Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.428
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE JURE Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Jurnal Yuridis Veteran Law Review Jurnal Simbur Cahaya University Of Bengkulu Law Journal ADIL : Jurnal Hukum Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Majalah Hukum Nasional Fundamental : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Ma'mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah dan Hukum JELAJAH: Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Journal of Islamic Economics, Management, and Business (JIEMB) Journal of Islamic and Law Studies (JILS) Wijaya Putra Law Review Qonun Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Sanskara Hukum dan HAM The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights SOSIO YUSTISIA Jurnal Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial SCLS Journal Governance Society Fundamental : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security
Safaruddin Harefa
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 28 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 28 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Dalam Pengadaan Proyek Jalan Tol Dengan Asas Keadilan Safaruddin Harefa
Sosio Yustisia: Jurnal Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): May
Publisher : Magister Hukum Tata Negara Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (582.403 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/sosyus.v2i1.154

Abstract

When the government wants to build a toll road on community land, usually there will be compensation that is charged to the government to pay it to the land owner, but in practice there are often land disputes that will be used in the construction of toll roads, one of which is the unwillingness of the land owner to make it. the land is built toll roads or the land owner does not agree to the compensation paid by the government to him. Whereas in the acquisition of land for toll roads, it is necessary to pay attention to clear stages and in accordance with the applicable legal rules. The stages are starting from the planning stage, preparation stage, implementation stage and the stage of submitting the results of toll road construction. This must be done based on the principles of good governance. Furthermore, the settlement of land disputes for the procurement of this toll road can also be carried out in consultation with the land owner, compensation for the loss of land that is used as the object of toll road construction and the last is through legal channels, namely submission to the court. However, in this case the author places more emphasis on compensation which is more highlighted because compensation prioritizes justice. So before the compensation is implemented, a clear and concrete legal scheme or rule must be made that regulates the scheme and the provision of compensation based on justice
Tinjauan Unsur Pembunuhan Berencana (Moord) Dalam Tindak Pidana Analisis Putusan 1474/Pid.B/2019/PN Dps Merina Puspita Sari; Safaruddin Harefa
Sanskara Hukum dan HAM Vol. 2 No. 01 (2023): Sanskara Hukum dan HAM (SHH)
Publisher : Eastasouth Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/shh.v2i01.169

Abstract

Pembunuhan berencana merupakan kejahatan merampas nyawa manusia lain, atau membunuh, setelah dilakukan perencanaan mengenai waktu atau metode, dengan tujuan untuk memastikan keberhasilan pembunuhan atau menghindari penangkapan. Latar belakang penelitian ini untuk menelaah lebih dalam perbedaan unsur di dalam Pasal 338 dan 340 KUHP berdasarkan analisis putusan 1474/Pid.B/2019/PN Dps, kasus seorang suami yang membunuh istrinya. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif, dan permasalahan yang dibahas adalah mengenai unsur-unsur tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana pada Pasal 340 KUHP yang diputuskan oleh hakim dan perbedaan unsur dari kronologi yang seharusnya menggunakan Pasal 338 dari kasus tindak pidana pembunuhan. Metode penelitian dengan menggunakan pendekatan Undang-undang. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa perlunya menelaah interperasi yang tepat dalam Pasal 340 dan 338 KUHP yang seringkali mengalami kerancuan dalam menentukan unsur perkara.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PROGRESIF Syochibul Amar Maruf; Safaruddin Harefa
Wijaya Putra Law Review Vol 2 No 2 (2023): Oktober
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijaya Putra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38156/wplr.v2i2.140

Abstract

Lahirnya hukum progresif tidak serta merta muncul menjadi produk hukum yang langsung jadi. Satjipto Rahardjo yang merupakan penggagas hukum progresif menyatakan bahwa adanya hukum progresif karena terdapat persoalan ketidakadilan hukum yang hanya berlandaskan pada hukum positivistik semata. Cara-cara berhukum lama itu yang hanya mengandalkan penerapan undang-undang, sudah seharusnya ditinjau kembali. Cara berhukum yang demikian itu dirasa kurang mampu guna memecahkan masalah sosial. Penegakan hukum selama ini sudah dilakukan, akan tetapi belum menyelesaikan masalah sosial. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji lebih lanjut keefektifan hukum progresif dalam penegakan hukum di Indonesia dalam dinamika kehidupan bermasyarakat. Jenis penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif yang menitikberatkan pada peraturan tertulis untuk mencari data sekunder melalui studi literatur. Adapun pendekatan yang digunakan antara lain pendekatan kasus dan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa hukum progresif mampu memperbaiki masalah sosial karena sesungguhnya hukum bertujuan untuk kebaikan manusia. Oleh karena itu, Penulis memandang hukum yang selama ini berlaku perlu ditinjau kembali dengan memperhatikan gagasan hukum progresif yang esensinya tidak dapat dinafikan.
CRIMINOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF CYBERBULLYING CRIMES OCCURRING ON SOCIAL MEDIA (STUDY OF COMMENTS ON THE TIKTOK ACCOUNT ELYNAWA21) Harefa, Safaruddin; Ismawati, Sri; Hertini, Mega Fitri
Sriwijaya Crimen and Legal Studies Volume 2 Issue 2 December 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law Sriwijaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/scls.v2i2.4118

