Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.64
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REVIEW Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurisprudentie International Journal of Law Reconstruction JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris SOL JUSTICIA Waskita: Jurnal Pendidikan Nilai dan Pembangunan Karakter Jurnal Jatiswara Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Jurnal Hukum Prasada Jurnal Restorative Justice Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam JUSTISI Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Musamus Devotion Journal Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Widya Pranata Hukum : Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) Devotion: Journal of Research and Community Service Parta: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Cakrawala: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Global Priviet Social Sciences Journal LUTUR Law Journal Law and Justice SASI Sagu: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Mulyadi Alrianto Tajuddin
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Musamus
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 58 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 58 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
Victimology analysis of child victims of sexual abuse Putri, Rendie Meita Sarie; Tajuddin, Mulyadi Alrianto; Badilla, Nurul Widhanita Y; Kolewora, Riez Kifli
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 5 No. 11 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v5i11.1149

Abstract

Victimology is the study of victims, their victimization causes, and the consequences of victimization. Victims can play a functional role in the occurrence of a crime. Although victims have a role in triggering a crime, they must still receive legal protection for their rights. This study examines victimology and forms of legal protection for child victims of sexual abuse using normative and empirical juridical approaches. The results of this study indicate that the occurrence of a crime cannot be seen solely from the perpetrator's perspective; victims also play a role in the occurrence of a crime. The victim's behavior is a driving factor in the occurrence of sexual abuse. In this case, the sexual abuse of victim NK can be categorized as biologically weak, participating, and provocative. The victim has received legal protection in accordance with Article 64, Paragraph (3) of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection, namely receiving rehabilitation, safety guarantees, and accessibility to obtain information on case developments.
REPRESENTASI DINAMIKA PEREDARAN MINUMAN KERAS DAN GANGGUAN KEAMANAN PUBLIK PAPUA SELATAN MELALUI INSTAGRAM SEBAGAI REAL-TIME PUBLIC ALERT SYSTEM: (Studi Akun Instagram @papua_selatan_update) Dyana Hesti Kamila; Tajuddin, Mulyadi Alrianto; Suradinata, Poetri Enindah
Jurnal Restorative Justice Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Restorative Justice
Publisher : Universitas Musamus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35724/jrj.v9i2.7339

Abstract

The establishment of South Papua Province under Law Number 14 of 2022 represents a strategic effort to strengthen governance and public security in the region. This study aims to identify patterns of public security disturbances and their relationship with the circulation of alcoholic beverages, as well as to analyze the role of the Instagram account @papua_selatan_update as a real-time public alert system. Employing a socio-legal approach, the research integrates normative analysis of alcohol-control and public-order regulations with empirical content analysis of posts uploaded between January and November 2025. The findings indicate that most incidents of violence, traffic accidents, and disturbances are strongly linked to alcohol consumption, with recurring spatial-temporal patterns in high-risk areas during nighttime. Instagram functions as a rapid, accurate, and participatory information platform, although it is not yet connected to formal governmental systems. The study concludes that regulatory strengthening, intensified patrols in hotspot areas, and the development of an integrated digital reporting system are urgently needed.
Restorative Justice as an Instrument for Implementing the Principle of Dominus Litis in Resolving Narcotics Cases: A New Paradigm for Humanistic Prosecution Mulyadi Alrianto Tajuddin
Jurnal Hukum Prasada Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Prasada
Publisher : Magister of Law, Post Graduate Program, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/jhp.12.2.2025.161-170

Abstract

This article examines the integration of the dominus litis principle with the restorative justice approach in the prosecution of narcotics cases in Indonesia. The study highlights the persistent reliance on retributive justice, resulting in overcrowded prisons and limited rehabilitation for drug users. Using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this research analyzes relevant legal frameworks including the Narcotics Law and prosecutorial regulations. Findings show that although restorative justice has normative support through legislation and prosecutorial guidelines, its implementation remains limited due to institutional inertia, lack of technical provisions, and weak prosecutorial discretion. The dominus litis principle, which grants public prosecutors authority over case management, is underutilized as a tool to shift from punitive to rehabilitative approaches. The article proposes a humanistic prosecution model grounded in restorative values and structured prosecutorial discretion. This model emphasizes selective case processing, interdisciplinary assessments, and integrated institutional cooperation. It aims to transform drug case handling from a punitive paradigm to a rehabilitative and socially responsive justice framework. The study recommends the issuance of technical guidelines by the Attorney General to facilitate this shift and enhance prosecutorial legitimacy. This research contributes to the discourse on progressive criminal law reform by offering a normative foundation for sustainable and ethical prosecution policies in narcotics cases.
Diversion and Juvenile Narcotics Sentencing: Indonesia and Japan Comparison under Pancasila Justice Mulyadi Alrianto Tajuddin; Jumriani Nawawi; Jaco Barkhuizen
JUSTISI Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v12i2.5456

