system is very important to resolve various disputes between the government and the community. Another indication that legal certainty has been guaranteed is the stipulation or legalization of a contract by a Notary. The purpose of this normative legal research is to examine laws and regulations relating to the position and duties of Notaries in society]]>
<![CDATA[AKIBAT HUKUM WANPRESTASI KREDITUR TERKAIT PENYERAHAN SERTIPIKAT YANG MENJADI JAMINAN KREDIT PEMILIKAN RUMAH ]]>
<![CDATA[Indah, Syiva Puspa]]>;
<![CDATA[Sudirman, Maman]]>;
<![CDATA[Fitrian, Achmad]]>
<![CDATA[ Case Law : Journal of Law Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Case Law : Journal of Law | Januari 2025 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hukum Program Pasca Sarjana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25157/caselaw.v6i1.4777
<![CDATA[The research aims to analyze the legal consequences of creditors for failure to submit mortgage guarantee certificates that have been paid off which are analyzed using collateral law theory. The research method uses normative juridical with a statutory approach, conceptual approach, analytical approach, and case approach. The technique for collecting legal materials is carried out by identifying and inventorying positive legal rules, book literature, journals and other sources of legal materials. The analysis technique for legal materials is carried out using grammatical and systematic legal interpretation, as well as the analogous legal construction method. The research results concluded that the legal consequences of a creditor's default in submitting a KPR guarantee certificate that has been paid off violates Article 1238 of the Civil Code and can harm the debtor. The debtor has the right to demand that the bank immediately submit the certificate and, if this is not fulfilled, can sue through legal channels, either through a lawsuit for breach of contract (Article 1243 of the Civil Code) or an unlawful act (Article 1365 of the Civil Code). If the debtor experiences losses due to delays in submitting the certificate, the bank may be required to pay compensation]]>
<![CDATA[TANGGUNG JAWAB PPAT TERHADAP PEMBUATAN AKTA JUAL BELI TANPA PERSETUJUAN DARI PEMILIK (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 3/PDT.G/2023/PN.BAN) ]]>
<![CDATA[Rafliansyah, Rafliansyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Djaja, Benny]]>;
<![CDATA[Sudirman, Maman]]>
<![CDATA[ Semarang Law Review (SLR) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Oktober ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.26623/slr.v5i2.10548
<![CDATA[This research aims to investigate the roles that Land Deed Making Officials (PPAT) play in the purchase and sale of land, particularly in cases where the legal owner is not present. Normative Legal Research is the research method employed to analyse the case of Decision Number 3/Pdt.G/2023/PN. Tyres are used as case studies to show the legal implications of actions that violate the landowner's consent in a sale and purchase transaction. The results showed that Decision Number 3/Pdt.G/2023/PN. Ban, PPAT has a big responsibility in ensuring legal land sale and purchase transactions. The sale and purchase deed was executed without the landowner's consent, so because PPAT neglected to carefully fulfil its obligations, it is void. PPAT responsibilities include civil, criminal, and administrative aspects. PPAT can be punished if you make a false deed, and can be subject to administrative sanctions. This ruling confirms the importance of PPAT compliance with legal procedures to maintain legal certainty in property transactions. The legal consequences of this ruling emphasize the importance of valid consent in property transactions to prevent unlawful acts.AbstrakStudi ini bertujuan untuk mempelajari tanggung jawab Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) dalam proses transaksi jual beli tanah, terutama dalam kasus di mana transaksi terjadi tanpa persetujuan pemilik yang sah. Fokus penelitian ini adalah kasus putusan Nomor 3/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Ban. Metode penelitian hukum normatif digunakan. Ban yang digunakan sebagai studi kasus untuk menunjukkan implikasi hukum dari tindakan yang melanggar persetujuan pemilik tanah dalam transaksi jual beli. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Putusan Nomor 3/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Ban, PPAT memiliki tanggung jawab besar dalam memastikan transaksi jual beli tanah legal. Tanggung jawab PPAT mencakup aspek perdata, pidana, dan administratif; namun, jika PPAT tidak melakukan tugasnya dengan benar, akta jual beli tersebut menjadi batal secara hukum karena tidak adanya persetujuan dari pemilik tanah. Jika PPAT membuat akta palsu, mereka juga dapat dikenai sanksi pidana dan administratif. Putusan ini menegaskan pentingnya kepatuhan PPAT terhadap prosedur hukum untuk menjaga kepastian hukum dalam transaksi properti. Akibat hukum dari putusan ini menekankan pentingnya persetujuan sah dalam transaksi properti untuk mencegah perbuatan melawan hukum.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Anak Luar Kawin Yang Diakui Sah dalam Pembagian Waris ]]>