Abstract

This research aims to examine the phenomenon of crime in the social media landscape, particularly cyberbullying, which has become increasingly prevalent. The primary focus is on how the development of information and communication technology has facilitated bullying on social media platforms. Utilizing the social control theory by Travis Hirschi and Michael Gottfredson, this study emphasizes that individuals with weak attachments to social institutions, such as family, school, or community, are more susceptible to engaging in criminal behavior, including cyberbullying. This study analyzes comments targeting the physical appearance of individuals, where the lack of social supervision and weak self-control are identified as key factors contributing to cyberbullying behavior. Additionally, a low awareness of legal frameworks, such as the ITE Law governing online harassment, further intensifies this issue. The novelty of this research lies in applying social control theory within the context of cyberbullying on social media, highlighting the importance of strengthening social bonds and implementing social control mechanisms as preventive strategies. The study also provides valuable insights into the need for more effective law enforcement and educational efforts to mitigate and address the rising cases of cyberbullying in the digital age.
Navigating the Tensions Between Sharia and Human Rights in Regional Legislation Fadhil, Moh.; Herman, Herman; Wagner, Ivan; Simbolon, Subandri; Harefa, Safaruddin
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 16, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Shariah Faculty UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v16i2.29031

Abstract

The legacy of past conflicts has prompted the emergence of a civil society movement with the objective of transforming Pontianak City into a Human Rights City. This movement is pursuing this goal through the drafting of a Regional Regulation on Tolerance. Nevertheless, the legislative and political process within the Regional Houses of Representatives has given rise to paradigmatic debates concerning the concept of human rights. This article aims to elucidate the paradigmatic conflict between state actors and civil society during the drafting of the Regional Regulation on Tolerance in Pontianak City. The field study presented in this article is based on active participation in public hearings and dialogues between the Regional Houses of Representatives and civil society. The study employs a socio-legal approach, which reveals a contention between two distinct paradigms: the positivist paradigm (naive realism), as represented by state actors, and the critical paradigm (historical realism), as advocated by civil society. The Regional Houses of Representatives, as state actors, oppose the institutionalization of tolerance on the grounds that the Eurocentric concept of human rights may conflict with Sharia and local culture. In contrast, civil society views tolerance as a tool for addressing structural inequalities inherited from past conflicts. The inability of the two parties to reach a consensus led to the failure to ratify the Regional Regulation on Tolerance, which prioritizes human rights. This outcome underscores that human rights have not been a primary consideration in the formulation of local regulations on tolerance. This attitude contrasts with international and national human rights law, which has the effect of neglecting the aspiration to become a human rights city. This research contributes to changes in the strategy of the civil society movement in advocating for human rights law in regional policy.
The Controversy of the Death Penalty for Narcotics Dealers: A Review of Indonesian Criminal Law and Islamic Criminal Law Harefa, Safaruddin
Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Vol 22 No 01 (2025): Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Metro, Lampung, Indonesia.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/istinbath.v22i01.10346

Abstract

This study explores the application of the death penalty to narcotics traffickers within the frameworks of Indonesian national criminal law and Islamic criminal law. Under Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, the death penalty is imposed as a sanction for severe drug-related offences. In Islamic criminal law, punishment falls under ta’zir, which allows the state to impose discretionary penalties based on the gravity of the harm caused and the need to protect public welfare. Fatwas issued by the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) and the Council of Senior Scholars in Saudi Arabia affirm that capital punishment may be implemented under ta’zir to combat the growing threat of drug trafficking. This research aims to examine the legal foundation and implications of the death penalty in both legal systems, with an emphasis on justice, deterrence, and social protection. The study employs a normative juridical method and a comparative approach, analysing statutory laws and Islamic legal doctrines. Findings reveal that while both systems permit the death penalty, its application must consider broader dimensions such as prevention, rehabilitation, and social consequences. The study concludes that the death penalty, when implemented prudently and within the scope of legal and ethical standards, can function as a strategic instrument to address narcotics trafficking. The death penalty should not be viewed merely as a form of retribution, but rather as a comprehensive legal response aimed at preserving social order and public health.
SH PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI DALAM KASUS PELANGGARAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DI INDONESIA: PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI DALAM KASUS PELANGGARAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DI INDONESIA Harefa, Safaruddin; Muhammad Alvin Nashir
Jurnal ADIL Vol 16 No 1 (2025): JULI 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Universitas YARSI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33476/ajl.v16i1.4966

