Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.761
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lex Jurnalica (Ilmu Hukum) Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat AbdiMas JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Journal of Comprehensive Science Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Edunity: Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Rechtsnormen SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas
Wasahua, Idris
Universitas Esa Unggul
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 20 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 20 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum terhadap Pelaku Penyalahgunaan Data Pribadi: Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tangerang No.76/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Tng Idris Wasahua
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 12 (2025): Tema Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i12.2954

Abstract

This study aims to examine the regulation of criminal acts involving the misuse of personal data under Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection, as well as the legal liability of perpetrators who misuse other individuals’ personal data as reflected in the Decision of the Tangerang District Court Number 76/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Tangerang dated April 2, 2024. This research is classified as normative legal research, employing a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. The results of this study indicate that the Personal Data Protection Law (PDP Law) provides a firm legal framework through Articles 67–70, which prohibit the unlawful acquisition, use, disclosure, and falsification of personal data, while also affirming that the protection of personal data constitutes a fundamental right that must be guaranteed by the state. The perpetrator’s actions in this case fulfilled all the elements of the charged provisions and therefore resulted in the imposition of criminal sanctions pursuant to Article 67 paragraph (3) of the PDP Law. Furthermore, the perpetrator’s conduct also satisfies the elements of an unlawful act as stipulated in Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code, as such conduct violated the right to privacy, was committed intentionally, caused immaterial damage, and had a causal relationship with the harm suffered by the victim. Consequently, the perpetrator may also be held civilly liable under Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code.
Pembaharuan Kebijakan Formulasi Pelaksanaan Pidana Denda dan Pidana Tambahan Pembayaran Ganti Kerugian dalam Undang-Undang Perlidungan Data Pribadi Idris Wasahua; Euis Nurul Bahriyah; Zulfikar Judge; Gousta Feriza
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 12 (2025): Tema Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i12.3064

Abstract

Law Number 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection regulates criminal sanctions in the form of fines and additional sanctions of compensation payment, enforced through the seizure of the convicted person’s assets or income. This policy aims to ensure the fulfillment of criminal sanctions and to provide legal protection for victims of personal data violations. However, this study finds that the current formulation policy contains fundamental weaknesses, as asset seizure may only be conducted after a court decision has obtained final and binding legal force, thereby allowing the convicted person to transfer assets during the lengthy criminal process. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that such weaknesses may hinder the execution of fines and compensation payments and undermine the objectives of punishment. Therefore, this study recommends reformulating the policy by allowing asset seizure at the investigation stage as a legal guarantee to ensure effective enforcement of fines and compensation payments, as well as stronger protection for victims of personal data misuse.
Problematika Kewenangan Lembaga Audit dalam Menentukan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Secara Nyata (Actual Loss) pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi Marsya Musyaffa; I Made Kantikha; Malemna Anabertha Sura; Idris Wasahua
Edunity: Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 8 (2026): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies
Publisher : PT Publikasiku Academic Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57096/edunity.v5i8.571