<![CDATA[Vianka, Maria Ibella]]>;
<![CDATA[Sudirman, Maman]]>;
<![CDATA[Djaja, Benny]]>
<![CDATA[ SUPREMASI : Jurnal Hukum Vol 7 No 1 (2024): SUPREMASI : Jurnal Hukum 2024 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sahid ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.36441/supremasi.v7i1.2542
<![CDATA[Tidak adanya bukti pencatatan pernikahan menimbulkan sejumlah dampak, tidak hanya kepada pasangan suami dan istri, tetapi berdampak kepada anak-anak hasil perkawinan tersebut. Sebagaimana kewajiban warga negara Indonesia yang baik setiap peristiwa penting di dalam kehidupannya wajib untuk dilaporkan dan dicatat kepada dinas penduduk dan pencatat sipil. Pernikahan yang tidak tercatat akan mempengaruhi kedudukan status hukum seseorang dan berdampak pula pada pembagian warisan ketika salah satu pihak meninggal dunia. Akta perkawinan memberikan perlindungan kepada ahli waris jika sewaktu waktu terjadi gugatan. Sehingga dalam penulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pentingnya peristiwa pernikahan untuk dicatat oleh negara dan mengetahui negara melindungi hak pembagian waris bagi anak luar kawin yang diakui sah oleh orangtuanya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif bersumber dari peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan nomor 44/Pdt.G/2021/PN Jkt.Pst, buku, artikel dari website serta jurnal. Dalam penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa anak luar kawin yang diakui sah tetap mendapatkan bagian haknya sesuai hukum waris golongan I atau pertama yang berhak mewaris secara penuh sebelum turunnya waris kepada golongan II, dimana putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 telah mengubah ketentuan Pasal 43 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan terhadap status keperdataan anak luar kawin juga mempunyai hubungan perdata dengan ayahnya sepanjang dapat dibuktikan ]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemilik Sertipikat Terkait Penyalahgunaan Akta Kuasa Persetujuan Kredit Yang Dibuat Dihadapan Notaris Tanpa Persetujuan Pemilik Sertipikat ]]>
<![CDATA[Mauli, Tiur]]>;
<![CDATA[Sudirman, Maman]]>;
<![CDATA[Francisca, Wira]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 8 (2023): Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Riviera Publishing ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.58344/jmi.v2i8.438
<![CDATA[Pada dasarnya notaris dituntut untuk membekali diri dengan memiliki kualitas standar pendidikan yang memuaskan, mempunyai kewenangan bertindak secara bebas dan mampu mengendalikan diri. Namun pada kenyataannya masih terdapat penyalahgunaan atas Akta Kuasa terhadap Persetujuan Kredit tambahan yang dibuat oleh Notaris dengan dibuatkannya akta kuasa tanpa sepengetahuan pihak ke tiga Dalam penelitian ini membahas bagaimana akibat hukum dan perlindungan hukum atas penyalahgunaan akta kuasa terhadap persetujuan kredit tambahan yang dibuat oleh notaris dengan dibuatkannya akta kuasa tanpa sepengetahuan pihak ke tiga. Teori hukum yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah teori akibat hukum dari R. Soeroso sebagai teori pendukung dari teori utama yaitu teori Teori Perlindungan Hukum menurut Menurut Satjipto Rahardjo. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum yuridis normatif. Adapun pendekatan penelitian yang dipergunakan yaitu Pendekatan Perundang-undangan, Pendekatan Konseptual, Pendekatan Analis, Pendekatan Kasus dan teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum. Serta teknik analisa bahan hukum dilakukan Penafsiran Gramatikal, dan Penafsiran Sistematis. Akibat Hukum penyalahgunaan atas Akta Kuasa terhadap Persetujuan Kredit tambahan yang dibuat oleh Notaris dengan dibuatkannya akta kuasa tanpa sepengetahuan pihak ke tiga yaitu dapat dimintakan sanksi Administratif jabatan berupa peringatan tertulis kepada majelis pengawas notaris terhadap Notaris yang melanggar tersebut. Adapun tambahan perlindungan hukum menurut peneliti Terhadap Pemilik Sertipikat Atas Penyalahgunaan Akta Kuasa Persetujuan Kredit Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris bahwa penggugat dapat meminta kepada Hakim dalam gugatannya yaitu tidak dijadikan tambahan yang berkedudukan sebagai subjek gugatan di kemudian hari jika pihak salah satu para tergugat dikemudian waktu melakukan upaya hukum kembali. Sebagai bentuk dari perlindungan hukum represif bagi pemilik sertifikat selaku pemberi kuasa.]]>
<![CDATA[Transformation of Criminal Law in Indonesia: An Analysis of Social Rights Protection through a Qualitative Descriptive Approach ]]>
<![CDATA[Tasya Nabilla]]>;
<![CDATA[Benny Djaja]]>;
<![CDATA[Maman Sudirman]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Vol. 5 No. 11 (2024): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV. Publikasi Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59141/jiss.v5i11.1512