Abstract

Indonesia adalah negara hukum, oleh karena itu negara harus mengedepankan segala bentuk sistem hukum sebagai dasar dalam menjalankan negara. Proses jalannya negara mempengaruhi beberapa aspek kehidupan, salah satunya adalah tindak pidana terhadap lingkungan hidup yang dilakukan oleh korporasi. Korporasi dapat dikatakan sebagai badan hukum maupun bukan badan hukum yang memiliki hak dan kewajiban yang sama dalam subjek hukum. Tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh korporasi telah mempengaruhi stabilitas lingkungan hidup yang berdampak pada masyarakat. Sebagai pelaku, korporasi harus bertanggung jawab atas segala bentuk kesalahan atas kerusakan lingkungan. Kerusakan lingkungan yang dilakukan korporasi dapat berupa pencemaran, polusi, dan lain-lain. Sehingga hukum lingkungan berkolaborasi bersama dengan hukum pidana untuk dapat mengatasi kasus-kasus perbuatan hukum oleh badan hukum tersebut. Pertanggungjawaban korporasi telah dituangkan dalam beberapa pasal Undang-undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja menjadi Undang-Undangsebagai langkah pemerintah atas banyaknya kasus yang dilakukan oleh korporasi terhadap lingkungan hidup. Prinsip pertanggungjawaban korporasi sering kali menimbulkan ketidakjelasan mengenai pihak yang seharusnya dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana, apakah korporasi sebagai subjek hukum atau individu yang bertindak atas nama korporasi.
Klitih Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Klitih dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Islam : Indonesia Harefa, Safaruddin; Maziyyah, Rifdatul; Murtadho, Nazhif Ali; Syatta, Indy Mafiiqo; Diamita Syndo, Sivana Amanda
Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023): Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34304/jf.v12i1.83

Abstract

Klitih berawal dari bahasa jawa yang bermakna sebuah aktivitas guna mencari angin di luar rumah. Namun, arti klitih yang dimaksud pada zaman dahulu ialah jalan-jalan guna mengisi waktu luang yang dalam bahasa jawa dianggap jalan-jalan untuk nglaras, akan tetapi seiring berjalannya waktu arti klitih bergeser menjadi sebuah tindak pidana yang menyerang seseorang secara acak. Tujuan dari penelitihan ini adalah untuk menganalisis penegakan hukum pada tindak pidana klitih dan menganalisis tindak pidana klitih dalam hukum pidana islam. Penelitian menggunakan metode penelitihan dengan jenis penelitian yuridis normative dengan mengunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute aproach) dan pendapat doktrin. Hasil penelitian ini berupa penerapan hukuman bagi tindak pidana klitih yang masih belum optimal karena terdapat peningkatan jumlah kasus selama kurun waktu tiga tahun terakhir. Hal tersebut menimbulkan keresahan dikalangan masyarakat. Oleh karena itu peneliti menganalisis pertama, mengenai kasus tindak pidana Klitih, dalam doktrin pidana telah memenuhi dua unsur perbuatan pidana antara lain objektif (actus reus) dan subjektif (mens rea). Perlu diketahui bahwa kedua unsur tersebut bersifat mutlak, artinya tidak dapat dipisahkan dan merupakan satu kesatuan yang tidak dapat dipisahkan. Dan juga penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana klitih haruslah berorientasi pada korban. mengenai penegakan hukum pada tindak pidana klitih yang mana perlu adanya kajian lebih lanjut terkait hukumannya karena hukuman yang selama ini diterapkan tidak menimbulkan efek jera pada pelaku; kedua dalam pandangan pidana islam sendiri pelaku pidana klitih dapat dikenai hukuman pokok berupa qishas, maupun hukuman tambahan berupa diyat dan ta’zir dengan didasarkan pada akibat yang ditimbulkan terhadap korban
House ownership financing: sharia economic perspective Harefa, Safaruddin
Journal of Islamic Economics Management and Business (JIEMB) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Prodi Magister Ekonomi Syariah FEBI UIN Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/jiemb.2021.3.2.11797