Abstract

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 25/PUU-XIV/2016 mengubah paradigma pembuktian tindak pidana korupsi dengan menghapus frasa "dapat" dalam Pasal 2 ayat (1) dan Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, sehingga unsur kerugian keuangan negara wajib dibuktikan sebagai kerugian nyata (actual loss), bukan sekadar potensi kerugian (potential loss). Pergeseran ini menimbulkan dua persoalan hukum yang saling berkaitan: pertama, dualisme kewenangan lembaga audit dalam menghitung dan mendeklarasikan kerugian keuangan negara; kedua, implikasi yuridis kekuatan laporan audit kerugian negara dalam tindak pidana korupsi. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis problematika kewenangan otoritas audit serta implikasi yuridis kekuatan alat bukti actual loss pasca pergeseran delik formil menjadi delik materil. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 28/PUU-XXIV/2026, BPK merupakan satu-satunya lembaga yang berwenang secara absolut menetapkan kerugian keuangan negara, sedangkan laporan BPKP hanya bersifat investigatif dan tidak dapat berdiri sendiri sebagai alat bukti. Kekuatan alat bukti actual loss ditentukan oleh ketepatan metodologi perhitungan real cost, net loss, atau total loss.
Keabsahan Penetapan Tersangka Tanpa Didukung Alat Bukti yang Cukup: Analisis terhadap Putusan Praperadilan Nomor 2/Pid.Pra/2024/PN Jkt.Sel dalam Perspektif Rechtsstaat VS Machtsstaat Rafael Benaya Zachary; Idris Wasahua
VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Vision and Ideas (VISA)
Publisher : IAI Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The designation of a suspect is a legal action that has significant implications for an individual's fundamental rights and therefore must be carried out in accordance with criminal procedural law and supported by sufficient preliminary evidence. However, in practice, suspects are sometimes designated without fulfilling the minimum evidentiary standard, as reflected in Pretrial Decision Number 2/Pid.Pra/2024/PN Jkt.Sel. This study aims to analyze the legal reasoning behind the court's declaration that the suspect designation was unlawful and to examine the proper procedure for designating a suspect under Indonesian positive law from the perspectives of rechtsstaat and machtsstaat. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, analyzed descriptively through primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings indicate that the suspect designation was declared legally defective because it was not supported by at least two valid pieces of evidence at the time the designation was made, thereby violating the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code, Constitutional Court Decision Number 21/PUU-XII/2014, the principles of legality, legal certainty, and due process of law. Furthermore, to ensure the validity of a suspect designation, investigators must strictly comply with all procedural requirements, including preliminary inquiry, issuance of an investigation warrant, collection of at least two lawful pieces of evidence, case exposition, submission of the Notice of Commencement of Investigation, and protection of the suspect's legal rights. Therefore, the legitimacy of suspect designation must be grounded in strict adherence to legal procedures as an embodiment of the rechtsstaat principle and to prevent machtsstaat practices in criminal law enforcement.
Keabsahan Penetapan Tersangka oleh Penyidik Kepolisian: Analisis Yuridis Normatif terhadap Putusan Prapradilan No. 13/Pid.Pra/2021/PN.Kdi Idris Wasahua; Rafii Navalino
VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Vision and Ideas (VISA)
Publisher : IAI Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

An important part of any criminal inquiry is the official designation of a suspect, which must adhere to the KUHAP, the concept of due process, and be backed by legally acceptable evidence in accordance with Indonesian law. As a result of Constitutional Court Decision No 21/PUU-XII/2014, judges may now check the legitimacy of investigation activities by reviewing the suspect designation before trial. The purpose of this research is to look at the right way to designate suspects under Indonesian positive law and to investigate the judges' legal reasoning in Pretrial Decision No 13/Pid.Pra/2021/PN Kdi, which found that the police investigators' suspect identification was flawed. Statutory, case law, and conceptual techniques are used in this study as part of a normative legal research process. A qualitative analysis was conducted using library research on the legal resources, which include primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. Because the suspect designation did not completely satisfy the formal and substantive conditions outlined in KUHAP also Constitutional Court Decision No 21/PUU-XII/2014, the court found it legally invalid, according to the findings. In addition, the study confirms that to properly designate a suspect, one must first conduct an investigation, formal inquiry, gather at least two pieces of valid evidence, question witnesses, present the case (gelar perkara), and then issue a letter designating the suspect in compliance with relevant legal provisions. By following these protocols, Indonesia's criminal justice system demonstrates its commitment to human rights protection, legal clarity, and the rule of law. So, for law enforcement to be fair and to avoid abuse of power, it is crucial that suspects be designated in accordance with legal processes.
Ketimpangan Penegakan Hukum dalam Proses Penetapan Tersangka oleh Aparat Kepolisian dalam Kasus Pegi Setiawan Idris Wasahua; Enry Jenniefer Virgie Dien
VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Vision and Ideas (VISA)
Publisher : IAI Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the inequality in law enforcement in the process of determining suspects by the police through the examination of Pretrial Decision Number 10/Pid.Pra/2024/PN Bdg. The background of this study is rooted in the importance of the rule of law and the principle of fair legal process in the Indonesian criminal justice system, particularly in the determination of suspects, which must be carried out based on valid and fair legal procedures. The research problem focuses on the judge's legal considerations in declaring the determination of a suspect null and void, as well as how the procedure for determining suspects by police investigators must be carried out in accordance with the principle of fair legal process. This study uses normative legal research with a statutory, case, and conceptual legal approach. The existing findings describe that in Pretrial Decision Number 10/Pid.Pra/2024/PN Bdg, the judge declared the determination of a suspect invalid because the investigator failed to examine the potential suspect before determining the suspect status and failed to present at least two valid pieces of evidence as outlined in Article 184 of the Indonesian Criminal Code. In conclusion, the determination of suspects must be carried out professionally, objectively, transparently, and accountably by upholding the principles of fair legal process, the presumption of innocence, and the protection of human rights to ensure legal certainty and justice in the criminal justice system.
Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen terhadap Praktik Penghangusan Kuota Internet oleh Penyelenggara Jasa Telekomunikasi di Indonesia Herlina; Markoni; Helvis; Idris Wasahua; Tuti Elawati
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Agustus 2026
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i4.3474