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the policy of diversion and criminalization of children in narcotics cases in the juvenile criminal justice system in Indonesia, and compare it with practices in Japan to identify systemic problems that hinder rehabilitative orientation. This study uses normative legal methods with legislative, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The analysis focused on the provisions in Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System and Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, as well as their comparison with the welfare-oriented juvenile justice system in Japan. The novelty of this research lies in the placement of Pancasila justice as an evaluative framework in analyzing the design of the juvenile criminal justice system, so that diversion is not understood solely as a procedural mechanism, but as a systemic principle that must integrate rehabilitation and social reintegration. The findings of the study show that the failure to implement diversion in narcotics cases against children is more due to normative restrictions and fragmentation of goals between criminal justice subsystems, rather than solely by technical implementation issues. This study concludes that policy reconstruction is needed by placing rehabilitation as the main response and imprisonment as the ultimate remedium, in order to realize child protection that is in line with human values and social justice within the framework of Pancasila justice.
Penghapusan Alat Bukti Petunjuk dan Pengakuan Pengamatan Hakim dalam Kuhap Baru: Kajian Doktrinal Terhadap Sistem Pembuktian Pidana Indonesia Mulyadi Alrianto Tajuddin
Jurnal Restorative Justice Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Restorative Justice
Publisher : Universitas Musamus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35724/jrj.v10i1.7801

Abstract

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana membawa perubahan mendasar pada sistem alat bukti dengan menghapus alat bukti petunjuk dan mengakui pengamatan hakim sebagai alat bukti mandiri. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dua persoalan doktrinal yang ditimbulkan oleh perubahan tersebut: implikasi yuridis penghapusan alat bukti petunjuk terhadap konsistensi sistem negatief wettelijke bewijstheorie, serta kedudukan pengamatan hakim sebagai alat bukti mandiri ditinjau dari aspek objektivitas, verifikabilitas, dan jaminan fair trial bagi terdakwa. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, bersumber pada bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sistem negatief wettelijke bewijstheorie tidak runtuh melainkan bertransformasi, selama Pasal 244 mempertahankan syarat kumulatif dua alat bukti sah dan keyakinan hakim, esensi sistem tersebut tetap berlaku meskipun daftar alat bukti kini bersifat terbuka. Penghapusan petunjuk justru memperkuat kepastian hukum dengan mengeliminasi instrumen yang selama ini paling rentan terhadap inkonsistensi penerapan. Sebaliknya, pengamatan hakim menghadirkan cacat bawaan yang lebih pelik, sistem ini menempatkan hakim dalam fungsi ganda sebagai sumber sekaligus penilai alat bukti tanpa tersedianya mekanisme kontestasi bagi terdakwa berbeda dari sistem Belanda yang mensyaratkan kewajiban pengungkapan dan kesempatan merespons bagi para pihak sebagai safeguard legitimasinya. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan Mahkamah Agung segera menerbitkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung yang menetapkan standar prosedural penggunaan pengamatan hakim guna menjamin kepastian hukum dalam praktik peradilan pidana Indonesia.
LOCAL JUSTICE WITHOUT RECOGNITION: THE CRISIS OF LEGITIMACY OF MARIND CUSTOMARY JUSTICE Mulyadi Alrianto Tajuddin; Marlyn Jane Alputila
JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) Vol 11, No 2: JCH (JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM)
Publisher : LPPM STIH Putri Maharaja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Papua customary justice is a vital expression of Indonesia’s legal pluralism, serving as a community-based dispute-resolution mechanism grounded in restorative and collective values. This study examines the contemporary dynamics of the Marind customary court in South Papua and explores strategies to strengthen it amid legal modernization. Using an empirical juridical approach supported by document analysis and field observations, the research analyzes the interaction between customary norms and state law. The findings show that the Marind customary court remains socially legitimate and functionally relevant. Yet, its existence is constrained by normative tensions with national criminal law and formal land governance, resulting in legal uncertainty and the marginalization of customary authority. The dominance of oral tradition further increases institutional vulnerability in the context of generational change. To address these challenges, the study proposes integrated strategies, including participatory documentation of customary law, capacity building for customary authorities, and legislative harmonization, to secure formal recognition while preserving indigenous legal values.
Plea Bargaining As A Reform of Criminal Procedural Law To Realize The Principle Of Swift, Simple, And Low-Cost Justice Cavin George Ngilawane; Salvadoris Pieter; Mulyadi Alrianto Tajuddin
LUTUR Law Journal Volume 6 Issue 2 November (2025): LUTUR Law Journal
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Diluar Kampus Utama Universitas Pattimura Kabupaten Maluku Barat Daya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/lutur.v6i2.24046

