Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.589
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Semaya JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA SOROT: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial DiH : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum International Journal of Law Reconstruction Vidyottama Sanatana: International Journal of Hindu Science and Religious Studies Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Jambe Law Journal Udayana Journal of Law and Culture JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Sociological Jurisprudence Journal Unes Law Review Jurnal Hukum Prasada Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Sosial PERSPEKTIF Jurnal Analisis Hukum JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi International Journal of Research in Community Services Jurnal Hukum Saraswati Journal Equity of Law and Governance Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Budiana, I Nyoman
Universitas Pendidikan Nasional
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 45 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 45 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Urgensi Lembaga Mediasi dalam Rangka Penyelesaian Sengketa Adat di Bali Budiana, I Nyoman; Gunadi, Gde Wahyu Marta; Driptayanti, Ni Kadek
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v10i2.16916

Abstract

Lembaga mediasi adalah lembaga yang berfungsi sebagai pihak ketiga yang netral, independen, dan profesional, yang membantu para pihak yang bersengketa untuk mencapai kesepakatan damai secara sukarela, tanpa mengikat, dan tanpa menggantikan keputusan para pihak. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui urgensi lembaga mediasi dalam rangka penyelesaian sengketa adat di Bali. Untuk mengetahui bentuk, fungsi, dan peran lembaga mediasi dalam rangka penyelesaian sengketa adat di Bali. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu metode penelitian hukum normatif. Teknik pengumpulan data yang dilakukan oleh penulis adalah dengan melakukan studi pustaka. Teknik analisis data yang dilakukan oleh penulis adalah dengan menggunakan metode deduktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Lembaga mediasi dapat memberikan solusi yang lebih sesuai dengan karakteristik dan kearifan lokal masyarakat adat Bali, yang mengutamakan musyawarah, mufakat, dan rekonsiliasi, daripada litigasi, yang bersifat konfrontatif, kompetitif, dan win-lose. Lembaga mediasi dapat memberikan solusi yang lebih menghormati dan melindungi hak asasi manusia, khususnya hak-hak masyarakat adat, yang seringkali terabaikan atau dilanggar oleh pihak-pihak yang berkepentingan. Lembaga mediasi dapat memberikan solusi yang lebih berkelanjutan dan berdampak positif bagi masyarakat adat, lingkungan, dan pembangunan, daripada solusi yang bersifat sementara, pragmatis, dan berdampak negatif. Bentuk lembaga mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa adat di Bali dapat dibedakan menjadi dua, yaitu Lembaga Mediasi Adat, Lembaga Mediasi Independen, Lembaga Mediasi Profesional.
Implementasi Pasal 21 Ayat (2) Huruf A Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1990 Tentang Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Hayati dan Ekosistemnya di Bali Suardana, I Nyoman Alit; Budiana, I Nyoman
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The problem in this research is why the implementation of Article 21 paragraph (2) letter a of law number 5 of 1990 has not been optimally implemented regarding living natural resources and their ecosystems in Susut District, Bangli Regency. The purpose of this study was to obtain data and analyze the factors causing the non-optimal implementation of Article 21 paragraph (2) letter a of Law Number 5 of 1990 in the case of eagle rearing by residents in Susut District, Bangli Regency, to find out and analyze the efforts made by the government. in optimizing the implementation of these regulations. The method used is descriptive with the type of normative legal research that is descriptive analysis. The technique of collecting legal materials is by studying literature, rules and literature related to the title of the study, and using a descriptive argumentative approach. The analysis uses descriptive with the theory of legal effectiveness. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of Article 21 Paragraph (2) Letter a of Law Number 5 of 1990 has not been maximized. It was found that there are still residents who keep eagles, this is caused by several factors including weak law enforcement, limited personnel on duty in the field, lack of funds provided by the government, lack of legal awareness among the community. Meanwhile, efforts that have been made by the government include conducting education and training for personnel capacity, conducting socialization of laws, conducting monitoring and investigations, managing, utilizing and preserving conservation areas, collaborating with other institutions/agencies in conservation efforts of living natural resources and their ecosystems. Efforts will be made by the government is to form a non-governmental group.
Legal Protection for Automatic Exchange of Information Taxation in Indonesia: The Importance of Synergy with Cybersecurity Institutions Gunadi, Gde Wahyu Marta; Budiana, I Nyoman
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 2 (2023): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i2.2488

Abstract

Every citizen who is the subject of taxes and already has a Taxpayer Identification Number (NPWP or NIK) must do tax reporting on his income. Such reporting ensures taxpayer property and income data validation while supporting good governance. Data automation support is needed from other agencies such as banks to find out the balance and ownership of deposits and bank securities, land bodies to know land ownership, stock exchanges to know share ownership and other institutions related to property ownership. Integration between these institutions will increase the validity of reporting property and income owned by government officials, ultimately improving integrity towards good governance. In reality, there is no automation of validation of annual notification letter (SPT) charging data on property ownership data in each institution due to the sectoral ego of each institution, and there is no real-time regulation of property validation. Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) enables the automated sharing of a set of information that has been previously defined by the tax authorities. AEOI is a plan of the G20 members and is initiated by the OECD. The AEOI system works through the exchange of financial data of foreign nationals living in a country. The exchange of financial data is carried out between the tax authorities in each country. Indonesia is prepared to put this into practice as a G20 member, as evidenced by the previous release of Minister of Finance Regulation Number 39/PMK.03/2017 (PMK 39), covering Procedures for Exchange of Information Based on International Agreements. Types of Documents and/or Additional Information Required to Be Retained by Taxpayers Conducting Transactions with Related Parties and Procedures for Management, Minister of Finance Regulation No. 213/PMK..03/2016 (PMK 213). As a result, in addition to the Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) regulation put out by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, there needs to be legal protection (OECD). Furthermore, the author emphasizes the importance of cooperation and synergy with cybersecurity institutions to secure tax exchange data.
FPIC dan Hak Ulayat Masyarakat Hukum Adat di Dunia Global Perspektif Hukum Internasional dan Praktik Negara Ida Bagus Bujangga Pidada Kastu Suardana; Dewa Krisna Prasada; I Nyoman Budiana; Putu Eva Ditayani Antari
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 6 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i6.2147