Abstract

The rapid development of mobile telecommunications services has made internet access a primary necessity. However, the practice of forfeiting unused internet data quotas raises legal issues concerning consumers’ legal position, legal protection, and the liability of telecommunications service providers. This study employs contract law theory, legal protection theory, and legal interpretation and construction theory, using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that although consumers are formally bound by valid contractual agreements, their substantive position remains unequal due to the dominant role of service providers in determining service terms and conditions. The forfeiture of unused data quotas prevents consumers from fully benefiting from services they have already paid for, thereby conflicting with the principles of balance and good faith in contract law. Furthermore, legal protection remains ineffective because no adequate compensation mechanism is provided, despite the existence of actual consumer losses that satisfy the elements of legal liability. Therefore, stricter regulations and improved service policies are necessary to ensure fairness, accountability, and effective consumer protection.
Legal Certainty Regarding the Probationary Period for the Death Penalty under Law No. 1 of 2023 on The Criminal Code Sahat Wahyu Febrianto Hasibuan; Helvis; Malemna Sura Anabertha Sembiring; Idris Wasahua
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i6.3760

Abstract

This study is motivated by the revision of the death penalty provisions in Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code, which introduces a ten-year probationary period as a condition for the possible commutation of the death penalty to life imprisonment. Although this provision reflects a more humanistic paradigm of punishment, it still raises issues of legal certainty, particularly regarding the indicators of “praiseworthy conduct and behavior” and the mechanisms for evaluating them. This study employs Gustav Radbruch theory of legal certainty as its primary framework, supported by the theory of legal protection and the concept of the purposes of punishment. The research method used is a normative-empirical legal study employing legislative, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Data collection was conducted through literature review, document analysis, and analysis of relevant legislation and legal materials. The results of the study indicate that the provision regarding the probationary period for the death penalty in Article 100 of Law No. 1 of 2023 represents a form of criminal law reform that prioritizes a balance between legal certainty, justice, and public interest. However, the lack of objective parameters regarding the assessment of a convicted person’s behavior, evaluation procedures, and the authority of the relevant agencies has the potential to lead to multiple interpretations and inconsistencies in the application of the law. Therefore, further regulations are needed that clearly outline indicators, mechanisms, and implementation procedures to ensure legal certainty in the application of the probationary period for the death penalty.
The Granting of Amnesty and Abolition by The President: The Perspective of Legal Certainty and The Principle of Checks and Balances Bryan Christofer Harefa; Annisa Fitria; Helvis Helvis; Idris Wasahua
Journal of Comprehensive Science Vol. 5 No. 9 (2026): Journal of Comprehensive Science
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/jcs.v5i9.4324

