Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR A DENTIST'S NEGLIGENCE THAT CAUSES INJURY TO A PATIENT IS BASED ON LAW NUMBER 17 OF 2023 CONCERNING HEALTH Najib Albana Daulay; Fitri Rafianti; Bambang Fitrianto
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): September
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59733/jishup.v2i3.89

Abstract

The profession as a dentist is not easy because many dentists in the world often commit malpractice acts. Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health regulates the qualifications and types of dental malpractice acts. Problems include how negligence by dentists in carrying out their duties is categorized as malpractice and is a criminal act, factors that cause dentists to be negligent in carrying out their duties and how criminal liability for dentist negligence which causes injuries to patients is reviewed from Law Number 17 of 2023 About health. The type of research used in this research is normative legal research. The nature of the research used in this research is descriptive. A dentist's negligence in carrying out their duties which results in injury to a patient can be categorized as malpractice and a criminal act. This occurs when dentists do not comply with professional standards, standard operating procedures, or applicable codes of ethics, which harms patients. The factors that cause dentists to be negligent in carrying out their duties include several important aspects, namely the negligence factor (culpa), the deliberate factor, the misunderstanding factor (dwaling), the error of judgment factor, the contributory negligence factor and the infrastructure factors. Criminal liability for a dentist's negligence which causes injury to a patient is reviewed by Law Number 17 of 2023 Health, regulated in Article 440 of the Law, punishable by a maximum imprisonment of 3 years or a maximum fine of IDR 250,000,000. If the negligence causes death, the sentence can increase to a maximum prison term. 5 years or a maximum fine of IDR 500,000,000. Researchers recommend that dentists regularly participate in training and education regarding professional standards, standard operating procedures (SOP). So that dentists increase awareness regarding the responsibility for negligence which can result in injury to patients..
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR DENTISTS IN HANDLING PATIENTS IN CASES OF TOOTH EXTRACTION WITHOUT INFORMED CONSENT (STUDY AT VARIOUS INDEPENDENT PRACTICE PLACES FOR DENTISTS IN PEMATANGSIANTAR) Hargo Basuki; Bambang Fitrianto; Dahlan
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): September
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59733/jishup.v2i3.92

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze legal regulations regarding the obligation of informed consent in tooth extraction services, the responsibility of dentists towards patients in providing informed consent in cases of tooth extraction and legal protection for dentists in handling patients in cases of tooth extraction without informed consent in various places. Independent practice of dentist in Pematangsiantar. The method in this research uses descriptive analytical empirical juridical research. The data sources obtained used primary data and secondary data. The data collection technique used is library research. The results of this research reveal that legal regulations regarding the obligation of informed consent in tooth extraction services by dentists in Indonesia have been regulated in various laws, including Law no. 36 of 2009 concerning Health, Law no. 44 of 2009 concerning Hospitals and now Law no. 17 of 2023 concerning Health. The dentist's responsibilities include providing sterile tools and materials, examining the patient's medical history, and carrying out extractions according to SOP and competency. Legal protection for dentists in cases of extractions without informed consent in Pematangsiantar reflects awareness of the importance of informed consent. UU no. 17 of 2023 emphasizes two principles of legal protection: preventive and repressive. If the dentist does not carry out the obligation to carry out informed consent, there could be civil and criminal consequences. This study recommends that every dentist provide informed consent in treating patients.
Implementation Of Patient Rights And Obligations In Health Services In Hospital (Study At Pidie Jaya Regional Hospital) Sunita Melati Nasution; Sumarno; Bambang Fitrianto
International Journal of Synergy in Law, Criminal, and Justice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): SLP-IJSLCJ
Publisher : PT. Sinergi Legal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70321/ijslcj.v1i1.28