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis implementasi Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) serta perlindungan hak ulayat masyarakat hukum adat dari perspektif hukum internasional dan praktik di berbagai negara. Masyarakat adat di seluruh dunia menghadapi tantangan besar dalam memperoleh pengakuan atas hak mereka di tengah arus globalisasi dan eksploitasi sumber daya alam. Prinsip FPIC dan hak ulayat telah diakui dalam hukum internasional, khususnya melalui United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) dan Konvensi ILO No. 169, yang menekankan partisipasi aktif dan penentuan nasib sendiri masyarakat adat dalam keputusan terkait tanah, wilayah, dan sumber daya mereka. Meskipun kerangka hukum internasional cukup kuat, implementasi di tingkat nasional masih jauh dari ideal. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan studi literatur, analisis peraturan, dan telaah praktik negara yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Temuan menunjukkan adanya kesenjangan antara standar internasional dan praktik di lapangan, di mana FPIC kerap direduksi menjadi konsultasi formal tanpa substansi. Ambiguitas mengenai hak veto memperburuk efektivitas prinsip ini. Di Indonesia, pengakuan konstitusional terhadap masyarakat adat belum sepenuhnya diikuti dengan legislasi dan kelembagaan yang memadai, sehingga menimbulkan konflik tanah dan marginalisasi. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan perlunya penguatan FPIC melalui interpretasi yang jelas, legislasi nasional yang selaras dengan standar internasional, penyederhanaan formalisasi hak ulayat, serta peningkatan kapasitas kelembagaan untuk menjamin keadilan dan keberlanjutan masyarakat adat
Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pelaku Usaha Laundry Terhadap Kerusakan Pakaian Berdasarkan Nota Laundry Sebagai Bukti Perjanjian Jasa Fridayanthi, Putu Pande Nathasya; Rama, Bagus Gede Ari; Budiana, I Nyoman; Nandari, Ni Putu Sawitri
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal responsibility of laundry service providers for damage or loss of consumer clothing, as evidenced by the laundry receipt as proof of the service agreement. The receipt serves as written evidence containing the agreement between the service provider and the consumer. The research uses a normative legal method, with primary legal sources such as the Civil Code (KUHPerdata) and the Consumer Protection Law (UUPK), along with secondary and tertiary sources. The analysis is conducted descriptively by comparing the applicable legal provisions. The findings show that the legal responsibility of laundry service providers arises from the service agreement, as stated in Article 1239 of the Civil Code and the principle of unlawful acts in Article 1365. Providers are obligated to compensate if proven negligent, in accordance with Article 19 of the UUPK. The application of the principles of justice and consumer protection forms the basis for the laundry service agreement, ensuring consumer rights are protected.
Co-Authors Anak Agung Ayu Ngurah Tini Rusmini Gorda Anak Agung Gde Rahmadi Anak Agung Ngurah Eddy Supriyadinata Gorda Antari, Putu Eva Ditayani Aptaningsih, Ni Made Indah Arif Budiman Lubis Desak Putu Rini Larashati Subagia Dewa Putu Adi Putra Dewi Bunga, Dewi Disantara, Fradhana Putra Driptayanti, Ni Kadek Fridayanthi, Putu Pande Nathasya Gde Wahyu Marta Gunadi Gede Eka Rusdi Antara gorda, tini rusmini Gunadi, Gde Wahyu Marta I Gede Agus Kurniawan I Gede Gatot Kasmariadi I Gusti Agung Mas Triwulandari I Made Warta I Made Warta I Nyoman Dharma Wiasa I Nyoman Subanda I Putu Wisnu Dharma Pura I Wayan Joniarta I Wayan Suderana Ida Ayu Sadnyini Ida Bagus Bujangga Pidada Kastu Suardana Kadek Julia Mahadewi Leo Liusiana Made Oka Cahyadi Wiguna Melianus T, Giovanni Narwadi, N Agus Adyatma Ni Ketut Ananda Putri Pramessy Ni Luh Putu Putri Prami Dewi Ni Luh Putu Rita Sukmawati Ni Nyoman Juwita Arsawati Ni Nyoman Nityarani Sukadana Putri Ni Putu Sawitri Nandari Novi Mardihana Sari Nutakor, Briggs Samuel Mawunyo Prasada, Dewa Krisna Purnamawan, I Gede Putu Aras Samsithawrati Putu Rosa Paramitha Dewi R. A.T. Kuswardhani Rama, Bagus Gede Ari Riski Wahyudi, Anak Agung Ngurah Rusdi Antara, Gede Eka Sabathian Poedjiarso, Benhard Okta Sadnyini, Ida Ayu Sanjaya, Sang Putu Adi Scolastika, Sheanny Suardana, I Nyoman Alit Sukmawati, Ni Luh Putu Rita Warta, I Made Wesnala, I Made Andika