Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.847
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pembaharuan Hukum Jurnal Akta Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER Unes Law Review Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Jurnal Hukum Adigama Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Community Empowerment JIAL (Journal of Indonesian Adat Law) Jurnal Abdimas Bina Bangsa CITIZEN: Jurnal Ilmiah Mulitidisiplin Indonesia Jurnal Hukum Prioris Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH) Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Amicus Curiae Tribuere
Adiasih, Ning
Faculty Of Law, University Of Trisakti
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 52 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Hukum Prioris

 1 
Analisis Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Dalam Perkara Perdata Yang Hukumnya Tidak Ada Atau Hukumnya Tidak Jelas Ning Adiasih
Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS Vol. 6 No. 1 (2017): Jurnal Hukum Prioris Volume 6 Nomor 1 Tahun 2017
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Trisakti University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (277.018 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/prio.v6i1.1909

Abstract

In practice, there will be events which were not regulated by was Laws, or even if it was regulated, still unclear or incomplete. Therefore, a Judge is responsible to fulfill the absence of law by creating, complete or clarify the law it if it needs to be created, completed or clarified by finding the law through exploration and understanding legal norms and justice which lives inside the society so that the law will be applied to the particular event. To provide justice, a Judge should seek the truth behind any event which proceed upon him/her by examining an event and connect it with the governing law and provide a Judgment by stating the law for the particular event. This research is using normative legal research by researching literature and supported by data from interview both from practitioner and academician. The specification of this research is descriptive analytic, and the data compiled is analyze qualitatively towards the substance of legal finding. Good law is law which was accordingly with the living law in society and a reflection of the governing norms in the society. In reality, lawmakers only enacted general law whereas consideration on concrete issues is given to Judges. The background for this is that lawmakers are not fully aware of the newest social norms therefore a Judge must complete the written laws or create a new law by establishing law (rechtsvorming) and finding the law (rechtsvinding) to filled out the absence of law and avoid cases not being examined in the court of law with reason that the written law is unclear or no written law was enacted in concrete cases. Judgments which are taken by Judges have to be accountable with their conscience.  
ARGUMENTASI HUKUM HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR: 29/PDT.SUS-PKPU/2020/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST. TERHADAP KASUS PERDAMAIAN KEMBALI PADA PROSES KEPAILITAN Jimmy Anthony; Ning Adiasih
Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS Vol. 10 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Hukum Prioris Volume 10 Nomor 2 Tahun 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Trisakti University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/prio.v10i2.17017

Abstract

Landasan kepailitan dan penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang (PKPU) adalah utang, yang sudah jatuh tempo, bisa ditagih serta wajib dibayar. Tinjauan yuridis PT. Hanson International, Tbk. dalam perkara permohonan PKPU nomor 29/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. yang diputus pailit, setelah proposal perdamaian ditolak para kreditor. Namun debitor pailit mengajukan kembali proposal perdamaian. Setelah diadakan kembali voting dengan tata cara permohonan pernyataan pailit, pengadilan niaga memutus damai (homologasi) atas perkara tersebut. Sehingga dalam 1 (satu) perkara yang sama yaitu nomor 29/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. terdapat 2 (dua) putusan akhir yang berbeda, yaitu putusan tertanggal 12 Agustus 2020 dan putusan tertanggal 18 Februari 2021. Upaya perdamaian kembali pada proses kepailitan yang berasal daripada permohonan PKPU (Bab III UU Kepailitan dan PKPU), namun menggunakan ketentuan permohonan pernyataan pailit (Bab II UU Kepailitan dan PKPU). Penelitian tersebut merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang menarik asas-asas dalam putusan pengadilan. Analisis data dilakukan secara kualitatif yang menghasilkan data deskriptif berupa kata-kata tertulis dari pertimbangan hakim yang dikaji. Hakim ketika merumuskan serta memutuskan perkara wajib menggunakan penalaran hukum yang sistematik serta lengkap peristiwa dan fakta hukum, perumusan fakta hukum, penerapan kaidah hukum baik terhadap hukum positif, hukum kebiasaan, yurisprudensi, teori hukum, dan lain-lain, berlandaskan metode penalaran hukum yang selaras saat penyusunan pertimbangan hukum terhadap putusan hakim tersebut. Argumentasi hakim dalam perkara tersebut menggunakan sistem pembuktian berlandaskan undang-undang dengan positif (positief wettelijk bewijstheorie) serta berpotensi mengakibatkan sesat pikir atau logical fallacy yang berdampak yuridis terjadinya ketidakpastian hukum. Kata kunci: argumentasi hukum, hukum kepailitan, pkpu, perdamaian kembali
DISPARITAS PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM DALUARSA GUGATAN PHK PADA PENGADILAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL: Disparity in Judges' Decisions in the Expiration of Termination Lawsuits at the Industrial Relations Court Andari Yuriko Sari; Sugeng Santoso PN; Amriyati; Adiasih, Ning; Gabriel Bramantyo Utomo
Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Hukum Prioris Volume 12 Nomor 1 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Trisakti University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/prio.v12i1.21357