Abstract

Healthcare services include all attempts to preserve and enhance a person's health, stop and treat illnesses, and recover their condition. The purpose of this study is to investigate Pidie Jaya Regional Hospital's legal aspects of healthcare services. The study concentrates on the way patients' rights and obligations are carried out and points up the challenges to this process. One used a descriptive method in an empirical study approach. Using both primary and secondary data, data were gathered by observations, interviews, and literary reviews. The results show that Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health rules several areas of healthcare services, including legality, balance, timeliness, good faith, prudence, transparency, autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, justice, confidentiality, honesty, and adherence. Patients' rights and obligations are enforced at the Pidie Jaya Regional Hospital by means of processes intended to guarantee that service standards are satisfied and that patients' rights are most respectfully respected. Obstacles such as a lack of knowledge and awareness, problems with facilities and human resources, and administrative and regulatory barriers, however, prevent the full realization of patients' rights and obligations. Notwithstanding these difficulties, Pidie Jaya Regional Hospital has responded to patient complaints by making sure their rights are respected in line with the hospital's dedication and operation as a public health agent. This paper comes to the conclusion that improving service quality depends critically on knowledge and application of pertinent legal components in healthcare services as well as awareness-raising and resource management. It also provides ideas on how satisfying patient rights and enhancing administrative effectiveness in regional hospitals would help to improve healthcare facilities.
Perkembangan Teori Penemuan Hukum dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia Berdasarkan Kitap Undang Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Baru Ismaidar; Bambang Fitrianto; Kevin Maisyan Rizaldi Mendrofa; Kospiyandi; Rika Suryana Surbakti; Tri Sandi
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 6 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i6.2532

Abstract

Perubahan sistem hukum pidana nasional melalui pengesahan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) menandai babak baru dalam pembangunan hukum di Indonesia. Salah satu aspek penting yang mengalami transformasi adalah peran dan fungsi penemuan hukum (rechtsvinding) dalam sistem hukum nasional. Penemuan hukum bukan sekadar kegiatan teknis hakim dalam mengisi kekosongan hukum, tetapi juga merupakan proses intelektual yang melibatkan penalaran yuridis dan pertimbangan moral untuk mewujudkan keadilan substantif. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perkembangan teori penemuan hukum dalam konteks sistem hukum Indonesia serta menelaah bagaimana prinsip-prinsip tersebut direfleksikan dalam KUHP Baru. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan menelaah sumber hukum primer seperti peraturan perundang-undangan dan yurisprudensi, serta sumber hukum sekunder berupa literatur dan karya ilmiah hukum. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa KUHP Baru memberikan ruang yang lebih luas bagi hakim untuk melakukan penemuan hukum secara kreatif dan berorientasi pada nilai-nilai keadilan sosial, terutama melalui pengakuan terhadap hukum yang hidup di masyarakat (living law). Dengan demikian, teori penemuan hukum yang semula berorientasi pada positivisme hukum kini bergeser menuju paradigma hukum progresif yang menempatkan hakim sebagai agen moral dalam menegakkan hukum yang berkeadilan.
Analisis Kecakapan Hukum Debitur di Bawah Usia 21 Tahun dalam Pelaksanaan Akad Kredit Menurut Hukum Perdata Indonesia Ismaidar; Bambang Fitrianto; Graha Ananda Zugusti Lubis; Maya Sari Novita; Faruq Rozy; Iman Irdian Saragih; Rohasiholan Doloksaribu; Angga Sahputra Sirait
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 6 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i6.2574