Abstract

Article 14(2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia gives the President authority to grant amnesty and abolition after considering the House of Representatives (DPR). However, Emergency Law No. 11 of 1954 does not provide sufficiently clear criteria, procedures, limits on presidential authority, or legal consequences, creating a legal-certainty gap. This study analyzes the regulation of presidential amnesty and abolition from the perspective of legal certainty, evaluates the operation of checks and balances through DPR consideration, and formulates a model for a new law to replace Emergency Law No. 11 of 1954. This study uses normative legal research with statute, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials were collected through documentary study and analyzed qualitatively using prescriptive analysis to assess the adequacy of the existing framework and formulate a regulatory model. The analysis identifies gaps in eligibility criteria, objective parameters for presidential discretion, DPR deliberation procedures, limitations on categories of offenses, and the legal consequences of amnesty and abolition. The development of practices from 1998–2025 demonstrates that these gaps have become increasingly significant. A replacement law is needed to establish objective criteria, transparent and measurable DPR procedures, limits on presidential discretion, clear legal consequences, and monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. Such a framework would strengthen legal certainty, institutional accountability, and the balance of power among state institutions.
Analisis Yuridis Status dan Hubungan Kerja Pilot: Studi Sinkronisasi Hukum Ketenagakerjaan dan Hukum Penerbangan di Indonesia Horadin Saragih; Malemna Sura Anabertha Sembiring; Idris Wasahua; Tuti Elawati
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4150

Abstract

Employment relationships in the aviation industry constitute a unique legal phenomenon because they exist at the intersection of two regulatory regimes with distinct objectives: labor law, which is grounded in the principles of worker protection and social justice, and aviation law, which focuses on technical standards and public safety. The tension between these two legal regimes has generated considerable legal debate, particularly regarding the validity of applying Fixed-Term Employment Agreements (Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu/PKWT) to pilots, who functionally occupy a central role in sustaining airline operations. This study aims to delineate the regulatory boundaries between general and special legal frameworks, assess the legal validity of the current employment agreement scheme, and formulate a harmonious and legally certain regulatory framework. Employing normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the study examines legal norms through the perspectives of the theory of legal certainty and the theory of legal protection. The findings demonstrate that the nature of a pilot's work—being a core, continuous, and indefinite activity—objectively satisfies the legal requirements for an Indefinite-Term Employment Agreement (Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tidak Tertentu/PKWTT) under Article 59 of Law No. 13 of 2003, as amended by Law No. 6 of 2023. Accordingly, the application of PKWT arrangements or bonded-service schemes disguised as service contracts constitutes a legal deviation, resulting, by operation of law, in the conversion of the employment relationship into permanent employment status. Aviation law does not possess the authority to override labor law with respect to employment status; rather, it serves only to complement the technical aspects of work performance. This study concludes that restructuring pilots' employment relationships under the PKWTT framework is both a legal necessity and a prerequisite for ensuring aviation safety. It further recommends regulatory harmonization to eliminate ambiguities in the interpretation and application of the relevant legal norms.
Co-Authors Ade Hari Siswanto Agus Suprayogi Ahmad, Ahluddin Saiful Alfiana, Rita Alya Puspita Juliasari Anatomi Muliawan Annisa Fitria Annisa Fitria Antara, Nyoman Putra Aurellia, Stefanny Azis, Rizka Amelia Bahriyah, Euis Nurul Binastya Anggara Sekti Bryan Christofer Harefa Elawati, Tuti Enry Jenniefer Virgie Dien Feriza, Gousta Fitria Olivia Freddy Harris, Freddy Gousta Feriza Hartadi, I Gede Helvis Helvis, Helvis Henry Arianto Herlina Horadin Saragih Horadin Saragih I Gede Hartadi Kurniawan I Made Kantikha Iqbal Hidayatullah Juanda Juanda Lisasih, Nin Yasmine Malemna Anabertha Sura Malemna Sura Anabertha Sembiring Malemna Sura Anabertha Sembiring Markoni Marsya Musyaffa Nixon Erzed Nurhayani nurhayani Nuriah, Resky Rafael Benaya Zachary Rafii Navalino Rahmahani, Adhining Prabawati Raihan Ramadhan Sahat Wahyu Febrianto Hasibuan Sri Redjeki Slamet Wahyudi, Endik Wasis Susetio Zulfikar Judge