Abstract

Initially in the Legislative Regulations, Article 82 of Law Number 2 of 2004 concerning Settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes should have been the legal basis used by the judge in deciding the case. Article 1969 of the Civil Code stipulates that the expiration period for cases of employment termination is 2 years. Changes occurred later where Law Number 06 of 2023 concerning Ratification of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation became law removing articles related to expiration, namely Article 89 and Article 171. Constitutional Court Decision Number 94/even later decided that the expiration period would only last one year. Various changes to statutory regulations governing changes in regulations regarding the expiration date for filing a lawsuit at the Industrial Relations Court have actually been discussed in several national journal articles in Indonesia, but the impact on filing lawsuits and the results of decisions at the Industrial Relations Court ultimately creates legal uncertainty for the parties. The formulation of the problem in this paper is how judges in their judgment assess whether a lawsuit in the Industrial Relations Court has or has not expired and how the disparity in Industrial Relations Court decisions in terms of expiration affects legal certainty regarding the expiration of the lawsuit.
Co-Authors , Marjan Miharja Achmad Fitrian Amriyati Amriyati Amriyati Andari Yuriko Sari Andi Suriyaman Mustari Pide Ardianto, Yosia Arini Suliantari Asha Sagsha Nurshoffa Athalia Christine Lamretta Boru Simbolon Bachry, Ramadhana Basri Batari Abdi Putri Bella Shaqira Sucipto Calso, Ravinka Amelia Destiamara Dominikus Rato Endah Rantau Itasari, Endah Endang Djuana Ezra De Artah Sasta Farhan Nugraha Fraya Layola Nainggolan Gabriel Bramantyo Utomo Geraldus Thenys Kurnia Manik Raja Gilang Narawangsa Namara Gilang Narawangsa Namara Hammar, Robert K.R Henny Saida Flora Indra Kho Indriyana Dwi Mustikarini, Indriyana Dwi Jimmy Anthony Johannes Johny Koynja, Johannes Johny Jonathan Santandrea Kirana, Gandes Candra Krestianto, Indra Kunthi Tridewiyanti Lasmaria Lasmaria Loso Judijanto Lumban Gaol, Selamat Maria Raissa Sofia Rantan Maria Raissa Sofia Rantan Meta Indah Budhianti Muhammad Afdal Muhammad Raja Akbar Rachman Nabain Idrus Nabilah Arwi Najwa Qonita Hasan Nam Rumkel Narawangsa Namara, Gilang Ningrum, Rinandu Kusumajaya Nur Aida, Nur Raifahd Razzaq Rais Ratu Salsabila Khairunnisa Rina Yulianti Rizki Kusuma Rosnidar Sembiring Rusmana, Dodi Rustamovich, Ehsonov Jasurbek Salsabila, Unik Hanifah Samudra, Muhammad Mpu Septiyani Septiyani Seruni Anjasmoro Sifra Zifora Sihombing, Januardo Sulung Partogi Siti Nurbaiti St. Laksanto Utomo Sugeng Santoso PN Sulastriyono . Sulistyowati Irianto, Sulistyowati Sylvana Grace Tamaulina Br. Sembiring Trishya Pradicintia Wahyu Saputra Wahyu Sejati Wayan P. Windia Winny Amanda Darwin Wulansari, Chatarina Dewi Yosa Raynaldi Maruli