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kecakapan hukum debitur di bawah usia 21 tahun dalam pelaksanaan akad kredit menurut hukum perdata Indonesia. Berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 1320 dan Pasal 1330 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata), salah satu syarat sahnya perjanjian adalah adanya kecakapan hukum para pihak. Pasal 330 KUHPerdata menentukan bahwa seseorang baru dianggap dewasa apabila telah mencapai usia 21 tahun atau telah menikah. Dengan demikian, debitur di bawah usia 21 tahun yang belum menikah dianggap belum cakap hukum untuk melakukan perbuatan hukum, termasuk akad kredit. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perjanjian kredit yang dilakukan oleh debitur di bawah usia 21 tahun tanpa persetujuan orang tua atau wali hanya memiliki kekuatan hukum bersyarat, yakni dapat dibatalkan oleh pihak yang berwenang. Temuan ini menunjukkan pentingnya prinsip kehati-hatian (prudential principle) bagi lembaga keuangan dalam proses penyaluran kredit untuk menjamin kepastian dan perlindungan hukum bagi para pihak.
Penafsiran Hakim Terhadap Persyaratan Usia Calon Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden Pemilu 2024: (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/Puu-Xxi/2023) Ismaidar; Bambang Fitrianto; Zulfa Almira; Ahmad Irham Tajhi; Susanto; Zefri Ansari
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 6 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i6.2685

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penafsiran hukum oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Putusan Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 mengenai ketentuan usia minimal calon presiden dan wakil presiden dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum. Permohonan perkara tersebut berfokus pada frasa “berusia paling rendah 40 tahun” dalam Pasal 169 huruf q Undang - Undang Pemilu yang dinilai diskriminatif dan membatasi hak konstitusional warga negara berusia di bawah 40 tahun yang memiliki pengalaman sebagai kepala daerah. Analisis ini menggunakan pendekatan normatif melalui telaah terhadap putusan MK serta kajian literatur terkait teori penafsiran hukum, hak konstitusional warga negara, dan prinsip non-diskriminasi dalam hukum pemilu. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa hakim MK melakukan penafsiran bersyarat dengan memperluas makna syarat usia yang dimaksud, sehingga membuka peluang bagi calon presiden/wakil presiden yang belum berusia 40 tahun tetapi memiliki pengalaman sebagai kepala daerah. Penafsiran ini dinilai berdampak pada dinamika perkembangan demokrasi dan konstitusionalisme di Indonesia, karena memberi ruang kepada representasi generasi muda dalam kontestasi politik nasional.
EKSEKUSI HAK TANGGUNGAN ATAS KREDIT BERMASALAH:ANTARA KEPASTIAN HUKUM DENGAN PERLINDUNGAN NASABAH Bambang Fitrianto; Jeni alfikri ginting; Vieri Rivaldo Hasibuan; Riza Alif Pasha; Nazwa Salsabila; Zavfirah Alya
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 5 No. 8 (2026): Januari 2026
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Kredit bermasalah menjadi persoalan utama dalam dunia perbankan karena dapat mengganggu stabilitas keuangan. Untuk melindungi kepentingan kreditur, digunakan hak tanggungan sebagai jaminan yang memiliki kekuatan eksekutorial berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996. Namun, pelaksanaan eksekusi sering menghadapi kendala seperti perlawanan debitur dan prosedur administratif yang rumit. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pelaksanaan eksekusi hak tanggungan atas kredit bermasalah serta menilai keseimbangan antara kepastian hukum bagi kreditur dan perlindungan hukum bagi debitur. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun hak tanggungan memberikan kepastian hukum, praktik eksekusi masih memerlukan penegakan prinsip keadilan dan transparansi agar tidak merugikan nasabah.
LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE DIVISION OF JOINT PROPERTY ON LAND OWNED BY ONE PARTY'S PARENTS ACCORDING TO MARRIAGE LAW (STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 183/Pdt.G/2025/MS.Sgi) Rizki Ardita; Beby Sendy; Bambang Fitrianto
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): December
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59733/jishup.v3i4.173