<![CDATA[This research aims to analyze the protection of human rights in criminal law in Indonesia, considering the importance of integrating human rights protection into a fair and effective criminal law system. This study uses a qualitative descriptive research method, utilizing primary data from case studies related to human rights violations and secondary data in the form of scientific literature, laws, and official documents from related institutions. Data were collected through documentation study techniques and media content analysis, which allowed for in-depth exploration of various cases and legal policies that had been implemented. Content analysis was used to identify key themes in legal documents and literature studies, while theoretical modeling helped formulate a theoretical model that links criminal law to human rights protection. The results of the study indicate that there is a discrepancy in several implementations of criminal law with human rights principles, especially in terms of protecting victims and fulfilling the rights of the accused. The conclusions obtained highlight the need for criminal law reform to ensure the fulfillment of basic rights for all individuals in accordance with international standards. This study provides recommendations for policymakers to integrate human rights protection more systematically into the criminal law system in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Liability of Notaries for Misuse of Certificate Custody by Third Parties: Case Analysis of Albert Riwukore ]]>
<![CDATA[Klenten, Bred]]>;
<![CDATA[Djaja, Benny]]>;
<![CDATA[Sudirman, Maman]]>
<![CDATA[ JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Vol 7, No 2 (2025): JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.58258/jihad.v7i2.8746
<![CDATA[A notary, as a public official, holds legal responsibility for any document or item entrusted to them in the scope of their professional duties. This paper examines the legal liability of Notary Albert Riwukore regarding the loss of nine land ownership certificates (SHM) that were initially deposited during the credit collateral process between Rachmat (debtor) and BPR Christa Jaya Perdana (creditor). Although the SHMs were retrieved by Rachmat—its legal owner—for photocopying purposes, the retrieval lacked written consent and official documentation from the notary's office. This raised legal concerns under both civil law (tort and breach of contract) and criminal law (alleged embezzlement). The analysis reveals that the notary’s responsibility must be distinguished between administrative negligence and criminal intent. No evidence supports the presence of dolus (malicious intent), although culpa (negligence) may still be applicable. Moreover, Rachmat's voluntary action as the rightful owner to retrieve the certificates eliminates a key element of embezzlement. This study underlines the importance of meticulous documentation systems and precautionary procedures in the notarial profession to avoid potential criminalization of their official duties.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Yuridis dan Peran Staf Notaris sebagai Saksi dalam Akta ]]>
<![CDATA[Eka Ratna Putri]]>;
<![CDATA[Benny Djaja]]>;
<![CDATA[Maman Sudirman]]>
<![CDATA[ Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Mei : Majelis : Jurnal Hukum Indonesia ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.62383/majelis.v2i2.675
<![CDATA[The making of authentic deeds by a notary is part of the legal service that has the highest evidentiary value in the Indonesian civil law system. One of the formal requirements of an authentic deed according to Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary (UUJN) is the presence of two witnesses who know and directly witness the process of signing the deed. In notarial practice, notary staff are often appointed as witnesses for reasons of administrative convenience, trust, and availability of time. This study aims to examine the legal position and role of notary staff as witnesses in authentic deeds and the form of legal protection available if the deed is legally disputed. The research method used is normative legal with a statutory and conceptual approach, supported by literature studies and analysis of related court decisions. The results of the study indicate that notary staff are legally valid as witnesses as long as they meet the requirements as competent witnesses according to law. However, if a dispute arises over the deed, the staff can be asked for information as a witness in court and has the potential to face legal pressure. Therefore, legal protection for notary staff includes the principle of good faith, legal protection for witnesses, the right to legal assistance, and the ethical responsibility of notaries as employers. In conclusion, there needs to be more explicit regulations regarding the role of staff in deeds and clear protection mechanisms to maintain professionalism, integrity, and legal certainty in notarial practice.]]>