Abstract

The Indonesian judicial system faces persistent challenges, including chronic case backlogs and severe prison overcrowding, which undermine the constitutional principle of swift, simple, and low-cost justice. This study explores the necessity of integrating Plea Bargaining into Indonesian criminal procedural law through the "Special Track" (Jalur Khusus) mechanism proposed in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code (RUU KUHAP). Employing normative legal research and a comparative approach—examining legal frameworks in the United States, England, and the Netherlands—the research identifies that Indonesia’s proposed model adopts a "pleas without bargains" framework. This model is intentionally designed to bypass corruptive negotiations while maintaining judicial control. The findings demonstrate that the Special Track streamlines the trial process by shifting ordinary examinations into abbreviated procedures for offenses carrying a maximum seven-year penalty, offering a mandatory sentence reduction of up to one-third. Furthermore, this study critically analyzes potential implementation hurdles, such as the risk of coerced confessions, the need for standardized judicial discretion, and the prevailing retributive legal culture in Indonesia. The research concludes that while the Special Track is a vital administrative tool for judicial efficiency, its success depends on rigorous judicial oversight to ensure that procedural speed does not compromise material justice or the defendant's fundamental rights.
Repositioning Correctional Institutions as Strategic Pillars of the Integrated Criminal Justice System in Countering Narcotics Recidivism Tajuddin, Mulyadi Alrianto
Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/ijclc.v7i2.30848

Abstract

The high number of narcotics-related recidivists in Indonesia reflects systemic failures in the rehabilitation of prisoners in prisons. Most cases of narcotics crimes involve repeat offenders, demonstrating a mismatch between the normative role of correctional institutions as an important part of the Integrated Criminal Justice System. The objectives of this study are to analyze the strategic position and role of correctional institutions in the Integrated Criminal Justice System in accordance with Law Number 22 of 2022, assess the challenges in implementing rehabilitation programs for inmates who have reoffended with narcotics, and formulate a model for repositioning correctional institutions to improve the prevention of narcotics law violations. The research method used is a juridical-normative approach by analyzing regulations, academic literature, and real data on recidivism that are analyzed in a descriptive-qualitative manner. The findings of the study show that the strategic position of correctional institutions is hampered by inconsistencies in implementation, which include prison overcapacity, limitations in human resources, absence of operational standards specific to procedures for recidivists, and inconsistent rehabilitation programs. These obstacles are multidimensional, including structural, normative, operational, and social and cultural aspects that together interfere with the effectiveness of rehabilitation. The novelty in this study is the development of a Risk-Need-Responsiveness model that is adjusted to the values of Pancasila and the Integrated Criminal Justice System, creating a repositioning model based on three stages of intervention: pre-coaching through the Integrated Assessment Team from the beginning of the investigation, coaching that is differentiated based on risk level, and post-coaching with a structured aftercare program. The research recommends phased implementation through pilot projects in selected narcotics prisons, as well as regulatory revisions to strengthen formal coordination mechanisms between subsystems.
Co-Authors Agus Sunaryo Alputila, Marlyn Andi Baso Kumala Andi Ervin Novara Jaya Asriadi Zainuddin Badilla, Nurul Widhanita Y Cavin George Ngilawane Darmawati Darmawati Dina Fitri Septarini Dyana Hesti Kamila Dyva Choirunnisa Eki Tolanda Emiliana Bernadina Rahail Erni Dwita Silambi, Erni Dwita Estes Metelmety Firman Hadi Gusti Ayu Utami Hadi, Firman Handika Dwi Ardiansyah Pelu Imran Rusli Tarsan Jaco Barkhuizen Jumriani Nawawi leonardus Abung Marlyn Jane Alputila Marlyn Jane Alputila Mohamad Aris Dianto Aris Dianto Muhammad Afrian Gae Muhammad Saiful Fahmi Nur Jalal Nurul Widhanita Y Badilla Nurul Widhanita Y. Badilla Nutakor , Briggs Samuel Mawunyo Ohoilulin, Adrian Rian Parera, Zegovia A Pramukti, Lilis Ragil Sanjaya Marjuki Rendie Meita Sarie Putri Ricardo Goncalves Klau Riez Kifli Kolewora Rudini Hasyim Rado Salsabella, Karina Farah Salvadoris Pieter Stefanie Gabriella Putri Sukirman Sukirman Sumarsono, Adi Suradinata, Poetri Enindah Tolanda, Eki Utami, Gusti Ayu Y. Badilla , Nurul Widhanita Y. Badilla, Nurul Widhanita Yuda Musatajab