Abstract

This study was conducted to analyze the division of joint assets and the judge's legal considerations in determining the status of joint assets standing on land owned by one of the parties' parents and the suitability of the decision with the provisions of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. The method used in this study is normative law with a case approach, namely analyzing secondary data in the form of the decision of the Mahkamah Syar’iyah Sigli Number 183 / Pdt.G / 2025 / MS.Sgi as well as laws and legal materials related to joint assets. This study shows that in this case, the object of the dispute is a permanent house unit standing on land owned by the Plaintiff's parents which is recognized as joint assets, while the land where the house stands is the Plaintiff's inherited property, but in its consideration the Panel of Judges did not clearly outline the boundaries between joint assets in the form of a house and land as inherited property, but instead immediately decided that the Defendant should divide 2 houses in kind. So that the decision can give rise to double interpretations as if the land where the house stands is also part of the joint assets. This creates legal uncertainty in the implementation of the decision and could potentially harm one of the parties. Therefore, the division of joint assets should be carried out fairly by clearly separating the house as joint property from the land as acquired property, in order to comply with the provisions of the Marriage Law.
Tinjauan Hukum terhadap Penyelesaian Sangketa Kredit Macet di Bank Umum di Indonesia Bambang Fitrianto; Siti Nur Raihani; Yola Fifilyan Salam; Joito Rajagukguk; Yusnidar Sitorus; Suvanji Binsar Aritonang
Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Volume 3 Nom
Publisher : PT PUSTAKA CENDEKIA GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70292/pchukumsosial.v3i3.182

Abstract

This study examines the legal aspects of resolving non-performing loan disputes in commercial banks in Indonesia. Non-performing loans are a crucial issue impacting bank financial stability and the protection of debtor and creditor rights.This study examines banking regulations and contract law governing non-performing loan resolution, including credit restructuring mechanisms, mediation, arbitration, and litigation. The analysis includes the Banking Law, Financial Services Authority (OJK) regulations, and judicial practices related to non-performing loan disputes. The results indicate that resolving non-performing loan disputes requires a comprehensive and equitable legal approach, with an emphasis on consumer protection and legal certainty for banks.Furthermore, alternative out-of-court dispute resolution methods such as mediation and arbitration are considered effective in expediting settlements and reducing the burden on the courts. However, challenges remain in implementing consistent and transparent regulations. This study recommends strengthening regulations and increasing the capacity of dispute resolution institutions to support optimal and equitable non-performing loan resolution in Indonesia.
EFEKTIVITAS MEDIASI PERBANKAN DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DI INDONESIA Bambang Fitrianto; Khairuddin, Khairuddin; Raihandinata, Primus
ANDREW Law Journal Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Desember 2025
Publisher : ANDREW Law Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61876/alj.v4i2.134

Abstract

Penyelesaian sengketa konsumen di sektor perbankan di Indonesia tidak hanya mengandalkan mekanisme litigasi, tetapi juga menekankan penggunaan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa, khususnya melalui mediasi perbankan. Mediasi perbankan diatur sebagai instrumen untuk memberikan penyelesaian sengketa yang mudah diakses, efisien, dan berkeadilan antara bank dan konsumen. Namun demikian, dalam praktiknya efektivitas mediasi perbankan masih menghadapi berbagai kendala, baik dari aspek normatif maupun kelembagaan. Sejumlah kasus menunjukkan bahwa hasil mediasi seringkali belum sepenuhnya melindungi kepentingan konsumen, terutama akibat ketimpangan posisi tawar, keterbatasan kekuatan mengikat kesepakatan mediasi, serta implementasi yang belum konsisten oleh lembaga perbankan. Permasalahan utama terletak pada keterbatasan kewenangan mediator, belum optimalnya mekanisme penegakan hasil mediasi, serta belum adanya standar prosedural. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus untuk mengkaji kerangka hukum, pelaksanaan, dan tingkat efektivitas mediasi perbankan dalam penyelesaian sengketa konsumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun mediasi perbankan memiliki peran strategis dalam memperkuat perlindungan konsumen dan efisiensi penyelesaian sengketa, efektivitasnya masih terhambat oleh lemahnya penegakan regulasi, keterbatasan institusional, serta rendahnya pemahaman hukum konsumen. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan regulasi, peningkatan kewenangan mediator, serta perluasan akses dan literasi hukum konsumen agar mediasi perbankan dapat berfungsi secara optimal sebagai sarana penyelesaian sengketa yang adil dan efektif di Indonesia.