Abstract

A place to live is one of the basic needs, so everyone tries to have it. However, people often have difficulty buying them in cash due to increasingly expensive house prices and limited funds. From here, banking institutions offer a house ownership model through a credit system. This article aims to determine the position of house ownership financing/credit from an Islamic economic perspective and what contracts can be made in this financing. This study uses a normative juridical method. Research data is obtained through library data in books, journals, laws and regulations, and other scientific writings related to mortgages from an Islamic economic perspective. Data analysis used qualitative data analysis methods, which were then presented descriptively. The study results that based on sharia economics, reinforced by the fatwa of the National Sharia Board-Indonesian Council of Ulama, financing home ownership in Islamic economics is justified as long as it complies with sharia provisions. Some of the contracts that can be made in financing the ownership of the house include murābaḥah, ijārah muntahiya bi tamlīk, istiṣnā‘, and mushārakah mutanāqiṣah contracts.
HAM dan Tindak Pidana Kemanusiaan di Indonesia: Menakar Efektivitas Instrumen Hukum Nasional Yuwanto, Frisha; Harefa, Safaruddin
Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 6 (2024): Desember
Publisher : Laboratorium Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya (https://uinsa.ac.id/fsh/facility)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/mal.v5i6.428

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to examine the effectiveness of Law No. 39 of 1999 on Human Rights and Law No. 26 of 2000 on Human Rights Courts in addressing crimes against humanity in Indonesia. The main problem highlighted is the weak law enforcement in resolving serious human rights violations, such as the Trisakti Tragedy, the Munir case, and the Marsinah case. This research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory and case study approach, analyzed qualitatively and descriptively. The findings indicate that both laws provide a fairly comprehensive legal framework for the protection and enforcement of human rights. However, their implementation remains suboptimal due to weak political will, overlapping institutional authorities, and ineffective legal mechanisms. This study also emphasizes the gap between national and international legal approaches, especially regarding jurisdiction over genocide crimes. The novelty of this research lies in its integration of legal-political developments in the post-reform era with institutional evaluation and the influence of international human rights principles, such as the Rome Statute. Therefore, this study recommends regulatory reform, institutional strengthening, and increased public participation to ensure accountability in law enforcement. The research is expected to contribute to the development of a more just, responsive, and internationally aligned human rights legal system in Indonesia. Keywords: human rights, crimes against humanity, law enforcement, legal reform. Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji efektivitas Undang-Undang No. 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia dan Undang-Undang No. 26 Tahun 2000 tentang Pengadilan HAM dalam menangani tindak pidana kemanusiaan di Indonesia. Permasalahan utama yang diangkat adalah lemahnya penegakan hukum dalam menyelesaikan kasus pelanggaran HAM berat, seperti Tragedi Trisakti, kasus Munir, dan pembunuhan Marsinah. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan studi kasus, yang dianalisis secara deskriptif-kualitatif. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa kedua undang-undang tersebut telah menyediakan kerangka hukum yang cukup komprehensif untuk melindungi dan menegakkan HAM. Namun, implementasinya masih belum optimal akibat lemahnya komitmen politik, tumpang tindih kewenangan lembaga, serta belum efektifnya mekanisme hukum yang tersedia. Kajian ini juga menyoroti perbedaan pendekatan antara hukum nasional dan hukum internasional, khususnya terkait yurisdiksi terhadap kejahatan genosida. Kebaruan dalam penelitian ini terletak pada integrasi analisis terhadap perkembangan politik hukum pasca-reformasi dengan evaluasi kelembagaan serta pengaruh prinsip-prinsip internasional, seperti Statuta Roma. Dengan demikian, kajian ini merekomendasikan adanya pembaruan regulasi, penguatan kelembagaan HAM, serta peningkatan partisipasi masyarakat dalam mendorong akuntabilitas penegakan hukum. Kajian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi dalam pengembangan hukum HAM di Indonesia yang lebih adil, responsif, dan sesuai dengan standar internasional.Kata Kunci: Hak asasi manusia, kejahatan terhadap kemanusiaan, Penegakan hukum, reformasi hukum
Co-Authors Azizah, Anisa Kurniatul bagus teguh santoso, bagus teguh Bahari, Syaiful Collins, Josua Satria Diamita Syndo, Sivana Amanda Erwinda, Mira Fadhil, Moh. Fanani Sri Ambarwati Fauzi, Resti Febriyanto, Satrio Indy Mafiiqo Syatta Ivan Wagner Jayawarsa, A.A. Ketut Jundullah Faqihudin Maziyyah, Rifdatul Mega Fitri Hertini Merina Puspita Sari Muhammad Alvin Nashir Muhammad Ghufron Murtadho, Nazhif Ali Musyafa’ah, Nur Lailatul Nazhif Ali Murtadho Nurahmani, Aditya Putri Silvah Al Hikmah Qurrata Ayuni, Qurrata Rifdatul Maziyyah Simbolon, Subandri Siti Aisyah Sivana Amanda Diamita Syndo Sri Ismawati Syatta, Indy Mafiiqo Syochibul Amar Maruf Widyanti, Garnetta Liya Yuwanto, Frisha